WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:03.640
To order tonight is Tuesday, June 26th, 2026.

00:03.640 --> 00:06.800
This is the City of Port Washington Common Council Meeting.

00:06.800 --> 00:08.720
All older persons are present.

00:08.720 --> 00:10.800
Please join with me for the Pledge of Allegiance.

00:13.800 --> 00:16.800
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States

00:16.800 --> 00:20.440
of America and to the Republic for which it stands,

00:20.440 --> 00:23.240
one nation under God indivisible

00:23.240 --> 00:25.040
with liberty and justice for all.

00:26.040 --> 00:30.440
All right, that takes us into the meeting.

00:30.440 --> 00:33.240
Our first agenda item this evening is public comments.

00:33.240 --> 00:35.440
Just a reminder to the community, you have up to three minutes

00:35.440 --> 00:38.200
and we will be capping it at 30 minutes for public comments.

00:38.200 --> 00:40.440
Are there any public comments or appearances?

00:49.680 --> 00:53.680
I'm Dean Weger at 3708 East Norport Drive

00:53.680 --> 00:56.400
in the town of Port.

00:56.400 --> 00:58.680
Obviously, the City knew about Vantage's plan

00:58.680 --> 01:01.280
to request a permit to turn existing wells on the data

01:01.280 --> 01:04.560
center site into high-capacity wells, at least as far back

01:04.560 --> 01:05.800
as November.

01:05.800 --> 01:08.080
We've all now seen the letter that Vantage received

01:08.080 --> 01:11.320
from the DNR authorizing the use of four of those wells

01:11.320 --> 01:12.880
without modification.

01:12.880 --> 01:16.760
But I have questions for the City and for Vantage.

01:16.760 --> 01:19.880
But in my experience, Vantage doesn't answer questions

01:19.880 --> 01:22.400
or give information, so I come to the City Council meeting

01:22.400 --> 01:26.160
to air my concerns about your new corporate citizen.

01:26.160 --> 01:28.520
Why was this plan to use the wells not disclosed

01:28.520 --> 01:31.840
to the public, especially to those in the town of Port

01:31.840 --> 01:34.600
and other surrounding rural areas that depend on wells

01:34.600 --> 01:36.080
for their water?

01:36.080 --> 01:39.000
Where was all the transparency that you, the mayor,

01:39.000 --> 01:40.720
and Vantage talked about?

01:40.720 --> 01:42.800
Some of those City Council meetings last winter

01:42.800 --> 01:45.120
were held in the banquet hall at the hotel

01:45.120 --> 01:48.200
with hundreds of people, including Vantage representatives.

01:48.200 --> 01:50.920
Why was this topic not discussed?

01:50.920 --> 01:52.880
The DNR letter indicates one of the wells

01:52.880 --> 01:57.600
will be sealed in 2026, and then another in 2027.

01:57.600 --> 01:59.920
How will we know when this has happened?

01:59.920 --> 02:01.120
What about the other wells?

02:01.120 --> 02:02.880
Will they be used indefinitely?

02:02.880 --> 02:04.640
I've seen nothing that gives a firm date

02:04.640 --> 02:06.400
when the other wells will be sealed.

02:06.400 --> 02:07.520
Why not?

02:07.520 --> 02:10.240
Who's going to monitor the well usage?

02:10.240 --> 02:14.040
These wells are not over 70 gallons per minute,

02:14.040 --> 02:15.960
so it seems they may not be required

02:15.960 --> 02:18.400
to have a meter measuring their usage.

02:18.400 --> 02:20.440
Who's going to monitor the usage?

02:20.440 --> 02:22.440
Who's going to monitor the wastewater?

02:22.440 --> 02:24.360
Where's the wastewater going?

02:24.360 --> 02:25.520
What will be in it?

02:25.520 --> 02:27.400
Will it endanger the aquifer?

02:27.400 --> 02:29.520
Has Vantage hired a hydrologist?

02:29.520 --> 02:31.240
Can they tell us where the water's coming from?

02:31.240 --> 02:34.120
How deep, which direction it goes?

02:34.120 --> 02:36.840
Who else is depending on that same water?

02:36.840 --> 02:39.320
It's the empty promises of transparency

02:39.320 --> 02:41.160
and these big surprises that happen

02:41.160 --> 02:42.680
that lead to the rumor mills

02:42.680 --> 02:44.800
and a complete lack of distrust

02:44.800 --> 02:47.600
in anything concerning Vantage and the data center.

02:47.600 --> 02:50.360
We all just wonder when the next surprise will come.

02:50.360 --> 02:52.000
Remember the agreed work hours

02:52.000 --> 02:54.880
that suddenly turned into 24-hour construction?

02:54.880 --> 02:56.880
Remember a few months ago when we were complaining

02:56.880 --> 03:00.200
about the 24-hour work and how it was impacting our lives?

03:00.200 --> 03:02.280
We were told Vantage was going to reach out

03:02.280 --> 03:06.360
to people individually and listen to our concerns.

03:06.360 --> 03:08.760
To my knowledge, that has never happened.

03:08.760 --> 03:10.680
If you go to the Lighthouse Campus website,

03:10.680 --> 03:12.680
you'll find a Let's Connect page

03:12.680 --> 03:15.680
with four Vantage people and their email addresses.

03:15.680 --> 03:18.760
There's even a community inquiries person.

03:18.760 --> 03:20.000
Guess what happens when you write

03:20.000 --> 03:21.840
to any of those email addresses?

03:23.000 --> 03:25.280
Well, you have to guess because I sure don't know.

03:25.280 --> 03:27.920
No response ever came when I wrote.

03:27.920 --> 03:29.200
But on that same webpage,

03:29.200 --> 03:31.720
you will see the verbiage that says Vantage is committed

03:31.720 --> 03:34.680
to participating in the Port Washington community

03:34.680 --> 03:37.680
and being a good, corporate citizen.

03:37.680 --> 03:39.480
I'd appreciate it if someone from the city

03:39.480 --> 03:41.760
could tell Vantage what that might mean.

03:41.760 --> 03:43.240
Thank you for listening to me.

03:44.920 --> 03:46.080
Thank you.

03:46.080 --> 03:47.880
Other public comments or appearances?

03:49.760 --> 03:50.600
Mm-hmm.

03:56.160 --> 03:58.320
This is not a data question.

03:58.320 --> 04:01.120
Sir, please just say to your name is Phil Warner.

04:01.120 --> 04:01.960
Thank you.

04:01.960 --> 04:04.480
I just moved into town here a little while ago.

04:04.480 --> 04:09.120
I met 207 West Washington and I purchased

04:09.120 --> 04:14.120
a two-bay garage at 418 Oakland Avenue.

04:14.960 --> 04:19.960
I came here and asked to have the water turned on to it.

04:20.600 --> 04:23.600
They said they would have somebody contact me.

04:23.600 --> 04:25.120
That was five weeks ago.

04:25.120 --> 04:29.320
I haven't heard a word from a soul.

04:30.520 --> 04:31.520
That's one part.

04:31.520 --> 04:36.360
The other is, is I can't believe I'm here about garbage cans.

04:36.360 --> 04:39.120
But I cannot get garbage cans there.

04:40.120 --> 04:43.120
It is zoned residential, the garage is.

04:43.120 --> 04:49.120
I use it for tinkering and I can't get garbage cans.

04:51.120 --> 04:55.120
I'd like to, I haven't looked at my tax bill yet,

04:55.120 --> 04:57.120
but I'm pretty sure the breakdown,

04:57.120 --> 05:00.120
I'm probably paying for garbage pickup.

05:02.120 --> 05:03.120
I don't understand.

05:03.120 --> 05:07.120
I was told that if I didn't have a tax bill,

05:07.120 --> 05:10.120
then I was told that if I didn't live there,

05:10.120 --> 05:12.120
I couldn't have garbage cans.

05:12.120 --> 05:15.120
Do they think that I'm not going to generate any garbage there?

05:20.120 --> 05:23.120
We can't respond, but we've got your name and address.

05:23.120 --> 05:26.120
And then Roger, if you wouldn't mind grabbing his phone number,

05:26.120 --> 05:28.120
then we can at least close the loop on the water,

05:28.120 --> 05:29.120
turn on peace.

05:30.120 --> 05:31.120
Thank you, sir.

05:31.120 --> 05:32.120
Thank you.

05:33.120 --> 05:35.120
Other public comments or appearances?

05:38.120 --> 05:39.120
Yeah.

05:40.120 --> 05:42.120
Kim Tydrick, 4, 4, 6, 5, Wilder's Way,

05:42.120 --> 05:46.120
town of Port Washington, which makes me an outside agitator,

05:46.120 --> 05:47.120
apparently.

05:47.120 --> 05:50.120
A couple of things, first of all,

05:50.120 --> 05:53.120
everything Dean said, double it.

05:55.120 --> 05:59.120
We have been lied to about basically everything from the get-go.

06:00.120 --> 06:02.120
None of you have listened to us.

06:02.120 --> 06:05.120
Most of you can't even bother looking at us when we speak.

