[percussive music]
- Murv Seymour: Courtney Bell, welcome to "In Focus."
- Well, thank you for having me.
- I really appreciate you being here.
So, we know you're in education.
So, here we are
in the Wisconsin Historical Society building,
a place of learning, a place of education.
Any vibes you get coming into this space?
- I love it. - Not necessarily
the auditorium space, [Courtney laughing]
but like, you know, the building itself.
- One of the first things someone told me about this space
is when I first came on campus, I'm new to campus,
when I first came on campus, they said,
"You have to go to the Wisconsin Historical Society.
You've got to go see the Reading Room."
And they were right.
So for me, it's this awesome place
of sort of learning and scholarship.
And it's been here a really long time, so it's pretty cool.
- Is it a space that you find yourself visiting
periodically still? - Mmm.
- Now that you're in your professional career?
- No, I'm mostly in my office and on Zoom,
like so many people. - Yeah.
- But occasionally I stop through
and just sit and do a quick few emails, and keep going.
- Yeah.
And now, and you work
for the Wisconsin Center for Education and Research.
Give us a sense of what you guys do over there.
- So WCER, which we fondly refer
to the Wisconsin Center for Education Research as,
is an externally-funded research center
here at the university.
So it goes, UW, the School of Education, and WCER.
So there are, roughly speaking, 600 researchers
who are students, faculty members, academic staff,
and all the supportive people who try to get external money
to do good things in the world
around research, evaluation, and development.
So, there's lots of projects,
everything from early childhood kinds of things,
all the way to studying how to help young people of color
navigate getting their PhDs. - Nice.
- Mentoring, those kinds of things.
So huge range, all research, all education.
- Good stuff. - Yeah.
- I love getting people to kind of give us a sense
of the state of things in their field.
What do you think
in terms of the state of education right now?
Maybe even from a teacher's perspective and...
- Yeah. - ...so forth.
- Well, I mean, you know better than anyone,
it has been a rough go with COVID for everyone
at the university level, but also at the K-12 level.
So on the one hand,
we kind of think about COVID as over, right?
We're not wearing masks as much as we used to
and schools are in session, but in my world,
researchers who are working with school districts
and with higher education institutions,
we're still totally dealing with COVID,
to tell you honestly.
We're dealing with young people with mental health issues.
We're dealing with grown-ups
with mental health issues. [chuckles]
We're dealing with, you know, big gaps in knowledge
that occurred when kids were home from school.
So things are not yet easy.
Not that they were easy before COVID.
But I think the other thing is,
it's hard to remember that the world is moving on,
but there are still these things that are lingering
for all of us to be paying attention to
and trying to deal with.
- So what have we learned
in terms of how to best teach in this environment?
Like, how do we get education to where it was prior to COVID?
- There was a recent "New York Times" article
that profiled a study that was done.
It was a collaboration, I think, between Harvard,
AIR-- American Institutes of Research-- and NWEA,
which is a company, I think they're not-for-profit,
that creates what we call formative assessments.
So, just sort of short-term regular assessments
that are supposed to help teachers in the K-12 environment
address what their students are, where they are,
and where they need to go.
And that report showed
that COVID, the longer schools were closed,
the worse it was for young people.
Of course, hindsight is 20/20.
People were doing the best they could
with the information that they had.
So, the federal government saw some of those findings
very early on, like as early as the fall of 2020
and early 2021, when we all went home in March.
You know, sort of K-12 schools went home in March,
in many places, of 2020,
and they immediately started to try to get funds to states
to deal with that situation.
So, a lot of that has looked like high-impact tutoring.
We see some movement on that,
so, long-term, high-impact tutoring.
But there's been some hiccups, I would say, along the way.
We do know that the online learning for the average child
is not useful.
You can imagine, young people might be more interested
in playing a game off to the side
versus paying attention to their Zoom call.
And it's hard for a lot of kids without that interaction,
without the facial cues.
