1
00:00:19,390 --> 00:00:20,429
The Democratic candidates for

2
00:00:20,430 --> 00:00:21,949
governor make their closing pitches

3
00:00:21,950 --> 00:00:22,889
to voters.

4
00:00:22,890 --> 00:00:23,929
What are they saying?

5
00:00:23,930 --> 00:00:25,429
And how's the race shaping up with

6
00:00:25,430 --> 00:00:27,289
less than two weeks to go?

7
00:00:27,290 --> 00:00:29,490
This is Inside Wisconsin Politics.

8
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:35,279
I'm Sean Johnson here with my

9
00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:36,919
colleagues, Anya Van Wachtendonck,

10
00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:38,799
Zach Schultz, and Rich Kramer in Eau

11
00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:39,699
Claire. Hey everyone.

12
00:00:39,700 --> 00:00:40,839
Hello.

13
00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:42,739
So we're gonna get into how each of

14
00:00:42,740 --> 00:00:44,059
these candidates is presenting

15
00:00:44,060 --> 00:00:45,679
themselves here in just a moment,

16
00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:47,599
but before we do that,

17
00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:49,619
I wonder if each of you

18
00:00:49,620 --> 00:00:51,679
would take a quick stab at

19
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:53,519
summing up this race as we

20
00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:55,479
know it right now with less than two

21
00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,119
weeks to go.

22
00:00:57,120 --> 00:00:58,279
Zach, you first.

23
00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:00,339
I would say remarkable consistency

24
00:01:00,340 --> 00:01:02,479
at the top and the bottom,

25
00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:04,219
and a lot of churn in the middle.

26
00:01:04,220 --> 00:01:05,159
There we go.

27
00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:06,179
Okay, Anya, how about you?

28
00:01:06,180 --> 00:01:07,319
You know, I feel like we spent so

29
00:01:07,320 --> 00:01:08,739
many months kind of waiting for

30
00:01:08,740 --> 00:01:10,659
something to happen in this race and

31
00:01:10,660 --> 00:01:12,619
then everything happened all at once

32
00:01:12,620 --> 00:01:13,979
and now the deck has kind of

33
00:01:13,980 --> 00:01:15,119
completely shuffled.

34
00:01:15,120 --> 00:01:16,799
So Topsy Turvy might be the word I

35
00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:16,900
would use.

36
00:01:16,901 --> 00:01:18,079
Topsy-turvy, I like it.

37
00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:19,080
How about you, Rich?

38
00:01:20,980 --> 00:01:22,439
Locked in, question mark.

39
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:23,479
It looks like we've got the

40
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,419
candidates that will stay

41
00:01:25,420 --> 00:01:27,559
in the race until the end of the

42
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:29,639
primary campaign

43
00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:30,899
season. I'm not sure though.

44
00:01:30,900 --> 00:01:32,979
All right, I'm gonna

45
00:01:32,980 --> 00:01:35,139
answer the question too, I suppose.

46
00:01:35,140 --> 00:01:36,959
I think at this point we have to

47
00:01:36,960 --> 00:01:39,039
say the primary is kind of Francesca

48
00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:40,439
Hong's to lose.

49
00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:42,319
Still a lot of undecided voters and

50
00:01:42,320 --> 00:01:44,019
they're still looking for somebody

51
00:01:44,020 --> 00:01:46,019
to send them a message, but she has

52
00:01:46,020 --> 00:01:47,459
consistently led in polling and

53
00:01:47,460 --> 00:01:49,759
seemingly driven the

54
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:52,839
discussion in this campaign.

55
00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:54,059
So let's look at what the candidates

56
00:01:54,060 --> 00:01:55,399
are saying and how they're

57
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:56,519
presenting themselves in these

58
00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:58,809
closing days and for help with this.

59
00:01:58,810 --> 00:02:00,089
We're gonna use clips from their

60
00:02:00,090 --> 00:02:01,029
debate this week.

61
00:02:01,030 --> 00:02:02,389
Let's start with Madison

62
00:02:02,390 --> 00:02:03,889
representative Francesca Hong.

63
00:02:03,890 --> 00:02:05,749
She's a democratic socialist,

64
00:02:05,750 --> 00:02:06,729
which is sort of defined this

65
00:02:06,730 --> 00:02:08,269
campaign. She was asked about her

66
00:02:08,270 --> 00:02:09,749
views. Let's give a listen to what

67
00:02:09,750 --> 00:02:10,750
she had to say.

68
00:02:11,670 --> 00:02:14,169
What democratic socialism is,

69
00:02:14,170 --> 00:02:15,649
is a form of government that puts

70
00:02:15,650 --> 00:02:17,309
working class people first, that

71
00:02:17,310 --> 00:02:19,029
puts work first.

72
00:02:19,030 --> 00:02:20,529
The policies that we have been

73
00:02:20,530 --> 00:02:23,149
working on, permanent affordability,

74
00:02:23,150 --> 00:02:25,089
has broad bipartisan support

75
00:02:25,090 --> 00:02:26,610
in every corner of the state.

76
00:02:27,640 --> 00:02:29,619
Anya, you profiled Francesca Hong

77
00:02:29,620 --> 00:02:31,319
for Wisconsin Public Radio.

78
00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:33,359
How is she presenting her brand

79
00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:35,879
of politics to primary voters

80
00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:37,899
and to potential critics out there?