06:06.120 --> 06:10.120
So yeah, there's a very strong lack of trust.

06:13.120 --> 06:17.120
Another issue I have is very recently there was an article put out

06:17.120 --> 06:23.120
and the mayor said that no one came and no one cared and no one put

06:23.120 --> 06:24.120
there was no pushback.

06:24.120 --> 06:28.120
And so this got pushed through very, very quickly because no one was here.

06:28.120 --> 06:31.120
Well, I beg to differ because we were here.

06:31.120 --> 06:34.120
We were here multiple times before this went to anywhere.

06:34.120 --> 06:36.120
We were at the town meetings.

06:36.120 --> 06:39.120
Some days we went to town meetings and came directly here.

06:40.120 --> 06:45.120
So flat out lying in articles, not a good look,

06:45.120 --> 06:48.120
but expected after the way this has all gone recently.

06:50.120 --> 06:56.120
What I most importantly want to say is that this,

06:57.120 --> 07:01.120
as far as the impact on the neighbors,

07:01.120 --> 07:05.120
has been far worse than we were even expecting at this point.

07:05.120 --> 07:09.120
We were worried about the things that would happen when the vantage data center

07:09.120 --> 07:10.120
was up and running.

07:10.120 --> 07:14.120
And when Oracle and OpenAI came in and were doing their crazy stuff,

07:14.120 --> 07:19.120
what is worse is I've lived in my home for 22 years now

07:20.120 --> 07:23.120
and I can't open my windows and doors.

07:23.120 --> 07:24.120
It's finally warm.

07:24.120 --> 07:26.120
It's finally spring in Port Washington.

07:26.120 --> 07:30.120
I can't open my windows and doors and enjoy it because as soon as I do,

07:30.120 --> 07:32.120
the dirt comes in.

07:32.120 --> 07:34.120
The noise.

07:34.120 --> 07:37.120
Okay, we get Sundays off now,

07:37.120 --> 07:41.120
but we all have PTSD from the beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep,

07:41.120 --> 07:44.120
beep, beep, beep of the 24-hour construction.

07:44.120 --> 07:49.120
You have no idea what you people have done to those of us

07:49.120 --> 07:51.120
who live around that site.

07:52.120 --> 07:55.120
And you have no idea what's coming.

07:56.120 --> 07:58.120
And that's the scary part.

07:58.120 --> 08:03.120
Have any of you taken any time to Google,

08:03.120 --> 08:08.120
vantage, OpenAI, Oracle, and the results of what happens

08:08.120 --> 08:11.120
when they come into your communities and build data centers?

08:11.120 --> 08:14.120
The aquifers that disappeared during construction

08:14.120 --> 08:16.120
that were never going to be used.

08:16.120 --> 08:19.120
Gee, that sounds kind of familiar, doesn't it?

08:20.120 --> 08:25.120
Please take some time and then step up and do your jobs

08:25.120 --> 08:30.120
as common council members and stand up for the citizens

08:30.120 --> 08:33.120
of this city.

08:33.120 --> 08:37.120
It was a beautiful city, and what is going on now is going to drive

08:37.120 --> 08:39.120
tourism away.

08:39.120 --> 08:42.120
Sure, you'll have those construction guys here for a couple of years,

08:42.120 --> 08:47.120
and then when they're gone, no one's going to want to come here.

08:47.120 --> 08:49.120
Look at Oregon.

08:49.120 --> 08:51.120
Look at Virginia.

08:51.120 --> 08:52.120
You'll see.

08:52.120 --> 08:53.120
Thank you.

08:55.120 --> 08:57.120
Other public comments and appearances?

09:05.120 --> 09:11.120
I'm Anna Mueller, 4488 Lilac Lane, Port of Town, Washington.

09:12.120 --> 09:16.120
John McGivron visited Port on May 5th.

09:16.120 --> 09:20.120
He was in town to promote a special release of his final

09:20.120 --> 09:24.120
installment of Main Streets, which is a travel docuseries

09:24.120 --> 09:28.120
highlighting Wisconsin cities and towns.

09:28.120 --> 09:32.120
PBS last funding, so this is now defunct.

09:32.120 --> 09:35.120
The last and final episode featured Port Washington.

09:35.120 --> 09:41.120
It was filmed last July and September before the November groundbreaking.

09:41.120 --> 09:47.120
It featured restaurants, lake fishing, historical locations and businesses.

09:47.120 --> 09:50.120
He interviewed a business owner who gave up the corporate world

09:50.120 --> 09:53.120
to start a small business here.

09:53.120 --> 09:58.120
She was asked, so you're committed to Port Washington?

09:58.120 --> 10:02.120
There's plenty to do and experience, even outdoors, right?

10:02.120 --> 10:07.120
She responded, we are surrounded by some pretty awesome views

10:07.120 --> 10:11.120
and yeah, biking and hiking, so we have a lot to offer here.

10:11.120 --> 10:15.120
So it's kind of like a dream come true.

10:16.120 --> 10:20.120
It ended with a panoramic view from the light station looking north,

10:20.120 --> 10:25.120
while the host was speaking, rolling meadows, wildflowers, fresh water,

10:25.120 --> 10:28.120
and with a community that bonds with nature,

10:28.120 --> 10:34.120
it panned out to the endless rolling hills and pastures as far as the eye could see.

10:34.120 --> 10:38.120
The uncomfortable silence was deafening.

10:38.120 --> 10:43.120
We had the realization that we were not witnessing a promotional tourist film.

10:43.120 --> 10:46.120
This was a eulogy at a funeral.

10:46.120 --> 10:52.120
I did not talk to Mr. Givens, so I don't know how he felt about Port's transformation

10:52.120 --> 10:56.120
from his last visit, but the parting shot of the horizon

10:56.120 --> 11:01.120
and the dialogue was cut from the May 7th release.

11:01.120 --> 11:04.120
You see, Mayor Ted, advantage?

11:04.120 --> 11:08.120
You didn't just destroy 2,000 acres of land.

11:08.120 --> 11:12.120
You sucked the life out of a community.

11:12.120 --> 11:15.120
You broke their spirit and their pride.

11:15.120 --> 11:19.120
You stole their reliable future.

11:19.120 --> 11:23.120
These are the things that don't show up in surveys and measured by polling

11:23.120 --> 11:26.120
and are not statistical evidence.

11:26.120 --> 11:29.120
These are things that the intricate fabric of our lives

11:29.120 --> 11:32.120
and the mesh work of a thriving community.

11:32.120 --> 11:35.120
Thank you for your time.

11:35.120 --> 11:40.120
Thank you.

11:41.120 --> 11:43.120
Ben, are you going to go?

11:43.120 --> 11:45.120
Sure.

11:45.120 --> 11:47.120
So I guess I don't need to say my name.

11:47.120 --> 11:49.120
Yes, you do.

11:49.120 --> 11:53.120
Ben Donakowski 4799 County Road, LL.

11:53.120 --> 11:56.120
With all the blue blinking security cameras,

11:56.120 --> 12:00.120
it's reasonable to expect a designated vantage representative

12:00.120 --> 12:05.120
who can provide footage when people are subjected to unsafe driving incidents.

12:05.120 --> 12:09.120
And to be clear, I'm not talking about the accidents that already occurred

12:09.120 --> 12:11.120
requiring police presence.

12:11.120 --> 12:15.120
I'm assuming that footage was made available as it should be.

12:15.120 --> 12:17.120
I'm talking about the near-miss situations.

12:17.120 --> 12:20.120
Someone cutting off or someone cutting a driver off

12:20.120 --> 12:22.120
and forcing them to slam on the brakes

12:22.120 --> 12:25.120
or a vehicle getting damaged with no accountability.

12:25.120 --> 12:30.120
In those cases, residents should be able to contact a single representative

12:30.120 --> 12:35.120
and say, I would like the footage from XYZ date and time.

12:35.120 --> 12:37.120
Hold them to being a good neighbor.

12:37.120 --> 12:41.120
And help with insurance claims or help identify employees needing an update

12:41.120 --> 12:48.120
and driving etiquette by taking responsibility from the impacts of your operation.

12:48.120 --> 12:52.120
For my second topic, I'm starting with a rhetorical question.

12:52.120 --> 12:55.120
If I slept in your couch for five days a week,

12:55.120 --> 12:58.120
showered there every day and ate a meal or two,

12:58.120 --> 13:01.120
would you say I'm living with you?

13:01.120 --> 13:05.120
Whatever fairytale sugar-coated explanation the city has in the pipeline

13:05.120 --> 13:07.120
won't fool anyone.

13:07.120 --> 13:12.120
People will be living on site despite the multiple assurances that this would never happen.

13:12.120 --> 13:17.120
Resting, camping, couch crashing, whatever label you want to use.

13:17.120 --> 13:21.120
If someone is eating, showering, and sleeping in the same place five out of seven days,

13:21.120 --> 13:23.120
it's fair to say that they're living there.

13:23.120 --> 13:28.120
Thank you.