All that said, for some kids, the pandemic and being away,
I've heard stories, individual stories,
where it's been really good for a child,
where they were finally getting the attention
that maybe they needed, or hadn't gotten.
So, I don't think the news was awful
for every child in the country, but overwhelmingly,
the conversation in the research community
is what are we doing now to remedy this situation?
There are big learning losses
that will affect this whole generation of kids,
not dissimilar from the 2008 recession did.
And you know, we know that
that has impacted those young people.
- Yeah, I was curious to know
if there are any aspects of remote teaching
that work well, or that may stick around
now that things are more normal than they were
when this all started.
Like, are there any pieces of that
that are gonna stick around?
- Well, we've seen some things stick.
So for example, when schools have snow days
and things like that, some school districts have chosen
to like, "Okay, everybody has Zoom on their computers."
We've got one-to-one computing in many places.
Not all places, not all kids.
But then we can say, "Okay, take your computers home
and we're gonna do some things remotely."
So, that part seems to have stuck in certain places.
I think some of the individualization has stuck.
Like here in Madison public schools,
when they've had maybe not enough teachers to teach,
let's say a gifted class,
or a class that's meant to help young people
who are a little further behind,
they've been able to have that teacher be centrally located
and teach kids across the district.
So, some of that has stuck, I think.
And some of the, like, getting access to really good,
like, let's say an AP course,
where that might have been done in a,
you know, if somebody had to drive, or they sent a bus
to go pick up a few children from one district
and bus them to another,
that can all be done remotely by now.
So, I think that technology, we're more fluid with that.
I think that has helped.
And I think one other thing is teachers, all of a sudden,
we're catapulted into needing to be able
to learn to use these learning management systems.
So, putting all their files online,
the course assignments, those kinds of things.
And so, for older students in particular,
that stuff seems to have really stuck.
- Yeah.
- Which is much more like university,
you know, when they go to college, or something.
- Yeah; and I know part of your mission,
you know, is to kind of deal with,
you know, the complex elements of teaching.
- Mm-hmm.
- I read that when I was looking over
some of the publishings on your website.
What kind of things are we talking about
when we talk about complex issues in teaching?
- Hmm.
So, you know this, you've been a student.
Let's pretend there's 25 kids in front of you.
They can be 10-year-olds.
They each have different-- - I've been
a substitute teacher.
I've been there. - [laughs] Have you?
- Yes.
- That's a relaxing job. [laughs]
- Oh, very relaxing.
- [laughs] And kids are so good to the subs, right?
- No, they treat us like the real thing.
[Courtney laughs]
I describe it as being like, you know,
in professional wrestling, they have the referee?
- Right. - You know, he's counting,
he's doing this and telling the person,
nobody listens to that referee. - Nope. [chuckles]
- That's what's-- - And they know
you're not gonna be there tomorrow.
- Nah. - So, it's like, "Whatever."
- But you know what, most of the time, I am there tomorrow
because when I go there,
they know that I can control that classroom
and they bring me back.
And once I get the trust of those kids,
I learned that they do pay attention
and listen more. - They'll totally listen.
They totally will listen.
- And I also learned too, that a lot of the times,
whatever control I did have in that classroom
was kind of based on how much control
the teacher who runs that classroom--
- You got it. - How much, you know...
- They had. - ...they had.
- What norms were in place.
- Yeah. - What sort of routines?
Like, we sit down when we come in,
and we open our book. - Yeah, and I'm sorry
that you're giving me flashbacks to my substitute teaching days,
but yeah, that brought back memories there.
[Courtney laughs]
- Well, so at any rate, the substitute teachers face this
and long-term teachers face this too.
25 different kids are in 25 different places.
Of course, there are patterns in where they are,
like, let's say you're teaching science,
or you're teaching journalism, right?
But you have to figure out, "I want them to move over here
"to this goal.
"I want them to understand,
for example, how the media shapes society."
That's a big goal.
