[four warm brass tones] - Chriss Scherer: The SBE at PBS TechCon, April 6, 2019. Launching ATSC 3.0 Next-Gen Broadcasts: A Tutorial. § § The SBE and PBS TechCon 2019 was made possible through financial support from Acrodyne Services, Comark Communications, Dielectric, Enensys, Gates Air, Technical Broadcast Solutions, Triveni Digital. § § [strong, confident synthesizer instrumental] [motivational music] § § - Fred Baumgartner, SBE: So, the platform section of this is really kind of the curious part. And Winston is going to talk about-- and his group-- the station of the future. And, obviously, it's a lot more than linear video. Those little guys off in the corner who have been doing digital start to take over the station and the natural flow of technology, etc. Now, we're going to talk about the central portion of the system, which is the scheduler. And that's the hard part to get your head around here is that it's just not an exciter that's a dumb thing and the video goes in and goes out. But the scheduler's the part that makes all the decisions. Make yourself at home, guy! Now, I have to apologize. We have a really bright guy who does nothing but schedulers, and he was going to moderate this session, but he's over with their portable transmitter at the moment, trying to make it go. So, out of 35 speakers, I've lost exactly one. And I'm going to try and fill in here and I know just enough about schedulers to be terrified. [chuckling] That's really about the way it goes. And so, I am literally gonna throw the microphone over to these guys, and we'll give it 45 minutes. Our goal here is to give you a feel for what this looks like, see what the user interface is, the decision points, and you'll see how this ties in to what Luke was talking about this morning, and what Madeline was talking about, and all the pieces that go into making ATSC 3.0 go. [engineers cheer and applaud] - Richard Lhermitte, Enensys: So, before going to the gateway, I start to make first introduction of what is a gateway, where you can find the gateway in the delivery process, This is also a summary of what you have seen this morning, especially by Luke and by Merrill. So, I try to summarize just to give you the key feature you will have in the gateway. So, a short diagram about the architecture, what is PLP, protocol structure, signaling. So, short diagram about what is the architecture, what is PLP, protocol scanning, signaling. I will try to do everything in about 10, 15 minutes. So, where is the broadcast gateway? When we say there is a broadcast gateway in the delivery process, where is it? So, in fact, it's- What-- especially when you have everything right close to the encoder. So, you have the generic studio side, and at the end, you arrive on classical encoding process, multiplexing, and so on. So, the broadcast gateway is here, close to the encoding at the studio side. And, you will see that it is the last point and the last project you will have before going to the transmitter. If you look at this general picture, it's a lot of blocks, but just to let you know that their broadcast gateway is really here. And this is the last product and the last feature you will have before going to the STL link. It take the content from all the different kind of services: from live services, emergency alert, the ESG, the interactive application. All service and content you will need to broadcast over the air will go at the end through the broadcast gateway, and all the last packaging, encapsulation, and so on we will explain later, is going through this broadcast gateway. Sometimes you heard about the word which is scheduler. We can say to be summarized that scheduler includes the broadcast gateway because inside the broadcast gateway, you have scheduling mechanisms to schedule the different content in different pipe and so and so. Sometimes you heard about the scheduler, sometimes you heard about the broadcast gateway, but let's say that they're same. So, this slide was also presented this morning by Luke, and just to say that these are all the difference between ATSC 1 and ATSC 3 on the modulations part. A key point for ATSC 3 is that you have a lot of possibilities regarding the modulation scheme, and typically, if you want to have a robust signal, or a very large coverage. So, it's always trade-off between: if you want more bandwidth, less bandwidth, more robustness, more coverage. So, anyway... So, you have a lot of parameters and all of these are prepared by the broadcast gateway. So, the broadcast gateway will make all the encapsulation and process to be able for the exciter to deliver the content. Especially when you are making SFN, but I will not explain that. And the concept in ATSC 3 which has been developed is what we call physical layer pipe. It means that you-- I will describe later, but there is this mechanism to be able to encapsulate the content. In ATSC 1, we have 6-Megahertz channel and we have one transport stream inside this 6-Megahertz channel. Inside this transport stream, you will have different content, but let's say you have one modulation, which is the same and one transport stream, which