1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
You

2
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,000
You

3
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,000
You

4
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:04,000
You

5
00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:06,000
You

6
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,000
You

7
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:10,000
You

8
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:12,000
You

9
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:14,000
You

10
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,000
You

11
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:18,000
You

12
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:20,000
You

13
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:24,000
After Sarah Rodriguez drops out of the race for governor, David Crowley drops back in.

14
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:28,000
We know Tony Eva supports him. We don't know yet what voters think.

15
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,000
This is inside Wisconsin politics.

16
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:40,000
I'm Sean Johnson here with my colleagues, Anya Van Wegndong, Zach Schultz, and Rich Kramer in Eau Claire.

17
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:42,000
Hey everyone.

18
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:57,000
So this race is pure chaos now wouldn't you say? I mean when you think about it just last week we were talking about Sarah Rodriguez's campaign sort of teetering shortly after it fell and then almost immediately you had David Crowley who had been out of the race get back in.

19
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:07,000
Get back in. Anya why did David Crowley take that step so quickly after Sarah Rodriguez dropped out? Why did it need to be him in this race?

20
00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:24,000
I mean it's a really great question and I think we're kind of trying to hammer down exactly what that eight-day calculus kind of was so he dropped out he backed Sarah Rodriguez a couple days later she made this announcement that there were issues with her campaign but she was going to stay in and I spoke to him a little bit ago and his timeline

21
00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:39,000
of events is essentially that she informed him what was going on. He reiterated his support for her campaign, started hearing from backers all week that they wanted him back in that essentially there was different information than what he had dropped out on.

22
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:44,000
And we started hearing from sources that maybe he was going to get back in with the finance deadline.

23
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:55,000
Never heard back from him when I directly asked this last week and then we started to hear the rumblings on Friday as Sarah announced that she was dropping out that he was going to announce the next day and then we kind of got that confirmation.

24
00:02:55,000 --> 00:03:11,000
So it really was almost a trading of who was going to be potentially this front runner. The other thing that of course came with his announcement was Governor Tony Evers endorsing him and so that he suddenly became the sort of person who was tied to that administration in this race.

25
00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:23,000
Yeah, I don't feel like you can talk about the Crowley candidacy without talking about Governor Tony Evers in that decision. Zach, why did Tony Evers who has told us repeatedly throughout this primary cycle, I'm not going to get involved.

26
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:26,000
Why did he get involved now and why did he say David Crowley is my guy?

27
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:35,000
Well, he always the second half of the statement of I'm not going to evolve is that I might decide later and that always felt like keeping the back door open but unlikely to be used.

28
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:42,000
Well, he went through the back door. He definitely did. He played his Euchar card as his last his last Jack in the hole for that.

29
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:53,000
The reason why seems only can be that he and others that think like him are not happy with Francesca Hong in the lead she has throughout this entire race.

30
00:03:53,000 --> 00:04:00,000
All the polling, including the stuff we're going to talk about later in this very show shows that she is a clear front runner for the Democratic primary.

31
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:11,000
And really there's been no ability for anyone else to centralize all of the support for the centrist, moderate Tony Evers air to take over that position.

32
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:15,000
We had heard that Evers and Crowley got along that they liked each other.

33
00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:19,000
How much of that personal relationship matters we don't know and matters a lot in politics.

34
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:23,000
Sarah Rodriguez clearly had that position even without the endorsement.

35
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:36,000
So Tony even could say I'm not the kingmaker here. Clearly him stepping in is that he felt he needed to use some of his political capital to try and boost someone to take on Francesca Hong and make it a two person race.

36
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:43,000
Yeah, Rich, we've been kind of hinting at that that Hong Diamond dynamic all campaign cycle.

37
00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:46,000
But until now, Democrats hadn't been out there saying it.

38
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:53,000
You covered the Crowley announcement this past Saturday. He's saying it now.

39
00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:59,000
Yeah, I mean, he didn't name her when he announced, but it was pretty obvious who he was talking about.

40
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:12,000
He referenced the Republican Governors Association, the RGA, putting up ads that it says are attacking her, but Democrats feel that it's actually boosting her

41
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:17,000
and aimed at trying to get her to clear the Democrats' nomination.