81
00:02:37,900 --> 00:02:39,559
I mean, so she's been running pretty

82
00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:41,119
consistent with who she was in the

83
00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,059
assembly, again, as a member of the

84
00:02:43,060 --> 00:02:44,519
Democratic Socialist Caucus in

85
00:02:44,520 --> 00:02:46,439
there. And that's been sort of the

86
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:48,099
name of the game for her campaign as

87
00:02:48,100 --> 00:02:49,959
well. You know, all of the Democrats

88
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:51,979
are relatively aligned on sort of,

89
00:02:51,980 --> 00:02:53,239
the big picture issues, and then she

90
00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:54,539
tends to take it a little bit

91
00:02:54,540 --> 00:02:56,359
further into, again that sort of

92
00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:57,519
DSA lane.

93
00:02:57,520 --> 00:02:59,219
But it's been interesting, as she's

94
00:02:59,220 --> 00:03:00,959
kind of been consistently at the

95
00:03:00,960 --> 00:03:02,809
front. It's not that the message has

96
00:03:02,810 --> 00:03:04,289
changed so much, but she is starting

97
00:03:04,290 --> 00:03:05,949
to kind of nuance some of those

98
00:03:05,950 --> 00:03:07,529
views. So, you know, in the past,

99
00:03:07,530 --> 00:03:08,929
for example, one of the really,

100
00:03:08,930 --> 00:03:10,129
really big things that has dogged

101
00:03:10,130 --> 00:03:12,029
her campaign is that during 2020,

102
00:03:12,030 --> 00:03:14,249
she called to defund the police and

103
00:03:14,250 --> 00:03:16,009
looking towards an eventual sort of

104
00:03:16,010 --> 00:03:17,689
abolition of the police.

105
00:03:17,690 --> 00:03:19,589
And all reporters have been asking

106
00:03:19,590 --> 00:03:20,909
her about these comments for months

107
00:03:20,910 --> 00:03:22,669
and months. And she's always given a

108
00:03:22,670 --> 00:03:24,409
kind of more nuanced take on her

109
00:03:24,410 --> 00:03:25,429
view of public safety.

110
00:03:25,430 --> 00:03:27,029
But I think she's had to be really

111
00:03:27,030 --> 00:03:28,949
kind of mindful about that as she

112
00:03:28,950 --> 00:03:30,349
has become a clear frontrunner

113
00:03:30,350 --> 00:03:31,739
because it.

114
00:03:31,740 --> 00:03:33,099
Republicans are going to make an

115
00:03:33,100 --> 00:03:35,519
attack ad, if not 20,

116
00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:36,819
out of those types of comments.

117
00:03:36,820 --> 00:03:38,659
Yeah, is she also kind of

118
00:03:38,660 --> 00:03:39,899
pivoting toward the general when it

119
00:03:39,900 --> 00:03:41,739
comes to tax policy, because she

120
00:03:41,740 --> 00:03:43,149
was asked about that at the debate.

121
00:03:43,150 --> 00:03:44,589
I mean, you have to kind of wonder,

122
00:03:44,590 --> 00:03:46,729
right? So on the

123
00:03:46,730 --> 00:03:48,589
trail again, she has, I think, some

124
00:03:48,590 --> 00:03:50,649
of the most specific sort of policy

125
00:03:50,650 --> 00:03:52,669
platforms of any of the candidates,

126
00:03:52,670 --> 00:03:53,849
which has been kind of interesting.

127
00:03:53,850 --> 00:03:56,029
She has these kind of

128
00:03:56,030 --> 00:03:57,089
platforms put on her website.

129
00:03:57,090 --> 00:03:59,029
And so in terms of like

130
00:03:59,030 --> 00:04:01,049
raising taxes, it has looked like

131
00:04:01,050 --> 00:04:02,909
she has wanted to greatly

132
00:04:02,910 --> 00:04:04,689
increase taxes on the wealthiest

133
00:04:04,690 --> 00:04:05,629
earners in Wisconsin.

134
00:04:05,630 --> 00:04:07,689
At the debate, she hedged and

135
00:04:07,690 --> 00:04:09,649
presented a much lower number.

136
00:04:09,650 --> 00:04:11,729
But of course, tax the rich is a

137
00:04:11,730 --> 00:04:13,769
major kind of attractive

138
00:04:13,770 --> 00:04:15,089
talking point that she has had for

139
00:04:15,090 --> 00:04:16,389
her base. People have really

140
00:04:16,390 --> 00:04:18,369
responded to that, but perhaps

141
00:04:18,370 --> 00:04:20,328
moderate voters or wealthier

142
00:04:20,329 --> 00:04:21,809
voters or more Republican voters

143
00:04:21,810 --> 00:04:22,569
would not.

144
00:04:22,570 --> 00:04:24,229
Yeah, the ads might run the same

145
00:04:24,230 --> 00:04:25,489
whether or not you're talking about

146
00:04:25,490 --> 00:04:26,689
the bill she sponsored in the

147
00:04:26,690 --> 00:04:29,349
assembly, which was around 17.7%

148
00:04:29,350 --> 00:04:30,989
for the top income earners versus

149
00:04:30,990 --> 00:04:32,509
8.65.

150
00:04:32,510 --> 00:04:34,389
But that is a pretty stark

151
00:04:34,390 --> 00:04:35,749
difference in terms of the amount of

152
00:04:35,750 --> 00:04:36,789
dollars we're talking about, which

153
00:04:36,790 --> 00:04:38,789
would be around $9 billion in

154
00:04:38,790 --> 00:04:40,829
its first year of increased taxes.

