WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:25.080
Big money pours into Wisconsin for the midterms with a big financial edge for conservatives.

00:25.080 --> 00:29.800
Who's behind the push and what are the candidates saying about issues ranging from gas prices

00:29.800 --> 00:36.800
to corruption?

00:59.800 --> 01:05.680
You covered this group, they are pretty much brand new and already they're a huge spender.

01:05.680 --> 01:10.680
Tell us about who they are and what they're doing here.

01:10.680 --> 01:14.720
By my math they're the biggest spender so far in 2026.

01:14.720 --> 01:19.040
So who they are, they're called First Amendment LLC.

01:19.040 --> 01:26.520
It is an express advocacy group so it's not affiliated with any specific candidate, etc.

01:26.520 --> 01:32.120
or a campaign but it is obviously a conservative group because all the money they're putting

01:32.120 --> 01:37.880
into Wisconsin is going against Democrats and it's a lot of money too.

01:37.880 --> 01:43.040
We're talking about this group was created last week and on the same day it reported

01:43.040 --> 01:52.400
spending around $13 million and that's divided up by $9 million going against David Crowley

01:52.400 --> 01:58.880
in the race for governor and the remaining $3.4 million or so going into key assembly

01:58.880 --> 02:06.160
and senate races as Republicans and Democrats for control of the state legislature and this

02:06.160 --> 02:11.440
money we don't know much about what it's going to be used for but in the filing it said it

02:11.440 --> 02:19.240
will be for direct mail, campaign literature, phone calls, digital ads, that sort of thing.

02:19.240 --> 02:24.760
It's hard to tell where the money's coming from, who this group is, it appears to be

02:24.760 --> 02:31.440
affiliated with a different Virginia based PAC called Make Liberty Win and Fox News did

02:31.440 --> 02:39.400
an article not long ago about a tech investor essentially putting $40 million into Make Liberty

02:39.400 --> 02:40.400
Win.

02:40.400 --> 02:45.680
I wasn't able to see in the federal campaign finance reports whether that money was transferred

02:45.680 --> 02:50.080
over but it appears that this new group is flush with cash.

02:50.080 --> 02:54.320
Okay and so this comes into an environment where we already knew who some of the big

02:54.320 --> 02:59.960
donors were in Wisconsin because they do report their contributions and Republicans had a

02:59.960 --> 03:04.640
pretty big advantage there too did they not?

03:04.640 --> 03:11.560
They did yeah and just the top spanners this year I mean it is the first amendment LLC

03:11.560 --> 03:16.160
group and then it's the Republican Party of Wisconsin those are the two top spenders

03:16.160 --> 03:23.040
and if you look back to 2022 the last race for governor it was Tony Evers was the number

03:23.040 --> 03:29.880
one spender in state politics and the second place runner up was the Democratic Party of

03:29.880 --> 03:35.240
Wisconsin so we're seeing a little bit of a flip of those two parties in terms of the

03:35.240 --> 03:39.640
money that they're bringing in and spending and when it comes to who's giving to the parties

03:39.720 --> 03:46.440
you have big contributions from billionaires Diane Hendricks and the U-lines Richard U-line

03:46.440 --> 03:52.960
also has his own group that's running ads to help Tom Tiffany this is a bit of a flip

03:52.960 --> 03:58.080
as we Rich mentioned there in terms of what we've gotten used to in Wisconsin where Democrats

03:58.080 --> 04:02.320
seem to know how to use this state law that lets unlimited money flow around from parties

04:02.320 --> 04:03.320
to candidates.

04:03.320 --> 04:07.200
Right so you mentioned those mega donors who have essentially put tons of money into

04:07.200 --> 04:11.360
the Republican Party of Wisconsin and that's using a kind of loophole in campaign finance

04:11.360 --> 04:15.760
law that says that there's a cap on how much individuals can donate to campaigns there

04:15.760 --> 04:20.120
is not a cap on what you can give to parties and then what parties can spend and so this

04:20.120 --> 04:24.560
was a law that was passed by Republicans but then Democrats ended up using to kind of great

04:24.560 --> 04:29.120
effect over many years but so I think there's a couple of different reasons for that potentially

04:29.120 --> 04:32.960
so one reason is just like a very kind of local reason which is that the former chair

