1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
You

2
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,000
You

3
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,000
You

4
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:29,000
Here to discuss the case is a member of Sarsour's legal team.

5
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:34,000
Sam Cole, an attorney with the ACLU of Illinois, who is also a former immigration judge.

6
00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:36,000
Sam, thanks for joining us.

7
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:37,000
Thanks for having me.

8
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:42,000
You're familiar with the arguments raised by the Trump administration against Sarsour.

9
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:49,000
The Secretary of State himself said that he posed an adverse consequence to foreign policy considerations.

10
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:53,000
Were there grounds to arrest and detain him?

11
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:56,000
No, absolutely not.

12
00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:04,000
Mr. Sarsour has been an upstanding person in the United States since he came here over 30 years ago.

13
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:11,000
He is a grandfather of nine U.S. citizen kids and has had absolutely no trouble in the United States.

14
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:19,000
The only reason he was arrested was because he's an outspoken advocate for Palestinian human rights.

15
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:22,000
And that's why he's been targeted by this administration.

16
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:28,000
And that is absolutely not an appropriate and lawful reason to arrest someone.

17
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:32,000
So what were conditions like for Mr. Sarsour in jail?

18
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:34,000
They were pretty bad.

19
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,000
He lost 30 pounds during the time that he was there.

20
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:40,000
He also has a medical problem.

21
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:48,000
He's a type 2 diabetic and his doctor required that he have daily glucose, blood glucose monitoring.

22
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,000
And he was getting tested once a month.

23
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,000
So that's not great.

24
00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:55,000
And that can really pose some serious risks to his health.

25
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:59,000
Was there a chance he could have been deported?

26
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:02,000
So the case is ongoing, right?

27
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:10,000
So he has been released from detention based on our motion in front of a federal district court judge.

28
00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:19,000
So Mr. Sarsour filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus asking the federal judge to release him from the immigration detention.

29
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:24,000
And the judge hasn't ruled on that habeas petition quite yet.

30
00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:36,000
But he did grant an interim release of Mr. Sarsour while the court adjudicates the habeas petition by saying that he's made a strong showing that he might prevail in the habeas petition.

31
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,000
But that doesn't mean immigration cases over.

32
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:45,000
So Mr. Sarsour is still fighting deportation in immigration court.

33
00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:47,000
And that's ongoing.

34
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:48,000
Okay.

35
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,000
You're a former immigration judge yourself.

36
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:53,000
You've said this case is highly unusual.

37
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,000
You've never seen anything like it.

38
00:03:55,000 --> 00:04:00,000
How much of the case is outside the bounds of what you'd normally see?

39
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:06,000
I was an immigration judge in the Chicago immigration court for nine years.

40
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,000
And I handled actually a detained docket.

41
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:13,000
That's a docket of individuals who are in immigration custody.

42
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:17,000
So very similar to the situation that Mr. Sarsour was in.

43
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:21,000
And Mr. Sarsour's case is in fact in the Chicago immigration court.

44
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:26,000
And I can tell you for one, I have never seen anything like this at all.

45
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:33,000
First of all, the primary charge against them is, as you noted, that letter from Secretary

46
00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:40,000
of State Marco Rubio saying that Mr. Sarsour's really lawful activity in the United States

47
00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:44,000
poses a foreign policy risk to the United States.

48
00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:49,000
Now that is highly unusual and highly legally dubious.

49
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:55,000
But the other thing that is extraordinary about this case is although the case is assigned

50
00:04:55,000 --> 00:05:01,000
to the Chicago immigration court, the judge that was assigned to hear the case is not

51
00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:03,000
a Chicago immigration court judge.

52
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:10,000
It's actually a very senior level management judge in the executive office for immigration

53
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:11,000
review.

54
00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:15,000
It's an acting regional deputy chief immigration judge.

55
00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:20,000
It's essentially the second in command of all the judges in the entire immigration court

56
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:21,000
system.

57
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:27,000
So that case was plucked out of the immigration court judges and specifically assigned to

58
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:28,000
this one management judge.

59
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,000
I've never seen that happen.

60
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:35,000
So I gather you feel like you have a strong First Amendment case here that his rights,

61
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:37,000
your client's rights were violated.

62
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:39,000
Can you explain that?

63
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:41,000
Absolutely.

64
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:48,000
Mr. Sarsour, as a longtime permanent resident of the United States, has the same First Amendment

65
00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:55,000
rights to speak and to engage in political activity and political activism that essentially

66
00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:59,000
you and I do as citizens of the United States.

67
00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:06,000
And so what's really happening is the government is targeting him because they don't like his

68
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:07,000
speech.

69
00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:11,000
And that is highly problematic.

70
00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:19,000
It violates the Constitution, the First Amendment, and we're very concerned to see

71
00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:22,000
these charges against him by the administration.

72
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:26,000
So you mentioned this, that this case is not over.

73
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,000
You have hearings coming up.

74
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:29,000
How does this proceed?

75
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:32,000
What happens next?

76
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:40,000
So there's another hearing coming up at the end of July, July 22nd, in the immigration

77
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:45,000
court, where the government has the burden of proof in this case.

78
00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:52,000
They have to prove the charges that they have made against him.

79
00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:57,000
And aside from the charges based on the Marco Rubio determination about foreign policy,

80
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:02,000
there are some other charges that relate to things that have been decades and decades ago.

81
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:05,000
Things the government has known about for a very long time.

82
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:09,000
And we will fight these charges.

83
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:13,000
We are, he has very good defenses and we are fighting them in immigration court.

84
00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:19,000
And if we lose immigration court, we will continue our fight all the way up as far as it takes.

85
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:21,000
Because everyone knows what's going on here.

86
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,000
It's not about anything that happened decades ago.

87
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:26,000
It's about what he's doing now, his speech.

88
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,000
And that's why he's being, that's why he's being targeted.

89
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:31,000
All right.

90
00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:32,000
We'll be watching the case.

91
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,000
Sam Cole, thank you so much for joining us.

92
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:35,000
Thank you.

93
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:41,000
Yes.

94
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:08,000
It's not surprising to me that this case has gotten international attention because it is just part of a pattern by the Trump administration.

95
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:10,000
To target people they don't like, right?

96
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:17,000
They, they do what they can to target individuals who are saying things that, that they're not happy with.

97
00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:26,000
And so in terms, and for Mr. Sarsour, he's one of many Palestinian rights activists who have been targeted by the administration.

98
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:40,000
Mr. Sarsour has gotten a tremendous amount of support from his community.

99
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:43,000
He is really, he is, he is a community leader.

100
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:47,000
He's the president of his mosque, which is the largest mosque in Wisconsin.

101
00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:53,000
He is beloved by many, many people, whether they're Muslim or Jews or Christians.

102
00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:59,000
So he has a very big support network because of who he is.

103
00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:04,000
And unfortunately, it doesn't mean this because you have a large support network.

104
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:09,000
Doesn't mean that this administration isn't going to specifically go after you because of your speech.

105
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:11,000
And that's what's happening.

106
00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:24,000
Yeah, thank you.