And the question for you as a teacher
is how do you get 25 different humans there,
given where they are, develop those relationships?
So, when we study teaching, we try to measure,
I think, three big aspects of the complexity.
One is the relationship between teachers and kids,
and kids and kids, 'cause those relationships
matter a lot too, for learning, right?
If I'm not safe, if I'm worried,
this happens, especially at certain grade levels,
if I'm worried my friend next to me
is gonna make fun of me, that's gonna be much harder
for me to learn in that classroom, right?
I won't take risks.
We know learning requires risks.
So, we pay attention to relationships
and we try to understand the complexities there.
And those intersect with the management things
you were talking about.
What do we do when we come in?
How do we get called on?
Do we raise our hands, do we just speak out?
All these, like, routines
that are about classroom organization.
And then we pay attention to instruction.
So, on that, how to get them to learn the role of the media.
So, what topics do you introduce for second and third?
What ways do you engage them?
So, those things all intersect with one another in teaching.
They're confounded with one another.
So, we can't pull just one apart
and say, "Oh, only relationships matter,"
or, "Oh, only classroom discipline matters."
We know that those things are related to one another,
like you said, even in your little story.
And so, figuring out...
- Little stories? - ...how to measure--
- Still traumatic times. [Courtney laughs]
- Yes, [Murv laughs]
your traumatic experience being a substitute.
But yeah, so those are some of the complex things
we try to measure, both with human eyes
and then with some other ways.
We can ask students what they perceive.
And students, older students are very good
at telling you what they notice.
They know when teachers have high expectations of them,
and they tell you.
- And they respond to that? - Oh.
You know what, the best...
I was a former high school teacher
and I'm the mother of three sons.
Kids know a lot.
We don't give them credit for knowing as much as they know
and paying attention.
And on the one hand, they may like, you know,
"Oh, I can't believe it's due.
I want this, or what."
On the other hand, they actually realize
what achievement looks like in the world.
They know the people that they respect in the world,
and they know that by doing nothing,
they're not gonna achieve those things, so, yes.
I've taught rural kids in the South, I've taught kids here.
Like, yes, they wanna be held to high expectations
and supported to meet those expectations.
- Yeah, I come from a family of teachers.
My mom was a teacher.
Taught here in Madison for, I think, almost 40 years.
And I saw the iron fist. - Yeah.
- And my friends who had her in class,
they saw the iron fist. [Courtney chuckles]
You know, and I think that's probably instilled in me
in terms of the expectations I have.
And you know,
I actually went to the same high school she taught at,
at East.
And I remember her getting into it with one of the students,
and the student called her
something that we can't say on PBS.
- Okay.
- And back in those days,
you could probably get away with this,
but she opened the door and said the same thing back to him.
- Mm-hmm. - You know?
And she would never let those kids
control that classroom, you know?
And I know things are a lot different now,
and things are just done in different kind of a way,
but that was certainly a learning experience,
you know, for me.
- But I think in your mom's case,
and I would say in my case as a classroom teacher,
and maybe in your substitute teaching days too,
kids actually need us to be in charge.
They need-- - I think so.
- They need grown-ups to be grown-ups.
- Murv: I think so. - Period.
So, at home, that isn't to say they need to have an iron fist.
There's lots of ways to accomplish goals.
There's not one way.
But there actually need to be grown-ups
in charge of buildings and in charge of classrooms.
- Yeah, I get the sense they mirror what they see
and what's expected of them.
- Mm-hmm.
- You know, I even, I think even I'm probably guilty as a teen
of, you know, as they say,
"Give 'em an inch and they take a mile," sort of thing.
- It's the nature of being a young person, right?
- Yeah; who do you think do we...
And we chatted about this a little bit
when you were on the "Black and White" series with us.
I forget the year now,
[chuckles] 'cause time's running.
But who do we blame for our failures in the classroom
in terms of, you know, how the students are doing
and how that, you know, teachers may not be able to cope,
and those sorts of things?
