- The following program is part of our "Here & Now"
2018 Wisconsin Vote election coverage.
- I'm Frederica Freyberg.
Tonight on "Here & Now," our series of general election
candidate interviews gets underway.
Tonight, a conversation with Republican for U.S.
Senate, Leah Vukmir.
After that, analysis of all the primary action with our
political panelists, Bill McCoshen and Scot Ross.
It's "Here & Now" for August 17.
- Funding for "Here & Now" is provided, in part,
by Friends of Wisconsin Public Television.
- Tuesday's primary races thinned the field heading into
the November elections.
In the closely-watched U.S. Senate race,
state senator Leah Vukmir won 49% of the vote over
her Republican opponent Kevin Nicholson.
A registered nurse by training, Vukmir was first elected to the
state Assembly in 2002.
Since 2010, she has served two terms in the state Senate.
She will face incumbent U.S.
Senator Democrat Tammy Baldwin.
We are working with the Baldwin campaign
to schedule an interview.
But now Leah Vukmir joins us.
Thanks very much for being here.
- Thanks for having me on. I appreciate it.
- First welcome and congratulations.
- Thank you.
- We wanted to start by asking you this.
You said you want to bring the Wisconsin way to Washington.
What is that?
- Well, the Wisconsin way-- I call it the economic miracle,
what we've been able to do here in Wisconsin since we took the
mantle of leadership in 2011.
Wisconsinites are really good at rolling up their sleeves
and getting the work done and following through on promises.
We turned our state around from a state that had a 9.3%
unemployment rate to a 2.8% unemployment rate.
We took a $3.6 billion budget deficit and we turned that into
a surplus that we now give back to people.
I think that's what people want as I travel
to every corner of the state.
They want to see leaders who are going to follow through on their
promises and give individuals and families the ability to do
more with their hard-earned dollars.
That's what we've done here in Wisconsin and we need strong
leaders to do the same in Washington.
- You have the endorsement of President Trump and yet a video
that surfaced in the primary showed you saying he was
offensive.
Do you still believe he's offensive?
- That was during the primary, as you know.
I stood with President Trump from the beginning when he
became our nominee.
And actually when it was one of the darkest times in the
campaign, we did a women for Trump radio ad.
I was proud of that and I have stood with him ever since.
I've had the opportunity to speak with the president since
the election and he has endorsed me.
He congratulated me.
He's offered his support.
And he did tease me a little bit about it.
But all is good.
- Do you feel as though his conduct is presidential?
- I want President Trump to succeed.
President Trump is succeeding.
I don't want to look for ways to bring him down.
I think that when President Trump succeeds,
America succeeds.
His record is showing he is doing policies people want and
our country is turning around.
The economy is turning around.
The deregulatory reforms are making a difference.
He's standing up to foreign leaders in a way that people
really are thirsting for in leadership and picking Supreme
Court and other judicial nominees that adhere to the
constitution.
Those are the things that I'm focused in on.
I'm not looking for ways to bring him down.
- What do you say to voters outside southeast Wisconsin in
northern parts of the state where your challenger
picked up the votes?
How do you connect with them?
- We're in the process of unifying our party.
I had a wonderful conversation with Kevin Nicholson and he was
very gracious and offered to help.
Senator Ron Johnson is heading up a tour around the state,
and we will be meeting with people all over.
My primary opponent had the ability to get up on the air
before me and had a lot of money in order
to get his name ID up there.
It took me a little while to get there.
But having the party's endorsement was very important
because that grassroots effort around the state also helped me
to give me those extra votes to join with southeastern
Wisconsin.
Also, having Congressman Sean Duffy's report is also very
important and vital and he will help me in the northern part of
the state as well.
- What do you know about whether or not you would get the
money that your challenger had to go up on the air first
pouring into your campaign now?
- Well I certainly know that as this election has moved from
the primary to the general the attention that it is getting on
the national scene has increased greatly.
And we can already see it as we're doing our initial
fundraising.
