1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:25,080
Big money pours into Wisconsin for the midterms with a big financial edge for conservatives.

2
00:00:25,080 --> 00:00:29,800
Who's behind the push and what are the candidates saying about issues ranging from gas prices

3
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:36,800
to corruption?

4
00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:05,680
You covered this group, they are pretty much brand new and already they're a huge spender.

5
00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:10,680
Tell us about who they are and what they're doing here.

6
00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:14,720
By my math they're the biggest spender so far in 2026.

7
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:19,040
So who they are, they're called First Amendment LLC.

8
00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:26,520
It is an express advocacy group so it's not affiliated with any specific candidate, etc.

9
00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:32,120
or a campaign but it is obviously a conservative group because all the money they're putting

10
00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:37,880
into Wisconsin is going against Democrats and it's a lot of money too.

11
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:43,040
We're talking about this group was created last week and on the same day it reported

12
00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:52,400
spending around $13 million and that's divided up by $9 million going against David Crowley

13
00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:58,880
in the race for governor and the remaining $3.4 million or so going into key assembly

14
00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:06,160
and senate races as Republicans and Democrats for control of the state legislature and this

15
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:11,440
money we don't know much about what it's going to be used for but in the filing it said it

16
00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:19,240
will be for direct mail, campaign literature, phone calls, digital ads, that sort of thing.

17
00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:24,760
It's hard to tell where the money's coming from, who this group is, it appears to be

18
00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:31,440
affiliated with a different Virginia based PAC called Make Liberty Win and Fox News did

19
00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:39,400
an article not long ago about a tech investor essentially putting $40 million into Make Liberty

20
00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:40,400
Win.

21
00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:45,680
I wasn't able to see in the federal campaign finance reports whether that money was transferred

22
00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:50,080
over but it appears that this new group is flush with cash.

23
00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:54,320
Okay and so this comes into an environment where we already knew who some of the big

24
00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:59,960
donors were in Wisconsin because they do report their contributions and Republicans had a

25
00:02:59,960 --> 00:03:04,640
pretty big advantage there too did they not?

26
00:03:04,640 --> 00:03:11,560
They did yeah and just the top spanners this year I mean it is the first amendment LLC

27
00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:16,160
group and then it's the Republican Party of Wisconsin those are the two top spenders

28
00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:23,040
and if you look back to 2022 the last race for governor it was Tony Evers was the number

29
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:29,880
one spender in state politics and the second place runner up was the Democratic Party of

30
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:35,240
Wisconsin so we're seeing a little bit of a flip of those two parties in terms of the

31
00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:39,640
money that they're bringing in and spending and when it comes to who's giving to the parties

32
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:46,440
you have big contributions from billionaires Diane Hendricks and the U-lines Richard U-line

33
00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:52,960
also has his own group that's running ads to help Tom Tiffany this is a bit of a flip

34
00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:58,080
as we Rich mentioned there in terms of what we've gotten used to in Wisconsin where Democrats

35
00:03:58,080 --> 00:04:02,320
seem to know how to use this state law that lets unlimited money flow around from parties

36
00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:03,320
to candidates.

37
00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:07,200
Right so you mentioned those mega donors who have essentially put tons of money into

38
00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:11,360
the Republican Party of Wisconsin and that's using a kind of loophole in campaign finance

39
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:15,760
law that says that there's a cap on how much individuals can donate to campaigns there

40
00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:20,120
is not a cap on what you can give to parties and then what parties can spend and so this

41
00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:24,560
was a law that was passed by Republicans but then Democrats ended up using to kind of great

42
00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:29,120
effect over many years but so I think there's a couple of different reasons for that potentially

43
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,960
so one reason is just like a very kind of local reason which is that the former chair

44
00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:37,240
of the Democratic Party Ben Wickler is just known for his kind of fundraising prowess

45
00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:42,160
and he has a sort of national profile among national Democrats he's very well respected

46
00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:46,960
among sort of DC Democratic circles so he was really the person it wasn't like the Democratic

47
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,960
Party immediately took advantage of the law it was when he came into leadership in the

48
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,320
Democratic Party the Democrats really kind of took this and ran with it so it's possible

49
00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:59,760
now that he's no longer in leadership but that has had some effect on the state party's

50
00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:03,840
ability to fundraise I think another thing also that's going on here though is that even

51
00:05:03,840 --> 00:05:08,800
though the governor's race is going to be very tight and is very important and even

52
00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:14,320
you know sort of national politico's recognize that the Wisconsin governor's race is important

53
00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:18,400
Democrats are also trying to flip Congress and so you know I went and looked at a number

54
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:22,800
of the kind of big Democratic mega donors who often try to put money in Wisconsin state

55
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:27,480
elections and they're still spending money this year but they are spending it on congressional

