1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
You

2
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:33,000
You

3
00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:42,000
David Crowley pulls off a political comeback for the ages. How did he do it?

4
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:48,000
And what does it mean for November? This is inside Wisconsin politics.

5
00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:57,000
I'm Sean Johnson here with my colleague Zach Schultz and Rich Kramer in Eau Claire.

6
00:00:57,000 --> 00:00:59,000
Hey guys. Hello.

7
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:06,000
So let's go back just one month here. David Crowley was not a candidate for governor.

8
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:11,000
He had ended his campaign, told us that it was because he knew he was not going to be in the nominee.

9
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:19,000
Yesterday he received 315,000 votes. Sorry, Tuesday he received 315,000 votes.

10
00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:23,000
Around 40% of the Democratic voting electorate.

11
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:30,000
Zach, I want to hear how he did this. How did he pull off this one month comeback?

12
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:35,000
Well, I think most importantly is he didn't do it alone. He did this with all of the team players.

13
00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:40,000
And I know he doesn't like the idea of being the establishment, but the Democratic establishment

14
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:44,000
is what pushed him over the line and pulled him all the way to this nomination.

15
00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:48,000
He certainly worked for it, but Tony Evers coming back with his endorsement.

16
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:51,000
And we talked before in this podcast about how endorsements aren't everything,

17
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:54,000
but then he followed up by doing the work with him, Tony Evers campaigning,

18
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,000
bringing the media attention to every one of David Crowley stops along the way.

19
00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:02,000
It was critical because it got him on more television sets, more news cast,

20
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:06,000
and got people aware that there were contrasts in this race, that it wasn't a runaway,

21
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:09,000
and that if Crowley had a chance, voters needed to be thinking about it.

22
00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:13,000
I can't tell you how many people I ran into in just the last week who said

23
00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:19,000
they had not made up their minds. They truly were still undecided going into the final few days

24
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:25,000
where they had a chance to decide this election, and it's clear a lot of them went to David Crowley.

25
00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:31,000
Rich, what's your take on this dramatic comeback here by Crowley?

26
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:37,000
Well, it was remarkable. It was not expected. I mean, I was fully on board

27
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:42,000
with these polls that we were seeing showing Francesca Hong way ahead.

28
00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:48,000
But I do remember, you know, what Zach just mentioned reminded me of talking with Charles Franklin,

29
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:52,000
and he essentially said, well, there are a lot of undecided people out there,

30
00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:58,000
but, you know, with Hong at the, you know, 20, 30 points ahead that we'd seen in some polls,

31
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:02,000
it would take essentially every undecided person, you know, rallying behind one candidate.

32
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:07,000
When he told me that, it wasn't, you know, we still had other candidates like Barnes in the race,

33
00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:16,000
so it does appear that the undecided voters did make a decision and went out.

34
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:21,000
So it was just something else. And being at a Republican event on Tuesday night

35
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:25,000
was interesting because of the reactions that I saw from people.

36
00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:29,000
Let's talk about those polls just a little bit more because I can imagine somebody sitting

37
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:37,000
home and thinking, hey, you know, the news presented this to me as Francesca Hong's victory,

38
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:42,000
you know, weeks ago, essentially, that there were these repeated polls that showed her leading,

39
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:46,000
and that gave the clear impression that, you know, she was going to win this thing.

40
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:53,000
Zach, I mean, what would you say to someone with those qualms about the information they were receiving?

41
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,000
They are right to have qualms about polling.

42
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:59,000
Everyone should always take polling with a grain of salt. Even the pollsters say that.

43
00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:05,000
But the thing that most people, I think, get wrong about what polls are is, even Charles Franklin will say it,

44
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:11,000
they are a snapshot of that moment. So the mistake I think some people make is they think polling is like

45
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:16,000
the score of a game in the third quarter. They say, oh, well, Hong's up 21 points.

46
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,000
It's like the Packers being up 21 points. They should have this in the bag.

47
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:22,000
If they lose, it's a complete colossal failure.

48
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:27,000
But you have to think of those polls that came out a few weeks ago as more of like a pre-season game.

49
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:30,000
They were a snapshot of where the race looked at that time.

50
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:36,000
The real game was on election night. And at that point, it was a toss-up because so many more people

51
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,000
had been changing their minds and moving to Crowley.

52
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:42,000
And the polls weren't updated to be able to reflect that.

53
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:47,000
So if you think of the polls as a snapshot and not reality and not a score on the board,

54
00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:51,000
they are a little better guide path to what the situation may be.

55
00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:56,000
And I think everyone should note, Francesca Hong's polling said she was going to get 40%.

56
00:04:56,000 --> 00:05:03,000
She got 40%. And that was considering that primary polling has an even larger margin of error.