I think that people look at this race as a key important race,
that Tammy Baldwin is vulnerable.
They see a clear, distinct difference between Tammy Baldwin
and myself.
And that stark difference is creating a lot of excitement and
energy.
So people are looking at the race and I'm confident that the
money will come in and it currently is.
- You say you do support President Trump and his
policies, but among them are the federal--
is the federal tax cut.
Now, as a fiscal conservative, how do you respond to the fact
that the CBO has said that partly as a result of that tax
cut the federal budget deficit will be $1 trillion by 2020?
- The tax cuts are going to--
they already are spurring the economy.
It's going to take some time for it to continue to do so.
I talk to folks all across the state who are thrilled to have
that extra money in their pockets to do with as they see
fit for their families.
And that's why I advocate for these tax cuts to be permanent.
And I think we are going to see that the economy will continue
to grow, not only with the tax cuts,
but also with the regulatory reform that the president and
Congress have been enacting.
This is a key, important thing.
We saw the same thing here in Wisconsin.
We have changed our economy around in our state by providing
tax relief and regulatory relief and it will be nice to have
someone like me there in Washington who's done it here to
be that advocate and that voice for similar reforms in
Washington.
- In addition to building the wall,
do you support a zero tolerance policy on people coming across
the border, a policy that did result in families being
separated?
- Look, no one wants families to be separated and I'm glad
that the president is taking steps to rectify that.
It's a very difficult, complicated issue and it's
taking some time to do.
I'm a strong proponent of building that wall,
that border security.
I'm the daughter of Greek immigrants, first generation.
My father came here in 1954.
My mom's family was born-- mom was born here,
but her parents were from Greece.
I spent my childhood helping my aunts and uncles come to this
country and study for their naturalization and citizenship
test.
Taught them how to speak English.
I believe we are a nation of laws and we have to uphold those
laws.
We have to first build that wall.
Then we can start talking about all the other aspects of
immigration reform.
But I feel very strongly that the wall is important for a
variety of reasons.
It's not just to stem the flow of illegal immigrants,
but human trafficking, drug trafficking.
We have problems with MS-13 gang members.
As a nurse I also look at public health concerns.
I do remember the times hearing grandmother talk about various
people who were stuck at Ellis Island because of health
concerns.
We have no control over that as people cross this border
illegally because we have porous areas on the border.
- Now, President Trump is pushing again for the Senate to
change filibuster rules in order to fund his $25 billion border
wall.
Do you support changing the filibuster rules to allow a
simple majority to move legislation?
- I have said this on the campaign trail and yes,
I do support it.
I look at the things that we've accomplished here in Wisconsin.
If we had had that policy in place,
we would not have been able to enact things like Act 10 and
Right To Work or an issue near and dear to my heart,
giving parents educational options for their children.
So, yes, I do.
- You describe yourself as 100% pro-gun.
And it was either your first or one of your first campaign ads
that showed you sitting down with a gun at your side.
In the wake of school and mass shootings,
do you think that there should be measures that allow taking
guns from people who demonstrate a danger,
kind of a red flag law?
- That's an area that I think needs to be investigated and
looked at very carefully.
As long as those laws are carefully looking at particular
issues.
For example, the Fix NICS bill that was done by Senator Cornyn
looked specifically at that making sure that law enforcement
and individuals have the information necessary when they
see red flags.
We also have to make sure we have a carefully-crafted law
that looks at mental health issues,
because that is a significant aspect that underlies a lot of
these.
I'd rather look at those aspects before we start looking at
taking away people's guns from them.
Because when you do that, you are taking away the ability of
law-abiding citizens to protect themselves.
That's why I stand so strongly with that Second Amendment right
and as you know, have been endorsed by the NRA.
- Would you replace Obamacare with policies that did not cover
pre-existing conditions?
- I support protecting people with pre-existing conditions.
We did it here in Wisconsin before it was even part of
Obamacare.
I support bringing health care decision-making back to the
states.
I'm a strong proponent of the principle of federalism.
States know best how to take care of their own.