56
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:31,480
races in other states so we're seeing much less of their money come through the Democratic

57
00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:36,120
Party and that's why I think you know the combination of huge funding from Republicans

58
00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:39,800
and then some amount of kind of taking their foot off the gas from Democrats shows that

59
00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:47,080
big split. Zach you know I kind of got a theory in politics that when you see these big donors

60
00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:51,520
put a lot of money into a race like ours like the race for governor they feel like they have

61
00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:54,960
a chance at getting something that they want right that they they feel like they have a

62
00:05:54,960 --> 00:06:00,960
chance of winning. I mean is it fair to say that Republicans are looking at Wisconsin as maybe

63
00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:06,080
friendly ground in an unfriendly environment? It's interesting because you have to look

64
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:09,840
at both the national environment and the state environment to realize there is a difference in

65
00:06:09,840 --> 00:06:15,840
what we're seeing out of the Midwest and Northern American races in Minnesota tightening up

66
00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:21,280
Wisconsin's always tight. Michigan Senate they're the polling out of Maine Senate being a lot tighter

67
00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:26,160
which is the opposite of what we're hearing out of the South which is you know Texas Democrats

68
00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:31,280
doing well in Kansas Senate race being competitive and these things that we really hadn't heard of

69
00:06:31,280 --> 00:06:36,080
in kind of expending of what Ani was talking about the map is so large that these Democratic

70
00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:40,400
national donors are being pulled in a lot of different directions whereas in the past Ben

71
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:46,640
Wickler could say hey support Tony Evers to protect Wisconsin's electoral votes in the presidential

72
00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:52,400
election. Protect the assembly so that Tony Evers veto still matters when it comes to drawing these

73
00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:57,440
maps. Invest in our our Supreme Court races so we can redraw these maps and declare what

74
00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:02,240
gerrymandering is. That argument has already been won and so every investor needs a new

75
00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:06,320
argument of why they need to invest and it may be that some of them are just looking in different

76
00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:11,440
directions and getting maybe greedy from a Democratic point of view of hey where Cal squing win

77
00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:16,000
forgetting that Wisconsin's still competitive. This race will be closer than some of those other

78
00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:21,760
races where they are investing millions and neglecting the the Democrats here and I think

79
00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:28,240
you also have to look at what does it matter for the assembly because if we're talking about the

80
00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:32,800
state Senate being more likely to flip to Democrats because you only need to win a couple seats and

81
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:36,960
one of them looks pretty solid and they've got a couple good battleground options and if they

82
00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:41,760
think they're going to lose the Democratic race for governor because they have this national

83
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:46,720
wave overtaking Tom Tiffany's ability to compete their backstop is the assembly where they're

84
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:52,480
very localized races they only have to win a handful of these seats to stop the Democrats

85
00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:56,960
from doing anything they want in the next session if they hold the assembly so that's worth pouring

86
00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:01,120
all these millions into and that's originally where these billionaires were dumping their money

87
00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:07,360
was into the Republican assembly packs and all their money so it's they're also expanding their

88
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:12,400
own map as they're saying hey maybe Tom Tiffany does have a legitimate chance to win even in this

89
00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:18,080
environment. You know when I look at this big financial push for conservatives here I can't help

90
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:23,840
but think about the 2010 election cycle a little bit because I remember that year there's a lot of

91
00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:29,200
talk in the closing days of the election that unions were the big spenders in that year's elections

92
00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:36,080
they were the big dogs in in that year's fight and we kind of remember how that turned out it was

93
00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:41,280
pretty much the worst year for Democrats ever basically but at least since we've been covering

94
00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:46,320
politics Zach one of the most consequential wave elections that we have covered and so it doesn't

95
00:08:46,320 --> 00:08:51,680
always work when you pour money into a race on the other hand David Crowley is not a well-known

96
00:08:51,680 --> 00:08:59,120
household name in Wisconsin and so when Tom Tiffany can go out and kind of define him there's a

97
00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:04,160
argument to be made that that money gets more bang for the buck you've talked to both of the

98
00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:11,440
candidates very recently David Crowley and Tom Tiffany and you get a sense that an issue gas

99
00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:17,600
prices specifically could become front and center in this race for governor how are they talking

100
00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:23,120
about it and why now why now is because they keep skyrocketing anyone who has directly drive

101
00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:28,160
anywhere knows that gas prices are only going up it's becoming a bigger issue at diesel specifically

102
00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:33,440
because that's rising at even faster rates so if you have a diesel truck or you have any connection

103
00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:38,880
to truckers that need to bring supplies to your business or farmers having to worry about

104
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:43,840
harvesting crops or paying for fertilizer which also deals with diesel and other fuel and oil

105
00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:49,520
related subsidies there's all sorts of issues that are really making this the highest profile