57
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:08,000
The polls really got her support correct. And they did reflect the amount of undecideds.

58
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:12,000
It is rare to see all of the undecideds go to the second place candidate.

59
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:16,000
But I think that goes more to what we were just talking about of the establishment telling everyone

60
00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:20,000
this has to happen in the context of what had happened in the Michigan Senate race

61
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:23,000
and all these national figureheads coming to Wisconsin.

62
00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:28,000
It really got a lot of people thinking, all right, this is not just about who I like the most

63
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,000
or who's leading. This is about electability.

64
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:36,000
Yeah, I think that the points you made there is something I want to impress upon myself

65
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:42,000
and all reporters for future elections that the undecided number is pretty significant.

66
00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:47,000
I think even looking back, and we're going to talk about today, but in 2016 there was a lot of talk

67
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:51,000
about where the polls got it wrong. I think we didn't talk about the undecided voters

68
00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:54,000
or the people who wouldn't commit in the presidential race that year.

69
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,000
It's another one that sticks out in our mind. And this just underscores that

70
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,000
a candidate can win all those as David Crowley did.

71
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:12,000
But for him to do that, Rich, you just do not see that level of a surge at the end by one candidate.

72
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:17,000
How big do you think was Governor Tony Evers in this instant?

73
00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:22,000
Well, obviously it was a big deal, which is interesting because looking back to a poll

74
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:28,000
that we had before the primary, the Marquette University Law School asked people

75
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:33,000
how much does Governor Evers' endorsement of David Crowley impact your decision?

76
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:37,000
And the majority said it didn't, but clearly it did.

77
00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:44,000
But what also might have impacted and probably did impact those undecided voters' decision

78
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:50,000
to get behind Crowley was a big surge of campaign TV advertising.

79
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:55,000
So add impact, which is a great service, and they put out a tweet,

80
00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:58,000
and it showed a line graph of all the different candidates

81
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:02,000
and what they were spending on ads right up to the election.

82
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:06,000
And there's just one blue line that goes straight up like Mount Everest

83
00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:10,000
and then crashes back down. Well, that is David Crowley.

84
00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:16,000
So it looked like something maybe upwards of a million dollars in that last those final days.

85
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:21,000
And I was talking with a friend of the podcast, Anthony Trigoski, today.

86
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:26,000
And he said TV advertising does matter.

87
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,000
It still matters because there were discussions about whether or not, you know,

88
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:35,000
Hong's success in the polls without spending any money on TV ads,

89
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:37,000
I was seeing people saying, well, maybe this is the new way.

90
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,000
Maybe the old model is dead.

91
00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:41,000
Trigoski doesn't see it that way.

92
00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:44,000
And he said that add impact graph proves it.

93
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,000
And I think that those ads come at a time or they came at a time

94
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:53,000
when all these people who were not paying attention to this race started paying attention.

95
00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,000
They came at the right time for David Crowley, essentially.

96
00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:58,000
Sir, Sean, I want to get your feedback here.

97
00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:02,000
So we've talked on this podcast about Francesca Hong's Thanksgiving tweets

98
00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:05,000
and some of the things that were coming up out of her past.

99
00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:10,000
Give me your impression of Crowley's ascent with everyone rallying behind him,

100
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:11,000
including the money.

101
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:15,000
And then the way Francesca Hong handled the amount of national attention

102
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:21,000
she was getting, questions about her past that really hadn't been pushed on her early in the campaign.

103
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:25,000
And certainly not by the other campaigns as we saw a very friendly only debate.

104
00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:30,000
So how much of an impact do you think that played with those undecided voters in the last week or two?

105
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:34,000
Well, I mean, the national window for our race was just so brief.

106
00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:38,000
The national media was paying attention to Michigan before us.

107
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,000
And then all of a sudden, we were the next big thing.

108
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:47,000
I think it's fair to argue about whether or not people should focus on a tweet from 2020, but they did.

109
00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:50,000
I was visiting my dad the weekend before the election.

110
00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:51,000
He lives in Illinois.

111
00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,000
He watches all the Sunday shows religiously.

112
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:58,000
And every one of them talked about that Thanksgiving tweet.

113
00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:02,000
My dad doesn't know who Francesca Hong is or David Crowley or much about their governor's race in Wisconsin.

114
00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:06,000
But he got an earful about that tweet that weekend.

115
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:13,000
And if he'd been watching those shows in Wisconsin, he would have been seeing ads in between saying to vote for David Crowley.

116
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,000
So that stuff matters and the timing matters.

117
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:24,000
And she did have an answer about that tweet that came later that kind of shrugged it off and said, look, I'll be frank, I'm a curmudgeon when it comes to the holidays.

118
00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:26,000
But I love Thanksgiving.

