1
00:00:50,180 --> 00:00:51,759
So that big budget deal that got

2
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:52,859
voted down in the Wisconsin

3
00:00:52,860 --> 00:00:55,159
legislature, turns out it's

4
00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:56,579
really popular.

5
00:00:56,580 --> 00:00:58,159
What can we make of that finding in

6
00:00:58,160 --> 00:00:59,559
the latest poll by Marquette

7
00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:00,979
University?

8
00:01:00,980 --> 00:01:02,639
And Tom Tiffany has the Republican

9
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:04,518
field largely to himself as he

10
00:01:04,519 --> 00:01:05,599
runs for governor.

11
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:07,299
We talk about his approach.

12
00:01:07,300 --> 00:01:09,459
This is Inside Wisconsin Politics.

13
00:01:14,060 --> 00:01:15,599
I'm Sean Johnson, here with my

14
00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:17,319
colleagues, Zach Schultz, Anya

15
00:01:17,320 --> 00:01:19,399
VanWaagtenonck, and Rich Kramer in

16
00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:21,039
Eau Claire. Hey, everyone.

17
00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:22,159
Hello.

18
00:01:22,160 --> 00:01:23,359
Hey, Sean.

19
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:25,559
So we have used the word rare

20
00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:27,659
to describe this budget surplus

21
00:01:27,660 --> 00:01:29,699
deal more than once in

22
00:01:29,700 --> 00:01:30,559
the last few weeks.

23
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:31,519
I mean, it's rare to see a

24
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:32,819
Democratic governor and Republican

25
00:01:32,820 --> 00:01:34,339
leaders come together to negotiate

26
00:01:34,340 --> 00:01:35,839
something like this in an election

27
00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:37,379
year. Rare to see this kind of

28
00:01:37,380 --> 00:01:39,939
bipartisan opposition

29
00:01:39,940 --> 00:01:42,779
kind of backstabbing after the vote.

30
00:01:42,780 --> 00:01:44,919
Rich, I'd say it's rare

31
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:46,959
to see this kind of a

32
00:01:46,960 --> 00:01:48,999
poll from Marquette University,

33
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:50,899
where you have such lopsided

34
00:01:50,900 --> 00:01:53,199
support in favor of any issue.

35
00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:54,200
What did Marquett find?

36
00:01:56,130 --> 00:01:58,229
So they found that among

37
00:01:58,230 --> 00:02:00,049
the 454

38
00:02:00,050 --> 00:02:02,029
Wisconsin residents that they

39
00:02:02,030 --> 00:02:04,729
surveyed, 80%

40
00:02:04,730 --> 00:02:06,509
said that the legislature should

41
00:02:06,510 --> 00:02:08,589
have passed the surplus spending

42
00:02:08,590 --> 00:02:09,409
deal.

43
00:02:09,410 --> 00:02:11,349
And what's really striking to

44
00:02:11,350 --> 00:02:13,049
your point is that when you break

45
00:02:13,050 --> 00:02:14,929
that down by partisanship,

46
00:02:14,930 --> 00:02:16,889
the numbers don't vary that much.

47
00:02:16,890 --> 00:02:19,169
Among Republicans, it was 77%

48
00:02:19,170 --> 00:02:21,689
who said that it should have past,

49
00:02:21,690 --> 00:02:23,589
independents 81%, Democrats

50
00:02:23,590 --> 00:02:24,489
80%.

51
00:02:24,490 --> 00:02:25,459
So.

52
00:02:25,460 --> 00:02:27,459
That is a, I mean,

53
00:02:27,460 --> 00:02:29,659
that's a strong majority of people

54
00:02:29,660 --> 00:02:31,099
cutting across all the partisan

55
00:02:31,100 --> 00:02:32,979
demographics who wanted

56
00:02:32,980 --> 00:02:34,979
to see this thing get

57
00:02:34,980 --> 00:02:37,039
passed. And the poll also

58
00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:39,678
asked questions about,

59
00:02:39,679 --> 00:02:41,239
you know, are you gonna remember

60
00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:43,019
this in the fall, et cetera, et

61
00:02:43,020 --> 00:02:45,039
cetera. And some people said they

62
00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:46,099
will.