04:32.960 --> 04:37.240
of the Democratic Party Ben Wickler is just known for his kind of fundraising prowess

04:37.240 --> 04:42.160
and he has a sort of national profile among national Democrats he's very well respected

04:42.160 --> 04:46.960
among sort of DC Democratic circles so he was really the person it wasn't like the Democratic

04:46.960 --> 04:50.960
Party immediately took advantage of the law it was when he came into leadership in the

04:50.960 --> 04:55.320
Democratic Party the Democrats really kind of took this and ran with it so it's possible

04:55.320 --> 04:59.760
now that he's no longer in leadership but that has had some effect on the state party's

04:59.760 --> 05:03.840
ability to fundraise I think another thing also that's going on here though is that even

05:03.840 --> 05:08.800
though the governor's race is going to be very tight and is very important and even

05:08.800 --> 05:14.320
you know sort of national politico's recognize that the Wisconsin governor's race is important

05:14.320 --> 05:18.400
Democrats are also trying to flip Congress and so you know I went and looked at a number

05:18.400 --> 05:22.800
of the kind of big Democratic mega donors who often try to put money in Wisconsin state

05:22.800 --> 05:27.480
elections and they're still spending money this year but they are spending it on congressional

05:27.560 --> 05:31.480
races in other states so we're seeing much less of their money come through the Democratic

05:31.480 --> 05:36.120
Party and that's why I think you know the combination of huge funding from Republicans

05:36.120 --> 05:39.800
and then some amount of kind of taking their foot off the gas from Democrats shows that

05:39.800 --> 05:47.080
big split. Zach you know I kind of got a theory in politics that when you see these big donors

05:47.080 --> 05:51.520
put a lot of money into a race like ours like the race for governor they feel like they have

05:51.520 --> 05:54.960
a chance at getting something that they want right that they they feel like they have a

05:54.960 --> 06:00.960
chance of winning. I mean is it fair to say that Republicans are looking at Wisconsin as maybe

06:02.080 --> 06:06.080
friendly ground in an unfriendly environment? It's interesting because you have to look

06:06.080 --> 06:09.840
at both the national environment and the state environment to realize there is a difference in

06:09.840 --> 06:15.840
what we're seeing out of the Midwest and Northern American races in Minnesota tightening up

06:15.840 --> 06:21.280
Wisconsin's always tight. Michigan Senate they're the polling out of Maine Senate being a lot tighter

06:21.280 --> 06:26.160
which is the opposite of what we're hearing out of the South which is you know Texas Democrats

06:26.160 --> 06:31.280
doing well in Kansas Senate race being competitive and these things that we really hadn't heard of

06:31.280 --> 06:36.080
in kind of expending of what Ani was talking about the map is so large that these Democratic

06:36.080 --> 06:40.400
national donors are being pulled in a lot of different directions whereas in the past Ben

06:40.400 --> 06:46.640
Wickler could say hey support Tony Evers to protect Wisconsin's electoral votes in the presidential

06:47.440 --> 06:52.400
election. Protect the assembly so that Tony Evers veto still matters when it comes to drawing these

06:52.400 --> 06:57.440
maps. Invest in our our Supreme Court races so we can redraw these maps and declare what

06:57.440 --> 07:02.240
gerrymandering is. That argument has already been won and so every investor needs a new

07:02.240 --> 07:06.320
argument of why they need to invest and it may be that some of them are just looking in different

07:06.320 --> 07:11.440
directions and getting maybe greedy from a Democratic point of view of hey where Cal squing win

07:11.440 --> 07:16.000
forgetting that Wisconsin's still competitive. This race will be closer than some of those other

07:16.080 --> 07:21.760
races where they are investing millions and neglecting the the Democrats here and I think

07:21.760 --> 07:28.240
you also have to look at what does it matter for the assembly because if we're talking about the

07:28.240 --> 07:32.800
state Senate being more likely to flip to Democrats because you only need to win a couple seats and

07:32.800 --> 07:36.960
one of them looks pretty solid and they've got a couple good battleground options and if they

07:36.960 --> 07:41.760
think they're going to lose the Democratic race for governor because they have this national

07:41.840 --> 07:46.720
wave overtaking Tom Tiffany's ability to compete their backstop is the assembly where they're

07:46.720 --> 07:52.480
very localized races they only have to win a handful of these seats to stop the Democrats