is-- which has, likely, some characteristic in term of error/ 6-Megahertz channel. So, the concept of physical layer pipe is to say, in each 6-Megahertz channel, I can divide my 6-Megahertz channel by different pipe, and put some different characteristic of fills of this different pipe. Typically, an example is my 6-Megahertz, I will divide it, let's say four pipe, which will have different modulation parameters, which allowed to have different robustness, different coverage, different bit rate, and then, I will decide which content I will put on which pipe. And this is the goal of the Gateway: to fill the pipe with the correct content. So, the classical example, I have UHD service with a pipe, and I will give it lots of bandwidth, but less coverage, typically, to cover, I don't know, very dense area. And at the opposite way, my non-realtime data services that I want to push to every kind of device, including cars, I would like to have very large coverage for this service so I will change the modulation parameters on this pipe, and I will cover that. So, it's-- it's very useful tools to be able to address different kind of receiver inside with have 6-Megahertz channel so you can target different kind of reception, different kind of coverage in one 6-Megahertz channel. Another big important things to think about in ATSC 3 is what we call signaling. I summarized very basically this is signaling. You have two tables in ATSC 3, which is the SLT, and the SLS. To make a very basic comparison with ATSC 1, SLT gives you a list of services you have in your network. It's equal mostly to the PAT table you have in ATSC 1. It gives a list of the service, and then, the SLS is similar to the PMT table. For each service, you know how many components you have, what are the resolution, what does the description of this component. You also have the service, the name of the service, and so on. So, let's say this two table, which out I've already summarized it, but it's very important because it gives you, in yours your ATSC signal, the list of services, and description of all of these services. So, the SLT is sent, and then, you have as many SLS as you have services, like PAT and PMT table. And if you come back to my previous slide, or getting PLP, you will have to decide where I will put this table in my different PLPs. So, it's also made at the broadcast gateway level. I will not go through that, but it's a description of this table. The SLT and these different SLS. And, if I look at from our example, four different PLPs, which contain one service, two service, three service, four, or five services, in four different PLPs, as an example. I have to decide where I will put my tables. In this example, I choose to put the SLS which is equal to the PAT on this PLP and on this PLP. Perhaps because this is the most robust PLP, and I'm sure that everybody, every receiver, will receive it. So, I will put for example my list of service in this PLP, and then, the SLS link to the service, and then spread around the others' PLP. So, that's one example you could imagine to deliver this table in all the different PLP. And this decision is made by you inside the broadcast gateway configuration. This is also, let's say, encapsulation process, which are made at the broadcast gateway level. You have the content coming from different encoders, root servers, and so on, and you need to encapsulate everything in ALP and BB frame, and so on, to deliver the signaling and so on. Everything is done in the gateway. And at the end here, you have lot of streams, a lot of IP streams, but at the end, you need to deliver everything to the transmitter. So, there is encapsulation-- and Merrill explained it this morning-- which is called STLTP, which take all this content, make a tunneling, and deliver everything to the transmitter to have only one IP multicast address, which is at the output of the gateway, which contain all the content. This is what you have here. You have the STL, but at the end, you have only one multicast address going to the transmitter. And typically, inside is channeling STLTP protocol, you have all this different type information, all the different IP multicast, ESG, and so on. So, you have this information inside this channeling so we can say that STLTP is IP inside IP because it's an IP stream which contain IP packets. More than that, you have also some timing information, typically for SFN, to be sure that all transmitter will deliver the same content at the same time. So, there are some timing information and there are some preamble data to configure that transmitters, and so on. So, this is the goal of the Gateway to generate this STLTP, which goes through the STL and up to the transmitter. As a conclusion, if you want, there are there are some technical poster over there which describe all of this so don't hesitate to pick one. So, all these different steps will be described now by this guy, which will allow-- show you the different gateway, how to allocate PLP, is how to put tables in these PLPs, how to generate the STLTP, and so on. [applause] - Sang Jin Yoon, DigiCAP: I'm Sang Jin Yoon with DigiCAP. Nice to