13:28.120 --> 13:31.120
Any other public comments?

13:32.120 --> 13:37.120
My name is Lauren Kerns.

13:37.120 --> 13:39.120
I live in West Bend.

13:39.120 --> 13:43.120
I'm not going to give my address because I don't feel like it's a comfortable thing.

13:43.120 --> 13:45.120
You must state your address.

13:45.120 --> 13:48.120
Okay, five, eight, five, nine, county of roadway.

13:48.120 --> 13:49.120
Thank you.

13:49.120 --> 13:52.120
I was not planning on doing a couple of comments today,

13:52.120 --> 13:59.120
but I am coming up here to speak about the property that is on the ATC line.

14:00.120 --> 14:05.120
And to say how people from outside of Port Washington have been impacted.

14:05.120 --> 14:08.120
And first, I want to address that.

14:08.120 --> 14:12.120
I see a lot of the same things that this government body has been doing

14:12.120 --> 14:15.120
that I've seen out in Trenton, Wisconsin,

14:15.120 --> 14:20.120
where the government body often insults people who come up and make comments

14:20.120 --> 14:24.120
and give their experiences and how often they'll be little.

14:25.120 --> 14:28.120
I know that Ted is frowns upon, you know, KFOs.

14:28.120 --> 14:32.120
I've heard him say it in interviews before.

14:32.120 --> 14:35.120
And I have dealt with KFOs out of my area and fighting it.

14:35.120 --> 14:38.120
And I've had my same government do the same thing.

14:38.120 --> 14:43.120
And what has been happening with my community impacted by this data center

14:43.120 --> 14:47.120
is far significantly worse than what has been happening with KFOs.

14:47.120 --> 14:52.120
And I am used to manure smells, you know, that smell like diarrhea going into

14:52.120 --> 14:58.120
my house and seeing how you guys in this community are facing some things

14:58.120 --> 15:04.120
different, something similar where you can't go outside and enjoy the outdoors.

15:04.120 --> 15:11.120
And I feel really awful and can only imagine what you guys are experiencing.

15:11.120 --> 15:17.120
And I am experiencing probably far less extent because I also have dust

15:17.120 --> 15:22.120
that is just being blown up everywhere from all the concrete trucks going on the roads.

15:22.120 --> 15:27.120
And it's just a dusty mess out by me too.

15:27.120 --> 15:29.120
Again, I am also on the ATC line.

15:29.120 --> 15:35.120
So I have the heartbreaking reality that I might have to watch my forest be cut down

15:35.120 --> 15:37.120
for your data center.

15:37.120 --> 15:42.120
All this greenwashing stuff that you guys are trying to pull with saying that

15:42.120 --> 15:44.120
Vantage is going to plant native plants.

15:44.120 --> 15:46.120
What about my native plants?

15:46.120 --> 15:53.120
What about my already established native community that I'm going to have to watch get cut down?

15:53.120 --> 15:58.120
What has been happening here has been without any regard to other communities.

15:58.120 --> 16:02.120
And I hope you guys are thinking about what lawsuits might end up coming for you.

16:02.120 --> 16:11.120
If you do not fix this, if you do not start asking the other communities what you can do to fix it.

16:11.120 --> 16:14.120
Thank you.

16:14.120 --> 16:17.120
Other public comments or appearances?

16:17.120 --> 16:20.120
Okay, we're going to move into the meeting.

16:20.120 --> 16:22.120
The next agenda item is the consent agenda.

16:22.120 --> 16:26.120
I'm looking for the approval of the previous meeting's minutes and the monthly invoice reports.

16:26.120 --> 16:27.120
So moved.

16:27.120 --> 16:28.120
There's a motion and a second.

16:28.120 --> 16:30.120
Any questions or concerns on that motion?

16:30.120 --> 16:31.120
All right.

16:31.120 --> 16:32.120
Seeing none.

16:32.120 --> 16:33.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

16:33.120 --> 16:34.120
Opposed?

16:34.120 --> 16:35.120
All right.

16:35.120 --> 16:36.120
The motion carries.

16:36.120 --> 16:40.120
Then under mayor's business before any of our speakers leave.

16:40.120 --> 16:49.120
If you email us so we can send you how we've advocated for the alternative lines and brought forward the other communities in that conversation with us to avoid going through your area.

16:49.120 --> 16:51.120
And we've advocated at the highest levels for that.

16:51.120 --> 16:54.120
So we will send you those documents that you can have those.

16:54.120 --> 16:59.120
The other pieces is there's an appointment for members to boards, commissions and committees.

16:59.120 --> 17:05.120
Dan Becker, former aldermen and lifetime resident of Port Washington is who I'm recommending for the police and fire commission.

17:06.120 --> 17:08.120
Dan is willing to serve on that.

17:08.120 --> 17:15.120
And he resigned from his zoning appeals board job that he had here for a little bit.

17:15.120 --> 17:18.120
Is there anyone willing to make a motion to accept that nomination?

17:18.120 --> 17:19.120
So moved.

17:19.120 --> 17:20.120
Motion.

17:20.120 --> 17:21.120
Is there a second?

17:21.120 --> 17:22.120
Moved and seconded.

17:22.120 --> 17:24.120
Any questions or concerns on that motion?

17:24.120 --> 17:25.120
All right.

17:25.120 --> 17:26.120
Seeing none.

17:26.120 --> 17:27.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

17:27.120 --> 17:28.120
Opposed?

17:28.120 --> 17:29.120
All right.

17:29.120 --> 17:30.120
The motion carries.

17:31.120 --> 17:32.120
And I went out of order here.

17:32.120 --> 17:40.120
But this past week, Betty Showalter, Betty Hill, who she was born as, celebrated her 100th birthday.

17:40.120 --> 17:45.120
Betty is the daughter of the founder of the Port Washington State Bank.

17:45.120 --> 17:48.120
And her and her husband Ron had run that state bank for a long time.

17:48.120 --> 17:57.120
And the business continues and the bank continues in the family's name being now run by son Steve and the grandson, James Showalter.

17:58.120 --> 18:02.120
So this past Sunday was Betty Showalter Day in Port Washington.

18:02.120 --> 18:04.120
I just want to make sure the community knew that.

18:04.120 --> 18:10.120
Ron and Betty Showalter for entertainment since the 70s watched every single council meeting.

18:10.120 --> 18:17.120
So they would go home, have dinner, and then make a Manhattan suite and watch the council meetings.

18:17.120 --> 18:21.120
They watched those council meetings until about three, four years ago.

18:21.120 --> 18:26.120
So just a happy birthday to Betty and a congratulations to her for meeting that centurion mark.

18:26.120 --> 18:27.120
Okay.

18:27.120 --> 18:29.120
That's all I've got for tonight.

18:29.120 --> 18:31.120
That's going to take us into staff reports.

18:31.120 --> 18:32.120
Melissa.

18:32.120 --> 18:34.120
Thank you, Mayor.

18:34.120 --> 18:38.120
The department head reports are on the Facebook and on the website.

18:38.120 --> 18:40.120
I encourage everyone to check those out.

18:40.120 --> 18:42.120
There's a lot of things going on in the city.

18:42.120 --> 18:43.120
The pool is open.

18:43.120 --> 18:45.120
We had nice weather for opening day.

18:45.120 --> 18:47.120
So check that out this summer.

18:48.120 --> 18:51.120
A couple of updates of things coming up in the future.

18:51.120 --> 18:57.120
The capital improvement plan and process will be going to public works in July.

18:57.120 --> 19:02.120
So if you're interested in the long term planning of the city, feel free to attend that meeting.

19:02.120 --> 19:08.120
Then also the July 15 will be having the BCC training.

19:08.120 --> 19:10.120
That's the board's commission committee.

19:10.120 --> 19:15.120
So just a reminder that those will be doing the training on that in the morning or the evening.

19:16.120 --> 19:21.120
And then later on the agenda, we do have two grant application on the agenda.

19:21.120 --> 19:23.120
These are just grant applications.

19:23.120 --> 19:27.120
The project costs and whatnot will be discussed at GGF.

19:27.120 --> 19:28.120
The following meeting.

19:28.120 --> 19:31.120
So seven seven will be talking about Valley Creek.

19:31.120 --> 19:32.120
A little bit more of the details.

19:32.120 --> 19:37.120
So if you're interested in that, check out that packet online or come to the meeting.

19:37.120 --> 19:41.120
And then I will be getting that to the common council after the GGF meeting.

19:41.120 --> 19:42.120
So that's all I have.

19:42.120 --> 19:43.120
Thank you.

19:43.120 --> 19:45.120
Any questions or concerns for Melissa?

19:45.120 --> 19:50.120
I just want to point out, I always appreciate the depth that the full staff puts in here.

19:50.120 --> 20:01.120
And I just in Rob's report to from public works, he pointed out the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation working with the National, the Wisconsin Shipwreck Coastal National Marine Sanctuary.

20:01.120 --> 20:04.120
And they'll be in Port Washington this summer to survey visitors, etc.

20:04.120 --> 20:08.120
I think that we overlooked the fact that we've got that marine sanctuary outside.