And before the Affordable Care Act was put in place,
Wisconsin had one of the lowest uninsured rates.
We had a robust insurance market.
And we had a program for people with pre-existing conditions.
And we had to get rid of that because of the one-size-fits-all
Obamacare.
I firmly believe that we can do better in Wisconsin and we
should and we would take care of people with pre-existing
conditions.
- Does it go without saying that you would like to see
the U.S. Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade?
- I'm a strong, 100%, pro-life person.
As a nurse, as a Christian, it has always been central to who I
am.
I will support and be part of a process of confirming people to
the Supreme Court who uphold the Constitution
and that is an issue that is very near and dear to my heart.
- In your view, should abortions be allowed
under any circumstance?
- I'm 100% pro-life.
I have said that from the beginning.
And I have not-- I have always had the endorsements of the
organizations that support life in the state of Wisconsin.
It's kind of hard to be a nurse and not be pro-life.
I spent a career protecting life, saving life.
And I believe in the dignity of all human life.
- Very briefly, with just about a half minute left,
could you and Senator Tammy Baldwin be any further apart?
- It is really the contrast that the people of the state of
Wisconsin will be given a chance to weigh in.
And I really, truly see a huge difference, a stark contrast.
Tammy Baldwin has virtually been a back-bencher,
both here in Wisconsin as part of the legislature and in
Washington.
It's very hard for people as I travel the state to talk about
issues that she's done.
I, on the other hand, have been at the tip of the spear of so
many reforms that have made a difference in the state of
Wisconsin.
I'm a strong fighter, a strong advocate for my constituents.
I will do the same in Washington for the people in Wisconsin.
- Leah Vukmir, thanks very much.
- Thank you Frederica.
- Now to other races on the ballot this primary week.
Governor Scott Walker easily won a primary challenge from
opponent Robert Meyer.
Walker repeated his pledge to keep Wisconsin moving forward on
election night.
- All over the state I hear people say we want to keep
moving forward.
We want to vote for someone with a positive agenda
that's going to move us forward.
We don't want to go backwards.
We don't want to go back to the days when our kids,
when our graduates had to go to some other state
to pursue their career.
That's not where we want to head in this state.
We want to keep moving forward.
- Governor Scott Walker on election night.
In the crowded field of Democrats,
State School Superintendent Tony Evers put a 25-point spread
between himself and the second place finisher Mahlon Mitchell.
Evers says he too is ready to move the state forward.
- We are going to be focused on issues that he has avoided or
failed in going forward.
So whatever he's proposed, I'm not concerned about.
It's what our race is about, is the people of Wisconsin have
values that have been essentially shredded by Scott
Walker and Rebecca Kleefisch for the last eight years.
We will be going forward with our agenda.
- And now for a closer look at all things general election.
For that we go to our partisan sharpshooters,
Bill McCoshen of Capital Consultants and Scot Ross of One
Wisconsin Now.
Thanks for being here.
- Thanks for having us.
- Before we talk about the governor's race,
let's talk about the U.S. Senate race.
Does Leah Vukmir, in your mind, have a Trump problem?
- I don't think so.
In fact, if I'm running her campaign,
I'm bringing the president to the state.
I'm bringing him to Green Bay.
I'm bringing him to Wausau, maybe La Crosse.
I think that would be very helpful.
If you look at the map from primary election night,
she won 15 counties, most of those in southeast Wisconsin.
She won, yes, Pierce County and Dane County.
But largely her race was won and lost in southeast Wisconsin.
Obviously she needs to do some catching up in Green Bay's
market, Wausau, Eau Claire, Superior, my hometown.
So, yeah, I'd bring President Trump here in a heartbeat.
- Please do.
Please bring President Trump.
Again because when you're talking about La Crosse and Eau
Claire those both topped out at about 40% for Trump.
So we can get those down under 40%,
I think it will be a good night for Democrats
up and down the ticket.
What I'd say is this.
Leah's problem is a couple things.
One, she has to heal the party.
