1
00:00:01,068 --> 00:00:04,705
stiffer sentence. Steil
Dugan is expecting to

2
00:00:04,771 --> 00:00:08,442
appeal the conviction. And
then there were five. This

3
00:00:08,509 --> 00:00:11,178
week, one of the six
Democrats running for

4
00:00:11,245 --> 00:00:14,314
governor dropped out of the
race. Milwaukee County

5
00:00:14,381 --> 00:00:16,817
Executive David Crowley
announced he would no

6
00:00:16,884 --> 00:00:19,686
longer seek the position,
saying it has become clear

7
00:00:19,753 --> 00:00:22,523
that I will not be the
Democratic nominee for

8
00:00:22,589 --> 00:00:25,492
governor. After being
outpaced by other

9
00:00:25,559 --> 00:00:28,028
candidates, he threw his
support to Lieutenant

10
00:00:28,095 --> 00:00:31,932
Governor Sarah Rodriguez,
also still in the race.

11
00:00:31,999 --> 00:00:35,302
Francesca Hong, Mandela
Barnes, Kelda, Roys and

12
00:00:35,369 --> 00:00:38,805
Joel Brennan. This week's
Inside Wisconsin politics

13
00:00:38,872 --> 00:00:41,508
took up changes in the
primary campaigns for

14
00:00:41,575 --> 00:00:44,912
governor.
>> Now we're down to five.

15
00:00:45,812 --> 00:00:49,716
Zac is it's still crowded,
or is this race shifted to

16
00:00:49,783 --> 00:00:52,953
you in a meaningful way?
>> I think the crowd. It

17
00:00:53,020 --> 00:00:55,622
depends more on the lanes
of what we're talking about.

18
00:00:55,689 --> 00:00:58,125
I think there's clearly a
progressive lane. There's

19
00:00:58,192 --> 00:01:00,460
clearly a more
establishment center,

20
00:01:00,527 --> 00:01:03,397
government lane. And then
there's a question of if

21
00:01:03,463 --> 00:01:06,233
there's room in between for
any of the rest of them to

22
00:01:06,300 --> 00:01:08,435
kind of stake their own
area, or if they're

23
00:01:08,502 --> 00:01:10,504
competing for those two
groups. But there clearly

24
00:01:10,571 --> 00:01:13,273
is this sense, as the two
candidates have dropped out,

25
00:01:13,340 --> 00:01:16,043
that have now endorsed Sara
Rodriguez, that there is an

26
00:01:16,109 --> 00:01:19,246
establishment going on and
that fits this national

27
00:01:19,313 --> 00:01:22,216
theme that we're seeing of
establishment Dems worrying

28
00:01:22,282 --> 00:01:24,751
about progressive Dems
potentially undermining

29
00:01:24,818 --> 00:01:28,155
chances to win seats in
November, versus

30
00:01:28,222 --> 00:01:30,591
progressives who are saying,
no, we are the ones that

31
00:01:30,657 --> 00:01:32,960
are going to win these
primaries and win in

32
00:01:33,026 --> 00:01:35,996
November, get behind us as
we keep going forward. So

33
00:01:36,063 --> 00:01:38,632
there's definitely a
shrinkage there, but it's

34
00:01:38,699 --> 00:01:41,168
almost a shrinkage into
lanes as opposed to these

35
00:01:41,235 --> 00:01:43,437
individual candidates.
>> How do you see those

36
00:01:43,504 --> 00:01:46,907
lanes? I mean, I think just
a few weeks ago, I was kind

37
00:01:46,974 --> 00:01:49,042
of having a hard time
putting the candidates into

38
00:01:49,109 --> 00:01:51,745
different lanes or buckets,
however you want to do it.

39
00:01:51,812 --> 00:01:54,314
What are the lanes now as
you see it?

40
00:01:54,381 --> 00:01:57,317
>> Yeah, I think Zac sort
of hit the nail on the head

41
00:01:57,384 --> 00:01:59,286
with establishment versus
progressive. And one way

42
00:01:59,353 --> 00:02:01,522
that we're seeing that is
when these candidates are

43
00:02:01,588 --> 00:02:03,490
dropping out, that they are
endorsing other candidates.