63
00:02:46,100 --> 00:02:48,039
And it's just really fascinating.

64
00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:49,779
I talked to Charles Franklin, who's

65
00:02:49,780 --> 00:02:51,879
Marquette's pollster.

66
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:53,959
And he said he wanted to do this

67
00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:55,759
poll. Which is different than

68
00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:57,639
others, because it was

69
00:02:57,640 --> 00:02:59,799
really interesting to him to see the

70
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:01,839
bipartisan birth of this legislation

71
00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:03,659
and the bipartisan death of

72
00:03:03,660 --> 00:03:05,319
it. So he wanted to see where the

73
00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:06,320
public stood.

74
00:03:07,140 --> 00:03:09,859
When you saw those numbers come out,

75
00:03:09,860 --> 00:03:11,999
Zach, Anya, what

76
00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:13,139
stood out to you?

77
00:03:13,140 --> 00:03:15,179
I mean, to me, I think the obvious

78
00:03:15,180 --> 00:03:17,859
top line number four of five is

79
00:03:17,860 --> 00:03:18,839
sort of eye popping.

80
00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:20,459
I would not have imagined that level

81
00:03:20,460 --> 00:03:21,999
of support for any bill that comes

82
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:23,799
out of Wisconsin legislature.

83
00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:25,259
Well, I would think there are two

84
00:03:25,260 --> 00:03:26,279
things that jumped out at me.

85
00:03:26,280 --> 00:03:27,639
The first is we talked about it from

86
00:03:27,640 --> 00:03:29,099
the very beginning. This was the

87
00:03:29,100 --> 00:03:31,079
definition of a bipartisan

88
00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:32,819
bill that the public has repeatedly

89
00:03:32,820 --> 00:03:34,759
said they want their lawmakers

90
00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:35,919
to do.

91
00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:37,979
And two, this is why we do not

92
00:03:37,980 --> 00:03:39,799
legislate by referendum.

93
00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:41,239
The public will always support

94
00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:42,859
something that gives them money, no

95
00:03:42,860 --> 00:03:44,879
matter the fiscal complications down

96
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,299
the road. And they hate nuance.

97
00:03:47,300 --> 00:03:48,899
Most people in the state just want

98
00:03:48,900 --> 00:03:50,319
things done.

99
00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:52,319
In a sane fashion, they don't like

100
00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:53,659
to get into the details of what will

101
00:03:53,660 --> 00:03:55,119
it mean for the structural deficit

102
00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:56,179
in two years.

103
00:03:56,180 --> 00:03:57,419
They're worried about their gas tank

104
00:03:57,420 --> 00:03:58,199
today.

105
00:03:58,200 --> 00:03:59,819
So it's not, if anything, it's

106
00:03:59,820 --> 00:04:01,259
surprising there weren't more people

107
00:04:01,260 --> 00:04:03,099
that wanted this deal done closer to

108
00:04:03,100 --> 00:04:05,079
90% because it looked like

109
00:04:05,080 --> 00:04:06,999
a win-win for everybody.

110
00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:09,099
But it is those little nitty

111
00:04:09,100 --> 00:04:11,059
details that the Democrats and some

112
00:04:11,060 --> 00:04:12,599
Republicans jumped on to say why

113
00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:14,299
this didn't get passed.

114
00:04:14,300 --> 00:04:15,239
Anya, how about you?

115
00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:17,319
I mean, to me, this finding

116
00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:19,599
sort of puts the

117
00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:21,458
way that people reacted to this bill

118
00:04:21,459 --> 00:04:22,979
in kind of a new light.

119
00:04:22,980 --> 00:04:24,959
I remember asking you last week,

120
00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:27,159
why would some Democrats not

121
00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:28,659
want to come out against this when

122
00:04:28,660 --> 00:04:30,399
other Democrats are?

123
00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:31,519
Well, maybe we have a pretty good

124
00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:32,209
answer here.

