1
00:00:31,889 --> 00:00:33,849
Another major shakeup in the

2
00:00:33,850 --> 00:00:35,429
Democratic primary for governor as

3
00:00:35,430 --> 00:00:37,789
Mandela Barnes drops out.

4
00:00:37,790 --> 00:00:39,769
How does this change the race and

5
00:00:39,770 --> 00:00:40,929
what are the remaining candidates

6
00:00:40,930 --> 00:00:42,569
saying as they make their closing

7
00:00:42,570 --> 00:00:44,269
pitches to voters?

8
00:00:44,270 --> 00:00:46,089
This is Inside Wisconsin

9
00:00:46,090 --> 00:00:47,090
Politics.

10
00:00:51,900 --> 00:00:53,259
I'm Sean Johnson here with my

11
00:00:53,260 --> 00:00:54,999
colleagues, Anya Van Wachtendonck,

12
00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:56,999
Zach Schultz, and Rich Kramer in Eau

13
00:00:57,000 --> 00:00:57,839
Claire. Hey everyone.

14
00:00:57,840 --> 00:00:58,919
Hello.

15
00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:00,279
So just when it seemed like this

16
00:01:00,280 --> 00:01:01,619
Democratic primary for governor

17
00:01:01,620 --> 00:01:03,959
couldn't get any wilder,

18
00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:05,179
let's see, let's go through the

19
00:01:05,180 --> 00:01:06,499
candidates here. David Crowley drops

20
00:01:06,500 --> 00:01:08,539
out, Sarah Rodriguez drops out.

21
00:01:08,540 --> 00:01:10,659
David Crowely drops back in.

22
00:01:10,660 --> 00:01:12,579
We now have Mandela Barnes dropping

23
00:01:12,580 --> 00:01:13,519
out of the race.

24
00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:15,699
Some pretty big names there.

25
00:01:15,700 --> 00:01:17,659
Anya, what happened?

26
00:01:17,660 --> 00:01:19,119
I mean, I will give a little

27
00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:20,979
behind-the-scenes entry for

28
00:01:20,980 --> 00:01:22,499
our viewers. We taped a whole

29
00:01:22,500 --> 00:01:24,279
different show right before this,

30
00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:25,399
talking about the debate, and we

31
00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:26,439
will get into that later.

32
00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:28,679
And we got the news in our earpieces

33
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:30,539
that Mandela Barnes had dropped out.

34
00:01:30,540 --> 00:01:32,439
So he released a video on social

35
00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:34,479
media and interestingly, you know,

36
00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:36,419
doesn't endorse another candidate,

37
00:01:36,420 --> 00:01:38,359
looked pretty dejected, and

38
00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:39,879
essentially said, we all can tell

39
00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:41,619
the writing is on the wall of who

40
00:01:41,620 --> 00:01:42,759
the nominee is going to be.

41
00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:44,639
I assume he is alluding to Francesca

42
00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:46,539
Hong, who is just carrying all these

43
00:01:46,540 --> 00:01:48,469
polls. And he said, you

44
00:01:48,470 --> 00:01:50,009
know, the number one thing to do is

45
00:01:50,010 --> 00:01:50,909
to beat Tom Tiffany.

46
00:01:50,910 --> 00:01:52,909
So it was not a ringing endorsement.

47
00:01:52,910 --> 00:01:54,929
It did not seem like an

48
00:01:54,930 --> 00:01:56,789
impassioned sort of choice

49
00:01:56,790 --> 00:01:58,669
to step down, but certainly

50
00:01:58,670 --> 00:02:00,789
some breaking news, you know

51
00:02:00,790 --> 00:02:02,189
were less than two weeks out from

52
00:02:02,190 --> 00:02:02,999
primary day.

53
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:04,039
Yeah, we got to tell you we're

54
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:05,559
recording this on a Thursday

55
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:07,419
afternoon, so by the time you watch

56
00:02:07,420 --> 00:02:09,038
it or hear it, you may know more

57
00:02:09,039 --> 00:02:10,839
about this story than we do right at

58
00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:11,919
this moment. We can tell you right

59
00:02:11,920 --> 00:02:14,359
now from the Journal Sentinel,

60
00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:16,059
the decisions by the Barnes camp,

61
00:02:16,060 --> 00:02:17,879
they said, came amid reporting

62
00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:19,899
into allegations that Barnes was

63
00:02:19,900 --> 00:02:21,399
taking advantage of his role in the

64
00:02:21,400 --> 00:02:23,179
party to have sexual encounters with

65
00:02:23,180 --> 00:02:25,099
young adult women.

66
00:02:25,100 --> 00:02:27,319
We also read from Politico,

67
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:28,919
the announcement comes as Democratic

68
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:30,639
officials in the state brace for

69
00:02:30,640 --> 00:02:32,279
damaging media.

70
00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:33,939
Reports.

71
00:02:33,940 --> 00:02:35,479
So, I mean, Zach, there are

72
00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:36,999
different circumstances under which

73
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:39,359
a candidate can drop out.

74
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:40,819
It can be received in different

75
00:02:40,820 --> 00:02:41,820
ways.

76
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:44,919
How would you characterize this one?

77
00:02:44,920 --> 00:02:46,759
This is different from past

78
00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:48,399
episodes, including the flip side of

79
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:49,759
this, when Mandela Barnes took

80
00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:51,659
advantage of this in 2022 in a

81
00:02:51,660 --> 00:02:53,639
Senate run, when the other

82
00:02:53,640 --> 00:02:55,179
opponents in that primary dropped

83
00:02:55,180 --> 00:02:56,979
out, and they dropped out gracefully

84
00:02:56,980 --> 00:02:58,379
saying the only way at that time for

85
00:02:58,380 --> 00:02:59,779
them to win the nomination would be

86
00:02:59,780 --> 00:03:01,299
to go negative and hurt the party,

87
00:03:01,300 --> 00:03:02,799
and they decided not to do that.

