I'm curious.
Anya. They.
The both parties, we said
gave money to the candidates.
Democrats gave more.
But in the past,
they've given a lot more.
What can we read into
the fact
that they're deciding
to not deem
this the election
of all elections and pouring
all resources into it
the way that they did in the
to say
it's race
or the Crawford race?
Yeah.
we are used to kind
of hearing
that level of language
around
both the Supreme
Court elections
and then also various
national elections.
Every elections
and most important of our.
Lives. Exactly.
But this one, November,
is actually probably
the most important
of our lives.
And maybe the Democrats
want to kind of keep
that, messaging
for the midterms.
And so kind of stepping back
and maybe they're
really confident
about their contender
this time.
The stakes are not as high.
Liberals will hold
the majority
no matter who wins.
And so why not kind of
keep those resources
in the bank for November?
Zac, you described it
as kind of,
they're making a bet.
Essentially.
They're they're
hedging their
bet that they don't
have to invest any more
to secure this win.
I think
you point out perfectly that
even if they lose the hedge
on that bet, somehow
they still maintain
the majority that you put.
The incentives
aren't as high,
and seeing
the incumbent Republicans
or conservatives
leave this race repeatedly
shows they don't
believe the same either.