125
00:04:32,210 --> 00:04:33,729
Well, yeah, I think we've talked

126
00:04:33,730 --> 00:04:35,249
about it as a messaging tool as

127
00:04:35,250 --> 00:04:37,269
well. And there is, to Zach's point,

128
00:04:37,270 --> 00:04:38,929
there's the nuanced messaging and

129
00:04:38,930 --> 00:04:40,489
the un-nuanced messaging.

130
00:04:40,490 --> 00:04:42,509
And one of those is

131
00:04:42,510 --> 00:04:44,669
easier to resonate

132
00:04:44,670 --> 00:04:46,869
with voters. And so you can kind of

133
00:04:46,870 --> 00:04:48,589
say, do you want money in your

134
00:04:48,590 --> 00:04:50,049
pocket or not? Do you want money for

135
00:04:50,050 --> 00:04:51,209
your schools or not.

136
00:04:51,210 --> 00:04:52,609
And most people, I, think, are going

137
00:04:52,610 --> 00:04:53,929
to say, yes, I would like money in

138
00:04:53,930 --> 00:04:56,169
my pocket. I would money in schools.

139
00:04:56,170 --> 00:04:57,509
Having the more complicated

140
00:04:57,510 --> 00:04:59,169
messaging, you know, the opponents

141
00:04:59,170 --> 00:04:59,949
of the D.R.

142
00:04:59,950 --> 00:05:01,429
Are the ones who are going to really

143
00:05:01,430 --> 00:05:02,949
have sort of their work cut out for

144
00:05:02,950 --> 00:05:03,949
them because they have to kind of

145
00:05:03,950 --> 00:05:06,069
prove a negative and say, well,

146
00:05:06,070 --> 00:05:07,569
but if we had done this, there would

147
00:05:07,570 --> 00:05:08,469
have been this deficit.

148
00:05:08,470 --> 00:05:09,689
We would have had to live under, you

149
00:05:09,690 --> 00:05:11,549
know, austerity measures going

150
00:05:11,550 --> 00:05:12,369
forward.

151
00:05:12,370 --> 00:05:14,009
That's a much more complicated thing

152
00:05:14,010 --> 00:05:15,649
than do you want 300 bucks in your

153
00:05:15,650 --> 00:05:16,669
bank account or not.

154
00:05:16,670 --> 00:05:18,549
Yeah, I will say that when I saw

155
00:05:18,550 --> 00:05:20,669
this poll, my immediate thought was,

156
00:05:20,670 --> 00:05:22,209
well, you didn't tell them about the

157
00:05:22,210 --> 00:05:23,549
other side of this, that if you do

158
00:05:23,550 --> 00:05:25,409
this thing, you're gonna blow a $2.9

159
00:05:25,410 --> 00:05:27,789
billion hole in the budget.

160
00:05:27,790 --> 00:05:29,889
Actually, Marquette did ask

161
00:05:29,890 --> 00:05:31,029
about that, Rich.

162
00:05:31,030 --> 00:05:33,189
They said in so many words,

163
00:05:33,190 --> 00:05:34,929
that this could create budget issues

164
00:05:34,930 --> 00:05:36,609
down the road and do you really

165
00:05:36,610 --> 00:05:38,009
wanna do this now?

166
00:05:38,010 --> 00:05:39,010
And the public said.

167
00:05:41,280 --> 00:05:42,539
They said we don't care.

168
00:05:42,540 --> 00:05:43,919
I mean, they might care, but they

169
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:45,759
said that we still

170
00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:47,499
think that it would be better to get

171
00:05:47,500 --> 00:05:49,579
this money to schools and

172
00:05:49,580 --> 00:05:51,439
to ourselves in the

173
00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:53,259
form of property tax relief and

174
00:05:53,260 --> 00:05:55,199
rebate checks, $300 for single

175
00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:57,599
adults and tax

176
00:05:57,600 --> 00:05:59,699
filers and $600

177
00:05:59,700 --> 00:06:01,059
for married couples.

178
00:06:01,060 --> 00:06:03,619
So they said it'd be better now than

179
00:06:03,620 --> 00:06:05,439
next year, even considering the

180
00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:07,279
potential for nearly a $3

181
00:06:07,280 --> 00:06:09,319
billion budget deficit going into

182
00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:10,879
the next state budget.