42
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:24,000
So he mentioned that and it's pretty obvious what's going on here.

43
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:29,000
So what does this say about what Tony Evers thinks about the rest of the field, Anya?

44
00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:36,000
Well, I think it was a bit of a dance that he needed to be doing because he does have relationships with everybody else in the field.

45
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:43,000
So obviously it was his current lieutenant governor who stepped out, Sarah Rodriguez, but his former lieutenant governor, Mandela Barnes, is in there.

46
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:51,000
His former DOA secretary, Joel Brennan, and then Calder Roy's, who's been in the legislature alongside him for quite a number of years.

47
00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:58,000
David Collin, in some ways, is actually the person he has the least professional relationship with, just because David operates at the county level.

48
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:03,000
He's not in the state legislature quite as much, so they haven't necessarily worked.

49
00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:06,000
He hasn't served in the administration, I guess I should say.

50
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:14,000
And so it's interesting that this is the person that he's choosing to back because he does have, you know, as you say, he pulled the one card that he kind of has.

51
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:20,000
And he's putting it behind this person who dropped out, who had said that he didn't have the finances, who said he didn't have the path.

52
00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:27,000
And so Tony Evers is saying, both I back this person, I back his politics, and I think I can help him get that path.

53
00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:32,000
I will say, if you just walk back a few years, David Crowley used to be a legislative staffer.

54
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:39,000
The governor's chief of staff used to be a legislative staffer who was called David Crowley a friend, and she is influential in the governor's office.

55
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:46,000
So there's possible that he was getting advice there that David Crowley is a good candidate.

56
00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:49,000
So what's the theory of how this works out, though, Zach?

57
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:55,000
I mean, the governor's office and Crowley are going into this thing thinking, we're going to take this big risk.

58
00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:57,000
They must think they can win. How does it work?

59
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:04,000
That's a good question. And we have seen how quickly the dynamics in this race can change on the ground.

60
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:11,000
We have seen candidates rise and fall according to finance reports, according to polling, candidates dropping out, coming back in.

61
00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:18,000
Things are happening rapidly. And one thing, it feels like it's really close to this primary election, because ballots have already been returned.

62
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:24,000
The Democratic Party is worried about people not being able to spoil those ballots if they backed someone who's dropped out.

63
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:30,000
And there's still a long way to go, though. There's still a couple of weeks, there's more polls, there's a lot more ad spending.

64
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:36,000
And as we're going to explain, there was actually an incident that happened in Madison last night with the police that involved shooting.

65
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:44,000
These kind of things shake up races in a big way by putting candidates in difficult positions to see how they react, and they are judged according to that.

66
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:50,000
Yeah, we do want to acknowledge that shooting people are reacting to that shooting that took place Wednesday.

67
00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:54,000
There's a vigil tonight or Thursday as we record this.

68
00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:59,000
This is going to be a thing. You've already seen the candidates react to some very strongly.

69
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:05,000
It's going to affect the race. We're just going to take a pause here and wait for more information to learn more about this.

70
00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:12,000
Before we talk about it in this setting, Rich, turning to something very explicitly political.

71
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:17,000
The Marquette poll came out this week. We've been looking forward to this for a while.

72
00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:21,000
The last time Marquette polled on the race for governor was in March.

73
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:27,000
So why did this one that we've been kind of marking on our calendar seem so incomplete?

74
00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:31,000
You're saying we marked the Marquette poll on our calendars?

75
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:41,000
I mean, we might have. It's because it is incomplete. It's not a full picture, but it's through no fault of the pollsters, who I'll mention in a second.

76
00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:48,000
But the questions went out to Wisconsin voters between July 8th and the 16th.

77
00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:55,000
Well, July 8th is when the things kind of got crazy in the primary.

78
00:08:55,000 --> 00:09:03,000
Crowley had dropped out on July 8th when the questions were out, so he wasn't included in the results that we saw.

79
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:15,000
And also the poll asked about Rodriguez. Her information was included, but she ended her campaign essentially right after they got the data back from their surveys.

