WISCONSIN.
>> JANET PROTASIEWICZ AND DANIEL
KELLY MET TUESDAY THIS WEEK FOR
THEIR ONLY DEBATE OF THE SUPREME
COURT ELECTION AND THEY SPENT
MOST OF THE HOUR ACCUSING THE
OTHER CANDIDATE OF BEING A LIAR
AND A THREAT TO THE COURT.
>> LIKE PRIZE FIGHTERS ENTERING
THE RING, DANIEL KELLY AND JANET
PROTASIEWICZ DESCENDED OPPOSITE
SIDES OF A CURVED STAIRCASE ON
THEIR WAY TO THE DEBATE STAGE
AND THEN SPENT THE NEXT HOUR
HITTING EACH OTHER WITH VERBAL
BLOWS.
>> I AM RUNNING AGAINST PROBABLY
ONE OF THE MOST EXTREME PARTISAN
CHARACTERS IN THE HISTORY OF
THIS STATE.
>> AGAIN, THIS IS YOU BEING
QUICK TO LIE.
>> THIS ELECTION WILL DETERMINE
THE IDEOLOGICAL BALANCE OF THE
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, AND AS
IT BECAME THE MOST EXPENSIVE
SUPREME COURT ELECTION IN UNITED
STATES HISTORY, IT BECAME MORE
AND MORE PARTISAN, WITH A HEAVY
FOCUS ON TOPICS LIKE WISCONSIN'S
1849 ABORTION BAN.
>> BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT IF MY
OPPONENT IS ELECTED, WE CAN TELL
YOU WITH 100% CERTAINTY THAT
1849 ABORTION BAN WILL STAY ON
THE BOOKS.
I CAN TELL YOU THAT TAKE A LOOK
AT WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE'S
WEBSITE.
THERE'S A PICTURE OF HIM AS
THEIR ENDORSED CANDIDATE WITH
THE LANGUAGE THAT HE HAS
PLEDGED-PLEDGED-TO UPHOLD THEIR
VALUES.
>> JUSTICE KELLY, YOUR RESPONSE.
>> THAT'S ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.
ONCE AGAIN.
SO THIS SEEMS TO BE A PATTERN
FOR YOU, JANET, JUST TELLING
LIES.
SO YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M
THINKING ABOUT THAT ABORTION
BAN.
YOU HAVE NO IDEA.
>> THE ACCUSATIONS OF LYING AND
SLANDER COVER TOPICS LIKE WHAT
PROMISES THEY MADE TO SPECIAL
INTEREST GROUPS, WHETHER THEIR
CAMPAIGN ADS ARE DISPORTIONS OF
DISTORTIONS OF THE TRUTH AND
WHETHER ELECTING THEIR OPPONENT
WAS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.
>> ANDREW HITT, THE HEAD OF THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY, TESTIFIED IN
THE JANUARY 6th HEARING THAT
HE HAD EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS
WITH MY OPPONENT.
EXTENSIVE.
EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM
ABOUT THE FAKE ELECTORS.
HE IS A TRUE THREAT TO OUR
DEMOCRACY.
>> JUSTICE KELLY, YOU HAVE 30
SECONDS.
>> SURE.
SO ONCE AGAIN, YOU'RE LYING.
SO YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW THIS, BUT
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAD
MULTIPLE.
HIS TESTIMONY WAS HE HAD
EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH HIS
ATTORNEYS, PLURAL.
>> THE DEBATE ENDED AS IT BEGAN
WITH NO HANDSHAKE AND THE