183
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,199
And I also wanted to mention that it

184
00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:14,919
has been really interesting seeing

185
00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:17,239
the opposition.

186
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:19,179
Almost every major candidate

187
00:06:19,180 --> 00:06:21,039
in the race for governor was against

188
00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:22,359
it. Tom Tiffany on the Republican

189
00:06:22,360 --> 00:06:24,359
side and on the Democratic

190
00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:26,399
side, the only Democrat who

191
00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:27,839
came out and said we should be

192
00:06:27,840 --> 00:06:29,439
supporting this as former Wisconsin

193
00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:31,119
Economic Development Corporation

194
00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:33,319
director CEO

195
00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:35,619
Missy Hughes and

196
00:06:35,620 --> 00:06:37,619
so after the vote failed

197
00:06:37,620 --> 00:06:39,719
and especially after this

198
00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:41,539
came out she said see

199
00:06:41,540 --> 00:06:43,459
you know this is why you know

200
00:06:43,460 --> 00:06:44,899
I want to get things done people

201
00:06:44,900 --> 00:06:46,759
want to give things done so

202
00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:48,039
it's going to be interesting to see

203
00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:50,499
what if any ads

204
00:06:50,500 --> 00:06:52,319
campaign attack ads come from

205
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:54,459
this because essentially you

206
00:06:54,460 --> 00:06:56,099
know Tiffany would have to say they

207
00:06:56,100 --> 00:06:57,999
didn't pass the thing that I

208
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,119
didn't support or vice versa

209
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:01,859
you know so it'll be really

210
00:07:01,860 --> 00:07:03,719
interesting to see if it if it plays

211
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:05,769
into the campaigns much

212
00:07:05,770 --> 00:07:07,129
I also wonder if this was just

213
00:07:07,130 --> 00:07:09,009
another window into

214
00:07:09,010 --> 00:07:10,929
an issue that we already know

215
00:07:10,930 --> 00:07:12,749
is big, and that is

216
00:07:12,750 --> 00:07:13,949
the cost of living.

217
00:07:13,950 --> 00:07:15,689
People feel that cost of live, and

218
00:07:15,690 --> 00:07:17,669
when you ask them, would you

219
00:07:17,670 --> 00:07:19,469
like a little help, might sound like

220
00:07:19,470 --> 00:07:20,649
a a little in terms of the state

221
00:07:20,650 --> 00:07:22,349
budget and 300 bucks.

222
00:07:22,350 --> 00:07:23,509
You can say that's not going to

223
00:07:23,510 --> 00:07:25,549
solve all their problems.

224
00:07:25,550 --> 00:07:27,449
But the answer is a resounding yes

225
00:07:27,450 --> 00:07:29,059
when you asked that question.

226
00:07:29,060 --> 00:07:30,379
It's the number one issue that

227
00:07:30,380 --> 00:07:31,959
people have been talking about for

228
00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:33,239
more than a year now.

229
00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:34,359
Affordability has been an issue.

230
00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:35,659
It was an issue in the 24

231
00:07:35,660 --> 00:07:37,079
presidential campaign.

232
00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,079
So in some ways it's surprising that

233
00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:40,719
all these major candidates dropped

234
00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:42,459
the ball. And Sean, I'll turn around

235
00:07:42,460 --> 00:07:44,039
the point that Rich brought and

236
00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:45,459
brought back to you, which is it

237
00:07:45,460 --> 00:07:46,539
seems like a lot of these major

238
00:07:46,540 --> 00:07:48,039
candidates other than Missy Hughes

239
00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:49,739
have flubbed their chance to have

240
00:07:49,740 --> 00:07:51,439
themselves a really nice issue to

241
00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:52,499
campaign on in the fall.

242
00:07:52,500 --> 00:07:54,259
So, if there's anyone that would

243
00:07:54,260 --> 00:07:56,329
take back their new- opposition.

244
00:07:56,330 --> 00:07:57,749
Do you think there's one or two

245
00:07:57,750 --> 00:07:59,369
candidates that would be better off

246
00:07:59,370 --> 00:08:00,450
if they'd been supportive?