80
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:23,000
So it's still good information. Still gave us a sense of where things are at, at least among those that were included in the poll results.

81
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:32,000
But it's just a partial picture. So I wanted to give a shout out to pollster Charles Franklin, who I know watches this podcast.

82
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:41,000
And we all really appreciate the work that Charles and the rest of his team do.

83
00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:52,000
And I think we can sympathize, at least I can, that we've all been in a position where we're writing a story or we just published a story only to have the news change and essentially make that story.

84
00:09:52,000 --> 00:10:00,000
You know, totally outdated and you have to start from scratch. So it's like throwing darts at a moving target. It's pretty tough.

85
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,000
So kudos to them for doing what they could.

86
00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:07,000
Rich Kramer looking to boost his approval rating with Marquette's pollster there with a shout out.

87
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:12,000
So let's take a look at those results real quick. The Canada 2 remain in the race.

88
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:18,000
This is when you don't include David Crowley and you don't include the voters who picked Sarah Rodriguez.

89
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:24,000
Francesca Hong leads the pack with 27% followed by Mandela Barnes with 18 Joel Brennan with five.

90
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:29,000
Kaldor is with two and 48% undecided.

91
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:37,000
So Francesca Hong leads the field. This is the third Marquette poll that she's done that in this year.

92
00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,000
Does she have this locked up?

93
00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:47,000
I mean, I think if she had it locked up, we wouldn't be seeing the deck shuffling that we keep seeing because she does very well in these polls.

94
00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:55,000
She has a very energetic base of support and yet she doesn't have the power players kind of unifying behind her because they keep trying to find an alternative.

95
00:10:55,000 --> 00:11:07,000
I think if she, you know, had it locked up, so to speak, there would be a confidence from the sort of democratic authorities, the democratic kingmakers that would say that she can win both the primary and win the general.

96
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:12,000
And I think we are seeing maybe implicitly more than explicitly a real concern that she can't.

97
00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:16,000
And so who can they kind of bring in in order to beat Tom Tiffany?

98
00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,000
And so she does very well in a democratic poll.

99
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:25,000
Although again, I think we also have to talk about that 48% undecided number, but can she do all in a general?

100
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:28,000
That's sort of the big question that Democrats are very worried about.

101
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:29,000
Yeah, let's talk about that.

102
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:35,000
48% nearly half of the people, half of the democratic voters who responded to this saying, I don't know how I'm going to vote for.

103
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:40,000
Zach, what's the deal? We've been doing podcasts about this rate all summer.

104
00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:44,000
Why are so many people not sure about this?

105
00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:47,000
What we thought would be going to be a very high profile race for governor?

106
00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:52,000
Because those 48% make up a lot of people who don't watch this podcast so they are not as informed.

107
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:57,000
There are a lot of people who don't pay attention to politics until the very end.

108
00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:01,000
I just got the first campaign flyer in my mailbox this morning.

109
00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:02,000
They're starting to come.

110
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:04,000
Those people will follow along.

111
00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:09,000
Another thing that happens in primaries pretty regularly is people wait to see if there is a front runner.

112
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:12,000
They don't like to waste their vote on someone who will not win.

113
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:17,000
Or they're going to say, well, I like this person, but they're in fourth place and they're not polling very high.

114
00:12:17,000 --> 00:12:19,000
Why would I throw it behind them?

115
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:20,000
Who's my next favorite?

116
00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:22,000
Which is another good thing the Marquette poll does.

117
00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:23,000
They do.

118
00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:24,000
Who is your next favorite in line?

119
00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:28,000
Another thing to look at is Tom Tiffany's unopposed and Republican primary.

120
00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:31,000
There's still 30% undecided there.

121
00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:33,000
They're going to vote for the Republican.

122
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:38,000
But I think you can take that 30%, put it over and compare it to the 48% for the Democrats and go,

123
00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:41,000
okay, there's just a lot of people that either aren't tuned in yet,

124
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:45,000
or they're waiting to the last minute to figure out who is actually the front runner.

125
00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:49,000
Who do I trust to be the candidate for my favorite party?