155
00:04:42,030 --> 00:04:43,909
Zach, we said last

156
00:04:43,910 --> 00:04:45,309
week we were just kind of going to

157
00:04:45,310 --> 00:04:47,469
wait for the facts to play out

158
00:04:47,470 --> 00:04:49,309
in an event that happened that all

159
00:04:49,310 --> 00:04:50,489
the candidates reacted to this

160
00:04:50,490 --> 00:04:52,699
Madison police shooting.

161
00:04:52,700 --> 00:04:54,359
I think it's fair to say a week

162
00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:56,179
later, Francesca Hong's reaction

163
00:04:56,180 --> 00:04:58,139
was the loudest and most

164
00:04:58,140 --> 00:04:58,999
attention-getting.

165
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:00,659
She went to a Madison City street,

166
00:05:00,660 --> 00:05:02,919
called it an execution.

167
00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:04,299
What's she saying now?

168
00:05:04,300 --> 00:05:05,839
Well she was asked directly at the

169
00:05:05,840 --> 00:05:07,379
debate would she make those same

170
00:05:07,380 --> 00:05:09,859
statements as governor and her

171
00:05:09,860 --> 00:05:11,699
response was no she says

172
00:05:11,700 --> 00:05:13,959
the governor has a larger megaphone

173
00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:16,239
or speaker and so indicating

174
00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:17,419
that she thought it wouldn't be

175
00:05:17,420 --> 00:05:18,719
responsible as governor to make

176
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:20,519
those interesting that a lot of

177
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:21,739
people are said you should campaign

178
00:05:21,740 --> 00:05:23,619
the way you would govern so i don't

179
00:05:23,620 --> 00:05:24,999
know why she thought it'd be okay as

180
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:26,419
a candidate to make these statements

181
00:05:26,420 --> 00:05:28,259
but not three months from now

182
00:05:28,260 --> 00:05:30,239
if she becomes governor-elect

183
00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:31,739
to make the same statements in the

184
00:05:31,740 --> 00:05:33,799
same type of scenario This is

185
00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:35,659
something that rolls right

186
00:05:35,660 --> 00:05:36,459
into what we were just talking

187
00:05:36,460 --> 00:05:38,659
about, that defund-the-police

188
00:05:38,660 --> 00:05:39,979
background that comes with her

189
00:05:39,980 --> 00:05:41,159
candidacy and others in the

190
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:43,099
Democratic Socialist Party,

191
00:05:43,100 --> 00:05:44,479
and Republicans are absolutely

192
00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:45,619
already using against her.

193
00:05:45,620 --> 00:05:47,059
They're prepared at every step along

194
00:05:47,060 --> 00:05:47,959
the way.

195
00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:49,179
I think maybe what's surprising in

196
00:05:49,180 --> 00:05:50,359
this campaign is none of the other

197
00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:51,599
Democrats that are running against

198
00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:53,179
her have tried to use that against

199
00:05:53,180 --> 00:05:54,919
her if they were serious about

200
00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:56,639
trying to make a move on her polling

201
00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:57,389
position.

202
00:05:57,390 --> 00:05:58,909
So let's move to one of those

203
00:05:58,910 --> 00:06:00,009
Democrats, Lieutenant Governor

204
00:06:00,010 --> 00:06:01,889
Mandela Barnes.

205
00:06:01,890 --> 00:06:04,029
He was considered a front runner to

206
00:06:04,030 --> 00:06:05,749
start this race because of his

207
00:06:05,750 --> 00:06:07,129
statewide name recognition as

208
00:06:07,130 --> 00:06:08,789
Lieutenant Governor and a candidate

209
00:06:08,790 --> 00:06:10,629
for Senate in 2022.

210
00:06:10,630 --> 00:06:12,409
He talked about that at Tuesday's

211
00:06:12,410 --> 00:06:13,410
debate.

212
00:06:13,850 --> 00:06:15,189
There's not a single person on this

213
00:06:15,190 --> 00:06:17,149
stage who's united all shades of

214
00:06:17,150 --> 00:06:18,869
blue of the Democratic party as I

215
00:06:18,870 --> 00:06:19,729
have before.

216
00:06:19,730 --> 00:06:21,749
Now that race in 2022,

217
00:06:21,750 --> 00:06:23,409
it was the closest U S Senate race

218
00:06:23,410 --> 00:06:24,729
in the state in over a hundred

219
00:06:24,730 --> 00:06:26,649
years. It was the close challenge to

220
00:06:26,650 --> 00:06:28,149
any incumbent across the entire

221
00:06:28,150 --> 00:06:29,690
country, no incumbent law statewide.

222
00:06:30,970 --> 00:06:32,929
Rich, you profiled Mandela Barnes

223
00:06:32,930 --> 00:06:34,589
for WPR.

224
00:06:34,590 --> 00:06:35,789
He's definitely presenting that

225
00:06:35,790 --> 00:06:38,109
Senate run as a positive, but

226
00:06:38,110 --> 00:06:40,069
I think, undeniably,

227
00:06:40,070 --> 00:06:41,729
it's a vulnerability for him with

228
00:06:41,730 --> 00:06:42,730
some voters.

229
00:06:43,750 --> 00:06:45,849
What are your impressions with

230
00:06:45,850 --> 00:06:47,829
how he's been navigating that and

231
00:06:47,830 --> 00:06:48,830
how voters view it?

232
00:06:50,740 --> 00:06:52,639
Well, since

233
00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:54,559
I've been, since I talked

234
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:56,599
to him for the profile, he's

235
00:06:56,600 --> 00:06:58,619
really hit on that, essentially

236
00:06:58,620 --> 00:07:00,539
saying none of the other Democrats

237
00:07:00,540 --> 00:07:02,159
in the race have faced the kind of

238
00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:03,239
headwinds.