44
00:02:03,557 --> 00:02:06,326
There's a world in which
you drop out and you say, I

45
00:02:06,393 --> 00:02:09,596
love my party and I all I
want is for a Democrat to

46
00:02:09,663 --> 00:02:12,299
win. And David Crowley did
that kind of initially in

47
00:02:12,366 --> 00:02:14,268
his original announcement
that he was stepping down.

48
00:02:14,334 --> 00:02:16,303
He didn't immediately
endorse anyone. He said,

49
00:02:16,370 --> 00:02:18,739
the most important thing is
just that somebody beats

50
00:02:18,805 --> 00:02:21,308
Tom Tiffany in the fall and
then this morning came out

51
00:02:21,375 --> 00:02:23,644
and endorsed Sara Rodriguez.
So I think that's a sign

52
00:02:23,710 --> 00:02:25,812
that people are kind of
choosing teams and trying

53
00:02:25,879 --> 00:02:30,083
to say, who do I think is
the best ability for

54
00:02:30,150 --> 00:02:32,386
Democrats to win in
November? Is it the sort of

55
00:02:32,452 --> 00:02:34,788
Hong progressive lane? Is
it the Rodriguez, more sort

56
00:02:34,855 --> 00:02:38,091
of establishment? Lane?
>> Nobody that I've heard

57
00:02:38,158 --> 00:02:41,428
has come out and said, well,
we got to stop Francesca

58
00:02:41,495 --> 00:02:43,463
Hong, you know, but we've
seen this debate that

59
00:02:43,530 --> 00:02:45,465
you've referenced at the
national level where you

60
00:02:45,532 --> 00:02:48,202
have sort of the national
establishment, Democrats

61
00:02:48,268 --> 00:02:52,840
fighting against this, you
know, Democratic Socialist

62
00:02:52,906 --> 00:02:57,144
caucus that's growing. Is
there an unspoken we got to

63
00:02:57,211 --> 00:03:00,514
stop Francesca Hong in all
this, or are we making that

64
00:03:00,581 --> 00:03:02,616
up? Are we looking for
conflict where there is

65
00:03:02,683 --> 00:03:04,751
none here in Wisconsin?
>> I don't think it'd be

66
00:03:04,818 --> 00:03:07,688
wise for anyone to say that
out loud from the

67
00:03:07,754 --> 00:03:09,756
Democratic Party, because
there's a very good chance

68
00:03:09,823 --> 00:03:12,659
that Hong can win this, and
then they have to unite

69
00:03:12,726 --> 00:03:15,629
behind her. So that is the
the other half of this game

70
00:03:15,696 --> 00:03:18,065
is you can drop out and you
can endorse someone that

71
00:03:18,131 --> 00:03:20,801
you would prefer, but then
you still want to create a

72
00:03:20,868 --> 00:03:23,604
sense of party unity that
that is still the goal is

73
00:03:23,670 --> 00:03:25,739
for the Democrats in their
minds, is to beat Tom

74
00:03:25,806 --> 00:03:27,841
Tiffany. And whether that
is Francesca Hong or

75
00:03:27,908 --> 00:03:29,843
whether that's Sara
Rodriguez or Mandela Barnes

76
00:03:29,910 --> 00:03:32,613
or Brennan or Roys or
anyone that's still in this

77
00:03:32,679 --> 00:03:34,848
race at this point. They
have to worry about that in

78
00:03:34,915 --> 00:03:37,784
the long run. So in the
short run, we're not seeing

79
00:03:37,851 --> 00:03:39,987
some of the disunity of
attacking each other. That

80
00:03:40,053 --> 00:03:42,756
was a potential with a more
crowded race. There's still

81
00:03:42,823 --> 00:03:44,825
time. There's still million
dollar ad buys coming up.

82
00:03:44,892 --> 00:03:47,494
Kelda Roys just announced
an hour ago that she's got

83
00:03:47,561 --> 00:03:49,663
1.2 million that she's
going to announce, and

84
00:03:49,730 --> 00:03:51,899
she's going to spend every
last penny of it. She's not

85
00:03:51,965 --> 00:03:54,735
going to drop out of this
race. And she has a history

86
00:03:54,801 --> 00:03:58,005
in some of these big
competitive elections of

87
00:03:58,071 --> 00:04:00,774
towards the end. So I don't
think it's going to be all

88
00:04:00,841 --> 00:04:03,610
quiet and rosy from from
here until August. There's

89
00:04:03,677 --> 00:04:08,582
going to be some fireworks
going to be some fireworks