247
00:08:01,530 --> 00:08:02,389
Maybe.

248
00:08:02,390 --> 00:08:03,989
Maybe. I think for Democrats, they

249
00:08:03,990 --> 00:08:05,209
have to focus on winning that

250
00:08:05,210 --> 00:08:06,129
primary.

251
00:08:06,130 --> 00:08:08,129
And so in the moments after this

252
00:08:08,130 --> 00:08:10,429
thing was made public,

253
00:08:10,430 --> 00:08:12,389
they had to decide, what

254
00:08:12,390 --> 00:08:13,649
is the left position?

255
00:08:13,650 --> 00:08:15,629
And how close do I want to get to

256
00:08:15,630 --> 00:08:17,329
that? And they made those

257
00:08:17,330 --> 00:08:19,169
calculations, you know, I think in

258
00:08:19,170 --> 00:08:21,389
hindsight, seeing an 80% issue,

259
00:08:21,390 --> 00:08:22,849
maybe you would want to be on the

260
00:08:22,850 --> 00:08:24,209
side of the 80%, especially when

261
00:08:24,210 --> 00:08:26,249
Democrats and independents

262
00:08:26,250 --> 00:08:27,589
basically feel the same way about

263
00:08:27,590 --> 00:08:28,590
that stuff.

264
00:08:30,570 --> 00:08:32,489
I we've talked about this before,

265
00:08:32,490 --> 00:08:33,548
but whether or not they'll pay the

266
00:08:33,549 --> 00:08:36,229
price for this in November,

267
00:08:36,230 --> 00:08:38,408
we should say, you know,

268
00:08:38,409 --> 00:08:40,629
voters were asked about that, Rich,

269
00:08:40,630 --> 00:08:41,928
and whether or not they will be

270
00:08:41,929 --> 00:08:43,869
thinking about this as they vote

271
00:08:43,870 --> 00:08:45,509
in November. How important is it to

272
00:08:45,510 --> 00:08:46,489
them?

273
00:08:46,490 --> 00:08:47,490
What did they say there?

274
00:08:49,219 --> 00:08:51,299
So 73% of the

275
00:08:51,300 --> 00:08:54,439
respondents said that this,

276
00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:56,319
you know, where candidates stood on

277
00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:58,259
this, them opposing this

278
00:08:58,260 --> 00:09:00,219
legislation will be either

279
00:09:00,220 --> 00:09:02,199
somewhat or very important to

280
00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:03,219
them come November.

281
00:09:03,220 --> 00:09:05,119
And I asked Charles Franklin about

282
00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:08,539
this, you know because in our world,

283
00:09:08,540 --> 00:09:10,219
in November might as well be three

284
00:09:10,220 --> 00:09:11,899
years away in terms of how fast

285
00:09:11,900 --> 00:09:13,379
things can change on the campaign

286
00:09:13,380 --> 00:09:14,219
trail.

287
00:09:14,220 --> 00:09:16,259
And he said well people

288
00:09:16,260 --> 00:09:18,339
might not remember individual votes

289
00:09:18,340 --> 00:09:20,299
on this specific bill, but

290
00:09:20,300 --> 00:09:22,219
to Zach's point Franklin said

291
00:09:22,220 --> 00:09:24,099
that Cost of living

292
00:09:24,100 --> 00:09:26,079
affordability property taxes school

293
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:28,139
funding have been and will

294
00:09:28,140 --> 00:09:30,079
likely Continue

295
00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:31,399
to be top of mind for them.

296
00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:33,509
Yeah, I'm tempted to say

297
00:09:33,510 --> 00:09:35,070
I don't believe you voters, you

298
00:09:35,071 --> 00:09:36,149
know, something else is gonna come

299
00:09:36,150 --> 00:09:38,129
along between now and November.

300
00:09:38,130 --> 00:09:40,169
But still, that is a pretty

301
00:09:40,170 --> 00:09:41,669
overwhelming finding from people

302
00:09:41,670 --> 00:09:43,729
right now saying, yeah, I'm

303
00:09:43,730 --> 00:09:45,149
gonna remember this.