239
00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:05,939
And, you know, a U.S.

240
00:07:05,940 --> 00:07:07,799
Senate campaign where you're getting

241
00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:09,239
attacked, tens of millions of

242
00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:11,219
dollars, those are some real

243
00:07:11,220 --> 00:07:12,759
headwind. So, that's been his

244
00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,279
argument, but we've seen

245
00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:17,459
that other Democrats aren't

246
00:07:17,460 --> 00:07:19,199
really buying it, that.

247
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:21,599
There was an effort to keep him from

248
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:23,459
joining the race way

249
00:07:23,460 --> 00:07:24,460
back when.

250
00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:27,239
And we also saw a

251
00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:28,539
great big snub.

252
00:07:28,540 --> 00:07:30,319
The Governor Evers, who didn't make

253
00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:31,999
any endorsements, chose not to

254
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:32,879
endorse Barnes.

255
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,639
So he's been

256
00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:37,539
kind of making a pivot lately

257
00:07:37,540 --> 00:07:40,219
saying, well, I'm not

258
00:07:40,220 --> 00:07:42,179
the establishment candidate, I'm the

259
00:07:42,180 --> 00:07:43,540
anti-establishment candidate.

260
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:46,639
So that's interesting in context

261
00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:49,649
of what went down in 2022 where

262
00:07:49,650 --> 00:07:51,249
you know, there were arguments from

263
00:07:51,250 --> 00:07:52,529
the Republicans that the

264
00:07:52,530 --> 00:07:54,229
establishment helped him get a clear

265
00:07:54,230 --> 00:07:56,249
path to the Democratic nomination

266
00:07:56,250 --> 00:07:57,189
there.

267
00:07:57,190 --> 00:07:59,149
So, otherwise, his messaging has

268
00:07:59,150 --> 00:08:00,949
been pretty similar.

269
00:08:00,950 --> 00:08:03,189
He talks a lot about people

270
00:08:03,190 --> 00:08:05,309
playing by the rules, working hard,

271
00:08:05,310 --> 00:08:07,469
not being able to get by, whereas

272
00:08:07,470 --> 00:08:09,309
the wealthy just keep on

273
00:08:09,310 --> 00:08:10,109
prospering.

274
00:08:10,110 --> 00:08:11,769
That continues in his current

275
00:08:11,770 --> 00:08:12,209
campaign.

276
00:08:12,210 --> 00:08:14,429
Do you see any difference between

277
00:08:14,430 --> 00:08:16,149
the way he's presenting himself now

278
00:08:16,150 --> 00:08:18,109
in terms of that messaging and

279
00:08:18,110 --> 00:08:20,069
his platform compared to,

280
00:08:20,070 --> 00:08:21,469
you know, when you talk to him on a

281
00:08:21,470 --> 00:08:22,470
dairy farm in June?

282
00:08:24,390 --> 00:08:26,289
Not really, not really, no.

283
00:08:26,290 --> 00:08:28,189
He's really good

284
00:08:28,190 --> 00:08:30,049
at staying on message and

285
00:08:30,050 --> 00:08:31,929
we all

286
00:08:31,930 --> 00:08:34,029
tend to remember

287
00:08:34,030 --> 00:08:35,389
that because we hear the same thing

288
00:08:35,390 --> 00:08:36,209
over and over again.

289
00:08:36,210 --> 00:08:37,428
So he's been real disciplined.

290
00:08:38,730 --> 00:08:40,769
But I wonder, Sean, what does that

291
00:08:40,770 --> 00:08:42,788
look like compared to Mandel

292
00:08:42,789 --> 00:08:44,289
Barnes from 2012?

293
00:08:44,290 --> 00:08:45,619
Or 2012, excuse me.

294
00:08:45,620 --> 00:08:47,419
Yeah, I mean, I think Mandela Barnes

295
00:08:47,420 --> 00:08:49,559
is kind of in a catch 22

296
00:08:49,560 --> 00:08:51,159
of his own making here.

297
00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:53,419
Like he rose to prominence

298
00:08:53,420 --> 00:08:55,319
as a Democrat and got the base

299
00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:56,319
to love him.

300
00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:58,139
And I don't use that word with

301
00:08:58,140 --> 00:08:59,499
any exaggeration. He was very

302
00:08:59,500 --> 00:09:01,219
popular at every Democratic event

303
00:09:01,220 --> 00:09:03,599
where he was a guest.

304
00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:05,459
And that was what made him a

305
00:09:05,460 --> 00:09:06,639
candidate in 2022.

306
00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:08,569
That's that's how he got there.

307
00:09:08,570 --> 00:09:10,589
He is now a very on-message

308
00:09:10,590 --> 00:09:12,289
candidate who is running kind of as

309
00:09:12,290 --> 00:09:14,089
a safe front runner.

310
00:09:14,090 --> 00:09:15,449
And the trick for him in this

311
00:09:15,450 --> 00:09:17,309
campaign is that he's

312
00:09:17,310 --> 00:09:18,449
got someone else kind of filling the

313
00:09:18,450 --> 00:09:20,309
Mandela Barnes role to his left that

314
00:09:20,310 --> 00:09:21,670
has energized the base.

315
00:09:22,710 --> 00:09:24,089
And you know, you haven't seen him

316
00:09:24,090 --> 00:09:25,969
waver from that front runner kind

317
00:09:25,970 --> 00:09:27,649
of position or that general election

318
00:09:27,650 --> 00:09:28,589
candidate.

