so much. >> Thank you.
>> What a week. A barn burner of a state Supreme Court election,
followed up by head spinning Trump tariffs, all as the beat
goes on with Elon Musk and Doge within the administration. Here
to discuss our political analysts. Republican Bill
McCoshen and Democrat Scot Ross. And thanks for being here.
>> Thanks for having us. >> So, Scott, how big of a gift
was Elon Musk to Susan Crawford's campaign?
>> Well, I think he certainly didn't help things. But this was
about Trump, you know. And when Trump finally gets tired of Musk
and dumps him, the failure, the incompetence, the
authoritarianism, the rejection of the rule of law, the stealing
away of people's money in their retirement accounts, that's
this anger is going to going to continue. It's going to continue
into 2026. But again, I don't think that the I don't think
that Musk helped the cause. I mean, granted, he and E line and
you know Hendricks, they spent a fortune to try and win this
seat, but they didn't because Democrats, independents and even
some Republicans stood up and said, what's going on with the
Trump administration does not work for Wisconsin.
>> Bill, do you think that the entry of Musk and Donald Trump
into Brad Schimel campaign was a good idea?
>> Part of it. But I want to pick up on something, Scott
said. First, Democrats were motivated. They were angry. They
were pretty beaten down in November when Trump won. I don't
think they ever thought that was possible. It was possible. Trump
not only won here, but he got the most votes in history in the
state of Wisconsin. So Democrats here did all they could to make
sure that their base turned out. Turnout was very high. It was it
was gubernatorial levels. 2.4 million people, which in a
spring election is unheard of. I thought the higher turnout
actually would help. Brad Schimel it helped Democrats more
on the Musks thing. I think without his money, Schimel would
have lost by worse. I think it might have been 14 or 15 points.
I think where there were where Musk's team crossed the line was
on giving away checks that didn't sit well with Wisconsin
voters, and it super fired up Democrats at the end. I was at
the Musk event in green Bay. There were probably 400
protesters outside that event in sleeting rain. And it was they
were fired up. >> Yeah, I mean, those people
better cash those checks quick, you know, because they most
likely won't be able to be cashed. But, you know, the thing
about it is, if you look at the numbers, literally every single
of the 72 counties in Wisconsin went more Democratic, went more
left than they did in November 24th. And this was not a special
election. This was a regularly scheduled election. We had
turnout that was higher than 38, 38 states. Off year turnout last
time. Like it was a it was a pasting. It was so, so much of a
pasting that like I don't know Derrick Van Orden wasn't drunk
yet and Chuck Schumer was still awake.
Republican turnout was up. It just wasn't up as much as
Democrats. independents were there with
with the Democrats on this one. >> Do you think that follows
through? >> Absolutely. Because it's not
going to get any better. We just saw with what's going on in
three, $30 trillion of wealth being shot out the window with
the Trump tariff tax tax going, it's not going to get any worse.
People are looking at their retirement accounts now, you
know, if you're Bill's age, you can put $8,000 in your IRA.
Other people, it's 7000. And people are seeing years and
years of the money they invested in their IRA wiped out like
that. >> Spring elections don't
correlate to what happens in the fall. Give you the example.
Janet Protasiewicz won by ten points, which is exactly what
Susan Crawford won in 2023, in the spring. Donald Trump came
back and won in 2024. >> There's that.
>> Yeah, but this is an off year election in 20 in 2026. And
Democrats are going to be motivated and independents are
what's going on with the economy and how badly things are going.
>> I want to bring this to you, Bill. Wisconsin conservative
Rick Esenberg said this quote, I'm not surprised that populist
voters didn't care about having a conservative court. They
aren't conservative. They are, rightly or wrongly, resentful
and alienated. What it takes to attract the populist vote limits
the conservative vote. How do you navigate this?
>> Well, we got some soul searching to do on our side,
whether it's the state party or the ally groups, and there are
many that have been helping Republican candidates.
Everything we did wasn't enough. And it wasn't enough by a lot.
When you lose by ten points, it's not just one thing. It's
multiple things. So I think the party's got to do some soul
searching on where we go from here to Esenberg Point. He's
right. There are low propensity voters that do turn out for
Donald Trump, but they also turn out for Donald Trump's agenda. I
think where Republicans came up short, particularly in the
Supreme Court race, is Brad Schimel wasn't clear enough
about what his agenda was, what he what he stood for. And the
Marquette poll in March told us 80% of Wisconsin voters actually
want to know what judicial candidates position is on
issues, which I find sort of appalling, but that's where the
public is. They want to know where you stand. These are no
longer nonpartisan races. They're very partizan.
>> A sea. >> This isn't this race was not
about some fracture between two parts of the Republican Trump
Party. This was about Democrats, independents, and even some
Republicans going out and saying, we reject what Donald
Trump's doing. They have taken over government. There needs to
be a check on them. That check needs to be Susan Crawford, and
it's not going to get any easier for the Republicans. And if you
think about, like, what the next race is, you know, April 2026,
Rebecca Bradley, the best chance that Republicans have is if she
gets a federal judgeship and Toni Evers Governor Evers gets
to appoint a successor because she is so toxic, she is more
toxic than even Brad Schimel or Dan Kelly.
>> Do you want to respond to that?
and that's the kind of candidate we need a we need a female
candidate. B we need somebody who's tough as nails that's
willing to fight for the job. >> So with about a minute and a
half left, how seismic was Crawford's win? Given what's
about to come before the court? >> Well, it preserves a Liberal
majority for three more years. Republicans or conservatives
cannot get the majority again until the spring. Actually, the
summer of 2028. So what will be will be now for three years
minimum. And that includes school choice. It includes act
ten. It includes a variety of voter ID, thankfully is no
longer under consideration because the voters
overwhelmingly passed that. But there are a lot of things that
will come before the court. And if you're a business owner here
in the state of Wisconsin, buckle up. Could get rough.
>> Listen, there have been freedoms under assault in
Wisconsin for the 15 years that Republicans controlled the
Supreme Court. Now that we have, you know, serious justices in
there who will look at the law and not interpret the law, I
think we're going to have a lot more a lot more cases coming
before the court in a way that's going to preserve freedom here