- You know, I suppose the answer depends on
who's answering the question.
Your answer might be different than mine,
might be different than my 81-year-old father's, right?
But I think one of the hard things about being a teacher...
[clearing throat] Oops.
I still work with teachers.
We're socially friends with teachers.
One of our closest family friends
is a principal of an elementary school.
And I think, what I will say is, all of us are to blame
for presuming that schools and teachers are magic.
On the one hand, they can be the best of us, right?
They can ameliorate problems that exist in society.
They can help fill gaps
that maybe a young person doesn't have at home,
like a computer or something like that.
They can help us learn to read,
which opens whole worlds, right, to young people,
imaginations, things they can't imagine
from their current circumstances.
But on the other hand, they're human institutions.
And teachers are not magicians.
And they have them, you know, six-ish hours a day
when you figure in bathroom breaks and lunch and recess.
They're not magicians.
And so, if we send them to school hungry
and, you know, maybe not paid attention to in certain ways,
or treasured and cherished the way
children should be treasured and cherished, right,
seen as whole people, we can't fix that.
We can't expect schools to fix that.
So, one of the hard things I think
is pretending that there is one person to blame.
Schools, education belong to all of us,
and unless we understand that, I think, as adults,
as citizens, we're gonna keep just wanting to point fingers.
That is not gonna solve
the problem. - Right.
- It will not fix things that we wanna fix.
- Yeah.
I'd love to hear your journey
in terms of how you knew you wanted to commit yourself
and your life to education.
How did that happen? [Courtney chuckles]
It's a laughing matter for you, I see.
[Courtney laughs]
The evil laugh, I call it. - I...
[both laughing]
I laugh because I never was one of those young people
who knew what they wanted to be when they grew up.
I'm not sure I even know now. [chuckles]
But I laugh because I needed a break after college.
You know, I was an athlete, a student athlete.
I worked half-time
and went to an academically rigorous institution.
I was tired.
I was tired of school, I was tired of that grind.
So, I wanted a break
before I either went to graduate school,
or went to medical school.
And so, I took all my little tests, or whatever.
At any rate, there were a couple of options,
and I wound up doing Teach for America.
So, I taught in the rural South.
There were many things that I learned.
I grew up just outside of Detroit in an inner-ring suburb,
but grew up in the city. - I lived there briefly.
- Yeah? - Just briefly.
- Southfield Public Schools are the schools that I went to.
And so, I was pretty comfortable being in situations
where I was the only white person.
Certainly very comfortable.
My class, my high school class was a very diverse,
and I do mean diverse, class,
but I didn't realize how much I would learn,
going as a Yankee, as a Northerner, going to the South.
I didn't actually think that was still really a thing,
to tell you honestly.
So my students, I taught ninth through twelfth grade
biology, chemistry, physics,
and water management from a grant that came--
- 'Cause you gotta know when to drink the water, right?
- Yeah, and you gotta clean it.
- You can't just drink it. - And know how to filter it.
Water management,
big water management systems, right?
So, my students were just tremendous humans.
They are still tremendous humans.
I wasn't that much older than them, right?
Some of them were 18 when I showed up in their lives
as a 22-year-old, first-year teacher.
And for some of them, I taught them all of the science
that they ever got exposed to
in their high school experience, which, let me tell you,
was frightening for them.
I was a chemistry major in college,
so I was a much better chemistry teacher than I was
a physics teacher. - Okay.
- At any rate, so it took me a long time
to then ultimately decide like,
"Oh, I'm not done with this thing.
"I'm not done facing this inequality
"that's in our country.
I could go be a doctor."
I thought I always wanted, you know...
I always thought that would be an interesting thing.
I love taking care of people.
I love science.
It seemed like a good fit.
But the longer I was in the classroom
and the more I realized there were levers to pull
that could improve things for young people,
the more I couldn't stop thinking about it.