88
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:04,299
And they were rewarded for that as

89
00:03:04,300 --> 00:03:05,819
being team players down the road.

90
00:03:05,820 --> 00:03:07,039
Sarah Galewski was appointed

91
00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:08,179
treasurer.

92
00:03:08,180 --> 00:03:09,399
We've seen examples of this almost

93
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:10,279
two decades ago.

94
00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:11,519
Scott Walker was going to run for

95
00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,099
governor in 2006.

96
00:03:13,100 --> 00:03:14,499
Party officials say, hey, why don't

97
00:03:14,500 --> 00:03:15,739
you clear the field for Mark Green?

98
00:03:15,740 --> 00:03:17,579
He did, and then he was the

99
00:03:17,580 --> 00:03:19,359
nominee in 2010 when party officials

100
00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:20,739
remembered he was graceful about

101
00:03:20,740 --> 00:03:22,539
that. So on one hand, it could be

102
00:03:22,540 --> 00:03:23,939
seen as Mandela Barnes seeing the

103
00:03:23,940 --> 00:03:24,759
writing on the wall.

104
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:26,099
He wasn't going to win, but he has a

105
00:03:26,100 --> 00:03:27,479
future in democratic politics in

106
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:28,499
Wisconsin.

107
00:03:28,500 --> 00:03:29,879
That would be the normal way to look

108
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:30,799
at this as saying, well, there's

109
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,539
lots of future races he could run

110
00:03:32,540 --> 00:03:34,389
for. But then when you combine this

111
00:03:34,390 --> 00:03:35,689
with the reporting that we're

112
00:03:35,690 --> 00:03:36,809
hearing, and the rumors that have

113
00:03:36,810 --> 00:03:38,909
been running around

114
00:03:38,910 --> 00:03:41,329
circles for quite a while now,

115
00:03:41,330 --> 00:03:43,429
it doesn't have that same tone

116
00:03:43,430 --> 00:03:45,029
to it. So this looks more of getting

117
00:03:45,030 --> 00:03:46,509
ahead of the damaging news that

118
00:03:46,510 --> 00:03:48,249
could be dropping less Graham

119
00:03:48,250 --> 00:03:50,269
Plattner in the East

120
00:03:50,270 --> 00:03:52,249
Coast Senate race, and more of just

121
00:03:52,250 --> 00:03:53,309
keep your head down and get out of

122
00:03:53,310 --> 00:03:54,789
the way so it becomes less of a

123
00:03:54,790 --> 00:03:56,389
distraction, and he's forced to bow

124
00:03:56,390 --> 00:03:57,949
out disgracefully as opposed to

125
00:03:57,950 --> 00:03:59,229
bowing out in his own terms.

126
00:03:59,230 --> 00:04:01,089
Yeah, you know, you alluded

127
00:04:01,090 --> 00:04:02,989
to there, but in his message,

128
00:04:02,990 --> 00:04:05,189
he did not say Francesca Hong's

129
00:04:05,190 --> 00:04:06,929
name. He didn't say I'm dropping out

130
00:04:06,930 --> 00:04:08,589
because she's the front runner and

131
00:04:08,590 --> 00:04:09,649
that's good.

132
00:04:09,650 --> 00:04:11,289
He didn't say I am dropping out and

133
00:04:11,290 --> 00:04:13,349
I support a challenger because he's

134
00:04:13,350 --> 00:04:14,769
kind of had some fights with them

135
00:04:14,770 --> 00:04:15,770
recently.

136
00:04:16,789 --> 00:04:18,729
Rich, you reported

137
00:04:18,730 --> 00:04:20,609
on Mandela Barnes,

138
00:04:20,610 --> 00:04:22,509
this campaign and in 2022, he

139
00:04:22,510 --> 00:04:24,809
entered this race and

140
00:04:24,810 --> 00:04:26,309
presented himself as the

141
00:04:26,310 --> 00:04:27,569
front-runner and it seemed like

142
00:04:27,570 --> 00:04:28,479
That's sort of...

143
00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:30,479
Slowly slipped away

144
00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:31,659
during this campaign.

145
00:04:31,660 --> 00:04:34,099
And now this quite a

146
00:04:34,100 --> 00:04:35,939
shocking arc to his story this

147
00:04:35,940 --> 00:04:36,940
year.

148
00:04:38,010 --> 00:04:41,029
Yeah, it's been something else.

149
00:04:41,030 --> 00:04:42,869
I mean, in terms of name

150
00:04:42,870 --> 00:04:44,589
recognition, he did enter the race

151
00:04:44,590 --> 00:04:46,069
with more than any of the other

152
00:04:46,070 --> 00:04:48,029
candidates, including Republican

153
00:04:48,030 --> 00:04:49,849
Congressman Tom Tiffany.

154
00:04:49,850 --> 00:04:51,729
And that was because of the 2022

155
00:04:51,730 --> 00:04:53,649
Senate loss to

156
00:04:53,650 --> 00:04:56,049
Ron Johnson. It was a close race.

157
00:04:56,050 --> 00:04:58,109
And there was a lot of advertising.

158
00:04:58,110 --> 00:04:59,389
So his name got around.

159
00:04:59,390 --> 00:05:01,279
Um, but.