07:52.480 --> 07:56.960
from doing anything they want in the next session if they hold the assembly so that's worth pouring

07:56.960 --> 08:01.120
all these millions into and that's originally where these billionaires were dumping their money

08:01.120 --> 08:07.360
was into the Republican assembly packs and all their money so it's they're also expanding their

08:07.360 --> 08:12.400
own map as they're saying hey maybe Tom Tiffany does have a legitimate chance to win even in this

08:12.400 --> 08:18.080
environment. You know when I look at this big financial push for conservatives here I can't help

08:18.080 --> 08:23.840
but think about the 2010 election cycle a little bit because I remember that year there's a lot of

08:23.840 --> 08:29.200
talk in the closing days of the election that unions were the big spenders in that year's elections

08:29.200 --> 08:36.080
they were the big dogs in in that year's fight and we kind of remember how that turned out it was

08:36.080 --> 08:41.280
pretty much the worst year for Democrats ever basically but at least since we've been covering

08:41.280 --> 08:46.320
politics Zach one of the most consequential wave elections that we have covered and so it doesn't

08:46.320 --> 08:51.680
always work when you pour money into a race on the other hand David Crowley is not a well-known

08:51.680 --> 08:59.120
household name in Wisconsin and so when Tom Tiffany can go out and kind of define him there's a

08:59.120 --> 09:04.160
argument to be made that that money gets more bang for the buck you've talked to both of the

09:04.160 --> 09:11.440
candidates very recently David Crowley and Tom Tiffany and you get a sense that an issue gas

09:11.440 --> 09:17.600
prices specifically could become front and center in this race for governor how are they talking

09:17.600 --> 09:23.120
about it and why now why now is because they keep skyrocketing anyone who has directly drive

09:23.120 --> 09:28.160
anywhere knows that gas prices are only going up it's becoming a bigger issue at diesel specifically

09:28.160 --> 09:33.440
because that's rising at even faster rates so if you have a diesel truck or you have any connection

09:33.440 --> 09:38.880
to truckers that need to bring supplies to your business or farmers having to worry about

09:38.880 --> 09:43.840
harvesting crops or paying for fertilizer which also deals with diesel and other fuel and oil

09:43.840 --> 09:49.520
related subsidies there's all sorts of issues that are really making this the highest profile

09:49.520 --> 09:54.560
but I think the true answer to that is you have to go beyond maybe the people that watch us program

09:54.560 --> 09:59.760
and it's the non politically invested people when do they tune into elections when it affects them

09:59.760 --> 10:04.560
personally and they can feel it I've spoken to so many people some of my own family who

10:04.560 --> 10:08.320
absolutely hate politics they don't want anything to do with it they don't want to talk about it

10:08.320 --> 10:13.440
but when gas goes up when eggs go up when beef goes up when they can feel it and see it everywhere

10:13.440 --> 10:20.160
they say why is this happening and who can I blame which is why in 2022 when we saw gas prices surge

10:20.160 --> 10:24.800
they blamed Biden Biden can have all the answers in the world about why it was international it wasn't

10:24.800 --> 10:30.160
his fault same things happening now it's whoever is in charge is going to get blamed when prices

10:30.160 --> 10:34.160
surge no matter what the nuance and an answer is and these are these are voters that don't look

10:34.160 --> 10:38.640
at political nuance they don't want to spend 30 minutes hearing about global supply chains

10:38.640 --> 10:42.880
or foreign conflicts they want to know why is it so expensive for me to fill up my truck

10:44.000 --> 10:50.320
and I mean in this particular election we do have I think democrats have a decent cause effect

10:50.320 --> 10:56.480
case to be made here is the straight line the president Donald Trump decided to go to war in

10:56.480 --> 11:05.200
Iran and that has been a huge factor affecting fuel prices rich one of our candidates for governor

11:05.200 --> 11:10.880
is in congress and I'm this has come up in congress of course with war powers resolutions you name it

11:11.760 --> 11:19.360
how is Tom Tiffany voting on those and what's he saying about it well he voted against the

11:19.840 --> 11:24.640
the democrats war powers resolution that would have essentially forced an end to the conflict

11:25.680 --> 11:32.160
several times so there's that but but now he's essentially saying well the governor

11:32.160 --> 11:37.280
governor evers could do something now you know there's various things that the governor could do to