304
00:09:45,150 --> 00:09:46,009
How about the candidates for

305
00:09:46,010 --> 00:09:47,049
governor specifically though,

306
00:09:47,050 --> 00:09:48,689
because that was one where I thought

307
00:09:48,690 --> 00:09:50,609
the findings were a little

308
00:09:50,610 --> 00:09:51,409
squishier.

309
00:09:51,410 --> 00:09:53,689
This is more the Wisconsin I know,

310
00:09:53,690 --> 00:09:55,049
when people are presented with this

311
00:09:55,050 --> 00:09:57,149
idea of whether or not they

312
00:09:57,150 --> 00:09:58,949
thought it was wrong for Tom Tiffany

313
00:09:58,950 --> 00:10:00,949
to take a stand against this or for

314
00:10:00,950 --> 00:10:02,529
other Democratic candidates to take

315
00:10:02,530 --> 00:10:03,530
a stand against this.

316
00:10:04,330 --> 00:10:05,829
Ah, it was more, it's closer to

317
00:10:05,830 --> 00:10:07,229
50-50, right?

318
00:10:07,230 --> 00:10:09,049
You had, it

319
00:10:09,050 --> 00:10:10,469
seems like Democrats and Republicans

320
00:10:10,470 --> 00:10:12,389
may be willing to give

321
00:10:12,390 --> 00:10:14,109
their candidate the benefit of the

322
00:10:14,110 --> 00:10:15,769
doubt if you hear the right

323
00:10:15,770 --> 00:10:18,229
messaging between now and November,

324
00:10:18,230 --> 00:10:18,799
Anya.

325
00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:21,099
Yeah, you know, one of the sort of

326
00:10:21,100 --> 00:10:22,939
upsetting truths for those of us who

327
00:10:22,940 --> 00:10:24,539
really care about facts and details

328
00:10:24,540 --> 00:10:26,459
in the public media world is

329
00:10:26,460 --> 00:10:28,299
that voters don't really care about

330
00:10:28,300 --> 00:10:29,479
those things, right? They care about

331
00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:30,999
sort of feeling heard and feeling

332
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:32,679
considered. And so one of things

333
00:10:32,680 --> 00:10:34,559
that candidates need to

334
00:10:34,560 --> 00:10:36,539
do right now is present that

335
00:10:36,540 --> 00:10:37,939
they take people's concerns

336
00:10:37,940 --> 00:10:39,059
seriously. They take the

337
00:10:39,060 --> 00:10:40,319
affordability concerns seriously,

338
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:41,339
they take the school funding

339
00:10:41,340 --> 00:10:43,179
concerns seriously and the

340
00:10:43,180 --> 00:10:45,159
kind of details of it are a lot

341
00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:46,779
less important to your everyday

342
00:10:46,780 --> 00:10:48,409
voter. And so how do you kind of

343
00:10:48,410 --> 00:10:49,369
message that in a way that makes

344
00:10:49,370 --> 00:10:51,029
people feel heard and understood

345
00:10:51,030 --> 00:10:52,709
enough to want to check that box at

346
00:10:52,710 --> 00:10:54,549
the ballot box, rather than kind

347
00:10:54,550 --> 00:10:55,549
of getting into some of this

348
00:10:55,550 --> 00:10:57,329
infighting around the actual

349
00:10:57,330 --> 00:10:59,189
mechanisms at the Capitol by

350
00:10:59,190 --> 00:11:00,649
which it could have or could have

351
00:11:00,650 --> 00:11:01,949
not occurred?

352
00:11:01,950 --> 00:11:03,509
I think you've brought up a really

353
00:11:03,510 --> 00:11:05,489
important element and that is that

354
00:11:05,490 --> 00:11:06,929
feeds into the cynicism of some

355
00:11:06,930 --> 00:11:08,289
people out there and the question

356
00:11:08,290 --> 00:11:10,589
for every midterm is turnout.

357
00:11:10,590 --> 00:11:12,169
Presidential elections will always

358
00:11:12,170 --> 00:11:13,229
have high turnout just because

359
00:11:13,230 --> 00:11:14,769
there's so much attention.