meet you all! So, for us, Richard explained all the concepts and, yeah, you know, technical specs so we're going to show you how we get down and dirty. We actually create the PLPs. So, we're going to talk a little bit, show you about the ATSC 3.0 frames, but I think you've already seen the pictures. And that transmission capacity. How do we calculate that? And also, the example of setting that we did in Korea during the Paralympic Games, and also show you the UI settings. The settings UI of the scheduler, with the example of 8 fixed channels and 1 mobile channel. So, I think you've all seen this picture in the morning, as well. It's a picture of the bootstrap and the whole frame. And the concept here, what's important concept here is the subframe and within the-- within each subframe, you could have multiple PLPs. So, there are about two ways you can create multiple PLPs. And one is to have more than two PLPs within a subframe, or you could also create one PLP per subframe, and create multiple subframes. And, we'll show you the differences of those two, and, for example, that we're going to show you is: you're creating multiple PLPs by way of creation of multiple subframes so the reason we show you that is creating the subframe, you also get to set the robustness of the signals that you transmit-- not just the data rate. So, this is a very simplistic view of how you calculate the data rate that you're going to get as TOV (Threshold Of Visibility.) So, that's a code rate or modulation order. That's pretty much what you set at the PLP-level. And also, what determines the data rate is a guard table and pilot pattern. And that's more to do with the robustness of the signal that you transmit. And this is the example that we did in Korea during the PyeongChang Olympic. And, you can see, you can see we created two subframes: one 1080p for mobile, and one 4K for the fixed device. And these are the settings that we did. Preamble: same setting and then for the subframe, we had a different FFT mode. For the mobile service, 1080p, it's 8K, and the subframe 1 for the fixed is 32K. So, we would have a different data rate for the fixed and mobile services, and also different signals with the robustness. So, we're going to show you the example of creating a scheduler configuration for 1 HD for mobile and one 8 HD services for fixed. So, we're going to consider having a mobile media 720p HD. That's about 2 Megabyte-- Megabits per second data rate, and also 7/8 720p HD for fixed. So, total we are going to have about 19.6 Megabits/second and the frame setting, the frame time at 250 milliseconds. That's the settings screen. We already preset the configurations here for the save time. And the white spaces here are the changes that we made for this particular service. So, this is a preamble parameter FFT set at 8K, and that you can see that we created two subframes. And the one subframe, one PLP per subframe, and there will be several inputs that you can put in for the fixed services. Okay, this-- each input to a PLP is a stream: one HD, second HD, third HD, and this is going to the mobile. So here, you can set the characteristics-- of the characteristic of each subframe so subframe number 1 as FFT, 8K, guarded table, G8-- I can't quite read- [laughs] Thank you! And also, here is what he said for the PLPs that belong to each subframe, and also, destination IPs for the inputs. So, with that, I'm going to conclude this simple demo, and hand it over to Enensys. [applause] - Thank you. - Floch Jérôme, Enensys: Alright, so let's conclude this presentation by having a look on what tendencies can provide in term of scheduler. So, I'm just, at first, going to sum up what we have presented this morning with Merrill and Luke, the physical layer part. Too, remains that, in fact, for ATSC 3.0, the scheduler is definitely the commander element of the ATSC 3.0 infrastructure. As this project manage or the services you want to deliver to your users. I'm talking about linear services, near-realtime services. The scheduler also manages all ATSC 3.0 signaling to enable a perfect decoding on the receiver part. The scheduler of build the physical layer, okay? And this physical layer will be applied by the exciters in the field, okay? So, point is that the scheduler, of course, broadcast all this content coming in route or in MMTP streams to an STLTP streams. So, a new level of encapsulations. And finally, the scheduler is a heart of the network, as it pilots exciters, in terms of configuration and also in terms of synchronization, to ensure the SFN. Okay, so, if we have a look on the key features and all the processing that has to be done by the gateway. There are many, many things to manage and many, many things to set up. So, let me tell you that in some cases could be a nightmare. [laughs] But don't worry! We are here to help you. [laughs] I'm going to present the workflow for my product. I hope that your Internet connection will work, Fred. [laughs] We will see. So, beginning at gateway, the product has to be configured in three steps. At first, you have to select the services you want to broadcast into your network. This