And when I went to graduate school for my PhD,
I had no idea what graduate school even really was.
So, I was like,
"Well, maybe I'll go back and be a principal.
Maybe I'll be a superintendent, I don't know."
And here I am, you know,
fast-forward to get real curious.
I get sucked into-- And I love to think,
so I got sucked into all the thinking stuff and the puzzling
about the intersections of research and policy
and practice, which is where
all the interesting stuff happened, in my mind.
And so, two decades later,
here I am running this big research center,
and studying teaching, and working with amazing people
in K-12 schools.
So, it was not a linear path there.
And even applied to
and was accepted in medical school.
And finally like,
"Okay, no, you really don't wanna do that, Courtney."
But it's hard.
It's hard to figure out, I think,
when you're a young person...
- Yeah. - ...what you wanna do.
- What was it like for you stepping in
to a role where you were the minority
and the students didn't look like you?
Like, how did you handle, you know,
the diversity of being in that situation?
And what has it taught you?
What have you learned from it?
[Courtney chuckles]
- "All the things," we say at my house,
when something is complicated and profound.
So, I learned all the things.
One of the things I learned
that was the most profound for me
was the ways in which we can be born into advantages
that we have no idea are even advantages.
So the example I said before, like,
that sometimes we send children to school,
and they never, at home, get the message
that they are loved and cherished
and great just the way they are.
I was loved and cherished and great.
I didn't know that was an advantage.
I walked around with that advantage my whole life.
I walked around with this skin color,
which is an advantage in our public schools, my whole life.
So, I learned a lot about the advantages
that I had been given just simply by my circumstances.
They were not earned advantages.
They were just advantages.
And one of the funnest things to learn
was that when children were given the opportunity...
And these were the descendants of sharecroppers,
for the most part.
This is the rural South and eastern North Carolina,
in the tobacco and cotton fields.
When those children were given the opportunity to learn,
they just soaked that up, took every advantage of it,
and thrived and flourished.
So, it was amazing to me to understand the ways in which,
in this country,
which I thought of as a much more equal society at the time,
when I was 22 and wide-eyed and idealistic.
It was shocking to me
that with some readjustment and opportunity to learn
that there could be so much flourishing.
It was kind of magical, actually, to watch
and to be a part of.
The greatest compliment I got from one of my students,
which I can say to you 20 years later, is...
Tiffany Gardner said to me...
I was doing after-school tutoring.
And Tiffany, I was talking about...
You know, let's say she was in fourth period,
and second period had been struggling with something.
They were both chemistry classes or whatever.
I was like, "But you know, they're getting it.
"They're getting it.
I think it's gonna be fine."
And Tiffany said to me,
"Miss Bell, you think everyone can learn.
You think all of us are smart."
"Yeah, I do.
"I think you can learn and I think you're smart.
That's actually true."
So, it was really fun to watch that become true
and to be a part of being able to help them see
their own potential. - Yeah, you have to hear it.
- You do have to hear it.
We all need to hear it.
Everybody needs to hear it.
- Yeah. - Yeah.
- And one thing I love about your work
is you are international, you are all over the world.
I'd love to get your perspective on
who's out there doing it the best.
- Mm. - Who's teaching
at the highest level out there?
At the various levels?
- Yeah, Murv, I will just say to you,
the systems are so different, one country to another.
So like, just take Singapore as a case in point, right?
A diverse nation in terms of racial and ethnic backgrounds.
They pride themselves on being a bilingual country.
One institution in the whole country
trains all the teachers, one. - Oh.
- Every teacher who is certified in that country
goes through one institution.
There is one curriculum.
Their government tells you where exactly you will teach.
And I could go on.
It is lined up so tightly in that system,
the standards, what teachers know,
what kids are expected to know,
the allocation of teachers across schools.
They are drop-dead serious about that.
Now, so you say like, "Oh."
