1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,520
assaulted and someone being killed and doesn't get much attention and that

2
00:00:05,520 --> 00:00:13,520
just is it is where it is but yeah seems out of work sometimes yes no I hear

3
00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:16,040
what you're saying

4
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:35,760
La Crosse County Attorney Tim Grinky joins us now and thanks very much for being here

5
00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:41,120
no problem so why did you seek this resolution with Ridgeland farms

6
00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:50,480
well the conclusion I came to was that I could charge one of the types of things that I was

7
00:00:50,480 --> 00:00:57,040
referred to by the judge in Dane County and I was going to charge that but charging that would

8
00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:01,840
only have started a process that probably would have taken six months to year to get the trial

9
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:06,400
there were some issues that could have been appealed so charging it would have just been the start

10
00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:14,400
of a process when the farm offered to close down in exchange of charging I thought that was a

11
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:18,400
good outcome because even if I had charged and convicted them I still had no authority to

12
00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:23,120
pose them down and the fines that they had been charged with as well they could have just paid

13
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:29,200
and kept on running so I thought them ending the business is what most people wanted

14
00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:33,760
and it's more than I could do by charging and it would happen much quicker than me charging

15
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:38,880
so I thought that was a good resolution to have them agree to end their business in exchange for

16
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:45,360
not charging a crime so the resolution effectively closes down the operation because I thought that

17
00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:50,960
under the deal they'd still be able to maintain their own research on remaining animals

18
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:57,120
correct there's two parts of the business the part where they do their own research I was never

19
00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:03,600
part of I had no authority over them the judge didn't involve that in the appointment of my

20
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,400
special prosecution so that was an issue I had no controller from the start so whether they

21
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:14,000
continue on or don't is up to them and I had no control over it the only control I had was on

22
00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:19,680
the breeding part which is the part they agreed to shut down and that's as far as my authority

23
00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:26,480
could take me do you have any idea how many dogs are still at Richland Farms and and Wood

24
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:33,200
Wisconsin statutes render Richland immune from any future prosecution based on what they're

25
00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:39,840
doing they're being researched well the first question I don't know how many dogs are there

26
00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:46,640
currently I'm not keeping up to date with them on a daily basis I'm relying on the state agencies

27
00:02:46,640 --> 00:02:52,400
to confirm at some point before July 1st that they're uh surrounding their license and they're

28
00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:56,000
out of their business so if they did anything after that they'd be doing it without a license and

29
00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:03,360
could be prosecuted um the federal law and the state law exempt research facilities and research

30
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:10,160
on animals from the animal cruelty law so if they are doing research on dogs under the federal

31
00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:16,800
grant of authority under the USDA uh the state statutes exempt that from prosecution so that's why

32
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:21,280
I never had any authority over them and wouldn't in the future if they continued testing on animals

33
00:03:21,920 --> 00:03:27,680
it did this week's sale and release of 1500 of the Beagles there come as a surprise to you

34
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:38,880
no uh when we negotiated this last fall the idea always was that they would be closing down and as

35
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:44,080
that process went on they would be uh getting rid of their Beagles by selling them off or if

36
00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:49,680
they couldn't sell them putting them up for adoption and they had kind of estimated a time range and

37
00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:54,160
this was kind of the end of that time range that they thought they would be doing that we picked

38
00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:58,480
July 1st just so they wouldn't be able to delay and I need to kind of renegotiate things but we

39
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:04,160
always I was always told that about April or May they would be hopefully winding down and getting

40
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:08,720
rid of all their dogs so it it wasn't a surprise to me that this is how they did it that was always

41
00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:14,400
their intent getting back to the specifics of your investigation you did find that you could

42
00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:20,640
support charging on one procedure conducted on these Beagles uh can you describe what that was

43
00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:27,840
it's called a cherry eye procedure it's basically uh an eye gland that is

44
00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:35,040
swollen or prolapse that has to be removed if you were doing it with a patch it would be an

45
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:41,520
expensive procedure and you'd want to have a licensed veterinarian doing it they were doing it

46
00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:46,560
the way they'd been doing it in decades past which is kind of outdated which was removing the gland

47
00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:53,120
without general anesthesia and without having a licensed veterinarian do it so when the veterinary

48
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:58,480
board decided that they would revoke the main veterinarian's license because it didn't meet their

49
00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:03,920
standard of care that's what I thought if they're violating that standard of care that allows me

50
00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:09,280
to charge the case honestly if they had found that it did not fall below the veterinary standards

51
00:05:09,280 --> 00:05:14,800
I'm not sure I would have had a legal authority to go forward um but basically they were performing

52
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:21,920
a surgery without proper veterinary methods required by the state of Wisconsin what one thing that

53
00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:28,000
you talked about in your charging decision was the prospect of euthanasia of the Beagles why did you

54
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:35,840
consider that the I'm sorry the prospect of euthanasia yeah or euthanasia

55
00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:45,360
being familiar with a lot of farmers growing up and farmers in lacrosse area that I

56
00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:52,800
talk to you know and they have animals that are injured or need some help they have the right to

57
00:05:52,800 --> 00:06:00,000
euthanize them as long as it's done humanely um and if you had a dairy farm or a pig farm

58
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:06,160
where an animal had some injuries if it costs more than the cost that animal is to you most farmers

59
00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:13,360
would would put it down and so in this case if the original farms are required to go to such an

60
00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:20,400
extent to uh you know surgery on the dogs they could just euthanize them um and so that was a

61
00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:25,760
factor of my charging decision that it's it's not a place that was breeding dogs for sale for pets

62
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:31,520
it's a farm like a turkey farm or a pig farm where you bring them for food or for in this case

63
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:36,240
testing so it's not looked at the same under the veterinary standards or under the law

64
00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:40,720
and so that just reality of the economics of farms that are doing business

65
00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:50,720
as a DA who prosecutes homicides and uh you're currently in the midst of a of a homicide uh case

66
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:58,000
still did it pull on your heartstrings to pour over evidence in this case especially as we know

67
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:03,360
that you are a beagle owner and a fan of beagles actually have a painting of one in your office

68
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:12,800
yes i uh like most people like dogs and like beagles are some in my opinion some of the cuter dogs

69
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:19,760
um it's heartbreaking to see them in cages and heartbreaking to see them um you know not being

70
00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:27,600
socialized properly not being able to run free and do what dogs do um but the law allows for this

71
00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:33,760
behavior on a farm um you know i've been to farms before with friends of mine that grew up on farms

72
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:39,600
and the way the cows were treated i didn't like but you know when you've got a hundred two hundred

73
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:45,600
cattle or cows they're not gonna be treated the same as a pet um and saying goes for other types

74
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:51,440
of animals so if you don't think of this as your pet or think of it as raising dogs to be pets but

75
00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:57,520
think of it as a farm it's a little bit different and uh the standard are different the way they're

76
00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:04,240
gonna be treated is different and the reasons are should be obvious that they're not going to get

77
00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:09,200
pets uh they're not going to be considered pets so as long as you're following the usda regulations

78
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:13,520
and the dad cap regulations the fact that i don't like it or we don't like it doesn't mean that

79
00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:19,520
we could charge a crime so i was relying mostly on the state regulator's inspectors that are

80
00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:26,080
experts in this area and going by their advice on what they normally see on farms uh dog readers

81
00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:31,520
and uh that's why one of the reasons i came with the decision i came to about this behavior

82
00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:37,360
we leave it there d.a. tim greenkey thanks very much thank you

83
00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:46,560
good luck with your criminal case good luck to you and say hi to gary

84
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:52,880
hi well i will thank you bye