20:08.120 --> 20:10.120
It's the same thing as a federal park.

20:10.120 --> 20:16.120
And then the other piece that I was really excited to see was the new staircase leading down into the pool.

20:16.120 --> 20:18.120
I really, really appreciated that.

20:18.120 --> 20:23.120
And then the last one that I have is the anniversary of Dennis Churney, our harbor master.

20:23.120 --> 20:31.120
He started after retiring in 1997 as our harbor master.

20:31.120 --> 20:35.120
And when I was a Mr. Beaster seat in the sixth ward, I voted for his appointment.

20:35.120 --> 20:38.120
And I just can't believe he's still out there doing it.

20:39.120 --> 20:44.120
Yeah, his promise was, I'll do this for one year so you guys can get your act together and hire somebody.

20:44.120 --> 20:49.120
So here we are, you know, close to 30 years later, and he's still doing it.

20:49.120 --> 20:54.120
And I just appreciate his ownership and congratulate him on that commitment to the city of Port Washington.

20:54.120 --> 21:04.120
And then one final request, Melissa, could you work with Vantage on that misinformation about the wells so that we can get a report and put that on to Facebook and put some facts out there from the city instead of individuals?

21:04.120 --> 21:05.120
That would be great.

21:06.120 --> 21:10.120
Okay, that brings us into council committees under general government and finance committee.

21:10.120 --> 21:11.120
Oh, I'm sorry.

21:11.120 --> 21:14.120
Oh, yeah, traffic safety charter presentation.

21:14.120 --> 21:15.120
Roger.

21:15.120 --> 21:17.120
You almost got lucked out.

21:17.120 --> 21:18.120
You almost lucked out.

21:18.120 --> 21:34.120
So as you do this, just a reminder to the community that the charters, each board commission committee has to present a charter to the council lined up with our strategic plan to ensure that their actions over the course of the year just keep us moving forward.

21:35.120 --> 21:37.120
Under the direction that we had established.

21:37.120 --> 21:38.120
Yeah.

21:38.120 --> 21:43.120
So I'll run through our charter here pretty quick and Paul is our chairman.

21:43.120 --> 21:45.120
Whatever he said.

21:45.120 --> 21:51.120
So start with our mission statement.

21:51.120 --> 22:02.120
The traffic safety committee reviews all proposed ordinances relating to parking speed limits and traffic controls and recommends public improvements which promote and enhance safety for all modes of transportation.

22:03.120 --> 22:08.120
So you said to want to make sure that we're also covering pedestrians, bikes.

22:08.120 --> 22:14.120
All the electronic mobility items that are out there now, along with cars.

22:14.120 --> 22:17.120
We meet every other month.

22:17.120 --> 22:20.120
10 a.m. fourth Monday of the month.

22:20.120 --> 22:28.120
The committee consists of three aldermen, the police chief and the city engineer.

22:29.120 --> 22:36.120
We will do one.

22:36.120 --> 22:38.120
Some of the goals we're working on.

22:38.120 --> 22:42.120
We've been working quite a while on as goal one was to design the implement,

22:42.120 --> 22:48.120
improve pedestrian bicycle safety at the intersection of the inner urban trail and county L L.

22:48.120 --> 22:50.120
We've had complaints about that.

22:50.120 --> 22:51.120
Bicyclists are not paying attention.

22:51.120 --> 22:55.120
So we're working with the county to improve that crossing.

22:55.120 --> 23:01.120
And now also goal two is traffic safety improvements to the intersection of sunset road and county highway L L.

23:01.120 --> 23:06.120
That's another thing we're trying to get pedestrians and bicyclists to.

23:06.120 --> 23:08.120
Be safer.

23:08.120 --> 23:14.120
Three is a port moves as we were talking about before with the bicycle plan.

23:14.120 --> 23:19.120
And we're also working with the state on ADA ramps.

23:19.120 --> 23:23.120
At South Spring 3 Grand Avenue and North Wisconsin street.

23:24.120 --> 23:27.120
So we've had a full agenda.

23:27.120 --> 23:32.120
This year and we're still working on that with the bike trail.

23:32.120 --> 23:36.120
So we've had a lot on our plate, but a lot of it, we have to get.

23:36.120 --> 23:37.120
Commendations.

23:37.120 --> 23:39.120
We have to get cooperation from the county in the state.

23:39.120 --> 23:41.120
So we keep at it.

23:41.120 --> 23:45.120
Roger does a good job of it.

23:45.120 --> 23:46.120
Any questions?

23:46.120 --> 23:52.120
No, I just I wanted to share that I appreciate your currently looking at the E bike.

23:52.120 --> 23:54.120
The ordinance and the different pieces.

23:54.120 --> 24:02.120
There are most of our neighboring communities who have bike trails that run through town and young people who are riding the different classes of E bikes.

24:02.120 --> 24:03.120
I appreciate that.

24:03.120 --> 24:05.120
I think that's a safety piece we need to get ahead of.

24:05.120 --> 24:06.120
So thank you for that.

24:06.120 --> 24:08.120
Other questions or comments?

24:08.120 --> 24:11.120
Any other members of the committee want to say anything?

24:11.120 --> 24:12.120
Okay.

24:12.120 --> 24:13.120
Well done, gentlemen.

24:13.120 --> 24:14.120
Thank you.

24:14.120 --> 24:21.120
That then takes us into agenda item number seven a general government and finance committee.

24:21.120 --> 24:30.120
I would like to thank you for the recommendation and possible action on approval of an alcohol license for class C wine for Bon Bon Bell LLC Meghan.

24:30.120 --> 24:37.120
Castes the agent at 211 North Franklin Street and a class A beer liquor cider for Adina Lakeside LLC.

24:37.120 --> 24:41.120
Daniel Cohn is the agent at 223 North Franklin Street.

24:41.120 --> 24:50.120
The issue is the common counsel is being asked to approve an original C wine and class A alcohol license and annual cabaret license for the establishment listed and approval for their agents.

24:50.120 --> 24:57.120
The recommendation is to approve the applications required and to approve.

24:57.120 --> 25:03.120
Let me start this over the city clerk has reviewed and approved the applications and required supporting documents.

25:03.120 --> 25:11.120
All required fees have been paid and the background record checks completed and approved by acting police chiefs are necky.

25:11.120 --> 25:12.120
Susan.

25:12.120 --> 25:17.120
So both of these license requests come to you.

25:17.120 --> 25:21.120
There's the two separate ones.

25:21.120 --> 25:26.120
The Bon Bon Bell is the same business.

25:26.120 --> 25:30.120
Same agent operating at the same location with their bridal salon.

25:30.120 --> 25:32.120
It's a restructuring of their corporation.

25:32.120 --> 25:36.120
So they reapplied with that new corporate structure.

25:36.120 --> 25:38.120
Other than that, nothing else has changed.

25:38.120 --> 25:45.120
And for the Adina Lakeside, that will be the new owner, what was dream harvest market.

25:45.120 --> 25:52.120
So being a new corporation, they had to file for a new alcohol license to be able to do the cider as well.

25:52.120 --> 26:05.120
As far as that goes, what I was told was that sale and the change will be happening over the course of these few weeks here throughout June and they'll be ready for July to begin the licensing year.

26:05.120 --> 26:12.120
And we met previously for general government finance and both were approved at that meeting.

26:12.120 --> 26:13.120
This one.

26:13.120 --> 26:16.120
Any questions or concerns or is there someone willing to make a motion?

26:16.120 --> 26:17.120
I will move to approve.

26:17.120 --> 26:18.120
There's a motion to approve.

26:18.120 --> 26:19.120
And a second.

26:19.120 --> 26:21.120
Any questions or concerns on the motion?

26:21.120 --> 26:22.120
All right.

26:22.120 --> 26:24.120
Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

26:24.120 --> 26:25.120
Opposed?

26:25.120 --> 26:26.120
Motion carries.

26:26.120 --> 26:29.120
That brings us into the next agenda item, which is for dollar general.

26:29.120 --> 26:35.120
The issue is should the common council approve the request for Dolgan Corps, LLC for the appointment of a successor agent.

26:35.120 --> 26:37.120
The staff recommends the city.

26:37.120 --> 26:43.120
The city clerk has reviewed the request background check has been approved and approval is recommended as presented.

26:43.120 --> 26:44.120
Susan.

26:44.120 --> 26:56.120
As with other retail establishments here, primarily class A, we'll see from time to time that there's a management shift at these locations.

26:56.120 --> 27:00.120
And we have done this before for dollar general.

27:00.120 --> 27:04.120
This is just a change of agent manager on site.

27:04.120 --> 27:10.120
The background check was approved and this was also considered at general government finance committee rep for this meeting.

27:10.120 --> 27:14.120
There as well.

27:14.120 --> 27:15.120
Any questions or concerns?

27:15.120 --> 27:16.120
The comments?

27:16.120 --> 27:21.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

27:21.120 --> 27:22.120
Opposed?