And Singapore scores very high on, like, PISA
or some of these international assessments that the OECD
and some of these global organizations help countries use
as yardsticks to see where they are.
So, you could say like, "Oh, well, Singapore's got it right."
But it's very hard to say like,
"Oh, let's just take the Singapore thing and just,
"you know, let's go put it
into Wisconsin--" - No, I think of it being here
and I could see people resisting that
because they want to be able to choose how they learn and...
- Absolutely. - ...what they learn.
But at the same time, I think of it like a franchise,
where if you've got everybody on the same page
and it's being done the right way,
then it's more likely to be done the right way.
So, I can see it both ways.
- Yeah, right, and it's a both/and, right?
You can see why it works in one country in one way
and why it works in another country the other way.
What I can tell you is,
Pasi Sahlberg, who is a very famous author
that's written about the Finnish system.
Everyone talks about the Finnish system,
and the revolution that started in the '70s in Finland
that has transformed Finnish education.
And he's written a number of books about it.
But one of the things he wrote in a recent blog post
is that while we see, like, let's say Japan, who really,
if you want your child to learn math, send 'em to Japan.
That while we see these different economies
and countries being successful in different ways,
there are a few things that are true across all of them.
One is that they don't use high-stakes accountability.
So, I think about that, as a policy person,
as like carrots and sticks, like,
"Here, come do this thing, and you have this carrot,"
and then. - Murv: But no rewards.
- No, not from the federal government.
Not in a sort of high-stakes accountability kind of way.
None of them use it like that.
They don't have that.
They do have in common continued, very steady,
we're not good with steady in the U.S.,
very steady investment in social capital,
so human knowledge and capability
at all levels of the system.
So administrators, school principals, teachers,
et cetera, school counselors.
Those systems, no matter how they're structured,
invest in that kind of knowledge and skill development
with supports for professional learning
at all levels of the system.
They believe professionals have to keep learning.
They all do that.
You don't need to talk to very many teachers
to know we don't do that.
That's not our superpower.
Yet, yet, yet. [laughs]
- I'd love to hear your thoughts on what we do well
here in Wisconsin when it comes to education.
- Mm.
We do lots of things well here.
One of the things I think we do well
is we are not hyper-reactive to national conversations.
Some states really love to be on the leading edge
of absolutely everything,
regardless of if it's a good idea.
We don't have that in us. - Okay.
- We're a little bit more circumspect.
That's a good thing, I think.
One of the things we do well here has to do, I think,
a little bit with our Midwesternness.
We do tend, rural, suburban, urban,
we do tend to see one another,
and try to show up for one another,
and care about our communities.
And that's not to say other states don't do that as well,
but as a person who has lived around the country,
it's been remarkable to see the ways in which
whole communities of people rally around young people
and around schools here in Wisconsin.
- Yeah.
And one of the things that I was really fascinated about
when I first met you,
was this idea of this education simulator.
Like, we talked about,
you know, they have simulators for pilots,
we have simulators for people to learn how to drive,
we have simulators for police officers
to shoot, don't shoot, those sorts of things.
And I don't even know if this is already in play now,
but you were telling me about a simulator for education
to teach teachers.
How exactly does that work?
- Oh, it's just the coolest.
And I should say, for audience members who,
you know, have been in theater, or done role plays,
it takes that and it automates some of that.
It uses AI, artificial intelligence,
to do some of that.
So, we have it,
and it doesn't have to only be used for education people.
Right now, we're partnering with a company
by the name of Mursion.
And they are working-- - I'm sorry, did you say Murv?
- Well, they're not quite that cool.
Mursion.
- Okay, I just wanna make sure I had it right.
- Mursion. [chuckles]
Murv and Mursion.
No. [Murv chuckles]
And Mursion is working
with a bunch of Fortune 100 companies.
Right now, they're training all of the Starbucks people
through the same simulator we're using at WCER for teachers.
For teachers who are going to be certified
for bilingual science, right now, there's a project.
