1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:23,600
The

2
00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:28,520
cost of attending University of Wisconsin Schools is going up in the fall.

3
00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:34,740
This month the UW Board of Regents approved a 2% tuition hike for in-state undergraduate

4
00:00:34,740 --> 00:00:39,860
students plus roughly commesurate increases in fees and room and board.

5
00:00:39,860 --> 00:00:48,700
That will put UW Madison at $12,416 on the high end and UW Parkside at $8,851 at the

6
00:00:48,700 --> 00:00:50,280
lowest price point.

7
00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:54,820
It's the fourth tuition increase in a row after a 10-year freeze.

8
00:00:54,820 --> 00:00:59,720
In the midst of increasing cost pressures on families, how reasonable is the tuition

9
00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:00,720
hike?

10
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:07,020
We're joined by Professor in the UW Madison Department of Education Policy, Taylor O'Dell, and thanks

11
00:01:07,020 --> 00:01:08,020
for being here.

12
00:01:08,020 --> 00:01:09,020
Thanks for having me.

13
00:01:09,020 --> 00:01:15,020
So a 2% tuition hike on paper seems really modest, but at a time as we said when people

14
00:01:15,020 --> 00:01:20,780
question the value of a college degree, does it turn some people away?

15
00:01:20,780 --> 00:01:25,180
I think it's very important to acknowledge that a 2% increase is very real money for

16
00:01:25,180 --> 00:01:26,740
students and families.

17
00:01:26,740 --> 00:01:31,580
I think at the same time we also have to acknowledge that costs are going up for all of us, including

18
00:01:31,580 --> 00:01:35,820
organizations and businesses like the Universities of Wisconsin.

19
00:01:35,820 --> 00:01:41,420
2% is relatively modest and predictable and below the rate of inflation right now.

20
00:01:41,420 --> 00:01:45,380
It doesn't mean it doesn't have important conversations about dollars and cents at the

21
00:01:45,380 --> 00:01:49,100
end of the day, but what students and families should really care about is the net price

22
00:01:49,100 --> 00:01:50,100
of college.

23
00:01:50,100 --> 00:01:54,220
So when you quote that $12,000 or that $8,000, that's what we call the sticker price, what

24
00:01:54,220 --> 00:01:58,620
you see on the website, but from that we know people get grants and scholarships and that

25
00:01:58,620 --> 00:02:02,100
pulls it down to what we call the net price, the check that you have to write at the end

26
00:02:02,100 --> 00:02:04,220
of the day to be able to enroll.

27
00:02:04,220 --> 00:02:08,940
And that number has actually been relatively flat over the last several years because UW

28
00:02:08,940 --> 00:02:13,740
is taking money from these tuition increases and putting it back into financial aid.

29
00:02:13,740 --> 00:02:21,940
It's a 30% decline in highest paying international students and volatile federal research funding.

30
00:02:21,940 --> 00:02:27,300
What is a university to do except use that tuition lever?

31
00:02:27,300 --> 00:02:29,100
That's a great question.

32
00:02:29,100 --> 00:02:33,980
UW, the Universities of Wisconsin have three primary revenue sources, right?

33
00:02:33,980 --> 00:02:38,460
Federal grants, which we are among the top in the nation at securing, we enroll students

34
00:02:38,460 --> 00:02:42,420
who pay tuition and fees and we receive funding from the state.

35
00:02:42,420 --> 00:02:47,140
State support has long stagnated with the exception of a recent increase.

36
00:02:47,140 --> 00:02:51,780
And so tuition dollars are a primary way of raising funds.

37
00:02:51,780 --> 00:02:56,140
With a tuition freeze for many, many years, our ability to do that was hamstrung.

38
00:02:56,140 --> 00:02:59,140
And so it quite literally strangled some of the campuses.

39
00:02:59,140 --> 00:03:03,060
We benefit from having international students and even students from out of state who pay

40
00:03:03,060 --> 00:03:05,500
higher tuition rates because they can afford it.

41
00:03:05,500 --> 00:03:08,180
They are mobile geographic for colleges.

42
00:03:08,180 --> 00:03:11,820
With a decline in international student enrollment, there aren't many other students that we

43
00:03:11,820 --> 00:03:15,820
can look to except for our in-state students, especially now because the state has begun

44
00:03:15,820 --> 00:03:20,700
to increasingly regulate our ability to even draw students from Minnesota and Iowa and

45
00:03:20,700 --> 00:03:22,420
other out-of-state partners.

46
00:03:22,420 --> 00:03:28,100
So how kind of in jeopardy are the finances of the Universities of Wisconsin given all

47
00:03:28,100 --> 00:03:29,100
of these factors?

48
00:03:29,100 --> 00:03:31,660
It's in a very serious position, right?

49
00:03:31,660 --> 00:03:35,300
We've already seen campus closures of many regional campuses.