27:22.120 --> 27:27.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

27:27.120 --> 27:28.120
Opposed?

27:28.120 --> 27:29.120
Motion carries.

27:29.120 --> 27:32.120
That brings us into boards, commissions and committees.

27:32.120 --> 27:47.120
Consideration and possible action on a national fish and wildlife foundation and SWF sustain our Great Lakes SOGO grant application for a regenerative stormwater conveyance RSC system in the Valley Creek watershed.

27:47.120 --> 28:00.120
The issue is should the city of Port Washington submit a sustain our Great Lakes grant application through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for the design and construction of a regenerative stormwater conveyance system in the Valley Creek watershed.

28:00.120 --> 28:13.120
And the staff recommend submitting a $365,000 grant application plus a local match of $365,000 from TID 5 to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation under their sustain our Great Lakes SOGL program for the design and construction of regenerative stormwater conveyance system in the Valley Creek watershed.

28:13.120 --> 28:28.120
The SOGL program for the design and construction of regenerative stormwater conveyance systems in the Valley Creek watershed at the storm sewer outfall near the intersection of Lakeview Avenue and Walter Street.

28:28.120 --> 28:29.120
Roger.

28:29.120 --> 28:34.120
Very evident an engineer wrote this description.

28:34.120 --> 28:36.120
All yours, buddy.

28:36.120 --> 28:39.120
You know, teacher said that they needed 100 words.

28:39.120 --> 28:47.120
Yeah, I'm all she's or scouts over there searching words for us.

28:47.120 --> 29:03.120
So, as Melissa mentioned in her updates, this is we need approval to submit this grant application that this is part of Valley Creek, which is, which has been presented here numerous times and Board of Public Works approved some

29:04.120 --> 29:11.120
grants to counsel that that we submit this application in it.

29:11.120 --> 29:26.120
So the nice thing about the Valley Creek is the project can easily be broken into bits and pieces where we can ask for grants for specific elements that fit the grant and then that kind of contributes to the whole project.

29:26.120 --> 29:30.120
Which is the case here.

29:30.120 --> 29:35.120
So, I guess really unless there's any other questions, I'll stop there.

29:35.120 --> 29:37.120
Council, any questions?

29:37.120 --> 29:38.120
Yes.

29:38.120 --> 29:46.120
I do have a comment. We've been hearing a lot about the Valley Creek project, I think, for like three plus years.

29:47.120 --> 29:54.120
I have yet to see a timeline, a final cost breakdown, and I kind of would have expected that by now.

29:54.120 --> 30:00.120
It's my understanding we'll be hearing more about this at the July 7th finance meeting. Is that correct?

30:00.120 --> 30:03.120
Correct.

30:03.120 --> 30:10.120
And I'm perfectly okay with approving the grant application, but I need more information.

30:11.120 --> 30:19.120
Yes, and this is not accepting the grant or anything like that. This is just approval to submit it.

30:19.120 --> 30:27.120
Any other questions other than city time, Roger, that there's no cost of this, right? Do it apply for the grant?

30:27.120 --> 30:32.120
No.

30:33.120 --> 30:40.120
I just wanted to add, I share Alderman Postle's wonderings.

30:40.120 --> 30:48.120
I'm struggling with the volume of city matches charged to tids that we want to try to close as fast as possible.

30:48.120 --> 30:56.120
And I would just ask that before this comes back to council, again, that there is a complete vision statement

30:56.120 --> 30:59.120
and visual of what this will be, what this will look like.

31:00.120 --> 31:09.120
And I'm just not seeing it. And frankly, this is not something we've ever talked about in finance or strategic planning.

31:09.120 --> 31:15.120
And it just feels like it's a tremendous amount of time, effort, and energy when we've got so many other things in port to do.

31:15.120 --> 31:20.120
Not that I don't want to do this. I just, I've never seen a scoped out plan.

31:20.120 --> 31:24.120
And I know that we can chase grants for shovel ready projects and such.

31:24.120 --> 31:31.120
But I feel like we're allocating a lot of time, energy, effort and resources toward something that we're not quite sure where this is going to go and end.

31:31.120 --> 31:34.120
And we've already seen significant improvement.

31:34.120 --> 31:40.120
We've already seen significant improvement as a result of some of the head water retention strategies.

31:40.120 --> 31:47.120
So I would just ask that that be done because I'll have a hard time signing a grant with these just continual matching funds,

31:47.120 --> 31:49.120
not knowing what it's going to be.

31:49.120 --> 31:54.120
I can't even know if we're tearing out forestry. What are we doing?

31:54.120 --> 31:57.120
So I think I've been paying attention.

31:57.120 --> 32:01.120
So again, like all the women pastel, I've got no problem with applying for the grants,

32:01.120 --> 32:04.120
but when it comes to the matching funds and the final commitments for the city,

32:04.120 --> 32:08.120
I'd really prefer that this is totally fleshed out for the community and ourselves.

32:08.120 --> 32:10.120
Mr. Gassmer.

32:10.120 --> 32:17.120
Yeah, I just want to say we do have plans that are around 60% level for the project right now.

32:17.120 --> 32:22.120
So that is pretty readily available of pretty much what it will entail.

32:22.120 --> 32:28.120
I mean, at 60%, there's still some tweaks around the edges, but the base idea, everything is there.

32:28.120 --> 32:33.120
And I agree with the idea that we want to close the TIF as fast as possible,

32:33.120 --> 32:39.120
but part of getting the grant money offsets money potentially that we don't have to spend from the TIF.

32:39.120 --> 32:40.120
Yeah.

32:40.120 --> 32:43.120
So yeah, the more grant money, the better.

32:43.120 --> 32:46.120
Yeah, I 100% agree.

32:46.120 --> 32:50.120
I've never seen a visual of kind of the end product.

32:50.120 --> 32:54.120
Like you said, it's been scoped and this is what it might look like.

32:54.120 --> 32:57.120
I think it's fair to all of us to see that.

32:57.120 --> 33:00.120
I know Roger has that available.

33:00.120 --> 33:07.120
And I'll just add, Mike, you know, I've seen the presentations of EPW.

33:07.120 --> 33:16.120
What we haven't seen is the project management documents, which say, here's the timeline anticipated.

33:16.120 --> 33:20.120
Here's the cost. Here's, you know, where we anticipate the funding coming from.

33:20.120 --> 33:25.120
And I think that's what I know I'm looking for.

33:25.120 --> 33:36.120
And then where does this fall in the priority of other spending that the city has to do and resource time availability and priority on projects.

33:37.120 --> 33:39.120
That's the part we're missing right now.

33:39.120 --> 33:42.120
Technical stuff, you know, the design agree.

33:42.120 --> 33:45.120
We're at 60 going to 90% quickly.

33:45.120 --> 33:50.120
I would say to from where it should fit priority wise.

33:50.120 --> 33:55.120
This is one of the goals this project is to protect our water treatment plant,

33:55.120 --> 34:00.120
where we have had flooding go through that plant, including a lot of mud going into the plant.

34:01.120 --> 34:07.120
We've had recent flooding in recent years that has been within an inch or two of shutting down our water plant.

34:07.120 --> 34:11.120
So this is very important to the city as a whole, I think.

34:11.120 --> 34:17.120
And, you know, understanding from that perspective, I think, I will agree.

34:17.120 --> 34:19.120
We haven't seen details scheduled yet.

34:19.120 --> 34:26.120
I've been told 20, 27, 20, 28, those two years that starting on the north end moving south.

34:27.120 --> 34:32.120
And, you know, this, you know, the goal is to alleviate the flooding problems downtown.

34:32.120 --> 34:36.120
And this will do that, and it's not a cheaper, easy thing to achieve.

34:36.120 --> 34:40.120
But, you know, again, I 100% agree.

34:40.120 --> 34:45.120
I just, I get a little nervous with continued matching grants over and over and over again.

34:45.120 --> 34:50.120
And I just, I just would like to see a scoped out vision statement and plan with a timeline.

34:50.120 --> 34:55.120
So I know that it's in people's heads and it's in different spots, and I just think it's fair to the council to see that.

34:55.120 --> 34:57.120
So again, I fully endorse this.

34:57.120 --> 35:00.120
I just think it's fair to be to see it all.

35:00.120 --> 35:01.120
Melissa?

35:01.120 --> 35:05.120
Sure. So next week, Monday, public works finance and myself are meeting.

35:05.120 --> 35:11.120
We want to do like a phase approach and then identify which sections of this project is going to be done.

35:11.120 --> 35:17.120
And when you do the grants, we have to match the grants with what piece of the pie it's going towards.

35:17.120 --> 35:21.120
So we need that full scoped out, like, up to, you know, 20 million.

35:21.120 --> 35:27.120
And like, what phase and then what grants and then what part of the 10 five would be applicable here.

35:27.120 --> 35:34.120
So our goal is to have this scoped out the financial end for.

35:34.120 --> 35:36.120
Seven, seven.

35:36.120 --> 35:43.120
GGF have discussion and then follow that up here so that you would get a full presentation of like what those phases look like.