I have colleagues that are working on that.
Mark Wilson and Mariana Castro are working on that.
And my colleagues Sarah Lent, Kimber Wilkerson,
they're both special educators.
They're working on doing it with special education teachers.
And what you do is you're sitting in front of a computer.
The computer has the video camera on you.
It gets the audio.
There's a human in the loop.
So, it's not just the computer responding
with pre-programmed kinds of things.
It's not that.
There are young people.
You could have one, you could have a parent,
you could have another teacher
if you wanted the teachers to practice.
And there's a human in the loop that uses voice technology
to modulate the voice.
And you can change the skin colors, the hair, the outfits,
the profiles of these people that appear on the screen,
and you can practice.
So, I'll give you an example.
One of the things that's very hard for beginning teachers
is to ask a question and close their mouths then,
and just stop talking, and let the child respond.
And let the child respond long enough
and with enough, you know, phrases in a row
that the teacher can come to understand
what that child thinks. - So, you're saying,
like even as a teacher asking the students a question,
the teacher... - It's hard.
- ...continues to talk kind of thing?
- Yes; so, it'll go like this.
So, I'll say,
"Murv, will you tell me what you know about the media?"
And so, yes, on the screen, Murv raises his hand
and the beginning teacher says,
"Okay Murv, what do you have to say?"
And Murv gives a response like,
"Oh, you know, at home, my dad watches 'Fox News,'"
or, "At home, my mom watches 'PBS,'"
or "At home, I just know that the media is the news on TV."
And then the teacher jumps right in and says,
"Well, actually, there's three kinds of media
that you could consider," and, like, then starts to explain.
That's a very, very common pattern of question.
One small response, a very long explanation.
So, we call that, that they immediately start teaching.
The problem is, the only thing the teacher knows
at that moment is that Murv knows something
about television and media.
That's all the teacher knows.
No probing questions.
No, like, "Oh, say more about that.
"Are there any other kinds of media
that you're familiar with?"
'Cause the child might,
Murv might actually know five different kinds of media,
but just happened to start on the TV program.
And now, the teacher has just explained everything away.
So, something like asking questions,
you can get really good at in a simulator
if we pause the simulator
when the teacher starts to lecture Murv about media,
and say, "Look, okay, hold on. Try a follow-up question there."
- So, there's like a little buzzer that goes.
[imitates buzzer] - No! [laughs]
No buzzers. - "Can we do that again
'cause, you know--" [Courtney chuckles]
- [imitates buzzer] "You're off."
[both chuckle] "Second strike, you're out,"
no. - Not that harsh.
- No; no.
And usually the teacher educators are involved in it.
They're teachers.
You can get mentor teachers involved in it.
And so, that's like a really, like a sort of benign example.
But a very important skill for teachers to learn
is to be able to go with the child's thinking
so you can figure out what is going on here.
Could be in math, "Why did you just do that thing?"
Let me not presume I understand
why you just made that wrong answer.
Let me ask enough questions and be quiet enough
to learn what's the story here, right?
But it can also be in, like,
hard-to-have conversations, right?
Principals have an angry parent that shows up
about something legitimately to be angry about.
It's not fun to be in that situation for the first time
with a real-life person on the other side of it. [chuckles]
So it's really good to get practice
where you have to say the words
that are maybe hard for you to say as a professional,
and say like, "Oh, okay, I haven't harmed anyone
in the process of me messing that up."
You can mess it up in the simulator.
You haven't hurt anybody.
You haven't traumatized a child,
you haven't lectured a parent, right?
Your relationships at your school building
are still intact.
So, simulation allows us to help professionals
do the things that they need to do
so that when they get ready to go into the building,
they're more ready.
- I think that's fascinating. - Ditto.
- And what about in terms of coaching teachers
in dealing with diversity in their classrooms,
those sorts of things?
Are there scenarios for that? - Yes.