11:37.280 --> 11:43.600
ease taxes or etc to bring the price down a little bit so that is that's a bit of a tight

11:43.600 --> 11:51.120
rope answer there where he doesn't want to cross the president but also Tiffany did recently say

11:51.120 --> 11:57.840
it's time to wrap up the war so there's that I also want to mention that in the third congressional

11:57.840 --> 12:04.880
district race which is my home turf here Derek van Orden a republican congressman incumbent

12:05.760 --> 12:12.320
he was on twitter and essentially blaming oil companies for price gouging and that I've seen

12:12.320 --> 12:19.440
from some other republicans who you wouldn't expect that sort of um rhetoric focused on

12:19.440 --> 12:26.800
industry or or you know a big industry like oil and gas you wouldn't expect that so it was

12:26.800 --> 12:31.520
kind of notable and I felt I had to mention kind of normally the proudly capitalist

12:32.320 --> 12:38.080
captains of industry but their backs are against the wall here in this moment in in 2026 so the

12:38.080 --> 12:43.920
candidates Crowley and Tiffany have been talking about other issues with a pretty good link to

12:43.920 --> 12:49.280
that the national debate uh they've come out with their own versions of this anti-corruption

12:49.280 --> 12:53.360
agenda I think they they framed it a little bit differently but they they both talked about

12:53.360 --> 12:59.200
gonna fight corruption on you know you covered the David Crowley version of this what's he talking

12:59.200 --> 13:04.080
about yeah so he kind of came out and he proposed four things that he said would be in his budget

13:04.160 --> 13:09.920
on day one and so that would include banning state office holders from trading stocks from

13:09.920 --> 13:16.480
participating in prediction markets there would be a sort of imposed gap on when energy regulators

13:16.480 --> 13:22.720
could go to work for energy companies two years and then also a change to kind of public record

13:22.720 --> 13:29.200
laws and he framed this very much in the context of Washington DC and sort of saying that there's

13:29.200 --> 13:34.000
all this corruption going on in Washington we don't have the power to address that but what we can do

13:34.080 --> 13:38.960
is kind of fight stuff here and so it was an interesting way I think of trying to frame things

13:38.960 --> 13:44.320
against President Donald Trump without necessarily naming him with the kind of understanding that

13:44.320 --> 13:49.040
Tom Tiffany and President Trump are pretty closely linked uh the other thing that was kind of interesting

13:49.040 --> 13:53.840
is then a couple of days later Tom Tiffany came out with his own platform and so it also kind of

13:53.840 --> 13:58.240
shows this dynamic right now in this race where the candidates really have to answer one another

13:58.240 --> 14:03.280
and so you see kind of how close they are and how close they understand themselves to be

14:03.280 --> 14:07.600
because they can't kind of dismiss when one person comes out with a policy proposal the

14:07.600 --> 14:13.040
other person needs to respond right it was data centers a few weeks ago and and now corruption and

14:13.040 --> 14:21.440
rich you covered the uh Tom Tiffany version of this up by Eau Claire uh what what what is anti-corruption

14:21.440 --> 14:28.000
mean to Tom Tiffany what's his platform look like well he talked a lot about the federal

14:28.000 --> 14:36.960
investigations and findings of uh you know Medicaid fraud etc from the in Wisconsin and elsewhere

14:36.960 --> 14:43.440
they there was talk about Minnesota and the um the fraud that was announced by the federal government

14:43.440 --> 14:49.520
in that state so that's the kind of fraud he was talking about he said there has been success

14:49.520 --> 14:57.200
at the federal level it's time to look in Wisconsin so Tiffany's proposal is to essentially do more

14:57.200 --> 15:03.760
audits of of every state agency and Wisconsin already has a nonpartisan legislative audit bureau

15:03.760 --> 15:08.560
and there is a committee in the legislature that is run by republicans right now that

15:08.560 --> 15:15.920
can tell it to do additional audits um on top of like the annual audit of state government that is

15:15.920 --> 15:22.080
done and they have done that and they've even audited some some groups that have gotten some some flak

15:22.080 --> 15:29.040
from republicans um or some money that went to these groups like there's this new cap organization

15:29.040 --> 15:35.360
in green bay that had some financial troubles and and shut down so he mentioned those audits and