35:43.120 --> 35:48.120
And then we can make sure we're from stand tech or whomever we can get the information.

35:48.120 --> 35:52.120
We know what it's actually going to truly cost or possibly cost the city.

35:52.120 --> 35:53.120
Awesome.

35:53.120 --> 35:56.120
Your finance director and administrator agree.

35:56.120 --> 36:02.120
So is there someone willing then to take the staff recommendation recommendation and make a motion?

36:02.120 --> 36:08.120
I move to approve the staff recommendation.

36:08.120 --> 36:10.120
There's a motion. Is there a second?

36:10.120 --> 36:11.120
Second.

36:11.120 --> 36:15.120
All right, Mr. Neumeier, the seconded.

36:15.120 --> 36:17.120
Any questions or concerns on the motion?

36:18.120 --> 36:20.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

36:20.120 --> 36:21.120
Opposed?

36:21.120 --> 36:22.120
All right, the motion carries.

36:22.120 --> 36:28.120
That brings us into the next one, Roger, consideration and possible action on the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

36:28.120 --> 36:33.120
National Coastal Resiliency Fund grant application for the Valley Creek corridor project.

36:33.120 --> 36:42.120
Should the city of Port Washington submit a grant application to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for National Coastal Resiliency Fund grant for construction of Valley Creek improvements.

36:42.120 --> 36:47.120
The staff recommends submitting a grant application totaling approximately $5 million.

36:47.120 --> 37:04.120
With a $5 million local match supported by $2.4 million from the vantage grant to LNRP and $2.6 million coming from TID 5 financing to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for National Coastal Resiliency Fund grant for construction of phase one of the Valley Creek improvement project.

37:04.120 --> 37:05.120
Roger.

37:06.120 --> 37:25.120
All right, so similar to the previous item, so this is another grant that the slight difference in this one is we had similar pre application and we were invited to submit for the full application, which means it's likely to be awarded.

37:25.120 --> 37:32.120
Not guaranteed, but we like our chances.

37:33.120 --> 37:47.120
And again, I guess half the match is already there from a previous donation from Vantage and we're looking at TID 5 for the remaining portion of the match.

37:47.120 --> 37:55.120
And this should get us towards being able to start construction.

37:56.120 --> 37:59.120
Any questions?

37:59.120 --> 38:03.120
There's someone willing to make a motion, then?

38:05.120 --> 38:07.120
Sure, so moved.

38:07.120 --> 38:08.120
Thank you.

38:08.120 --> 38:09.120
Is there a second?

38:09.120 --> 38:10.120
Second.

38:10.120 --> 38:11.120
All right, moved and seconded.

38:11.120 --> 38:12.120
Any questions or concerns on the motion?

38:12.120 --> 38:15.120
Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

38:15.120 --> 38:16.120
Opposed?

38:16.120 --> 38:17.120
All right, motion carries.

38:18.120 --> 38:23.120
It brings us into 8C consideration and possible action on a utility service agreement with the village of Sockfield.

38:23.120 --> 38:34.120
The issue is should the Common Council approve an agreement with the village of Sockfield to cooperatively exchange properties in our respective sewer services area and the staff recommends approval of the agreement.

38:34.120 --> 38:39.120
Roger, before you begin, I just want to thank the entire team that worked on this with Sockfield.

38:40.120 --> 38:51.120
This is not our normal tradition, and I just really appreciate the fact that Sockfield and Port Washington are collaborating so closely over the course of the last five, six years for this type of work to help both of our communities.

38:51.120 --> 38:56.120
So thank you for whatever diligence you did on this, and it's the floor is yours.

38:56.120 --> 38:57.120
You're welcome.

38:58.120 --> 39:15.120
So essentially what the mayor said is the reason behind us is so that both communities are growing and city on the west and Sockfield on the east and we're going to bump into each other.

39:15.120 --> 39:24.120
So we just want to want to say, hey, there's areas that they're logically served by each community in those areas that either serves.

39:25.120 --> 39:28.120
Either community could serve.

39:28.120 --> 39:38.120
So basically we wanted to come up with an agreement that, hey, if there's a developer for whatever reason prefers to be in one community or the other.

39:38.120 --> 39:43.120
And then here we said basically driven by economics because that's what the developer will.

39:44.120 --> 39:45.120
Based our decision on.

39:48.120 --> 40:00.120
That that we have a mechanism to allow sewer service areas to change without getting into long dronald battles and sending cash either direction.

40:03.120 --> 40:05.120
I believe Sockfield is also taking us up tonight.

40:05.120 --> 40:06.120
I think your meeting is tonight.

40:09.120 --> 40:10.120
It may be next week.

40:11.120 --> 40:23.120
And we're also in a situation because we need to do a sewer service area update for we have pending development to north was beyond already what's going there.

40:23.120 --> 40:26.120
We have probably even more.

40:29.120 --> 40:32.120
Pressure or requests on the west side kind of.

40:33.120 --> 40:38.120
Adjacent to Sockfield that people want to want to develop and come into the city.

40:39.120 --> 40:43.120
And right now those are not in our service area sewer pack.

40:43.120 --> 40:46.120
Basically told us with our last amendment that hey, you need an update.

40:46.120 --> 40:48.120
You need to do a full update.

40:50.120 --> 40:55.120
If we don't have this agreement or if neighboring communities choose to object to.

40:56.120 --> 40:58.120
Our proposed plan.

40:59.120 --> 41:01.120
That slows the whole works down.

41:01.120 --> 41:11.120
So that's that's another driving factor behind this agreement so that for both communities we can be as efficient as government can be with development.

41:14.120 --> 41:16.120
Any questions for Roger?

41:18.120 --> 41:19.120
Roger.

41:21.120 --> 41:27.120
I don't have a map that I can overlay the two next to each other, but it appears there's still some gaps.

41:28.120 --> 41:30.120
In the southwest side.

41:30.120 --> 41:34.120
Is that true or it's hard to tell because they can't.

41:35.120 --> 41:37.120
The maps are different scales.

41:37.120 --> 41:38.120
Yeah.

41:38.120 --> 41:39.120
Yeah.

41:39.120 --> 41:43.120
But it but it seems like on the southwest side of the city.

41:44.120 --> 41:46.120
You know, southeast side of Sockfield.

41:46.120 --> 41:48.120
There might be some gaps or.

41:48.120 --> 41:49.120
Yeah.

41:49.120 --> 41:51.120
Kind of from East Sock Road.

41:52.120 --> 41:53.120
Going.

41:54.120 --> 41:55.120
North.

41:55.120 --> 41:59.120
Basically all the way up to 43 as it goes north on the city, but that's kind of we're all.

41:59.120 --> 42:03.120
Pretty much a budding or the intention is that we're that we're a budding.

42:03.120 --> 42:04.120
So.

42:05.120 --> 42:07.120
And as far as property, southeast Sock.

42:07.120 --> 42:13.120
There might there might be open areas and part of it is is is the map for port shows the.

42:13.120 --> 42:15.120
New areas, not the existing.

42:16.120 --> 42:18.120
District and that's maybe where I'm.

42:19.120 --> 42:26.120
You know, seeing gaps because it our existing area may cover some of those areas type of thing.

42:26.120 --> 42:27.120
Is that the case?

42:27.120 --> 42:30.120
I mean, do we have a map of the existing.

42:30.120 --> 42:31.120
District.

42:31.120 --> 42:33.120
You could throw up quick.

42:39.120 --> 42:40.120
I apologize.

42:40.120 --> 42:42.120
I meant to get to you earlier today on this.

42:42.120 --> 42:43.120
I forgot.

42:44.120 --> 42:45.120
Okay.

42:45.120 --> 42:46.120
I got.

42:46.120 --> 42:47.120
So if you.

42:49.120 --> 42:51.120
If you look at Sockfield's map.

42:51.120 --> 42:53.120
They're pretty much showing parts existing.

42:53.120 --> 42:55.120
That's the city limits.

42:55.120 --> 42:56.120
Yep.

42:56.120 --> 42:58.120
But that's not the sewer district is it.

43:06.120 --> 43:07.120
We can take it afterward.

43:07.120 --> 43:10.120
I just want to make sure I understand if there are.

43:11.120 --> 43:13.120
There's a lot of.

43:13.120 --> 43:16.120
Gap areas because, you know, I mean, southwest side of the city.

43:16.120 --> 43:17.120
There's a lot of.

43:17.120 --> 43:23.120
Areas there are in town of grafting or the town of Sockville and or the town of port to.

43:29.120 --> 43:32.120
I mean, Roger, just so you're not sitting there, spent like.

43:32.120 --> 43:37.120
If it's okay, I mean, for for tonight's purposes, that's that's the village in the city right there.

43:38.120 --> 43:42.120
And then would we be able to get that full map because like as Alderman Benning is saying, like.

43:42.120 --> 43:47.120
The north woods court area and proms property is not included on the maps that we have.

43:50.120 --> 43:51.120
All right.

43:51.120 --> 43:52.120
Yeah.

43:52.120 --> 43:54.120
So I guess the intent is to approve the agreement.