160
00:05:01,280 --> 00:05:03,939
That race really hurt him also,

161
00:05:03,940 --> 00:05:05,919
beyond whatever is going to be

162
00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:07,759
reported or is being reported at

163
00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:11,139
this moment about any improprieties.

164
00:05:11,140 --> 00:05:12,979
He was damaged from that

165
00:05:12,980 --> 00:05:15,139
Senate loss to Ron Johnson

166
00:05:15,140 --> 00:05:17,059
among Democrats.

167
00:05:17,060 --> 00:05:18,419
Even before he jumped into the race

168
00:05:18,420 --> 00:05:20,259
for governor, there was an

169
00:05:20,260 --> 00:05:22,039
op-ed that had former Lieutenant

170
00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:23,919
Governor Barbara Lawton,

171
00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:25,859
a Democrat that is very involved

172
00:05:25,860 --> 00:05:27,699
in the party, said that

173
00:05:27,700 --> 00:05:29,659
he shouldn't get in the race, that

174
00:05:29,660 --> 00:05:31,639
he's proven that he can.

175
00:05:31,640 --> 00:05:33,539
Can't win statewide, et

176
00:05:33,540 --> 00:05:35,719
cetera. So there was that.

177
00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:37,779
And then we started seeing in

178
00:05:37,780 --> 00:05:40,739
the earlier days of this

179
00:05:40,740 --> 00:05:42,919
gubernatorial primary

180
00:05:42,920 --> 00:05:44,959
among the Democrats where people

181
00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:45,939
were dropping out. They weren't

182
00:05:45,940 --> 00:05:47,799
endorsing Barnes like they

183
00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:49,079
did in 2022.

184
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:50,379
So that was a signal.

185
00:05:50,380 --> 00:05:52,379
Then Governor Evers endorsed

186
00:05:52,380 --> 00:05:54,559
someone besides Barnes,

187
00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:56,679
who Barnes and Evers served together

188
00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:58,519
for

189
00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:00,059
years. So.

190
00:06:00,060 --> 00:06:02,019
That was a sign and

191
00:06:02,020 --> 00:06:04,099
now here we are.

192
00:06:04,100 --> 00:06:06,819
It's really been just

193
00:06:06,820 --> 00:06:09,199
a really interesting

194
00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:11,229
ride for Barnes.

195
00:06:11,230 --> 00:06:13,229
So his departure kind

196
00:06:13,230 --> 00:06:14,909
of leaves the race in some ways

197
00:06:14,910 --> 00:06:16,409
where it was, where there seems to

198
00:06:16,410 --> 00:06:18,149
be this growing consensus out there

199
00:06:18,150 --> 00:06:20,069
that this is Francesca Hong's race

200
00:06:20,070 --> 00:06:21,289
to lose.

201
00:06:21,290 --> 00:06:23,049
She is a democratic socialist, which

202
00:06:23,050 --> 00:06:25,209
has sort of defined this campaign.

203
00:06:25,210 --> 00:06:27,049
She was asked about her views

204
00:06:27,050 --> 00:06:29,209
at this week's debate.

205
00:06:29,210 --> 00:06:30,849
Let's give a listen to what she had

206
00:06:30,850 --> 00:06:31,850
to say.

207
00:06:32,460 --> 00:06:34,419
What democratic socialism is

208
00:06:34,420 --> 00:06:36,459
is a form of government that puts

209
00:06:36,460 --> 00:06:38,099
working class people first, that

210
00:06:38,100 --> 00:06:39,839
puts work first.

211
00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:41,319
The policies that we have been

212
00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:43,979
working on, permanent affordability,

213
00:06:43,980 --> 00:06:45,879
has broad bipartisan support

214
00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:47,379
in every corner of the state.

215
00:06:48,570 --> 00:06:50,829
Anya, you've covered her

216
00:06:50,830 --> 00:06:52,289
campaign. You profiled her for

217
00:06:52,290 --> 00:06:54,169
Wisconsin Public Radio.

218
00:06:54,170 --> 00:06:56,409
How is she presenting her

219
00:06:56,410 --> 00:06:58,329
brand of politics to

220
00:06:58,330 --> 00:07:00,849
primary voters and also potentially

221
00:07:00,850 --> 00:07:02,989
critics as this primary closes

222
00:07:02,990 --> 00:07:03,389
out?

223
00:07:03,390 --> 00:07:04,789
Yeah, I think she's been really

224
00:07:04,790 --> 00:07:06,409
consistent, not just throughout this

225
00:07:06,410 --> 00:07:07,769
campaign, but you know, throughout

226
00:07:07,770 --> 00:07:08,979
her political career.

227
00:07:08,980 --> 00:07:10,439
She was a member of the Democratic

228
00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:12,079
Socialist Caucus in the Assembly.

229
00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:13,379
She's running as a Democratic

230
00:07:13,380 --> 00:07:15,179
socialist on the Democratic ticket.

231
00:07:15,180 --> 00:07:16,839
And so you've seen that a lot in her

232
00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:18,019
policy positions.

233
00:07:18,020 --> 00:07:19,559
I think a little bit what we saw on

234
00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:21,959
the debate stage was her trying to

235
00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:23,979
nuance some of that, perhaps for

236
00:07:23,980 --> 00:07:25,519
a more general election, again, as

237
00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:27,699
she is this kind of runaway favorite

238
00:07:27,700 --> 00:07:28,899
at the moment.

239
00:07:28,900 --> 00:07:31,239
I saw some criticism actually from

240
00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:33,179
national DSA members on

241
00:07:33,180 --> 00:07:34,299
social media who were saying

242
00:07:34,300 --> 00:07:36,239
essentially, oh, she's not socialist

243
00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:38,269
enough, but I think she understands.