319
00:09:28,590 --> 00:09:30,589
But it seems like, you

320
00:09:30,590 --> 00:09:32,169
know he may need to pull out some

321
00:09:32,170 --> 00:09:33,329
stops here in the closing weeks.

322
00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:36,259
Part of the reason for that is that

323
00:09:36,260 --> 00:09:38,079
the field was reshuffled, as

324
00:09:38,080 --> 00:09:39,699
you mentioned, Anya.

325
00:09:39,700 --> 00:09:41,399
Milwaukee County Executive David

326
00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:43,639
Crowley left the race on July 8th,

327
00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:45,259
rejoined the race on July 18th with

328
00:09:45,260 --> 00:09:47,099
Governor Tony Evers' endorsement.

329
00:09:47,100 --> 00:09:48,759
His critics, mostly the Mandela

330
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:50,279
Barnes campaign lately, have called

331
00:09:50,280 --> 00:09:52,639
him the establishment candidate.

332
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:53,719
David Crowely had already made

333
00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:55,200
response for that at the debate.

334
00:09:56,390 --> 00:09:57,789
I was never born into the

335
00:09:57,790 --> 00:09:58,909
establishment. I was actually born

336
00:09:58,910 --> 00:09:59,929
into struggle.

337
00:09:59,930 --> 00:10:01,649
I grew up in the 5-3 tool, 6-zip

338
00:10:01,650 --> 00:10:03,289
code, where I had to work extremely

339
00:10:03,290 --> 00:10:04,689
hard for everything that I have.

340
00:10:04,690 --> 00:10:06,509
And so I'm not here to protect the

341
00:10:06,510 --> 00:10:08,269
establishment, I'm here to deliver

342
00:10:08,270 --> 00:10:10,489
real results for Wisconsinites

343
00:10:10,490 --> 00:10:11,490
all over our state.

344
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:14,199
Anya, I don't know if David Carly

345
00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:16,239
gets back in this race if he didn't

346
00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:18,099
have Governor Tony Evers sitting

347
00:10:18,100 --> 00:10:20,119
there ready to endorse him.

348
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:21,599
How has that been kind of a double

349
00:10:21,600 --> 00:10:22,469
edged sword for him?

350
00:10:22,470 --> 00:10:24,289
Yeah. I mean, obviously, you know,

351
00:10:24,290 --> 00:10:25,709
Governor Tony Evers is consistently

352
00:10:25,710 --> 00:10:27,589
one of the most popular, if not the

353
00:10:27,590 --> 00:10:29,729
most, popular politician in

354
00:10:29,730 --> 00:10:31,569
the state. You know, grain of salt.

355
00:10:31,570 --> 00:10:33,269
Nobody loves politicians.

356
00:10:33,270 --> 00:10:35,129
But so that's a helpful

357
00:10:35,130 --> 00:10:36,989
kind of endorsement to have.

358
00:10:36,990 --> 00:10:39,069
But of course, that that

359
00:10:39,070 --> 00:10:40,789
energy that is going around

360
00:10:40,790 --> 00:10:42,409
Francesca Hong, it's not just I

361
00:10:42,410 --> 00:10:44,249
think, because of her her

362
00:10:44,250 --> 00:10:46,009
platform, but also because of this

363
00:10:46,010 --> 00:10:48,009
idea of being sort of an outsider,

364
00:10:48,010 --> 00:10:49,739
having a more unusual background.

365
00:10:49,740 --> 00:10:51,959
And so, having the Evers endorsement

366
00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:53,979
does make Crowley kind of

367
00:10:53,980 --> 00:10:55,539
seem more mainstream or pull him

368
00:10:55,540 --> 00:10:57,359
into that more traditional lane at a

369
00:10:57,360 --> 00:10:58,559
time that I think some voters are

370
00:10:58,560 --> 00:11:00,559
really looking for people who

371
00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:02,399
want to kind of blow up some

372
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:03,979
of these institutions rather than

373
00:11:03,980 --> 00:11:05,879
kind of going along with them.

374
00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:07,639
And so it shows that he has the

375
00:11:07,640 --> 00:11:08,739
backing of this really popular

376
00:11:08,740 --> 00:11:10,479
politician, but it maybe also shows

377
00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:12,359
that, he would be more

378
00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:13,579
of the same.

379
00:11:13,580 --> 00:11:15,559
Zach, if he is kind of

380
00:11:15,560 --> 00:11:17,759
being put out here as the

381
00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:19,699
alternative to Francesca Hong and

382
00:11:19,700 --> 00:11:21,379
that is kind how he launched or

383
00:11:21,380 --> 00:11:23,379
relaunched his campaign,

384
00:11:23,380 --> 00:11:25,279
why did we not see him go

385
00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:27,019
after her or attack her during the

386
00:11:27,020 --> 00:11:28,020
debate?

387
00:11:28,300 --> 00:11:29,939
He's still playing it safe.

388
00:11:29,940 --> 00:11:31,099
Like every one of these politicians

389
00:11:31,100 --> 00:11:32,699
understands when you go negative,

390
00:11:32,700 --> 00:11:34,639
that harms you long term within the

391
00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:36,479
party. He's still a young man.

392
00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:38,419
Like this isn't his last chance at

393
00:11:38,420 --> 00:11:39,759
statewide politics.

394
00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:41,219
He will be the county executive

395
00:11:41,220 --> 00:11:43,119
after this if he does not

396
00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:44,999
win and become the nominee.

397
00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:46,119
So there's still chance.