You know, her forces were out there telling all of Kevin
Nicholson's voters that you're kind of dumb because you're
voting for the Democrat.
I mean that's basically what's happened
for the last six, eight months.
I actually thought it was going to prevail.
But it turns out it prevailed in six of the media markets,
but not one.
Leah Vukmir won the southeastern Wisconsin media market.
I think her biggest problem with Trump there is the fact that
those women, suburban moms, have a real problem with what Trump
has said.
I think the closer she gets to Trump,
the further she gets away from winning the general.
- I think southeast Wisconsin voters, women in particular,
are smart.
They understand.
Leah Vukmir is a mom on a vision.
She's not going to Washington to get along.
She's going there to shake things up.
She's not going to take her seat and do what the old boys tell
her to do or what the establishment tells her to do.
She's there to make a difference.
I think women will figure that out and separate her from Trump,
particularly in southeast Wisconsin.
She's not going to have a problem with voters over there.
- How resonant is Vukmir calling Baldwin a far left,
out of touch elite?
- Wow, now she's going to say tax and spend liberal, you know.
I mean that's the playbook.
They have the playbook.
That's the way they're running it.
For Leah, her big challenge is Leah has never won an election
in a seat that is Democratic.
She had Scott Walker's Assembly seat.
Then she knocked off an incumbent Democrat in her state
Senate race in 2010 who is in a marginal Republican district.
She's never had to play to that.
She's basically kind of sat in the back and done whatever the
Republicans told her.
Here's the question I want her to answer.
- False, totally false.
- I want her to answer this question.
In testimony in our federal court case,
it was said that Leah Vukmir was giddy at the prospect of
disenfranchising students and African-Americans in Milwaukee.
She didn't answer the question then when she was asked by the
press.
We need to make sure she answers that question now.
Was she giddy doing that? - Leah's tough.
She just got out-spent four to one in a primary.
There was $10 or $11 million spent against her yet she beat
a combat marine.
That's one tough cookie.
I would take that any day in a general election.
- What about the Tomah VA opioid scandal that resulted in
Tammy Baldwin having to fire people and demote staff?
That's another one of Leah Vukmir's prongs here.
- I think she has -- Senator Baldwin has spent a lot of time
trying to make sure that our veterans are protected --
- Trying to cover it up.
- -- and to make sure that we protect from the scourge of
opioids.
We'd have a better chance of dealing with that if we had an
attorney general and governor who were willing to sue the
Purdue Pharma and other pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Now we have -- Donald Trump has announced he wants Jeff Sessions
to sue the opioid manufacturers.
It seems that everybody wants them to be sued but Walker and
Schimel.
- For your viewers, this is the first time in Wisconsin
electoral history that we have two women vying for a major
statewide office.
So I think that's noteworthy in and of itself but the contrast
between the two could not be sharper on every single issue.
You've already interviewed Leah tonight.
Whether it's taxes.
Whether it's government spending.
Whether it's health care.
Whether it's the Supreme Court pick Judge Kavanaugh or whether
it's the Tomah VA.
Their positions are diametrically different.
- So how scorched earth is this race going to be?
- I think that's the only chance Leah Vukmir has is to try
and go as negative and as nasty as possible because there is
Democratic enthusiasm out there.
Democrats support Senator Baldwin.
Independents support Senator Baldwin.
It's why she was able to knock off Tommy Thompson in 2012,
who I think we can all agree is probably the most gifted
politician on either side that we've had in the last
generation.
- I'll take that but I would say she doesn't have to be
personally negative.
The contrast is so sharp on the policy difference,
that that's what Vukmir should focus on.
- What's the money race going to look like?
- It depends.
I mean I'm hopeful that the national money comes in early
for Leah, which it did not for Tommy in 2012.
And Tammy Baldwin was able to redefine Tommy between the
primary election and Labor Day and none of us thought it was
possible but by golly, it was possible.
So the national money or the Uline money needs to come in
relatively quick to give Leah a fighting chance.