is the first part, and to have a look and check on the SLT table, which will be used by the receiver to perfectly decode the services. This is the first step. Second step is to build the physical frame. I mean, your channel, your subframe, your PLP. One PLP will enable you to define a level of data rate of robustness for one or several services. Okay? The last step is to configure the output, so the encoding of your distribution networks. You will have to set up one or several STLTP streams output with a different level of FEC to ensure the robustness of the transmission. Do you feel confident? Great! Okay, so now it's time for the demo. I'm going to connect to Amazon Web Services, where my broadcast gateway is running. Okay, so this is SmartGate from Enensys. At first, you are connected to the dashboard of the product. It means when the product is running, it shows you all the [inaudible] and the streams delivered by the product. So here, in my configuration, I have one STL output. Okay? That is carrying two PLP. PLP 0 with this constellation, PLP 1 with another constellation, and five services, which are linear services, are commonly broadcast into this ATSC transmission. For example, here PLP 0: In green, I have the payload of the PLP. In yellow, I have the padding. So, it mean that my PLP in not completely used, and if I want, I can integrate new services to deliver in this PLP. Okay? So, I can show this PLP and I can see that this PLP is currently broadcasting content from NexStar TV and W-R-A-L. This is just a demo, not realistic case. But you can have look in realtime of what happened on your networks. So, in terms of configuration, here I have my three steps. At first, the service management. So, the SmartGate will automatically scan an input of the route and MMTP stream to help you to select which service you want to broadcast. So, here, everything is checked. And I can have a look on the SLT table. So, to verify the signaling information that must be fully validated to be sure that on the receiver that the service will be free decoded. So, this is a first step. Second step, the physical frame. Okay. So, I am not going into detail, but here you have to set up your channel information, your subframe information, and your PLP. So, here, I have only one subframe and two PLP. Okay, but if I want I can add another subframe, another PLP. Okay, so it's very flexible. And if I have a look on PLP 1, I can see that in my configuration, I have selected these three services into PLP 1 with this modulation, this code rate for the robustness, and this mode of FEC interleaving of cells. Last step is the output. So, there is only one STL output that is configured with some FEC to be sure that all the packets will be fully transmitted to all the exciter path. Okay. So, STL is flexible. You can either add several STL outputs, if you have many distribution networks: microwave, optical fiber, and so on... So, it's time to finish, I think. I hope that it's now clear for you what is a scheduler for your network. There are many possibilities. [applause] - Fred Baumgartner: Are there questions? Really, this is, like, scariest part of this whole system. [laughter] - Engineer: How do you get the bit rate information? - How do you get the bit rate information? - Is there a sampler? - So, bit rate, no, no. So, the bit rate here are internal calculations. We directly calculate into SmartGate. So, this here is bit rate in output into the STL tunneling. So, we calculate these metrics per service and per PLP. - Richard: If a service is delivered over IP multicast, the gateway receives this multicast and knows its IP bit rate and compute this IP bit rate including also all the overhead, but it's mostly coming from the router and the MMTP server and the IP multicast. And each service has its own bit--[inaudible comment] - Yeah, because on the network with either bit rate arriving, either packet arriving, and then, it knows the IP bit rate incoming on the gateway. - How do you know what bit rate the encoder packager has to put out? I mean, is-- Does it tell you somewhere what the capacity of the PLP is? - It's a good question. I mean, for now, you define your PLPs with the maximum bit rate you can fill, and, the other way, you define the encoders, you define the bit rate you want per service. But there is, for now, no link between each other. You can imagine to have encoding which providing too many data, then you have overflow in your PLP. So, for today, it's completely independent. You have to set up your encoding system with different bit rate per service, you have to define your PLP which give you maximum bit rate, and you mostly cross your finger that you will never have a overflow. [laughter] This is for today, but we are working with the encoder manufacturer to avoid that, to be able to from this broadcast gateway to have a feedback to the encoder to ensure that if there are too many data, the encoder will decrease a little bit the bit rate, but also, on the opposite side, if you have enough data, then why not increase a little bit the bit rate? So, to be able to have 99.9% of capacity that is