126
00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:53,000
A large portion of Wisconsinites have just been living their lives this year.

127
00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:54,000
It turns out.

128
00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:57,000
Who knows to them?

129
00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:03,000
So what about the candidates who are toward the bottom of this polling?

130
00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:10,000
Joel Brennan and Kilda Royce, Brennan at 5%, Royce at 2%.

131
00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:12,000
Where does that leave them?

132
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:14,000
Rich, I'll go to you first.

133
00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:17,000
What do you think?

134
00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:22,000
Well, I mean, it leaves them in the position that they've been in for a while.

135
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:26,000
They're just towards the bottom of the heap in terms of the polling we've seen.

136
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:31,000
So ultimately, they and their supporters and their donors have decisions to make,

137
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:36,000
whether they stay in the race or whether they drop out and endorse someone like a Crowley

138
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,000
or a Hong or a Barnes or whoever.

139
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:43,000
So, you know, I've never been in that position.

140
00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:46,000
I don't know what all you have to think about.

141
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:51,000
They've clearly invested a lot of time and resources into their races thus far,

142
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:53,000
so maybe they won't drop out.

143
00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:58,000
But at some point, you would think that those are conversations happening within the campaigns.

144
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:01,000
It seems like they are saying we have money.

145
00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:08,000
And if, you know, sharing their own internal polling, if voters get to know us, they like us.

146
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:12,000
And so a lot of race left to run from their point of view.

147
00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:17,000
Joel Brennan is actually running probably the most negative ads I've seen in the primary

148
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:23,000
where he lists all the sort of front-runner candidates and explains kind of explicitly

149
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,000
why they can't win in November.

150
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:30,000
His words, Anya, I mean, what's going on with Joel Brennan's decision there?

151
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:32,000
Yeah, I mean, you're right.

152
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:34,000
I think it is a kind of tonal shift.

153
00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,000
We've talked about some of these, you know, attacks on social media,

154
00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:39,000
but this is a really kind of negative ad.

155
00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:46,000
It has the, you know, the color tint over the, like, the opponents that you normally kind of see more in a general.

156
00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:52,000
And I think it goes to this kind of game that voters tend to play in competitive primaries

157
00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:56,000
in such a swing state, like Wisconsin, where, again, you are not taking for granted

158
00:14:56,000 --> 00:14:59,000
that the winner of a primary is going to win the general, as might happen in other states,

159
00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:03,000
where Democratic voters right now are, like, playing 3D chess.

160
00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:06,000
They are not just trying to identify who is the candidate that I support,

161
00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:09,000
but who is the candidate that my neighbors are going to support?

162
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:12,000
And so, therefore, how can I make sure to kind of get the most out of my vote?

163
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,000
And so he's speaking to that electability question

164
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:20,000
and essentially saying, I am the most electable, and then when you do have 48% undecided,

165
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:23,000
there's maybe an argument to be made or he's trying to make the argument of, like,

166
00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:26,000
well, what would happen if all 48% of them went to me, right?

167
00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:28,000
That's a lot of extra voters.

168
00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:34,000
So, yes, he's now 3% to Fran Hong's, you know, 27% to Mandela Barnes's 18%,

169
00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:37,000
but if he gets half of those undecideds, he's a front runner.

170
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:39,000
And so maybe he's kind of banking on that.

171
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:40,000
There you go.

172
00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:43,000
Marquette did look at, well, they looked at a lot,

173
00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:46,000
but they had some head-to-head match-ups in there.

174
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:48,000
If you look at those, you get a slightly different story.

175
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,000
Of the Democrats in the race right now, not including David Crowley,

176
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:56,000
only Mandela Barnes defeats Tom Tiffany in head-to-head match-up

177
00:15:56,000 --> 00:16:00,000
by a 44% to 40% split among registered voters.

178
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:04,000
Tiffany leads Francesca Hong 43% to 40%.

179
00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:10,000
So, a plus four for Mandela Barnes, minus three for Francesca Hong.

180
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:13,000
Zach, I mean, I think it kind of begs the question,

181
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:18,000
why did the establishment not rally around Mandela Barnes?