244
00:07:38,270 --> 00:07:40,389
That there is going to be a

245
00:07:40,390 --> 00:07:41,949
pretty ready-made line of attack

246
00:07:41,950 --> 00:07:43,829
from Republicans based on some

247
00:07:43,830 --> 00:07:45,129
of her past statements, based on

248
00:07:45,130 --> 00:07:46,849
calling for defunding the police,

249
00:07:46,850 --> 00:07:48,489
based on aligning with certain, you

250
00:07:48,490 --> 00:07:50,049
know, sort of far left, more like

251
00:07:50,050 --> 00:07:52,669
agitated sort of online figures,

252
00:07:52,670 --> 00:07:54,429
that that gives them easy things to

253
00:07:54,430 --> 00:07:56,509
kind of clip, which can

254
00:07:56,510 --> 00:07:58,429
really kind of be hard to

255
00:07:58,430 --> 00:07:59,889
oppose from a more kind of nuanced

256
00:07:59,890 --> 00:08:01,409
position. And so I think we saw her

257
00:08:01,410 --> 00:08:03,249
on the debate stage kind of trying

258
00:08:03,250 --> 00:08:06,009
out some of these more biteable,

259
00:08:06,010 --> 00:08:07,349
clippable ways of approaching her

260
00:08:07,350 --> 00:08:08,189
politics.

261
00:08:08,190 --> 00:08:10,129
Yeah, part of the question that led

262
00:08:10,130 --> 00:08:11,969
to that answer there was,

263
00:08:11,970 --> 00:08:13,309
hey, the Democratic Socialists of

264
00:08:13,310 --> 00:08:15,269
America stand for getting rid

265
00:08:15,270 --> 00:08:16,489
of prisons, getting rid of the

266
00:08:16,490 --> 00:08:18,209
Senate. Are you with them?

267
00:08:18,210 --> 00:08:19,609
And she said she didn't agree with

268
00:08:19,610 --> 00:08:21,649
them on everything.

269
00:08:21,650 --> 00:08:23,869
But Zach, I do kind of sense from

270
00:08:23,870 --> 00:08:25,829
her a pivot toward

271
00:08:25,830 --> 00:08:27,669
the general election in terms of the

272
00:08:27,670 --> 00:08:28,869
way that she's answering these

273
00:08:28,870 --> 00:08:31,029
questions, you

274
00:08:31,030 --> 00:08:32,949
know, on, I don't know, you name it,

275
00:08:32,950 --> 00:08:34,769
tax policy on

276
00:08:34,770 --> 00:08:35,788
defund the police.

277
00:08:35,789 --> 00:08:37,539
You know, what stood out to you.

278
00:08:37,540 --> 00:08:39,158
She's definitely nuancing those

279
00:08:39,159 --> 00:08:41,479
positions, because in politics,

280
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:43,239
if you're explaining, you're losing.

281
00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:44,659
That phrase has been around for a

282
00:08:44,660 --> 00:08:46,079
long time. So she's trying to

283
00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:47,699
explain to general election voters

284
00:08:47,700 --> 00:08:49,339
that she's not that kind of

285
00:08:49,340 --> 00:08:50,579
socialist. She's a democratic

286
00:08:50,580 --> 00:08:52,619
socialist, because Republicans

287
00:08:52,620 --> 00:08:54,099
are comparing her to Venezuela.

288
00:08:54,100 --> 00:08:55,919
I mean, that's Tom Tiffany's

289
00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:57,159
line of attack that I heard on

290
00:08:57,160 --> 00:08:58,359
Tuesday night during the debate.

291
00:08:58,360 --> 00:08:59,859
I was covering one of his events.

292
00:08:59,860 --> 00:09:00,999
And he's saying, well, if want to

293
00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:02,079
know about socialism, you just have

294
00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:03,299
to look at Venezuela when they're

295
00:09:03,300 --> 00:09:04,239
eating the animals and they're

296
00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:05,409
eatin' their shirts and...

297
00:09:05,410 --> 00:09:06,569
There's nothing available for

298
00:09:06,570 --> 00:09:07,629
anybody, and that's what's coming to

299
00:09:07,630 --> 00:09:09,329
Wisconsin if you looked at Francesca

300
00:09:09,330 --> 00:09:10,769
Hong. That's what you're gonna hear

301
00:09:10,770 --> 00:09:11,749
from them.

302
00:09:11,750 --> 00:09:13,289
So her trying to go more on the

303
00:09:13,290 --> 00:09:14,509
lines of the old Milwaukee

304
00:09:14,510 --> 00:09:15,709
socialists, like the sewer

305
00:09:15,710 --> 00:09:16,909
socialists they were called, of

306
00:09:16,910 --> 00:09:18,409
like, let's work on infrastructure

307
00:09:18,410 --> 00:09:19,989
and public schools and the public

308
00:09:19,990 --> 00:09:22,149
good, the public welfare.

309
00:09:22,150 --> 00:09:23,609
She's trying to get ahead of some of

310
00:09:23,610 --> 00:09:25,069
those attacks and explain that's

311
00:09:25,070 --> 00:09:27,269
where her socialist policies lie

312
00:09:27,270 --> 00:09:29,089
less in the international

313
00:09:29,090 --> 00:09:30,769
communist socialist stuff that we

314
00:09:30,770 --> 00:09:32,329
hear from the countries that fall

315
00:09:32,330 --> 00:09:34,249
apart that claim to be socialist.