43:54.120 --> 43:56.120
But so I'll get a pair of the maps.

43:56.120 --> 43:57.120
All right.

43:57.120 --> 43:58.120
Thank you everybody.

43:58.120 --> 43:59.120
And then just take that up a separate.

43:59.120 --> 44:00.120
Yes.

44:00.120 --> 44:01.120
We can see all of it.

44:01.120 --> 44:02.120
Okay.

44:02.120 --> 44:03.120
That's it.

44:03.120 --> 44:04.120
Okay.

44:05.120 --> 44:06.120
Okay.

44:06.120 --> 44:07.120
All right.

44:07.120 --> 44:09.120
Any other questions on the agreement?

44:09.120 --> 44:12.120
Is there someone willing to make a motion?

44:12.120 --> 44:13.120
I'll move to approve.

44:13.120 --> 44:14.120
Motion by Alderman Benning.

44:14.120 --> 44:16.120
Seconded by Miss Miller.

44:16.120 --> 44:18.120
Any questions or concerns on the motion?

44:18.120 --> 44:19.120
All right.

44:19.120 --> 44:21.120
Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

44:21.120 --> 44:22.120
Opposed?

44:22.120 --> 44:23.120
All right.

44:23.120 --> 44:24.120
Motion carries.

44:24.120 --> 44:30.120
That brings us to the next agenda item under new business consideration and possible action on an intergovernmental cooperation agreement with the Ozaki

44:30.120 --> 44:35.120
with Ozaki County for municipal road and street services and the vantage project.

44:35.120 --> 44:47.120
The agenda item is consideration possible action on this intergovernmental cooperation agreement for municipal road and street services between the city of Port Washington, Ozaki County, relating to the data center project.

44:47.120 --> 44:52.120
The common counsel is being asked to prove an intergovernmental cooperation agreement between the city of Port Washington, Ozaki County.

44:52.120 --> 44:59.120
The agreement allocates the authority and responsibility for repairing streets, city streets, town of Port Washington roads and county highways that are.

44:59.120 --> 45:03.120
Or may be damaged by heavy construction traffic associated with vantage data center.

45:03.120 --> 45:08.120
Lighthouse campus project with all repairs cost to be borne by the developer.

45:08.120 --> 45:12.120
Who's taking this, Roger?

45:12.120 --> 45:13.120
Sure.

45:13.120 --> 45:14.120
I'll start.

45:14.120 --> 45:28.120
So again, with their developers agreement with vantage in any road damage and essentially in the county that's caused by their construction or their hauling is

45:28.120 --> 45:32.120
to be repaired and paid for by vantage.

45:32.120 --> 45:46.120
We essentially found early on that their method of repair or their timeness of repair wasn't to the standard we wanted.

45:46.120 --> 45:55.120
We didn't have the staff or materials to do it, but the county said, Hey, we're all over the county. We see what needs to be fixed.

45:55.120 --> 46:00.120
We know how we like to fix it. Essentially, we'd like to do this.

46:00.120 --> 46:10.120
And this establishes a means where the county can do the work. They can just build vantage without going through us and kind of streamline.

46:10.120 --> 46:15.120
Basically, streamline repairs, get them done.

46:15.120 --> 46:23.120
And then just to add to that, you know, this also keeps the money in the county for the highway department. And like Roger said, this is them doing our work.

46:24.120 --> 46:35.120
To our specs, not having an outside company doing this. So this is sort of a win-win and then the county can build vantage and then the city isn't paying that and then being reimbursed.

46:35.120 --> 46:41.120
It's just going straight to vantage and removes us from that. So an extra layer of protection.

46:41.120 --> 46:50.120
And previous to any construction beginning you and others, engineering firms went out and took drone footage, pictures, depths of all of the roads.

46:50.120 --> 46:51.120
Correct.

46:51.120 --> 46:52.120
Yes.

46:52.120 --> 46:57.120
That's a background of that. I think that's a misnomer in the community that, you know, we're going to be left with all this damage. So I appreciate that.

46:57.120 --> 47:01.120
That's an important piece of this. Okay. Any questions?

47:01.120 --> 47:03.120
I do have one. Yes.

47:03.120 --> 47:15.120
I really like this agreement. Thank you very much. But it has a termination clause and I just want to clarify this termination is the agreement between the city and Ozaki County.

47:15.120 --> 47:21.120
Does not relieve vantage of its responsibilities to pay for the road repair. Correct.

47:21.120 --> 47:25.120
I'm not an attorney, but I'm going to say correct.

47:25.120 --> 47:33.120
I'll answer that. I had actually answered this earlier. So this is just to protect both parties if the county can't do the work.

47:33.120 --> 47:41.120
So say they have five people quit and we cannot do this. They need to give 60 days notice so that they that vantage can get somebody else on the line.

47:41.120 --> 47:52.120
And vice versa. They're like, hey, we want to have our own contractors. There's that, you know, that discussion and that, you know, they're relying on the money or they already have it scoped out. So that's correct.

47:52.120 --> 47:58.120
Okay. Thank you. I just didn't want people to misunderstand saying, well, vantage can walk away. No, they can't.

47:58.120 --> 48:01.120
And you weren't the only one with that question. So thank you.

48:01.120 --> 48:07.120
Thank you for that clarification. And remember that the developers agreement would supersede this one anyways.

48:07.120 --> 48:12.120
So, right. So is there someone then willing to make a motion to accept it? Oh, Mr. Beaster.

48:12.120 --> 48:17.120
I had the same question earlier. So thanks for clarifying that. But I just wanted to clarify.

48:17.120 --> 48:24.120
County highways. Does that mean like KW and LL or does that include other county roads that would be.

48:24.120 --> 48:29.120
So we can get into civil engineering jargon.

48:30.120 --> 48:35.120
The county highways are KW, LL, basically to letter roads.

48:35.120 --> 48:41.120
Other roads like like Mink Ranch or Highland Drive are town roads.

48:41.120 --> 48:51.120
Maintained by the county. So technically those are town roads, but the disagreements still covers those roads also. And then, of course, we have our own city roads.

48:52.120 --> 48:56.120
Any other questions? Mr. Plater.

48:56.120 --> 49:00.120
I'll make a motion to approve the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement.

49:00.120 --> 49:03.120
There's a motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. Seconded by Mr. Gasper.

49:03.120 --> 49:08.120
Any questions or concerns on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

49:08.120 --> 49:20.120
Opposed? Motion carries. That takes it. Roger, it's your night, man. This is Roger show consideration, a possible action and approval of an easement to we energies for underground electric utility.

49:20.120 --> 49:31.120
In Upper Lake Park, the question is, should the city approve an easement agreement for electric utilities in Upper Lake Park to we energies to improve electrical service?

49:31.120 --> 49:35.120
The staff recommends approving the easement to we energies. Roger.

49:35.120 --> 49:43.120
So we've had similar easements brought to council before that this is part of we energies.

49:43.120 --> 49:51.120
Overall program in the city to make our electrical distribution system more robust.

49:51.120 --> 50:00.120
Essentially, they're bearing a lot of lines in the park and then we're getting a nice new dedicated line to the wastewater plant.

50:00.120 --> 50:12.120
So it's essentially all good for us. We made sure that where the easement was located was not where we were planning to come back to Bluff if we ever move forward with that project.

50:12.120 --> 50:22.120
And as best as possible, not in any vicinity, any areas where John was planning improvements.

50:22.120 --> 50:28.120
This is an important infrastructural improvement for the city of Port Washington. So I appreciate the work that went into this.

50:28.120 --> 50:38.120
And I also appreciate where it is through the Bluff. It's not going to be. I mean, they're going under. So it's not going to be that disruptive to day to day operations.

50:38.120 --> 50:42.120
Any other questions? Concerns or comments?

50:42.120 --> 50:46.120
Someone willing to make a motion? I will move to approve.

50:46.120 --> 50:51.120
I will move to approve. I will move to approve. I will move to approve. I will move to approve. I will move to approve.

50:51.120 --> 50:56.120
Second. Second by Mr. Benning. Any questions or concerns on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

50:56.120 --> 51:01.120
Opposed? All right, that motion carries. Roger.

51:02.120 --> 51:10.120
The next agenda item is consideration and possible action on resolution 2026-06 compliance maintenance annual report for the CMAR.

51:10.120 --> 51:20.120
The issue is the DNR requires common counsel to pass a resolution stating that the body has reviewed the wastewater utilities compliance maintenance annual report by June 30th of each year.

51:20.120 --> 51:24.120
The staff recommends approval of resolution 2026-06.

51:25.120 --> 51:40.120
All right, so as you can see, this was prepared by Dan. One fortunately, they have another water main break today. So back to back issues with the water system.

51:40.120 --> 51:46.120
So he's all dealing with that right now so they can are prepared to fix it tomorrow.

51:46.120 --> 51:55.120
Anyways, the CMAR for, I think, Mary and Michael that haven't seen us before.

51:55.120 --> 52:00.120
I'm sorry, Mary Lou.