360
00:11:14,770 --> 00:11:16,369
Midterms, the candidate success

361
00:11:16,370 --> 00:11:18,229
rises and falls with who shows up

362
00:11:18,230 --> 00:11:19,849
and which party can get their people

363
00:11:19,850 --> 00:11:21,669
out. So if there are

364
00:11:21,670 --> 00:11:23,629
voters, independents or moderates

365
00:11:23,630 --> 00:11:25,569
on either side who feel like

366
00:11:25,570 --> 00:11:27,149
They're not being heard by their

367
00:11:27,150 --> 00:11:29,319
politicians because both sides...

368
00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:30,759
But all the candidates in front of

369
00:11:30,760 --> 00:11:32,719
them said, no, I'd rather do it my

370
00:11:32,720 --> 00:11:33,659
way later on.

371
00:11:33,660 --> 00:11:35,039
You don't need anything right now.

372
00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:36,439
You can just wait.

373
00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:37,879
That may feed into them saying,

374
00:11:37,880 --> 00:11:39,039
well, forget it, I'm just gonna tune

375
00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:40,759
out. None of you deserve my vote.

376
00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,139
And that could impact turnout.

377
00:11:43,140 --> 00:11:44,679
Who were those voters more likely to

378
00:11:44,680 --> 00:11:45,919
be persuadable by?

379
00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:47,439
Which side could they have gone to

380
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:48,659
if they vote at all?

381
00:11:48,660 --> 00:11:50,459
That is a big factor when you see

382
00:11:50,460 --> 00:11:52,259
the potential of this midterm with

383
00:11:52,260 --> 00:11:54,239
wave elections and people feeling

384
00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:55,319
upset and angry.

385
00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:56,679
Some of them just tune out and there

386
00:11:56,680 --> 00:11:57,959
are votes that are not even counted

387
00:11:57,960 --> 00:11:59,039
at all they never show up.

388
00:12:00,050 --> 00:12:01,329
So let's talk about one of the

389
00:12:01,330 --> 00:12:02,729
candidates for governor in a little

390
00:12:02,730 --> 00:12:04,689
more detail here.

391
00:12:04,690 --> 00:12:06,509
Tom Tiffany had a forum

392
00:12:06,510 --> 00:12:08,349
in Madison on the day that

393
00:12:08,350 --> 00:12:09,589
this poll came out.

394
00:12:09,590 --> 00:12:11,449
So it was a few hours after the

395
00:12:11,450 --> 00:12:12,749
poll had been out there.

396
00:12:12,750 --> 00:12:14,109
Essentially, he'd seen the answers

397
00:12:14,110 --> 00:12:16,149
to the test by then, and he knew

398
00:12:16,150 --> 00:12:17,629
where the public stood on this

399
00:12:17,630 --> 00:12:18,629
issue.

400
00:12:18,630 --> 00:12:20,589
Tom Tiffany was asked, Anya, at this

401
00:12:20,590 --> 00:12:22,469
forum, you know, do you

402
00:12:22,470 --> 00:12:24,589
stand by your comments

403
00:12:24,590 --> 00:12:26,569
earlier that you oppose this

404
00:12:26,570 --> 00:12:28,229
deal? What did he have to say?

405
00:12:28,230 --> 00:12:30,149
He stands by those.

406
00:12:30,150 --> 00:12:32,089
But again, like needing to thread

407
00:12:32,090 --> 00:12:33,949
that needle of, but yes, I

408
00:12:33,950 --> 00:12:35,129
want to fund schools.

409
00:12:35,130 --> 00:12:37,009
Yes, I think that people need more

410
00:12:37,010 --> 00:12:38,069
money in their pockets.

411
00:12:38,070 --> 00:12:39,829
I just don't think that this was the

412
00:12:39,830 --> 00:12:41,229
right deal for that.

413
00:12:41,230 --> 00:12:42,909
And so again, he got kind of squishy

414
00:12:42,910 --> 00:12:43,709
on detail.