316
00:09:34,250 --> 00:09:37,049
And Rich, you covered the debate.

317
00:09:37,050 --> 00:09:38,549
She was asked about, I mean,

318
00:09:38,550 --> 00:09:39,789
everybody there on that debate stage

319
00:09:39,790 --> 00:09:41,409
was saying, let's tax millionaires

320
00:09:41,410 --> 00:09:42,569
to pay for stuff in state

321
00:09:42,570 --> 00:09:43,570
government.

322
00:09:44,430 --> 00:09:46,329
She got a little more specific

323
00:09:46,330 --> 00:09:48,389
than others, and yet it

324
00:09:48,390 --> 00:09:49,829
seemed like potentially an

325
00:09:49,830 --> 00:09:51,089
incomplete answer based on her

326
00:09:51,090 --> 00:09:52,090
record.

327
00:09:53,140 --> 00:09:54,140
Yeah, that's right.

328
00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:56,899
Her website has

329
00:09:56,900 --> 00:09:58,559
all kinds of very specific numbers.

330
00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:00,399
And also, she's been in the

331
00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:01,859
Assembly for some time now.

332
00:10:01,860 --> 00:10:03,719
And she's taken a

333
00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:05,659
lot of votes. She's introduced a lot

334
00:10:05,660 --> 00:10:06,559
a legislation.

335
00:10:06,560 --> 00:10:09,139
So on the debate stage,

336
00:10:09,140 --> 00:10:10,639
essentially, she was saying, well,

337
00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:13,159
for millionaires, it'd be a 1%

338
00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:15,199
tax increase to something like

339
00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:17,339
8.6% versus

340
00:10:17,340 --> 00:10:19,279
whatever it is

341
00:10:19,280 --> 00:10:21,199
now. So she said

342
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:22,279
that. But...

343
00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:24,199
Right away online, Democrats

344
00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:26,299
even, were saying, well, you know,

345
00:10:26,300 --> 00:10:28,719
actually, she's got a plan to

346
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:30,539
create a new tax bracket and set it

347
00:10:30,540 --> 00:10:32,439
at 17 point something

348
00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:34,659
percent, which is

349
00:10:34,660 --> 00:10:36,639
true. That was part of a

350
00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:38,459
plan she put out in the

351
00:10:38,460 --> 00:10:41,839
legislature, so she

352
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:43,859
talked really

353
00:10:43,860 --> 00:10:45,939
generally about it,

354
00:10:45,940 --> 00:10:48,019
and so then others had to go and

355
00:10:48,020 --> 00:10:50,419
dig up what she said in the past.

356
00:10:50,420 --> 00:10:52,539
Um, we did mention last week

357
00:10:52,540 --> 00:10:54,699
that we were gonna wait for another

358
00:10:54,700 --> 00:10:57,099
story to develop this police

359
00:10:57,100 --> 00:10:59,539
shooting in Madison and

360
00:10:59,540 --> 00:11:00,719
you've heard all the candidates for

361
00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,439
governor come out and say, you know,

362
00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:04,259
we need to have a swift

363
00:11:04,260 --> 00:11:06,159
investigation of that.

364
00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:07,759
Uh, Zach, I think it's fair to say

365
00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:09,599
that Francesca Hong's response

366
00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:11,199
to the shooting was certainly the

367
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:12,219
most attention getting.

368
00:11:12,220 --> 00:11:14,219
She went out to the site of the

369
00:11:14,220 --> 00:11:15,459
shooting with the bullhorn and

370
00:11:15,460 --> 00:11:16,460
called it an execution.

371
00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:19,699
What is she saying now and why'd

372
00:11:19,700 --> 00:11:21,949
she use that word in her words?

373
00:11:21,950 --> 00:11:23,089
Well, she was asked during the

374
00:11:23,090 --> 00:11:24,909
debate, would you make

375
00:11:24,910 --> 00:11:26,629
the same statement as governor?

376
00:11:26,630 --> 00:11:28,449
And her answer was no, because

377
00:11:28,450 --> 00:11:31,089
the governor has a bigger megaphone,

378
00:11:31,090 --> 00:11:32,149
and essentially eluding it wouldn't

379
00:11:32,150 --> 00:11:33,689
be appropriate for the governor to

380
00:11:33,690 --> 00:11:34,769
make that statement.

381
00:11:34,770 --> 00:11:36,169
What's interesting is you're

382
00:11:36,170 --> 00:11:37,869
supposed to campaign how you would

383
00:11:37,870 --> 00:11:39,689
govern, and she did make

384
00:11:39,690 --> 00:11:41,869
that as a candidate,

385
00:11:41,870 --> 00:11:43,269
only a few weeks away from a

386
00:11:43,270 --> 00:11:44,109
primary.

387
00:11:44,110 --> 00:11:45,809
And the video of her doing it, the

388
00:11:45,810 --> 00:11:47,469
crowd is clearly trying to goad her

389
00:11:47,470 --> 00:11:49,309
into using word murder and she

390
00:11:49,310 --> 00:11:51,189
at that moment takes a pause and

391
00:11:51,190 --> 00:11:52,839
then says execution.

392
00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:54,759
So she was even calibrating what she

393
00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:56,559
was saying in that moment.

394
00:11:56,560 --> 00:11:58,299
This wasn't as much of an off the

395
00:11:58,300 --> 00:11:59,879
cuff statement as you might think.

396
00:11:59,880 --> 00:12:01,339
When you cover her in speeches, she

397
00:12:01,340 --> 00:12:03,239
is very measured in her in

398
00:12:03,240 --> 00:12:04,319
her thought and her speech.