398
00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:47,459
We've seen that throughout history

399
00:11:47,460 --> 00:11:49,919
of Scott Walker in 2006,

400
00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:51,279
gracefully bowing out of a primary

401
00:11:51,280 --> 00:11:52,619
and then being rewarded with a clear

402
00:11:52,620 --> 00:11:54,759
path to the nomination in 2010.

403
00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:55,839
We've see it with other candidates

404
00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:57,619
along the way where the.

405
00:11:57,620 --> 00:11:59,499
It is an insider's game

406
00:11:59,500 --> 00:12:01,479
in the sense that the people in

407
00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:03,399
the party in power will remember who

408
00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:04,939
played nice and who did not and

409
00:12:04,940 --> 00:12:06,779
we've seen other candidates that

410
00:12:06,780 --> 00:12:08,359
have not played nice in the past and

411
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:10,519
have not received any of the support

412
00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:12,399
despite what on paper looks like

413
00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:13,979
a strong resume in these kind of

414
00:12:13,980 --> 00:12:15,059
races.

415
00:12:15,060 --> 00:12:16,719
Rich, I know there's not a lot of

416
00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:17,879
daylight between some of these

417
00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:19,719
candidates when it comes to

418
00:12:19,720 --> 00:12:21,519
the issues, but in this debate, I

419
00:12:21,520 --> 00:12:23,339
wonder if David Crowley kind of

420
00:12:23,340 --> 00:12:25,399
made a play for the most mainstream

421
00:12:25,400 --> 00:12:27,239
Democrat, because they were all

422
00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:30,779
asked, would you support that

423
00:12:30,780 --> 00:12:32,299
budget surplus bill that Governor

424
00:12:32,300 --> 00:12:33,519
Tony Evers negotiated with

425
00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:34,520
Republicans?

426
00:12:35,380 --> 00:12:36,799
And you know, what did David Crowely

427
00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:37,800
say compared to the others?

428
00:12:39,790 --> 00:12:41,949
Well, he said if it was passed on

429
00:12:41,950 --> 00:12:43,689
a bipartisan basis, he would sign

430
00:12:43,690 --> 00:12:45,849
it. And none of the other candidates

431
00:12:45,850 --> 00:12:46,729
said that.

432
00:12:46,730 --> 00:12:48,889
They all talked about the potential

433
00:12:48,890 --> 00:12:51,469
deficit down the road that was

434
00:12:51,470 --> 00:12:53,309
mentioned by the Legislative

435
00:12:53,310 --> 00:12:54,269
Fiscal Bureau.

436
00:12:54,270 --> 00:12:56,429
They also talked a lot about Robin

437
00:12:56,430 --> 00:12:58,329
Voss, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos,

438
00:12:58,330 --> 00:13:01,229
a Republican, saying, well, he's

439
00:13:01,230 --> 00:13:03,229
not a negotiating in good faith

440
00:13:03,230 --> 00:13:04,769
kind of guy.

441
00:13:04,770 --> 00:13:06,629
So Crawley stood out on that

442
00:13:06,630 --> 00:13:07,630
topic.

443
00:13:07,980 --> 00:13:09,859
All right, let's turn to

444
00:13:09,860 --> 00:13:11,559
Madison Senator Kel DeRoyze.

445
00:13:11,560 --> 00:13:12,939
She's pretty consistently presenting

446
00:13:12,940 --> 00:13:14,739
herself as the most experienced

447
00:13:14,740 --> 00:13:16,239
candidate in the race.

448
00:13:16,240 --> 00:13:17,419
Here's how she did it during the

449
00:13:17,420 --> 00:13:18,420
debate.

450
00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:20,819
That kind of experience is

451
00:13:20,820 --> 00:13:22,499
absolutely essential, and voters

452
00:13:22,500 --> 00:13:24,419
need to think about not just who

453
00:13:24,420 --> 00:13:25,839
can beat Tom Tiffany, although that

454
00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:27,859
is important, not just to deliver

455
00:13:27,860 --> 00:13:29,339
a democratic legislature, although

456
00:13:29,340 --> 00:13:31,239
that's vitally important, but who

457
00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:33,220
can actually do the job on day one.

458
00:13:34,380 --> 00:13:35,719
Zach, I feel like if you were going

459
00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:36,999
to grade these candidates in terms

460
00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:38,559
of how they sort of broke down

461
00:13:38,560 --> 00:13:40,219
policy in the debate, or just in

462
00:13:40,220 --> 00:13:42,079
general, Kelda might come out

463
00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:43,159
on top.

464
00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:44,879
She likes to talk about herself as a

465
00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:45,940
details person.

466
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:48,949
Do details matter to voters?

467
00:13:48,950 --> 00:13:50,089
In these moments?

468
00:13:50,090 --> 00:13:50,929
No.

469
00:13:50,930 --> 00:13:52,889
I think voters are going on

470
00:13:52,890 --> 00:13:54,589
emotion a lot of the time.

471
00:13:54,590 --> 00:13:56,469
Who is the candidate that speaks to

472
00:13:56,470 --> 00:13:58,429
me? And they're often not

473
00:13:58,430 --> 00:13:59,649
looking at the most experienced

474
00:13:59,650 --> 00:14:00,469
policy wonk.

475
00:14:00,470 --> 00:14:02,229
That's why we have, we've seen a lot

476
00:14:02,230 --> 00:14:04,009
politicians in today's politics that

477
00:14:04,010 --> 00:14:05,409
really have no experience and they

478
00:14:05,410 --> 00:14:06,789
prove it once they get in office at

479
00:14:06,790 --> 00:14:08,389
all different levels, federal and

480
00:14:08,390 --> 00:14:10,129
state. But there's all sorts of

481
00:14:10,130 --> 00:14:11,169
different things that happen,

482
00:14:11,170 --> 00:14:12,389
including breaking news right at the

483
00:14:12,390 --> 00:14:13,529
moment, Sean.

