- Now a look ahead to what's in store for the State Department
of Natural Resources as current Secretary Cathy Stepp leaves to
take a regional director position for the EPA.
For that we turn to former DNR Secretary and now executive
director at the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation George Meyer.
Thanks for being here. - Thank you for having me.
- First it occurs to me I should ask you whether or not
you were surprised Cathy Stepp was moving up to the EPA?
- Well, I wasn't surprised she was leaving the agency.
There's been a rumor to that effect for some time.
The fact that she's moving up to that position,
we hadn't heard about that.
So it was something we had not anticipated.
- As for her legacy, you are quoted as saying this.
I can very easily say that Secretary Stepp had the worst
record of the seven DNR secretaries I have known in
terms of protection of the environment.
How so?
- Well, I'm not one to -- that is prone to hyperbole,
but her record in terms of the other seven secretaries that
I've known or worked for, she was not proactive on any
significant environmental issues.
And there were issues that would have been easy for any other
secretary to jump -- and would have jumped up and tackled.
We have the groundwater situation in Kewaunee County,
where you know, half the wells in some townships are so
polluted they can't be used.
And it took local citizens and some of the state environmental
groups to petition EPA to come in
and get DNR ordered to fix that situation.
The slowness in working with the chronic wasting disease
situation in the deer herds.
Those are just some of the things that other secretaries
would have been far more proactive on.
- Were there some changes within the agency that you
regard as positive?
- Well, there's one situation recently
where I think she did step up.
You know, Representative Adam Jarkle from northwest Wisconsin
was going to split the agency into five agencies.
And she came out and opposed that.
We supported her on that.
She did have cutbacks in positions.
Unfortunately she advocated for some of those.
She came up with a realignment that, by and large,
is going to help the situation.
So there were some of those things.
But on environmental policy and implementation, not so much.
- As for the easing of regulations for the Foxconn
development, what's your position on that?
- Well, our wildlife federation hasn't taken a position.
Our plate is so full.
We're always concerned when in fact you have regulations eased
even for a project that can provide a great deal of economic
development.
As an example, you know, I was secretary during 1990s.
We had a very reasonable and strong environmental programs in
the state and the economy grew under Governor Thompson.
So you can have both.
What I worry about Foxconn is much more than
just what's going to happen on site.
You already see organizations such as Wisconsin Manufacturers
and Commerce and some state representatives say if it's good
enough for Foxconn, let's do it statewide.
I worry about the precedent of that decision.
- How lasting do you suppose that Cathy Stepp's kind of open
for business legacy will be on Wisconsin?
- Well, you know, she was responding to the call from
several legislators and obviously the governor on this.
And I think it's going to be up to those entities,
the governor and legislature, to understand that the long-term
impacts of weakening environmental protection is not
good for the environment of the state,
not good for the citizens, but most importantly
not for the economy of the state.
- What will you be looking for from the new secretary
of the DNR?
- Well, we surely want somebody that has a background in
conservation or environmental management.
Doesn't have to be somebody from the agency.
But someone that understands the science and practicalities
of environmental management.
We'd also like somebody that's proactive and understands
and is not afraid to raise their concerns publicly that in fact
there's a problem that needs addressing.
We understand that the secretary doesn't make all decisions.
The governor does.
Legislature sets policy.
But those people need to hear from a secretary that's willing
to say if you're go in that direction,
this is what's going to happen and that's not good for the
environment, not good for the economy.
- Meanwhile next week there is to be a legislative public
hearing on a bill that would repeal the mining moratorium.
What do you think of that?
- Well, it changes several things in terms of non-iron
mining, non-ferrous mining.
The bill is substantially different than the bill that was
adopted a few years ago regarding iron mining.
It has some provisions that the Wildlife Federation
is concerned about.
But many of the provisions seem reasonable updating in the law.
And our organization is going to be trying to work out some of
the challenging parts of the bill.
But basically it is not nearly as bad a bill as the iron mining
bill was that passed the legislature.
- And in fact you've suggested that there are some prongs of
this new bill that take from a substitute bill that you helped
work on in the last round.
- That's right.
During the iron mining bill, Senator Cullen,
Senator Schultz asked some representatives of the mining
industry, Tim Sullivan who was with Bucyrus and myself and some
engineers from the mining company,
and we came up with a compromise bill.
Several of those portions of that bill are in this bill.
And that's encouraging.
- All right. George Meyer, thanks very much.
- Thank you for having me.