399
00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:06,099
She pauses before she answers a

400
00:12:06,100 --> 00:12:07,979
question. She's thinking about it's

401
00:12:07,980 --> 00:12:09,879
not just letting the words fly

402
00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:11,039
like we see on social media

403
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:12,579
sometimes with some politicians and

404
00:12:12,580 --> 00:12:14,019
then worry about retracting it

405
00:12:14,020 --> 00:12:16,019
later. So for her to use that word

406
00:12:16,020 --> 00:12:17,919
was a intentional thing,

407
00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:19,639
and then to say, well, I wouldn't as

408
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:21,459
governor. Does call into question,

409
00:12:21,460 --> 00:12:22,539
like what is the line then?

410
00:12:22,540 --> 00:12:24,199
Why use it now in this case and not?

411
00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:25,499
And we know it will be used against

412
00:12:25,500 --> 00:12:27,039
her. Tom Tiffany's already talking

413
00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:28,139
about that.

414
00:12:28,140 --> 00:12:29,679
They're attacking the Democratic

415
00:12:29,680 --> 00:12:31,059
candidate simply because the street

416
00:12:31,060 --> 00:12:32,679
where the shooting took place is

417
00:12:32,680 --> 00:12:34,559
still shut down by protestors,

418
00:12:34,560 --> 00:12:35,799
saying that Madison needs to get

419
00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:36,999
control of the streets and that as

420
00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:38,179
governor, he would obviously have

421
00:12:38,180 --> 00:12:39,659
that street open by now.

422
00:12:39,660 --> 00:12:41,179
So they're going to use this against

423
00:12:41,180 --> 00:12:42,639
her as a candidate, assuming that

424
00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:43,999
she wins this primary.

425
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:45,219
And the question is, how does she

426
00:12:45,220 --> 00:12:46,939
continue explaining those statements

427
00:12:46,940 --> 00:12:48,879
and those votes to general election

428
00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:49,880
voters?

429
00:12:50,510 --> 00:12:52,109
Let's talk about David Crowley,

430
00:12:52,110 --> 00:12:53,789
Milwaukee County's executive, who

431
00:12:53,790 --> 00:12:56,009
got back in this race as

432
00:12:56,010 --> 00:12:58,029
the Francesca Hong alternative.

433
00:12:58,030 --> 00:12:59,809
And I got to think that Mandela

434
00:12:59,810 --> 00:13:01,749
Barnes' departure from this

435
00:13:01,750 --> 00:13:04,129
race potentially changes

436
00:13:04,130 --> 00:13:06,309
the calculus for him.

437
00:13:07,790 --> 00:13:09,769
Rich, what were we hearing from

438
00:13:09,770 --> 00:13:11,589
David Crowly

439
00:13:11,590 --> 00:13:13,329
as it relates to Francesca Hung up

440
00:13:13,330 --> 00:13:15,469
to this point in the race?

441
00:13:15,470 --> 00:13:17,149
And has it been catching on?

442
00:13:17,150 --> 00:13:18,929
Is there is there a sign that this

443
00:13:18,930 --> 00:13:19,889
theory?

444
00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:21,409
That Crowley supporters had is

445
00:13:21,410 --> 00:13:22,410
actually working.

446
00:13:24,230 --> 00:13:26,329
Well, yeah, the

447
00:13:26,330 --> 00:13:28,209
claim that we've heard from

448
00:13:28,210 --> 00:13:29,509
David Crowley and some of the other

449
00:13:29,510 --> 00:13:31,609
Democratic candidates is that

450
00:13:31,610 --> 00:13:33,709
the Republican Governors

451
00:13:33,710 --> 00:13:35,529
Association is essentially trying

452
00:13:35,530 --> 00:13:38,309
to get Hong elected

453
00:13:38,310 --> 00:13:40,009
during the primary so that it would

454
00:13:40,010 --> 00:13:42,149
be easier for Tom Tiffany to

455
00:13:42,150 --> 00:13:43,989
defeat her. So that was the line

456
00:13:43,990 --> 00:13:45,610
going into it.

457
00:13:49,350 --> 00:13:50,709
And they...

458
00:13:50,710 --> 00:13:53,079
The Oh,

459
00:13:54,100 --> 00:13:54,919
I lost it.

460
00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:55,019
I'm sorry.

461
00:13:55,020 --> 00:13:56,979
Yeah, yeah, I mean, I will

462
00:13:56,980 --> 00:13:58,419
say one thing about those those ads

463
00:13:58,420 --> 00:13:59,519
that you mentioned the Republican

464
00:13:59,520 --> 00:14:01,559
ads I

465
00:14:01,560 --> 00:14:03,679
think they are kind of Doing

466
00:14:03,680 --> 00:14:05,219
there's they're serving two goals

467
00:14:05,220 --> 00:14:06,519
right now for Republicans.

468
00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:07,619
They're kind of getting bang for

469
00:14:07,620 --> 00:14:09,699
their buck in a couple ways I

470
00:14:09,700 --> 00:14:10,699
do think there's a pretty strong

471
00:14:10,700 --> 00:14:12,699
case to be made that they were

472
00:14:12,700 --> 00:14:15,519
there to prop up

473
00:14:15,520 --> 00:14:17,719
Francesca Hong They're saying

474
00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:19,299
that she's a very liberal candidate

475
00:14:19,300 --> 00:14:21,099
in these liberal media markets, but

476
00:14:21,100 --> 00:14:23,039
I think now Republicans

477
00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:25,099
do view her as the general

478
00:14:25,100 --> 00:14:26,319
election candidate in the way that

479
00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:27,379
they're talking about her.