used. So, this protocol is under definition between us and the different encoder manufacturer. - So, it sounds like what you're saying is, right now, you don't have the equivalent of statistical multiplexing. That you do not have feedback enabled for-- - Yeah, exactly, so-- - My question about that is: is that feedback going to be across the entire scheduler or on an individual PLP-basis? - Per PLP. - It's per PLP? - Yeah. - So, for each PLP that I set up, that is its own statmux with feedback to a group of encoders? It's not across multiple PLPs? - And, you can imagine, to have two different statmux pool from two different encoder manufacturer and to address two different PLPs, and have this protocol. - On the subject of the subframes, are there advantages, tradeoffs for assigning multiple PLPs to a single subframe versus a single PLP to a single subframe? - Richard Lhermitte, Enensys: That's a very technical question. It's mostly... The idea of subframe is mostly if you want to address two different kind of reception, mostly mobile reception versus fixed reception. So, if the target device you would like to address, of course, mostly the same, there is no real advantage to separating in different subframe. But if you need different EFT, for example, then you need two different subframe: one must be for fixed and one for mobile. So, it's mostly the receiver you target. Otherwise, there is no specific advantage or disadvantage. It's mostly linked to the reception you want to have. - Fred: Are you good? Oh, one more. - Broadcast Engineer: Hi, could you describe a situation where you installed your system and could you describe how it changed how they did their business and what efficiencies or benefits resulted? - For now, just to give you an idea-- So, we were speaking previously about the Olympic games so these broadcast gateways use on the three main broadcaster in South Korea, typically. And they are using-- they are making SFN or so, they are using these gateways to make the PLP allocation and the SFN. These gateways also used in all the different trial in the US. Quite everywhere you find the gateway. Probably, to answer to your question. The main issue we had mostly setting up these gateway was the timing information-- Because you need to have very precise timing from the studio side, let's say, to the transmitter. So, this is the first issue we had: to ensure the timing during the complete delivery chain. The second issue was the STL: to ensure that there was not too many, let's say, jitter or lose of packet inside the STL because if-- especially in SFN. In SFN, each transmitter has to receive exactly the same content, exactly. So, in one STL link, there is missing of one IP packet, the SFN is broken. So, it's very important to ensure you have a reliable STL link and it's also why, in the standard config, we have included the Forward Error Correction over the STL to be able to cover such kind of issue. If you have one lose of packet, you can recover this IP packet thanks to the FEC. So, it was mainly the two main issue we had during the broadcast gateway, so... The other issue, more classical, which were the interoperability between the gateway, the exciter, and the receiver because everything is a link, but now, it's solved. - I have a question. I see two tabs there: One is Scheduler, the other is SmartGate. What's the difference between those two? [laughs] - The Scheduler is from DigiCAP and the SmartGate is our product. But it's mostly what I said at the beginning. Scheduler, broadcast gateway are mostly same. - Right, no. I have seen your brochure says, "Enensys Scheduler" and now I see SmartGate. - Yes. - What is the difference between those two? - Okay, so... um... - Answer that one! [light laughter] - So, we-- for people who know Enensys, we're working on DVB and especially on DVB-2 since many years, and when South Korea decided to launch ATSC 3.0, to be ready for this, we decided to use the hardware platform we had for DVB-2, and we implemented ATSC 3.0 broadcast gateway in this hardware version. This is the ATSC Scheduler. Now, we are in the process to have everything utilized, and you saw this here on the Amazon website, and the name of the broadcast gateway is [inaudible] SmartGate. So, the ATSC scheduler is the product which has been deployed in South Korea, more than, let's say, one year and a half now. And we are deploying in US mostly the software version. - Floch Jérôme, Enensys: Just to make an ad of what Richard said, SmartGate [will also bring new features that [inaudible] is many dedicated from South Korea market will not, especially on the STLTP security, especially on other advanced key features, like the emergency. So, that's why is that for the USA, the key broadcast gateway for broadcast sales will be SmartGate. - Richard: Just to avoid any confusion: So, this is a software platform so we can run on Amazon, but you can also run it on a classical server. It's up to you. You can choose it, so... you can have your appliance running in your office. - Fred Baumgartner: I'm gonna say thank you and go to the next one. - Thank you. [applause] [four warm brass tones]