119
00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,000
It's not what she said at first.

120
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:30,000
At first, she kind of stood by it.

121
00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:36,000
And, you know, I know this stuff is sort of dumb, arguably.

122
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:39,000
But it's how elections are won and lost.

123
00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:46,000
And so in a race that was won, in this case by David Crowley, by 4,000 votes, a little less.

124
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:49,000
Stuff like that can matter, Rich.

125
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:59,000
If I could chime in, I've seen some pundits online talking about, well, Hong's campaign collapsed at the very final moments.

126
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:12,000
Because of the way she handled those media interviews at the national level, I want to ask both of you, Sean and Zach, did you see her campaign, you know, at the very final stages as a collapse or an implosion?

127
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:16,000
I think it's harder to say because she did hit the polling mark that she was at.

128
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:27,000
If she came in significantly below what people were talking that she would receive, then you could wonder, did some of those soft Hong supporters disappear and leave her at the end.

129
00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:32,000
But we didn't see that. She hit the marks that all the polling said she had along the way.

130
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:36,000
The difference is the people that hadn't made up their minds chose elsewhere.

131
00:10:36,000 --> 00:10:38,000
I think those were about electability concerns.

132
00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:51,000
I think there are legitimate questions about how she answered those questions when the national spotlight was on her and whether the people in Wisconsin that had been paying attention were starting to think more about electability than about policy.

133
00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:53,000
But I don't know if Collapse is the right word.

134
00:10:53,000 --> 00:11:06,000
When she still got 40% of the voter thereabouts, and that's a really strong showing from any candidate, especially someone from her background who doesn't have a long track record of politics in Wisconsin and hasn't spent a long time developing those relations around the state.

135
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,000
So she had a very impressive showing from that context.

136
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:15,000
And I think there are just choices in the way that she ran her race in the closing days.

137
00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:18,000
I mean, not going on television was a choice.

138
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:23,000
I know TV is not free, and she didn't have a ton of money, and the money really flowed to David Crowley there at the end.

139
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:26,000
So it's not like she could just snap her fingers and run TV ads.

140
00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:29,000
But she did run a campaign in different ways.

141
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:38,000
When you're trying to reach these kind of casual primary voters, maybe older voters in the closing days, she didn't have a strategy for that or the resources for that in the way that crowds are going.

142
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:40,000
It's also a choice.

143
00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:52,000
I know it's her community, and she felt passionate about it, but it is a choice to go to the site of a shooting and call it an execution over a bullhorn as she did in the closing days of the race that gets attention.

144
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:55,000
And she said in a debate she wouldn't do that as governor.

145
00:11:55,000 --> 00:12:00,000
She did it as a candidate for governor, though, so those are choices.

146
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:08,000
I think another debatable thing in this campaign is the role that these Republican ads attacking Hong played.

147
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:12,000
These were run backed by the Republican Governors Association.

148
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:28,000
And the going theory among Democrats, who get Democrats who didn't want Hong to be the nominee, was that these were there to prop her up, that they were going to run these ads in these Milwaukee and Madison media markets where all these Democratic voters are

149
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:36,000
and say she's too liberal for Wisconsin, and that Democratic voters would see that and say, liberal, that's my choice.

150
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:41,000
Zack, would you say that's the effect that it had or did the backfire in Republicans?

151
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,000
I think what Republicans saw those ads as a twofer.

152
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:51,000
One, they did boost her with liberals by giving her more name recognition than she would have otherwise had.

153
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:57,000
And two, even in the Madison and Milwaukee television viewing areas, there are a lot of Republican voters out there.

154
00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:00,000
So it was working towards the election that still to come.

155
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:08,000
If she was the nominee, it was weakening her and tarnishing her name, attaching her to these issues with Republicans that would vote getting them aware of who she was.

156
00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:13,000
So they definitely saw that as a great double by doing two things at once.

157
00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:26,000
It backfired in the sense that it really did alarm a lot of Democrats, and it made it easier for Crowley to say, this is who Republicans want to face, and we should talk more about why and the vulnerabilities that lie within there.

158
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,000
Boosting his credibility when it came to electability.

159
00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:31,000
It was kind of his opening.

160
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:39,000
I mean, it let him attack her without really attacking her because Democrats have been hands off at that point, and David Crowley is going to want her voters in November.

161
00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:45,000
So he doesn't want to attack her too aggressively and say, Democratic socialists have no place in our party.

162
00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:47,000
Of course, he's not going to say that.

163
00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:54,000
He's going to want those Francesco Hong supporters to support him, but the ads were definitely the opening for him.

164
00:13:55,000 --> 00:14:11,000
Rich, I know a lot of political observers nationally were looking to Wisconsin as for a lesson in terms of whether Democratic socialism that has played well in other states can play in a Midwest swing state.