106
00:09:49,520 --> 00:09:54,560
but I think the true answer to that is you have to go beyond maybe the people that watch us program

107
00:09:54,560 --> 00:09:59,760
and it's the non politically invested people when do they tune into elections when it affects them

108
00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:04,560
personally and they can feel it I've spoken to so many people some of my own family who

109
00:10:04,560 --> 00:10:08,320
absolutely hate politics they don't want anything to do with it they don't want to talk about it

110
00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:13,440
but when gas goes up when eggs go up when beef goes up when they can feel it and see it everywhere

111
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:20,160
they say why is this happening and who can I blame which is why in 2022 when we saw gas prices surge

112
00:10:20,160 --> 00:10:24,800
they blamed Biden Biden can have all the answers in the world about why it was international it wasn't

113
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:30,160
his fault same things happening now it's whoever is in charge is going to get blamed when prices

114
00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:34,160
surge no matter what the nuance and an answer is and these are these are voters that don't look

115
00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:38,640
at political nuance they don't want to spend 30 minutes hearing about global supply chains

116
00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:42,880
or foreign conflicts they want to know why is it so expensive for me to fill up my truck

117
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:50,320
and I mean in this particular election we do have I think democrats have a decent cause effect

118
00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:56,480
case to be made here is the straight line the president Donald Trump decided to go to war in

119
00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:05,200
Iran and that has been a huge factor affecting fuel prices rich one of our candidates for governor

120
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:10,880
is in congress and I'm this has come up in congress of course with war powers resolutions you name it

121
00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:19,360
how is Tom Tiffany voting on those and what's he saying about it well he voted against the

122
00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:24,640
the democrats war powers resolution that would have essentially forced an end to the conflict

123
00:11:25,680 --> 00:11:32,160
several times so there's that but but now he's essentially saying well the governor

124
00:11:32,160 --> 00:11:37,280
governor evers could do something now you know there's various things that the governor could do to

125
00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:43,600
ease taxes or etc to bring the price down a little bit so that is that's a bit of a tight

126
00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:51,120
rope answer there where he doesn't want to cross the president but also Tiffany did recently say

127
00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:57,840
it's time to wrap up the war so there's that I also want to mention that in the third congressional

128
00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:04,880
district race which is my home turf here Derek van Orden a republican congressman incumbent

129
00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:12,320
he was on twitter and essentially blaming oil companies for price gouging and that I've seen

130
00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:19,440
from some other republicans who you wouldn't expect that sort of um rhetoric focused on

131
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:26,800
industry or or you know a big industry like oil and gas you wouldn't expect that so it was

132
00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:31,520
kind of notable and I felt I had to mention kind of normally the proudly capitalist

133
00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:38,080
captains of industry but their backs are against the wall here in this moment in in 2026 so the

134
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:43,920
candidates Crowley and Tiffany have been talking about other issues with a pretty good link to

135
00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:49,280
that the national debate uh they've come out with their own versions of this anti-corruption

136
00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:53,360
agenda I think they they framed it a little bit differently but they they both talked about

137
00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:59,200
gonna fight corruption on you know you covered the David Crowley version of this what's he talking

138
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:04,080
about yeah so he kind of came out and he proposed four things that he said would be in his budget

139
00:13:04,160 --> 00:13:09,920
on day one and so that would include banning state office holders from trading stocks from

140
00:13:09,920 --> 00:13:16,480
participating in prediction markets there would be a sort of imposed gap on when energy regulators

141
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:22,720
could go to work for energy companies two years and then also a change to kind of public record

142
00:13:22,720 --> 00:13:29,200
laws and he framed this very much in the context of Washington DC and sort of saying that there's

143
00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:34,000
all this corruption going on in Washington we don't have the power to address that but what we can do

144
00:13:34,080 --> 00:13:38,960
is kind of fight stuff here and so it was an interesting way I think of trying to frame things

145
00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:44,320
against President Donald Trump without necessarily naming him with the kind of understanding that

146
00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:49,040
Tom Tiffany and President Trump are pretty closely linked uh the other thing that was kind of interesting

147
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:53,840
is then a couple of days later Tom Tiffany came out with his own platform and so it also kind of

148
00:13:53,840 --> 00:13:58,240
shows this dynamic right now in this race where the candidates really have to answer one another

149
00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:03,280
and so you see kind of how close they are and how close they understand themselves to be

150
00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:07,600
because they can't kind of dismiss when one person comes out with a policy proposal the

151
00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:13,040
other person needs to respond right it was data centers a few weeks ago and and now corruption and

152
00:14:13,040 --> 00:14:21,440
rich you covered the uh Tom Tiffany version of this up by Eau Claire uh what what what is anti-corruption

153
00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:28,000
mean to Tom Tiffany what's his platform look like well he talked a lot about the federal