484
00:14:13,530 --> 00:14:15,429
Yeah, we just heard in our ears that

485
00:14:15,430 --> 00:14:17,209
Mandela Barnes has dropped out of

486
00:14:17,210 --> 00:14:19,149
the race. So how about that right

487
00:14:19,150 --> 00:14:20,689
in the middle of a show?

488
00:14:20,690 --> 00:14:22,169
Kind of reshuffles the deck a bit

489
00:14:22,170 --> 00:14:23,789
there. That churn in the

490
00:14:23,790 --> 00:14:25,609
You know, we joke a lot

491
00:14:25,610 --> 00:14:27,509
about something like that happening,

492
00:14:27,510 --> 00:14:28,929
but hoo boy, I was not necessarily

493
00:14:28,930 --> 00:14:29,839
expecting that.

494
00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:30,819
Yeah.

495
00:14:30,820 --> 00:14:32,679
So, in a race

496
00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:34,539
that has been wild for the last

497
00:14:34,540 --> 00:14:36,399
few weeks, another major

498
00:14:36,400 --> 00:14:38,179
development here, right toward the

499
00:14:38,180 --> 00:14:39,069
end.

500
00:14:39,070 --> 00:14:40,629
So, um... Well, the question then,

501
00:14:40,630 --> 00:14:42,129
Sean, becomes, does that help

502
00:14:42,130 --> 00:14:43,009
Crowley?

503
00:14:43,010 --> 00:14:44,869
If they were the two that had the

504
00:14:44,870 --> 00:14:46,009
legitimate chance and they were

505
00:14:46,010 --> 00:14:48,329
splitting that vote against Hong,

506
00:14:48,330 --> 00:14:50,249
does this give Crowley an outside

507
00:14:50,250 --> 00:14:51,749
chance? Even though we won't have

508
00:14:51,750 --> 00:14:53,509
any more big polling numbers to come

509
00:14:53,510 --> 00:14:55,509
out before the race, this

510
00:14:55,510 --> 00:14:57,469
has to send some questions into

511
00:14:57,470 --> 00:14:59,369
Francesca Hong's campaign and to

512
00:14:59,370 --> 00:15:01,009
some others of like, will this

513
00:15:01,010 --> 00:15:02,409
matter? Can enough people unite

514
00:15:02,410 --> 00:15:04,989
behind Crowley as the non-socialist

515
00:15:04,990 --> 00:15:05,529
in this race?

516
00:15:05,530 --> 00:15:07,529
I think it has to help David

517
00:15:07,530 --> 00:15:09,469
Crowley. They were pretty obviously

518
00:15:09,470 --> 00:15:11,189
competing for second place at this

519
00:15:11,190 --> 00:15:12,769
point, Mandela Barnes and David

520
00:15:12,770 --> 00:15:15,409
Crowley, two Milwaukee candidates,

521
00:15:15,410 --> 00:15:17,569
two black men in the race,

522
00:15:17,570 --> 00:15:19,489
the two candidates who are not

523
00:15:19,490 --> 00:15:21,249
Francesca Hong, who have like

524
00:15:21,250 --> 00:15:23,109
meaningful votes behind them.

525
00:15:23,110 --> 00:15:24,969
So you talked about leaving a race

526
00:15:24,970 --> 00:15:26,489
and kind of like trying to leave a

527
00:15:26,490 --> 00:15:27,709
good impression for the future.

528
00:15:28,710 --> 00:15:29,989
This would be one way to do it if

529
00:15:29,990 --> 00:15:31,329
you're Mandela Barns and maybe want

530
00:15:31,330 --> 00:15:32,509
to do something like, I don't know,

531
00:15:32,510 --> 00:15:33,719
run for Congress in the future

532
00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:35,339
Well, it's the flip side of what

533
00:15:35,340 --> 00:15:37,279
happened in 2022 was around this

534
00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:38,419
same time where the rest of the

535
00:15:38,420 --> 00:15:40,259
field left the race for him

536
00:15:40,260 --> 00:15:41,779
He's returning the favor

537
00:15:41,780 --> 00:15:43,439
understanding. I don't have a path

538
00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:44,959
without going extremely negative

539
00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:46,919
It's time for me to step aside And

540
00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:49,039
yes He is one that understand this

541
00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:50,979
will pay dividends down the road for

542
00:15:50,980 --> 00:15:52,819
himself and how the party views

543
00:15:52,820 --> 00:15:53,820
him

544
00:15:54,500 --> 00:15:56,119
We should talk about one of the

545
00:15:56,120 --> 00:15:57,819
other candidates remaining, Joel

546
00:15:57,820 --> 00:15:59,739
Brennan, in the race.

547
00:15:59,740 --> 00:16:01,019
And here's how Joel Brennen

548
00:16:01,020 --> 00:16:03,139
presented himself at

549
00:16:03,140 --> 00:16:04,779
the debate when he was asked if a

550
00:16:04,780 --> 00:16:06,979
vote for him is

551
00:16:06,980 --> 00:16:07,980
a wasted vote.

552
00:16:09,210 --> 00:16:10,349
I don't think primary voters have

553
00:16:10,350 --> 00:16:11,869
been paying much attention until the

554
00:16:11,870 --> 00:16:13,709
last two weeks and all the upheaval

555
00:16:13,710 --> 00:16:14,809
that you have seen.