165
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,000
What lesson can they take away from our race?

166
00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,000
Oh boy, that's such a big question.

167
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:36,000
I feel a little unqualified in answering, but the obvious takeaway is it didn't work this time, but all the caveats being the coordinated effort by establishment Democrats, moderate Democrats to make sure that it doesn't happen.

168
00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:40,000
So I would say at face value, yeah, I guess it didn't work out.

169
00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:48,000
And it came pretty close in the effort to stop the far left, you know, progressive candidate in the Senate race in Michigan.

170
00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:52,000
The closeness of that plus this, maybe it changed the conversation.

171
00:14:52,000 --> 00:15:02,000
And I guess the counterpoint to that would be if she picks up 5,000 more votes than we're having a different discussion here today.

172
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:04,000
What does this mean for November?

173
00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:12,000
I mean, I think that Republicans were starting to expect it was going to be Tom Tiffany versus Francesca Hong.

174
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:17,000
What does it mean that it is Tom Tiffany versus David Crowley?

175
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:21,000
You were at the Tiffany campaign headquarters on election night, Rich.

176
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:23,000
What's your impression?

177
00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:28,000
Oh man, this is what I was alluding to in the beginning.

178
00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:29,000
It was really interesting.

179
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:37,000
So the spirits were high the whole night because there was no doubt that Tiffany was going to be the nominee.

180
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:48,000
And the other thing was before the polls closed, I talked to a few people that were there and they said, well, Hong being the nominee obviously makes it easier for Tiffany.

181
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,000
And people were telling me that Hong scares them, etc.

182
00:15:52,000 --> 00:16:02,000
And then what I noticed was spirits were still high, but people became more and more glued to the big screen showing cable news and their phones.

183
00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:08,000
And I went outside a couple times and there were some young guys that are like, I could overhear them talking.

184
00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,000
Crowley's beating Hong in this county.

185
00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:14,000
Crowley's, you know, they were not expecting that.

186
00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:20,000
But when Tiffany came and he gave his speech at a, right around 10 p.m.

187
00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:30,000
And he talked with reporters after and the first question was, if Crowley wins, does that change your strategy since you've been spending so much time attacking Hong?

188
00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:36,000
And he's been using a line where he says, there's not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrats.

189
00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:37,000
Okay.

190
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:47,000
And then the next line out of his mouth was David Crowley never called out Francesca Hong for all those crazy things she said, which is, it's an answer.

191
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:57,000
But you, it just seemed like he might not have had a whole list of talking points against Crowley ready to go because it was a surprise for a lot of people.

192
00:16:57,000 --> 00:16:59,000
That has happened.

193
00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:13,000
Tiffany's campaign put out its first campaign attack at against Crowley trying to, you know, identify him to the rest of the state, but still on a campaign, election night, unexpected.

194
00:17:13,000 --> 00:17:22,000
So what are you watching for, Zach, as the campaign gets going here, week one of the general election campaign between Tiffany and Crowley?

195
00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:23,000
Well, right now it's about money.

196
00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:28,000
Tom Tiffany has got a lot of money in the bank and he's already spending his first ads going out already.

197
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:31,000
He's got billionaires funneling money through the party to him.

198
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:34,000
So he looks like he'll be well financed, at least for now.

199
00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:38,000
Crowley did release a statement saying he raised a million and a half in the first 24 hours.

200
00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:40,000
The big question is, can he build on that?

201
00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:47,000
That might have been a lot of transfers from the Democratic Governor's Association or the state Democratic Party waiting to give money to the nominee.

202
00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:58,000
So the question is how fast can he get out and start running his own ads before Tiffany is able to define him among the voters in the state that haven't heard much about him because they've heard so much about Francesca Hong.

203
00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:01,000
And you mentioned the billionaires, the U-lines and Diane Hendricks.

204
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:05,000
They're not always united around a Republican candidate or backing the state party.

205
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:06,000
They are this time.

206
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:07,000
For now.

207
00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:16,000
I think one question you've got to have is that this is the first year we've had, really, Ritu alluded to this in a story you did, but the first year since 2010,

208
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:23,000
when you could say the Assembly and the Senate and the Governor's Office are all kind of up for grabs.

209
00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:27,000
Either party could win, you know, all three.

210
00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:34,000
And so big donors are going to have to decide, do we want to spread this around or focus on where we think our money will go the farthest.

211
00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:36,000
That's all the time we have for today.

212
00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:37,000
Thanks for joining us.

213
00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:40,000
Our colleague Anya Ben-Wackdendank will be back next week.

214
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:42,000
This has been Inside Wisconsin Politics.

215
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:49,000
Be sure to follow us on pbswisconsin.org, wpr.org, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.