50
00:03:35,300 --> 00:03:36,980
We've seen cuts to academic programs.

51
00:03:36,980 --> 00:03:40,140
We've seen staff and faculty restructurings.

52
00:03:40,140 --> 00:03:43,260
And so no one wants to raise prices.

53
00:03:43,260 --> 00:03:46,100
If you're a business owner, you don't want to walk out and show your customers raising

54
00:03:46,100 --> 00:03:47,100
prices.

55
00:03:47,100 --> 00:03:48,860
The University doesn't want to do that either.

56
00:03:48,860 --> 00:03:53,300
We want more people to access and have access to a college education, like you said, for

57
00:03:53,300 --> 00:03:55,900
upper social and economic mobility.

58
00:03:55,900 --> 00:04:00,620
But when the state is no longer a primary funding partner, federal research and grants

59
00:04:00,620 --> 00:04:05,860
landscape is certainly uncertain, tuition is one of the only livers left.

60
00:04:05,860 --> 00:04:10,940
So some Republican state policy makers are super angry about this tuition increase saying

61
00:04:10,940 --> 00:04:17,860
it's the fourth in the row after a state budget gave the system $256 million.

62
00:04:17,860 --> 00:04:19,380
What about that persuasion?

63
00:04:19,380 --> 00:04:20,620
Yeah.

64
00:04:20,620 --> 00:04:25,620
I think the average Wisconsinite should also be super angry about that characterization.

65
00:04:25,620 --> 00:04:30,540
So $256 million is a big number and it's a very important investment.

66
00:04:30,540 --> 00:04:32,180
It's however a biennial increase.

67
00:04:32,180 --> 00:04:35,940
So we have to divide that by two because it's going to be the 120 something million

68
00:04:35,940 --> 00:04:36,940
every year.

69
00:04:36,940 --> 00:04:40,300
And just to put that in context, the university leverages.

70
00:04:40,300 --> 00:04:45,980
It's the state's largest public employer and its operating budget is around $7 billion.

71
00:04:45,980 --> 00:04:49,900
And so that increase is less than almost one and a half percent.

72
00:04:49,900 --> 00:04:55,020
So substantially below inflation and more importantly, that $256 million came with a

73
00:04:55,020 --> 00:04:57,740
lot of important caveats.

74
00:04:57,740 --> 00:05:04,980
It's importantly an unfunded salary raise for faculty and staff across the institution.

75
00:05:04,980 --> 00:05:10,300
So no other piece of state government has unfunded mandates in that same way.

76
00:05:10,300 --> 00:05:15,460
So we're required to raise salaries by 2% for all faculty and staff, but the state didn't

77
00:05:15,460 --> 00:05:17,620
put in the money to fully fund that raise.

78
00:05:17,620 --> 00:05:22,260
And so the Regents have said that the tuition increase will predominantly fund faculty

79
00:05:22,260 --> 00:05:24,140
and staff salary increases mandated.

80
00:05:24,220 --> 00:05:30,500
Well, that's another piece that some policymakers are unhappy about because they say the number

81
00:05:30,500 --> 00:05:36,700
of staff has gone up, whereas the number of students has not.

82
00:05:36,700 --> 00:05:41,500
So many people when they think about staff increases on cross campus, we use this federal

83
00:05:41,500 --> 00:05:44,660
survey where we report people in these huge buckets.

84
00:05:44,660 --> 00:05:45,660
Do they teach?

85
00:05:45,660 --> 00:05:46,660
Do they work?

86
00:05:46,660 --> 00:05:48,460
Are they administrative in different ways?

87
00:05:48,460 --> 00:05:51,740
It doesn't capture the granularity of what those staff are actually doing.

88
00:05:51,820 --> 00:05:57,620
So if we hire more students to provide career exploration or oversee internships for students

89
00:05:57,620 --> 00:06:01,540
or help them get placements with employers, those are staff members and those are very

90
00:06:01,540 --> 00:06:02,540
valuable staff members.

91
00:06:02,540 --> 00:06:05,020
I'd be happy to double or triple those numbers.

92
00:06:05,020 --> 00:06:07,540
And so it's a really nuanced conversation, right?

93
00:06:07,540 --> 00:06:09,220
Are there efficiencies to be had?

94
00:06:09,220 --> 00:06:10,220
Of course.

95
00:06:10,220 --> 00:06:14,220
But we need to have better data and a more frank conversation around what staff are

96
00:06:14,220 --> 00:06:15,220
actually increasing.

97
00:06:15,220 --> 00:06:16,220
All right.

98
00:06:16,220 --> 00:06:17,220
Well, we leave it there.

99
00:06:17,220 --> 00:06:18,220
Taylor Oedle.

100
00:06:18,220 --> 00:06:19,220
Thanks very much.

101
00:06:19,220 --> 00:06:20,220
Thanks.

102
00:06:20,220 --> 00:06:30,540
And I'll see you next time.