480
00:14:27,380 --> 00:14:28,979
So they are kind of getting a head

481
00:14:28,980 --> 00:14:30,839
start on these attacks

482
00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:31,840
in some way.

483
00:14:32,840 --> 00:14:34,679
Anya, David

484
00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:36,699
Crowley and Mandela Barnes were kind

485
00:14:36,700 --> 00:14:38,379
of going at it.

486
00:14:38,380 --> 00:14:40,979
And as their candidacies

487
00:14:40,980 --> 00:14:42,919
progressed in this race,

488
00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,259
as Mandela Barnes kind of felt like

489
00:14:45,260 --> 00:14:47,259
David Crowely had blocked his

490
00:14:47,260 --> 00:14:48,139
path.

491
00:14:48,140 --> 00:14:49,679
Now that Mandela Barns is out of the

492
00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:51,859
way, is there a

493
00:14:51,860 --> 00:14:53,279
boost coming for Crowley?

494
00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:54,739
Yeah, I mean, you know, it is

495
00:14:54,740 --> 00:14:56,959
possible that among other concerns,

496
00:14:56,960 --> 00:14:58,559
Mandela Barnes felt snubbed by the

497
00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:00,699
fact that Governor Tony Evers backed

498
00:15:00,700 --> 00:15:01,959
Crowley and not him.

499
00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:03,839
He was his lieutenant governor.

500
00:15:03,840 --> 00:15:06,139
And so we saw barbs,

501
00:15:06,140 --> 00:15:07,919
I means like almost schoolyard barbs

502
00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:09,799
on social media, primarily

503
00:15:09,800 --> 00:15:11,739
coming from Barnes

504
00:15:11,740 --> 00:15:13,059
towards Crowley, but then Crowley

505
00:15:13,060 --> 00:15:14,449
would sort of respond in kind.

506
00:15:14,450 --> 00:15:16,849
So really like a really kind of

507
00:15:16,850 --> 00:15:18,669
it felt like bad blood between them.

508
00:15:18,670 --> 00:15:20,149
One of the arguments that the Barnes

509
00:15:20,150 --> 00:15:21,789
camp has been making as other

510
00:15:21,790 --> 00:15:23,589
candidates have dropped out is we

511
00:15:23,590 --> 00:15:25,469
will absorb those votes.

512
00:15:25,470 --> 00:15:27,709
And so now part of the question is

513
00:15:27,710 --> 00:15:29,529
where will these remaining

514
00:15:29,530 --> 00:15:30,469
sort of Barnes votes go?

515
00:15:30,470 --> 00:15:31,969
Will they go further left towards

516
00:15:31,970 --> 00:15:33,449
Hong? Will they go further towards

517
00:15:33,450 --> 00:15:35,089
the center, towards Crowley?

518
00:15:35,090 --> 00:15:36,289
And of course, I haven't checked the

519
00:15:36,290 --> 00:15:37,749
numbers recently, but as of last

520
00:15:37,750 --> 00:15:39,669
week, 100,000 absentee ballots

521
00:15:39,670 --> 00:15:40,669
had already been turned in.

522
00:15:40,670 --> 00:15:42,109
I imagine that number is much higher

523
00:15:42,110 --> 00:15:43,829
now. So, there's also the question

524
00:15:43,830 --> 00:15:45,649
of like... Of the remaining

525
00:15:45,650 --> 00:15:47,129
voters who haven't cast their

526
00:15:47,130 --> 00:15:49,469
ballots, some of them are undecided,

527
00:15:49,470 --> 00:15:51,349
but those who were leaning towards

528
00:15:51,350 --> 00:15:52,929
Barnes, now where are they going to

529
00:15:52,930 --> 00:15:54,909
go, especially if these

530
00:15:54,910 --> 00:15:56,529
allegations start to come out and it

531
00:15:56,530 --> 00:15:58,129
becomes an even more chaotic news

532
00:15:58,130 --> 00:16:00,149
cycle that distracts from the actual

533
00:16:00,150 --> 00:16:02,329
meat of the campaign.

534
00:16:02,330 --> 00:16:04,229
Uh, Rich, you know, real

535
00:16:04,230 --> 00:16:06,049
quick on that law, on those

536
00:16:06,050 --> 00:16:08,229
ballots, there was a lawsuit filed

537
00:16:08,230 --> 00:16:11,149
to try to get them counted,

538
00:16:11,150 --> 00:16:12,849
a judge ruled on that this week,

539
00:16:12,850 --> 00:16:14,909
what does that mean for those

540
00:16:14,910 --> 00:16:15,910
absentee ballots?

541
00:16:17,580 --> 00:16:20,939
Well, yeah, the judge dismissed

542
00:16:20,940 --> 00:16:23,059
or denied to issue an injunction

543
00:16:23,060 --> 00:16:24,679
essentially blocking the Wisconsin

544
00:16:24,680 --> 00:16:26,379
Elections Commission guidance saying

545
00:16:26,380 --> 00:16:28,619
that you cannot,

546
00:16:28,620 --> 00:16:30,299
if you have sent in your absentee

547
00:16:30,300 --> 00:16:32,139
ballot, you cannot ask for

548
00:16:32,140 --> 00:16:34,259
it to be spoiled and get a new one.

549
00:16:34,260 --> 00:16:36,079
So essentially what that means is

550
00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:37,299
that people who have already cast

551
00:16:37,300 --> 00:16:39,619
ballots for,

552
00:16:39,620 --> 00:16:41,659
you know, Lieutenant Governor Sara

553
00:16:41,660 --> 00:16:43,779
Rodriguez, Mandela Barnes,

554
00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:46,879
Missy Hughes, they're essentially

555
00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:47,839
out of luck.