- Yeah, I think that's the big elephant in the room,
is whether or not the Illinois billionaire is going to come in
after losing all his money trying to get Kevin Nicholson
across the line.
That's the big she has.
You know that Uline is a problem not just for Leah,
but it is also a problem for Scott Walker because all of
Scott Walker team was with Leah Vukmir, his kid, his wife,
you know.
- The party was.
She won the party endorsement.
- The Walker machine basically rigging the election for her
because a couple people at the convention voted on her behalf.
- Unlike Democrats with super delegates.
- If I'm Dick Uline, I'm sitting there looking at the
governor race that I have in my own state and I'm saying you
know what?
I think I'll just keep my money here for the rest of the cycle.
- We'll see.
But speaking of scorched earth, let's take a listen to snippets
of ads in the governor's race.
- A teacher viewed and shared pornographic material at school.
Tony Evers knew about it.
The same teacher made sexual remarks about the bodies of
middle school girls.
Evers knew that, too.
Yet despite calls from parents and school officials,
Tony Evers sided with the union and refused to revoke the
teacher's license.
- So is this the Tony Evers didn't strip the license of the
bad teacher going to be like Wisconsin's latest version of
Willy Horton?
- Well according to Scott Walker it is because Scott
Walker spent $3 million, he and Americans For Prosperity,
trying to be positive.
His numbers continue to be in the tank.
So he is doing what he has always done which is try and
divide Wisconsin to win an election.
Scott Walker is a 25-year career politician.
He will say anything.
He will do anything to get re-elected.
The fact is is that Scott Walker is passing the buck and Tony
Evers passed a law to make sure that this kind of thing --
because he was unable to do what they are accusing him of doing
because of the law.
Now Scott Walker may not care about following the law,
but Tony Evers does, and the vast majority of Wisconsinites
want their elected officials to follow the law.
- First of all, the attack is true.
So if it wasn't true, that might be problematic for Walker.
But I think Walker's trying to define Evers before Evers can
define himself.
Remember, on the last two Marquette polls about 50% of the
people statewide had no idea who Tony Evers is.
Scott Walker's been governor for eight years.
He's got 99% name ID.
Everybody knows who he is.
He won't have any problem defending his record.
But part of this is to turn the tables and start to define Tony
Evers before Tony can define himself, number one.
Number two, he's kicking out Tony's best leg of his stool,
which is education, right?
He's the DPI superintendent three times elected.
Maybe he wasn't minding the store
when he was doing that job.
- So when you're saying that the ad is true,
it's true that Tony Evers knew about it.
- Correct.
- But there was a state law that prevented him from
stripping the license of the teacher.
- It's true he knew about it.
The governor even sent him a letter back then.
He chose not to do anything.
He could have challenged the law.
He could have suspended the license and had the teacher or
the union sue him.
That would have been an option for sure.
- The fact is when you talk about being asleep at the switch
and not minding the store, when the bill came up before the
legislature in May of 2011, Scott Walker's office didn't
register in favor of it.
Didn't come to testify, didn't do anything.
In fact, when they put out a press release about the bill
being signed, he didn't even mention that bill in any of the
quotes that he did.
Scott Walker didn't care about this issue until he realized
that he is going to lose this coming election if he doesn't
try and tear Tony down.
- All right.
So we're likely to see more and more of that.
Let's take a look now at an ad in support of Tony Evers.
- You know who they are, the politicians who only care about
politics.
But then there's this teacher.
Started out in a classroom in Baraboo,
became a principal in Tomah, then superintendent
of 2,000 public schools.
His life's mission is to make their lives better.
So you can forget the lobbyists and their politicians.
They'll never change.
- You don't like that line about lobbyists.
- I don't necessarily like that line,
but I think it actually amplifies the attack ad cause
it's telling people this guy is part of the education
establishment here in the state of Wisconsin.
The other ad is more powerful.
The attack ad.
This one actually amplifies the attack, I think,
and reminds people this guy is part of the school establishment
and oh, by the way, he may have missed one.