182
00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,000
I think that's the question Mandela Barnes's campaign is asking

183
00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:25,000
and saying you might have made a mistake if you are looking for a Hong alternative.

184
00:16:25,000 --> 00:16:27,000
That's certainly what they are pushing right now.

185
00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:32,000
But I think one of the distinctions is Barnes came in with the most name recognition

186
00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:37,000
of everyone due to his 2022 U.S. Senate run, his close loss to Ron Johnson.

187
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,000
And it was always a question because he also had the highest negatives

188
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:44,000
that came with that hangover from that election.

189
00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,000
And he started running this race as the front-runner.

190
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,000
He introduced himself as saying, I'm the one to take on Tom Tiffany.

191
00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:54,000
He did the thing where he ignores the rest of the field and kind of pretends they weren't there.

192
00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:57,000
And then part way through this election, I think he or his campaign realized,

193
00:16:57,000 --> 00:16:59,000
oh, no, Francesca Hong is there.

194
00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:01,000
I do have to take her seriously.

195
00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:04,000
So he kind of had to shift his tone to talking about his competitors,

196
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:08,000
where I think at first he was running the 2022 U.S. Senate primary,

197
00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:12,000
where all of his competitors dropped out at the end and he basically had the field to himself.

198
00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,000
That didn't happen.

199
00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:17,000
So it is a question of did the rest of the field say you've had your chance

200
00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:19,000
and you couldn't make your case.

201
00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:21,000
Now we're going to go with someone else.

202
00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:24,000
Or is it simply that they think Harry's negatives are too high

203
00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,000
despite the head-to-head matchup looking good?

204
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,000
So it is a legitimate question for Evers.

205
00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:31,000
It's a legitimate question for voters out there.

206
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:34,000
How should they take all these different pieces of information?

207
00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:39,000
And that's what happens when you have this many centrist or moderate candidates

208
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:43,000
all trying to claim that one mantle is they can divide the field, which is what they're doing.

209
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:50,000
And now Mandel Barnes is attacking the establishment, which was definitely his friend four years ago.

210
00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:56,000
We should talk real quick before we wrap up here today about what happens

211
00:17:56,000 --> 00:18:01,000
with all these tens of thousands of voters who cast absentee ballots

212
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:04,000
and maybe want to change those ballots.

213
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:07,000
A short answer, can they?

214
00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:08,000
No.

215
00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:11,000
Well, not at this moment.

216
00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:12,000
Yeah.

217
00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:16,000
According to Wisconsin Election Commission guidance, the answer is no.

218
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:21,000
That guidance was issued voted on on July 9th, issued on July 10th.

219
00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,000
Anya, you had a well.

220
00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:24,000
Well, yes.

221
00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:29,000
So, you know, truly moments before we started taping, I got sent motions that were filed in court,

222
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:31,000
so there is now a lawsuit about this.

223
00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:35,000
I did not have a chance to open those documents, and so we won't talk about them today.

224
00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:36,000
I skimmed them.

225
00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:38,000
But I suspect that we'll talk about them soon.

226
00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:39,000
Yeah, that's right.

227
00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:43,000
And so that's something that's going to need to get resolved pretty quickly in the primaries August 11th.

228
00:18:43,000 --> 00:18:50,000
And so for people who, you are talking tens of thousands of people who have voted 80,000 people

229
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:56,000
who have now voted absentee, so that's definitely something that we'll have to watch get resolved

230
00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:57,000
through the courts potentially.

231
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:02,000
But as of right now, those votes cannot be counted in this very quickly shifting race for governor.

232
00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:07,000
Well, they're counted, but they just can't be disqualified and recast to me there.

233
00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:11,000
They will absolutely be counted no matter who you voted them for.

234
00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:18,000
But changing your mind is not a reason to recast your ballot according to Wisconsin Election Commission guidance.

235
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:20,000
That's all the time we have for today.

236
00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:21,000
Thanks for joining us.

237
00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:23,000
This has been Inside Wisconsin Politics.

238
00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:29,000
Be sure to follow us on PBSWisconsin.org, WPR.org, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.