52:00.120 --> 52:13.120
Anyways, it's a comprehensive evaluation of the wastewater treatment system. It's operation, it's ability to staff that we had the appropriate license people there.

52:13.120 --> 52:18.120
The financial situation background of the treatment plant.

52:18.120 --> 52:25.120
So anyways, Dan did all the number of crunching fill out all the forms.

52:25.120 --> 52:35.120
Assuming that resolution passed tonight, it was submitted to DNR for approval. But the bottom line, we scored a 4.0 all A's across the board.

52:36.120 --> 52:45.120
And if you want any more specific details and what we're doing and how we evaluate things, I'm more than happy to meet with you and then go through it.

52:45.120 --> 52:52.120
Or I'm sure Dan would also, or I could spend 40 minutes now going through it.

52:52.120 --> 52:55.120
Enough is microphone.

52:55.120 --> 53:03.120
No, I think, I just wanted to state, I mean, when you review this report, the rich data and you see what we do in Port Washington and you see how well it's done.

53:03.120 --> 53:09.120
And just the volume of different things that go through that plant, it's very impressive.

53:09.120 --> 53:12.120
And I think it's an important piece for everybody to understand.

53:12.120 --> 53:13.120
Ms. Miller?

53:13.120 --> 53:17.120
That's what I wanted to say is congratulate all of you. That is great.

53:17.120 --> 53:24.120
It feels like we're doing great work down there and I appreciate all of the effort that's put into it because I know there's been a lot of changes.

53:24.120 --> 53:30.120
I don't know what previous reports look like, but I'm impressed by this one.

53:30.120 --> 53:31.120
Yeah.

53:31.120 --> 53:32.120
Thank you.

53:32.120 --> 53:33.120
Mr. Beaster?

53:33.120 --> 53:39.120
I appreciate it. I'm also bringing our attention to the PFAS thing, which I attended yesterday.

53:39.120 --> 53:45.120
What's the opportunity to advocate for emerging things that could show up in water?

53:45.120 --> 53:52.120
Is PFAS reporting, is that something that would normally be added to this or is that a different process?

53:53.120 --> 54:02.120
I imagine right now it's not not included in our WPDS permit.

54:02.120 --> 54:05.120
I expect it to be included in future permits.

54:05.120 --> 54:12.120
DNR has prepared a general permit for wastewater plants statewide for PFAS.

54:12.120 --> 54:19.120
So likely it's not going to show up in this report yet next year, but I would anticipate in the future that it'll be in there.

54:20.120 --> 54:27.120
We have sampled for PFAS at the wastewater plant. We're concerned about it in the sludge because that we take that and spread that out in the land.

54:27.120 --> 54:42.120
And our numbers, as they are right now, are I want to say it's 15 parts per trillion, which is below the DNR's action level of needing to do anything about it.

54:42.120 --> 54:47.120
But it is, as you say, emerging contaminant.

54:47.120 --> 54:52.120
And it will be an expensive one to deal with if we need to get that.

54:52.120 --> 55:01.120
So we do want to stay in top of that and really monitor industries that make sure they take it over their product.

55:01.120 --> 55:03.120
Thank you, Roger.

55:03.120 --> 55:04.120
Thanks.

55:04.120 --> 55:05.120
Any other questions?

55:05.120 --> 55:07.120
Is there anyone willing to, Mr. Benning?

55:07.120 --> 55:14.120
Roger, on the PFAS thing, you said sludge, is it anticipated, primarily sludge?

55:14.120 --> 55:21.120
Do we take in from haulers that bring it in? And do we check it before we process it?

55:21.120 --> 55:25.120
See, identify who might be bringing stuff that's contaminated.

55:25.120 --> 55:31.120
Right now we haven't gone to that detail.

55:31.120 --> 55:36.120
Actually, Dan, Dan is working on a project to improve our remote.

55:36.120 --> 55:42.120
Dumping sites, so we can essentially, right now, our sampling up there doesn't work.

55:42.120 --> 55:44.120
So it's one of the things that they want to prove.

55:44.120 --> 55:46.120
And that is one of those things that we can check on.

55:46.120 --> 55:51.120
But really, right now, we check the sludge in the tank.

55:51.120 --> 55:54.120
That was our sampling point.

55:54.120 --> 55:57.120
So, which is good news, then.

55:57.120 --> 55:59.120
I mean, system-wide area-wide, we're good.

55:59.120 --> 56:07.120
But there are haulers that I would say would be suspect for high amount of PFAS.

56:07.120 --> 56:12.120
With that, I'll move to approve.

56:12.120 --> 56:14.120
Is the motion to approve? Is there a second?

56:14.120 --> 56:15.120
I'll second.

56:15.120 --> 56:16.120
Moved and second.

56:16.120 --> 56:19.120
Any questions or concerns on the compliance maintenance annual report?

56:19.120 --> 56:22.120
Seeing none, all in favor signify by saying aye.

56:22.120 --> 56:24.120
Opposed? Motion carries.

56:24.120 --> 56:26.120
That brings us to the last agenda item.

56:26.120 --> 56:27.120
Public comments and appearances.

56:27.120 --> 56:35.120
Is there anyone willing to make public comments or appearances?

56:35.120 --> 56:38.120
We're in current 5.859 County Road Y.

56:38.120 --> 56:44.120
I wanted to let you guys know that you were contacted by some ATC people.

56:44.120 --> 56:47.120
And you did not ever email them back.

56:47.120 --> 56:56.120
And you were emailed in regards to something that you guys might understand a little bit better since instead of people's experiences.

56:56.120 --> 56:57.120
And that's money.

56:57.120 --> 57:05.120
Every single person, regardless of whether what you advocate for the ATC line, has to protect their property.

57:05.120 --> 57:11.120
They all have to hire attorneys to do it and spend a lot of money on attorney fees.

57:11.120 --> 57:21.120
No amount of car washes or any little bandage you want to put on it is going to fix the amount of time, energy, and money.

57:21.120 --> 57:25.120
They are going to have to spend to protect their property.

57:25.120 --> 57:29.120
That doesn't matter which line the ATC chooses.

57:29.120 --> 57:35.120
That just means that if their line is not taken, then someone else's is.

57:35.120 --> 57:41.120
And whoever's line is taken to chosen is just going to have to spend that much more money.

57:41.120 --> 57:50.120
So I don't know if you guys are realizing how much impact you have money wise on other people.

57:50.120 --> 57:51.120
But this is a big deal.

57:51.120 --> 57:55.120
And a lot of this would have been avoided if you did an environmental impact assessment.

57:55.120 --> 58:00.120
Thank you.

58:00.120 --> 58:01.120
Okay.

58:01.120 --> 58:03.120
Thank you for that.

58:03.120 --> 58:08.120
Could our boy scout come up here?

58:08.120 --> 58:19.120
You want to go up behind the Mr. Strom there and come all the way around here?

58:20.120 --> 58:23.120
So what is your name?

58:23.120 --> 58:25.120
My name is Jonathan Donovan.

58:25.120 --> 58:27.120
Jonathan, I'm very 19.

58:27.120 --> 58:29.120
And what pack are you in?

58:29.120 --> 58:31.120
I'm in truth 8.5.

58:31.120 --> 58:35.120
I'm a scout in also 8.6.8.

58:35.120 --> 58:37.120
And here, step over here.

58:37.120 --> 58:39.120
And what are you doing here tonight?

58:39.120 --> 58:42.120
I'm here to work on my communications.

58:42.120 --> 58:43.120
Awesome.

58:43.120 --> 58:45.120
And this is how many years of scouting for you?

58:46.120 --> 58:49.120
This is my seventh year including Cub Scouts.

58:49.120 --> 58:50.120
That's fantastic.

58:50.120 --> 58:53.120
So would you like to adjourn our meeting tonight?

58:53.120 --> 58:54.120
Yes.

58:54.120 --> 58:55.120
Okay.

58:55.120 --> 59:01.120
So when you hear me say, when you hear them all say, are you bang that down and that closes our meeting?

59:01.120 --> 59:02.120
Okay.

59:02.120 --> 59:04.120
Thanks for being a scout and then investing in your community.

59:04.120 --> 59:09.120
And if you go for your Eagle, I hope that you pick a cool project for the city of Port Washington.

59:09.120 --> 59:10.120
Okay.

59:10.120 --> 59:12.120
This is my truth.

59:12.120 --> 59:13.120
All right.

59:13.120 --> 59:14.120
So with that, is there a motion to adjourn?

59:14.120 --> 59:15.120
So moved.

59:15.120 --> 59:16.120
There's a motion and a second.

59:16.120 --> 59:18.120
Are there any questions or concerns on that motion?

59:18.120 --> 59:21.120
If anybody questions this one, it's a problem.

59:21.120 --> 59:22.120
All right.

59:22.120 --> 59:25.120
All in favor signify by saying aye.

59:25.120 --> 59:26.120
Opposed?

59:26.120 --> 59:29.120
This meeting is adjourned.

59:29.120 --> 59:30.120
Go Pirates.