556
00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:50,139
At this point so

557
00:16:50,140 --> 00:16:52,199
Unless that changes unless this is

558
00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:53,899
rushed through an appeal process up

559
00:16:53,900 --> 00:16:55,379
to the Supreme Court and the Supreme

560
00:16:55,380 --> 00:16:57,279
court makes a ruling before August

561
00:16:57,280 --> 00:16:59,779
11th it kind of seems like

562
00:16:59,780 --> 00:17:02,139
Those votes will be counted, but

563
00:17:02,140 --> 00:17:04,409
they won't go anywhere

564
00:17:04,410 --> 00:17:06,149
Zach, we had a couple of polls out

565
00:17:06,150 --> 00:17:07,368
this week.

566
00:17:07,369 --> 00:17:09,189
They both showed Francesca Hong

567
00:17:09,190 --> 00:17:11,009
with at least a 20-point

568
00:17:11,010 --> 00:17:12,010
lead.

569
00:17:12,670 --> 00:17:14,429
One of them showed Mandela Barnes.

570
00:17:14,430 --> 00:17:15,848
Marquette showed Mandella Barnes.

571
00:17:15,849 --> 00:17:16,929
And second, David Crowley down at

572
00:17:16,930 --> 00:17:18,309
about 7%.

573
00:17:18,310 --> 00:17:20,409
But in the Marquett poll,

574
00:17:20,410 --> 00:17:21,949
we're looking at a third of voters

575
00:17:21,950 --> 00:17:23,649
still undecided.

576
00:17:23,650 --> 00:17:24,989
Now Mandela Barns is out of the

577
00:17:24,990 --> 00:17:25,969
race. You got all those undecide

578
00:17:25,970 --> 00:17:26,848
voters.

579
00:17:26,849 --> 00:17:28,709
David Crowely is still there.

580
00:17:28,710 --> 00:17:30,909
Could this race shake

581
00:17:30,910 --> 00:17:33,789
up and change in the closing days?

582
00:17:33,790 --> 00:17:34,379
Well.

583
00:17:34,380 --> 00:17:36,339
Every time we say no, we're proven

584
00:17:36,340 --> 00:17:38,199
wrong, it does get shaken up

585
00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:39,919
by larger events than what we

586
00:17:39,920 --> 00:17:40,979
probably could have predicted on

587
00:17:40,980 --> 00:17:41,859
this show.

588
00:17:41,860 --> 00:17:43,719
But the question is, is there

589
00:17:43,720 --> 00:17:45,799
enough room for anyone to

590
00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:47,439
gain enough ground to catch the lead

591
00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:49,319
that Franchesca Hong looks like she

592
00:17:49,320 --> 00:17:51,479
has? Just talking about those

593
00:17:51,480 --> 00:17:52,639
absentee ballots that have been

594
00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:53,939
cast, they're not getting counted

595
00:17:53,940 --> 00:17:54,859
back.

596
00:17:54,860 --> 00:17:56,459
The question will be, once this race

597
00:17:56,460 --> 00:17:58,359
is all over, will the margin

598
00:17:58,360 --> 00:18:00,479
of votes that Mandela Barnes

599
00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:02,359
and Rodrigues received add

600
00:18:02,360 --> 00:18:04,129
up to the amount.

601
00:18:04,130 --> 00:18:05,889
That the second place person took,

602
00:18:05,890 --> 00:18:07,249
or will they have made a difference

603
00:18:07,250 --> 00:18:08,869
in some spoiling manner?

604
00:18:08,870 --> 00:18:10,189
That'll be interesting math to see,

605
00:18:10,190 --> 00:18:11,609
but by then, we'll have a winner.

606
00:18:11,610 --> 00:18:13,689
Yeah, we're either going to have

607
00:18:13,690 --> 00:18:15,769
a massive comeback

608
00:18:15,770 --> 00:18:17,349
here by one of these candidates

609
00:18:17,350 --> 00:18:19,569
coming back to,

610
00:18:19,570 --> 00:18:21,469
I guess, edge out Francis Kong

611
00:18:21,470 --> 00:18:22,869
at the end, or else we're going to

612
00:18:22,870 --> 00:18:24,789
the most interesting governor's

613
00:18:24,790 --> 00:18:26,629
race in the country this November

614
00:18:26,630 --> 00:18:28,649
between a democratic socialist

615
00:18:28,650 --> 00:18:30,449
and somebody that Democrats will

616
00:18:30,450 --> 00:18:32,469
paint as an election denier in

617
00:18:32,470 --> 00:18:34,329
Tom Tiffany. So get ready for

618
00:18:34,330 --> 00:18:36,069
a lot of money and ads to come to

619
00:18:36,070 --> 00:18:37,449
your state of Wisconsin, which we

620
00:18:37,450 --> 00:18:39,059
are very used to.

621
00:18:39,060 --> 00:18:40,079
That's all the time we have for

622
00:18:40,080 --> 00:18:41,519
today. Thanks for joining us.

623
00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:43,099
This has been Inside Wisconsin

624
00:18:43,100 --> 00:18:44,239
Politics.

625
00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:45,259
Be sure to follow us on

626
00:18:45,260 --> 00:18:47,879
pbswisconsin.org, wpr.org

627
00:18:47,880 --> 00:18:49,799
YouTube, or wherever you

628
00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:50,800
get your podcasts.