154
00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:36,960
investigations and findings of uh you know Medicaid fraud etc from the in Wisconsin and elsewhere

155
00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:43,440
they there was talk about Minnesota and the um the fraud that was announced by the federal government

156
00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:49,520
in that state so that's the kind of fraud he was talking about he said there has been success

157
00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:57,200
at the federal level it's time to look in Wisconsin so Tiffany's proposal is to essentially do more

158
00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:03,760
audits of of every state agency and Wisconsin already has a nonpartisan legislative audit bureau

159
00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:08,560
and there is a committee in the legislature that is run by republicans right now that

160
00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:15,920
can tell it to do additional audits um on top of like the annual audit of state government that is

161
00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:22,080
done and they have done that and they've even audited some some groups that have gotten some some flak

162
00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:29,040
from republicans um or some money that went to these groups like there's this new cap organization

163
00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:35,360
in green bay that had some financial troubles and and shut down so he mentioned those audits and

164
00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:41,120
essentially that his own office the department of administration if he were elected governor

165
00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:46,800
would be going through agency budgets as well as the audit bureau so that's a little bit of a

166
00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:52,720
new thing um and he also said we need more transparency essentially online dashboards

167
00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:59,040
where you can go and see where every penny is spent how it's spent and he referenced a site that

168
00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:03,760
i didn't even know existed open book wisconsin which already does this but he said it needs to be

169
00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:09,520
modernized and and just be smoother because it's a bit of a clunky website but interesting

170
00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:15,680
information on there so that's kind of his pitch so uh david growley going after congress where

171
00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:20,240
tom tefney serves tom tefney kind of attacking democratic governor tonyivers david krauley's

172
00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:26,800
endorser in chief zack uh why this message at this moment in time in 2026 i think what we're seeing

173
00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:32,560
from each of these candidates is they are taking the issues that voters say they care about like

174
00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:39,120
affordability pricing and corruption and government transparency and they are kind of gaslighting

175
00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:42,880
it right around their own issues that have been in their pet projects forever because when democrats

176
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:47,840
talk about affordability it's prices and gouging and when democrats and when republicans talk about

177
00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:52,400
affordability it's your taxes it's the same issues they've been doing all along and this corruption

178
00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:57,760
stuff it's like every single year we hear republicans talk about fraud and social welfare programs

179
00:16:57,760 --> 00:17:02,240
and more audits more audits they've been audits all along as rich said none of these are new they're

180
00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:07,040
not unaudited programs but it kind of says to the voter oh yeah we hear what you're complaining

181
00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:10,960
about and we're ready to do that in fact it's something we've we've been talking about all along

182
00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:15,040
you should vote for me because that's what i want to do too so it's a way of taking these

183
00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:19,440
fears that the voters are really upset about and saying hey you're already ready to vote for me

184
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:25,040
that's what i'm talking about too so rebranding relabeling these old packages a new package not

185
00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:32,080
necessarily a new platform uh on you before we wrap up here uh there uh was a primary and one side

186
00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:38,320
for governor and essentially not on the other you have been covering a unity tour for democrats

187
00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:43,920
led by francesca hong who came up just short in the primary what is she saying and does

188
00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:48,640
the democratic party need unifying right now i mean this is a really kind of interesting

189
00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:52,880
moment so she's kind of hitting the road to make the case that democrats have to get this trifecta

190
00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,720
they need the legislature they need the governor's office because i think there was this question

191
00:17:56,720 --> 00:18:02,720
right after the election would her supporters kind of go away and again with how tight wisconsin

192
00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:07,120
races are uh democrats can't afford to lose any of those voters and so this will be a really

193
00:18:07,120 --> 00:18:12,400
interesting moment to kind of see how gettable or get backable her supporters are for Crowley

194
00:18:12,400 --> 00:18:16,560
because he'll need them to win all right that's all the time we have for today this has been

195
00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:23,760
inside wisconsin politics be sure to follow us on pbswisconsin.org wpr.org youtube or wherever you

196
00:18:23,760 --> 00:18:37,440
get your podcasts

197
00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:41,040
all right nonya 20 seconds

198
00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:48,800
yeah okay that was rich rich coffin too i know it was

199
00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:57,360
it wasn't me it was not on you maybe let the record show

200
00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:04,880
i coughed for the first six programs and here's the heck seriously ill

201
00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:11,760
what do you have to say then my sinus infections were non-transmissile

202
00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:15,120
nice

203
00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:34,800
okay

204
00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:55,760
Big money pours into Wisconsin for the midterms with a big financial edge for conservatives.

205
00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:57,240
Who's behind the push?

206
00:19:57,240 --> 00:20:02,280
And what are the candidates saying about issues ranging from gas prices to corruption?

207
00:20:02,280 --> 00:20:04,560
This is Inside Wisconsin Politics.