15:35.360 --> 15:41.120
essentially that his own office the department of administration if he were elected governor

15:41.120 --> 15:46.800
would be going through agency budgets as well as the audit bureau so that's a little bit of a

15:46.880 --> 15:52.720
new thing um and he also said we need more transparency essentially online dashboards

15:52.720 --> 15:59.040
where you can go and see where every penny is spent how it's spent and he referenced a site that

15:59.040 --> 16:03.760
i didn't even know existed open book wisconsin which already does this but he said it needs to be

16:03.760 --> 16:09.520
modernized and and just be smoother because it's a bit of a clunky website but interesting

16:09.520 --> 16:15.680
information on there so that's kind of his pitch so uh david growley going after congress where

16:15.760 --> 16:20.240
tom tefney serves tom tefney kind of attacking democratic governor tonyivers david krauley's

16:20.240 --> 16:26.800
endorser in chief zack uh why this message at this moment in time in 2026 i think what we're seeing

16:26.800 --> 16:32.560
from each of these candidates is they are taking the issues that voters say they care about like

16:32.560 --> 16:39.120
affordability pricing and corruption and government transparency and they are kind of gaslighting

16:39.120 --> 16:42.880
it right around their own issues that have been in their pet projects forever because when democrats

16:42.880 --> 16:47.840
talk about affordability it's prices and gouging and when democrats and when republicans talk about

16:47.840 --> 16:52.400
affordability it's your taxes it's the same issues they've been doing all along and this corruption

16:52.400 --> 16:57.760
stuff it's like every single year we hear republicans talk about fraud and social welfare programs

16:57.760 --> 17:02.240
and more audits more audits they've been audits all along as rich said none of these are new they're

17:02.240 --> 17:07.040
not unaudited programs but it kind of says to the voter oh yeah we hear what you're complaining

17:07.040 --> 17:10.960
about and we're ready to do that in fact it's something we've we've been talking about all along

17:10.960 --> 17:15.040
you should vote for me because that's what i want to do too so it's a way of taking these

17:15.040 --> 17:19.440
fears that the voters are really upset about and saying hey you're already ready to vote for me

17:20.000 --> 17:25.040
that's what i'm talking about too so rebranding relabeling these old packages a new package not

17:25.040 --> 17:32.080
necessarily a new platform uh on you before we wrap up here uh there uh was a primary and one side

17:32.080 --> 17:38.320
for governor and essentially not on the other you have been covering a unity tour for democrats

17:38.400 --> 17:43.920
led by francesca hong who came up just short in the primary what is she saying and does

17:44.480 --> 17:48.640
the democratic party need unifying right now i mean this is a really kind of interesting

17:48.640 --> 17:52.880
moment so she's kind of hitting the road to make the case that democrats have to get this trifecta

17:52.880 --> 17:56.720
they need the legislature they need the governor's office because i think there was this question

17:56.720 --> 18:02.720
right after the election would her supporters kind of go away and again with how tight wisconsin

18:02.720 --> 18:07.120
races are uh democrats can't afford to lose any of those voters and so this will be a really

18:07.120 --> 18:12.400
interesting moment to kind of see how gettable or get backable her supporters are for Crowley

18:12.400 --> 18:16.560
because he'll need them to win all right that's all the time we have for today this has been

18:16.560 --> 18:23.760
inside wisconsin politics be sure to follow us on pbswisconsin.org wpr.org youtube or wherever you

18:23.760 --> 18:37.440
get your podcasts

18:39.760 --> 18:41.040
all right nonya 20 seconds

18:44.720 --> 18:48.800
yeah okay that was rich rich coffin too i know it was

18:49.520 --> 18:57.360
it wasn't me it was not on you maybe let the record show

18:57.520 --> 19:04.880
i coughed for the first six programs and here's the heck seriously ill

19:06.880 --> 19:11.760
what do you have to say then my sinus infections were non-transmissile

19:12.720 --> 19:15.120
nice

19:32.240 --> 19:34.800
okay

19:41.760 --> 19:55.760
Big money pours into Wisconsin for the midterms with a big financial edge for conservatives.

19:55.760 --> 19:57.240
Who's behind the push?

19:57.240 --> 20:02.280
And what are the candidates saying about issues ranging from gas prices to corruption?

20:02.280 --> 20:04.560
This is Inside Wisconsin Politics.

