>> It seems rare that majority of Republicans in Wisconsin are
at odds with each other over major budget items.
In tonight's "Capitol Insight" we're joined by Wisconsin Public
Radio's Capitol Bureau Chief Shawn Johnson
to unpack the discord.
And Shawn, thanks for being here.
>> Thanks for having me.
>> The majority in the Senate and Assembly are at odds as
we've said with each other over road funding and tax changing
proposals.
Where are we with all of this at week's end?
>> I would say the gulf between them has grown over the past
week at least it looks like that from a distance.
We should preface this by saying they're Republicans,
they're all Republicans, they've all done budgets together
before.
They'll get there eventually but right now they're
nowhere near each other when it comes to transportation.
There are a couple ideas that got floated this week that were
almost immediately objected to.
>> Like?
>> Like for example one was Senator Fitzgerald said,
"Here's one way that we can maybe solve the transportation
issue.
We borrow more only we don't do it and back it up with the
transportation fund.
We back it up with the general fund which pays for schools,
prisons, Medicaid.
Get its money from the income and sales taxes." He thought
that might be more palatable to legislators who have issues with
transportation borrowing.
It was not.
Assembly speaker or at least the Assembly co-chair of the budget
committee said almost immediately, "No,
that doesn't change anything.
We still don't want to borrow more for roads.
We're still borrowing too much."
>> Does it suggest this is a really,
really difficult problem?
>> I think when they start looking at these -- they're kind
of thinking outside the box a little bit on these.
You heard the co-chairs of the budget committee do another one
of those this week and say hey, "Let's take the transportation
budget and pass it as a stand-alone bill.
Get the rest of this budget done on its own.
And then we do the transportation budget on its own
and then maybe we get Democratic votes for that." That was
something they were open to.
Again, that one was shot down almost immediately by Governor
Walker's office and Senate Majority Leader Fitzgerald's
office.
They don't want to go there.
>> Backing up a little bit from what's happening right now,
the legislature's budget committee rejected the
governor's transportation plan.
I mean that's why they're all here trying to figure out their
own.
What were the big sticking points with the governor's
transportation budget?
>> I think by and large they viewed it as another budget that
didn't come up with a long-term solution to transportation.
So the state has long-term issues when it comes to
transportation funding.
There are a lot of big projects that lawmakers want to move
forward with but over the last decade or so,
they haven't come up with new money, really,
to move forward with those projects.
They've continually borrowed.
That borrowing has added up to the point that, you know,
at the end of this budget, 22 cents of every dollar of
transportation revenue would be going to pay off old debts.
So think of that like paying off interest on a credit card.
That's a lot of money.
Those are their big issues with the problems.
It doesn't fund all the projects they want and it continues to
borrow.
>> Is this one of those budgets do you suppose that goes well
into the summer?
>> It could.
I mean the last time they split off the transportation budget I
think was 1995 or at least that was one of the times they did it
and just looking back in the legislature's records looked
like they wrapped that up around November.
Again, they had the biggest Republican majorities in decades
here.
They could reach a deal any day now.
But doesn't look like it.
>> On another of the governor's proposals,
this idea of going to self-insurance.
How surprising is it to you and other kind of capitol observers
that Republican budget writers are just outright rejecting
that?
>> Not surprising in the sense they've sent signs they didn't
like it for quite a while now.
They are not sure that the savings that the governor's
office has latched onto would be there.
And you're changing a pretty huge insurance market to try to
get that $60 million over the next couple years.
Not a huge payoff for disrupting the entire system.
>> Now, the Joint Finance Committee and the budget writers
haven't even gotten to the university budget and all those
things having to do with tuition cuts and performance metrics and
that kind of thing.
How gnarly is that going to be?
>> I think that the university and anyone else is going to be
watching the budget pretty closely because if you're
pulling out that money that was going to be there through this
projected savings on self-insurance, for example.
That money's not going to be there.
Where's it going to come from?
There's a lot of areas that could be targets to find that
extra money if the legislature still wants to spend more money
on K-12 public education.
>> We'll leave it there, Shawn, thanks.
>> You're welcome.