556
00:16:14,810 --> 00:16:16,389
This is what I find when I am going

557
00:16:16,390 --> 00:16:18,329
out around the state is that, and

558
00:16:18,330 --> 00:16:20,169
this has been verified by polls

559
00:16:20,170 --> 00:16:22,189
that was done here by my alma mater

560
00:16:22,190 --> 00:16:24,269
at Marquette because about

561
00:16:24,270 --> 00:16:26,189
half the people at this point

562
00:16:26,190 --> 00:16:27,330
haven't made a decision.

563
00:16:28,889 --> 00:16:30,709
34% undecided in the

564
00:16:30,710 --> 00:16:32,110
latest Marquette poll.

565
00:16:33,709 --> 00:16:35,469
So it's getting smaller, the number

566
00:16:35,470 --> 00:16:37,229
of undecide voters.

567
00:16:37,230 --> 00:16:38,689
One thing that I learned about Joel

568
00:16:38,690 --> 00:16:40,469
Brennan when I was editing a profile

569
00:16:40,470 --> 00:16:42,229
of him written by our colleague

570
00:16:42,230 --> 00:16:43,929
Corrine Hess is that he is kind of

571
00:16:43,930 --> 00:16:45,249
the Tom Barrett candidate in this

572
00:16:45,250 --> 00:16:47,209
race and more ways

573
00:16:47,210 --> 00:16:49,189
than one. Tom Barret lives

574
00:16:49,190 --> 00:16:50,190
in the same neighborhood

575
00:16:51,329 --> 00:16:53,409
and also Joel Brennen.

576
00:16:53,410 --> 00:16:55,509
Ran his campaign in 2002,

577
00:16:55,510 --> 00:16:57,089
ran his campaigns for Congress and

578
00:16:57,090 --> 00:16:58,349
the legislature, worked on his

579
00:16:58,350 --> 00:16:59,509
campaigns for Congress and the

580
00:16:59,510 --> 00:17:00,510
Legislature.

581
00:17:01,330 --> 00:17:03,089
And he's presenting a kind of a

582
00:17:03,090 --> 00:17:05,229
similar kind of politics here.

583
00:17:05,230 --> 00:17:07,169
So as the candidates sort

584
00:17:07,170 --> 00:17:09,549
of carve out their lanes,

585
00:17:09,550 --> 00:17:11,889
if you feel sort of familiar with

586
00:17:11,890 --> 00:17:13,789
Joel Brennan, it

587
00:17:13,790 --> 00:17:15,909
could be why. They're very good

588
00:17:15,910 --> 00:17:17,429
friends and speak very highly of one

589
00:17:17,430 --> 00:17:18,430
another.

590
00:17:19,109 --> 00:17:21,348
Just a closing question here.

591
00:17:21,349 --> 00:17:22,868
And I feel like it's changed a lot

592
00:17:22,869 --> 00:17:24,149
knowing that Mandela Barnes out of

593
00:17:24,150 --> 00:17:26,549
the race, but what could change

594
00:17:26,550 --> 00:17:28,429
this race that

595
00:17:28,430 --> 00:17:30,429
would present somebody with a chance

596
00:17:30,430 --> 00:17:32,430
to beat Francesca Hong?

597
00:17:33,790 --> 00:17:35,349
Is Barnes dropping out enough to do

598
00:17:35,350 --> 00:17:36,189
it on you?

599
00:17:36,190 --> 00:17:37,569
I mean, the really big question for

600
00:17:37,570 --> 00:17:39,349
me has been, is another person going

601
00:17:39,350 --> 00:17:40,849
to drop out, especially with the

602
00:17:40,850 --> 00:17:42,249
court decision this week that says

603
00:17:42,250 --> 00:17:43,569
that people can't spoil their

604
00:17:43,570 --> 00:17:44,549
ballots if their preferred

605
00:17:44,550 --> 00:17:45,749
candidate, or if the candidate that

606
00:17:45,750 --> 00:17:47,589
they've already voted for drops

607
00:17:47,590 --> 00:17:48,569
out?

608
00:17:48,570 --> 00:17:50,289
And so Barnes has answered that

609
00:17:50,290 --> 00:17:52,349
question. I don't know whether any

610
00:17:52,350 --> 00:17:53,649
of these major changes that could

611
00:17:53,650 --> 00:17:55,709
still happen could have an effect on

612
00:17:55,710 --> 00:17:57,289
Hong, because again, the question is

613
00:17:57,290 --> 00:17:58,989
sort of, where do his voters then

614
00:17:58,990 --> 00:18:01,029
split? But some proportion of them

615
00:18:01,030 --> 00:18:02,309
are going to go to Hong, some

616
00:18:02,310 --> 00:18:03,849
proportion them are gonna go to a

617
00:18:03,850 --> 00:18:05,159
more mainstream Democrat.

618
00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:07,179
So it kind of remains to be seen

619
00:18:07,180 --> 00:18:08,639
what effect this has.

620
00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:09,479
All right.

621
00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:10,539
That's all the time we have for

622
00:18:10,540 --> 00:18:12,019
today. Thanks for joining us.

623
00:18:12,020 --> 00:18:13,519
This has been Inside Wisconsin

624
00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:14,379
Politics.

625
00:18:14,380 --> 00:18:15,319
Be sure to follow us on

626
00:18:15,320 --> 00:18:17,599
pbswisconsin.org, wpr.org

627
00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:19,419
YouTube, or wherever you

628
00:18:19,420 --> 00:18:20,420
get your podcasts.