- And are you using, like, real types of scenarios
to kind of play out? - Yeah, no, real situations,
you know, that people have in their classrooms all the time.
Often like a piece of text.
We can put, like a short text
in front of the beginning teacher, say, "Okay,"
an example, we were just doing it the other day,
is you want to help these five children
identify the character traits of Bindi,
the main character in the story.
"So, what do you notice about Bindi in the story?"
And we can train the interacter, the person who's voicing
and acting out those avatars that are on the screen,
we can train them, if the tasks are standardized,
we can train them to say things that real children say.
- Wow. - And so, we try all the tasks
and test them out in the feedback loops.
And it also helps us do research on how teachers learn,
or how professionals learn.
So, we can do, sort of give them A-scenario
versus B-scenario, versus C,
and watch how they interact with those
as they as teachers become more skilled,
so we can learn about what does it mean to learn to teach.
- Wow.
And that story there kinda answers this a little bit,
but I'm curious,
'cause it feels like we're already kind of there,
but I'm just curious,
what do you think the future of teaching looks like?
How's it gonna change and how's it gonna evolve?
- You know, I think certain things are gonna stay the same
and certain things will evolve.
I think for sure all the online stuff
is just gonna keep exploding.
I think the big transformation we all,
as a society and teachers, for sure have to face,
is what do we do about knowledge that is in our pockets,
on our pocket computers, which are our phones, right?
Are we going to continue to spend time, and how much time,
and in what ways to teach that knowledge?
Knowledge is critical, right?
Knowledge builds the infrastructure in our brains
that then helps us solve problems.
So, it's not that it's irrelevant
just because we can look it up.
But how are we gonna spend time on that
and how are we gonna spend time on the integration of knowledge
and action being in the world and problem-solving,
these more critical, higher-order kinds of things.
The fact that it's so easy to look things up
and you can find the answer so quickly,
I think that will, you know, 20, 40 years from now,
we will have a different set of answers to that
than we have today.
But something that I think is gonna stay the same
is like, I'm willing to learn from you
if I'm willing to learn from you.
That's still gonna be true.
So, our relationships with one another are gonna matter.
You're still gonna be teaching me about a thing,
about journalism, or about science, or about math.
You are gonna need to know about that thing
and you're gonna have to help guide me
to learn about that thing.
So, some of the interactions, I think,
are probably gonna be the same.
They might look different.
Maybe some will be more online,
maybe they'll be more hybrid, but certain things
probably are gonna be a little bit different
with the computers that...
I mean, that's the biggest revolution,
and for sure, AI as well.
- AI teachers in the classroom permanently
ever happening, you think?
- I don't think, no.
I don't want my child there, I'll say that.
No, I don't think so.
I mean think about,
if you think about your most profound learning experiences,
there are some of them that are alone, right,
just with the subject matter.
Maybe reading a book, or writing a poem,
or practicing your scales on the piano,
or something like that, or tinkering with a bike.
You learn that way.
So, it's not that individual learning,
alone kind of learning with automated information
is not useful; it is.
But it has limits.
It has constraints on what kinds of things it can teach you.
So, maybe it'll be a part of the solution,
but I doubt a big part.
- I don't do this to everybody.
You've seen me do this before,
but I give out these superpowers from time to time.
[Courtney laughs]
Yes, Dr. Bell, [Courtney chuckles]
I give you superpowers.
What are you doing with it?
- Oh, man. - In the world of education?
[Murv sings "Jeopardy" theme]
- In my superpower, I would be able to somehow magically
'cause it's a magical superpower,
I would be able to get people to suspend disbelief
long enough that they could listen to one another
and try to focus on common solutions and common ground,
'cause I think we have common ground,
but in this divided and increasingly polarized society,
it's hard for us to see what unites us.
My superpower would be to be able to bring us together
and help people see what's common,
and help us figure out how to work on that.
- Good stuff.
Dr. Courtney Bell, thank you so much for joining us
on "In Focus." - Thank you for having me.