- I think the cake is baked on Scott Walker.
He's not out there talking about the good things he's going to do
or he's not talking about the good things he's done.
He's talking about things
he could have done over the last eight years and didn't do,
like student loan debt and child care.
I mean, and I think that's where--
I mean I think that's a challenge.
He's going after Tony because he called himself the education
governor after making the largest cuts to public education
in our state's history.
Education is going to be a top issue.
It is for Democrats, Republicans and independents.
- So as the only living campaign manager of a candidate
who ran and won a third term in the state of Wisconsin,
I can tell you it has to be about the future.
Can't just be about the past.
I think Walker's got an incredible record that he can
run on of things he's gotten done over the course of the last
two terms but he has to have a forward-looking agenda.
That's what he's beginning to roll out.
- In fact, a new ad this week, just after the primary as you
were speaking to, talks about giving a $5,
000 tax credit to college grads who stay and work in the state
and child care tax credits and things for senior citizens.
Who doesn't like money in hand?
- Here's the thing.
If you have watched Scott Walker,
you're reminded of in 2014 when he looked in the camera and told
the women of Wisconsin I will leave the final decisions about
reproductive freedom between you and your doctor and then two
months later signed the 20-week ban on abortion.
The guy will say anything and do anything to win elections.
I think the problem he has this time is that the enthusiasm on
the Democratic side is so high.
We saw more than-- 100,000 more Democrats vote in the primary
and with all that money spent - People like money in hand,
just like you said.
I mean I think 85 or 90% of the eligible applicants applied for
that $100 child care tax credit when it was available over the
course of the summer.
Anybody who had an opportunity to take advantage of the school
sales tax holiday this past week took advantage of it.
So those are things they like.
But more than that, we've had six straight months of
unemployment below 3%.
That's the first time in our history where that's happened.
More people working than ever before and wages are now going
up.
The economy's booming here.
This election ends up being a referendum on the economy,
Walker wins easily.
- I think it's a referendum on your wallet.
And when you're putting out money for student loan debt
every month, when you're putting out money for child care,
when you're putting out money if you have to take family medical
leave, that's what matters.
Numbers don't matter.
What matters is what's in your wallet.
- What about Scott Walker, does he have a Donald Trump problem
with these tariffs and Harley Davidson?
- Well, here's the thing.
Scott Walker has three advantages--
money, unity in the Republican Party, and strength.
His money is down.
- But he's got a lot.
- He's got a fractured party with the whole Leah/Nicholson
primary and now with his fecklessness with Donald Trump
where he wouldn't even defend-- would even criticize baby jails
makes him look weak.
He's going to have that problem throughout this election.
- We can say what we will, but Larry Sabato, the crystal ball,
turned this from a leans Republican to a toss-up.
Why is that?
- It's going to be competitive.
The governor himself has said he wouldn't be surprised if on
Marquette's poll next week, it actually showed him behind by a
point or two.
And I wouldn't either.
Could be tied.
Could have Walker up, could have Evers up by a couple.
I mean this is going to be a competitive race for the final
80 days.
There's no question about it.
It's still Wisconsin.
Yeah, Walker's got 99% name ID, but he can't take anything for
granted in this race.
It's a tough political environment.
On the Trump issue, I don't understand why he's not bringing
the president to the state.
He said he's not going to campaign
with the president here.
I think that's a mistake.
I think he ought to campaign with him, particularly up north.
- Final word.
- I think that the cake is baked on Scott Walker.
Democrats need to get sure they get their voters out.
I think with the ticket of Tony Evers and Mandela Barnes,
they're going to get their voters out.
- Both of you, thank you. - Thanks.
- That is our program for tonight.
Next week, Marquette Law School Poll Director Charles Franklin
will be here with the latest statewide survey results.
I'm Frederica Freyberg.
Have a great weekend.
- Funding for "Here & Now" is provided, in part,
by Friends of Wisconsin Public Television.
For more information on "Here & Now's" 2018 election coverage,
go to WisconsinVote.org.