415
00:12:43,710 --> 00:12:45,369
So he talked about, he believes

416
00:12:45,370 --> 00:12:47,389
basically every penny of the surplus

417
00:12:47,390 --> 00:12:49,229
needs to go back into people's

418
00:12:49,230 --> 00:12:50,869
pockets. This would have obviously

419
00:12:50,870 --> 00:12:52,709
split the surplus

420
00:12:52,710 --> 00:12:54,629
between school funding and some of

421
00:12:54,630 --> 00:12:55,849
those rebates and then things like

422
00:12:55,850 --> 00:12:57,229
no tax on tips.

423
00:12:57,230 --> 00:12:58,729
He then didn't really have a

424
00:12:58,730 --> 00:13:00,529
proposal for how he would return

425
00:13:00,530 --> 00:13:01,829
that money to the taxpayers.

426
00:13:01,830 --> 00:13:03,949
And he didn't have details on

427
00:13:03,950 --> 00:13:05,729
how he would then boost school

428
00:13:05,730 --> 00:13:06,889
funding. Because of course, that is

429
00:13:06,890 --> 00:13:08,909
the other kind of half of the deal.

430
00:13:08,910 --> 00:13:10,089
But he said he really cares about

431
00:13:10,090 --> 00:13:11,369
that.

432
00:13:11,370 --> 00:13:13,169
And stay tuned for his first budget

433
00:13:13,170 --> 00:13:14,629
as governor. So it was a way of, I

434
00:13:14,630 --> 00:13:16,089
think, trying to thread that needle

435
00:13:16,090 --> 00:13:17,709
of I didn't support it because it

436
00:13:17,710 --> 00:13:19,629
didn't do enough for you, the

437
00:13:19,630 --> 00:13:21,809
voter, vote for me, and I'll

438
00:13:21,810 --> 00:13:23,289
make it happen. I will find a way to

439
00:13:23,290 --> 00:13:24,729
balance the budget and find a to put

440
00:13:24,730 --> 00:13:25,509
money in your pocket.

441
00:13:25,510 --> 00:13:27,309
What did he describe the projected

442
00:13:27,310 --> 00:13:28,659
surplus as at this forum?

443
00:13:28,660 --> 00:13:30,159
I believe he said it was Madison

444
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:32,119
math to try to, if

445
00:13:32,120 --> 00:13:33,419
there was going to be a deficit

446
00:13:33,420 --> 00:13:34,759
because of how you spend money, that

447
00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:36,199
that is Madison math, and he's going

448
00:13:36,200 --> 00:13:38,599
to do sort of family checkbook math,

449
00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:40,799
which is how you balance a budget.

450
00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:42,299
So again, a lot of sort of talking

451
00:13:42,300 --> 00:13:44,259
points, not a lot specifics.

452
00:13:44,260 --> 00:13:45,799
Yeah, I would say in terms of the

453
00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:47,779
Madison math versus the family math,

454
00:13:47,780 --> 00:13:49,879
it is basically like assuming your

455
00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:51,799
family is not going to get a raise

456
00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:52,939
in the next couple of years.

457
00:13:52,940 --> 00:13:54,159
And this is what would happen if you

458
00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:55,979
didn't, you would run out of money.

459
00:13:57,080 --> 00:13:59,099
At this forum hosted

460
00:13:59,100 --> 00:14:01,019
by Wist Politics in Madison,

461
00:14:01,020 --> 00:14:02,919
Tom Tiffany was also given an

462
00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:04,899
open invitation to show where

463
00:14:04,900 --> 00:14:06,739
he disagrees with President Donald

464
00:14:06,740 --> 00:14:07,649
Trump.

465
00:14:07,650 --> 00:14:09,329
One of those questions was about

466
00:14:09,330 --> 00:14:11,329
whether he'd support this $1.8

467
00:14:11,330 --> 00:14:13,169
billion pot of money

468
00:14:13,170 --> 00:14:14,469
that Trump's administration has

469
00:14:14,470 --> 00:14:17,129
dubbed the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

470
00:14:17,130 --> 00:14:18,189
That's the one the Democrats worry

471
00:14:18,190 --> 00:14:19,889
could be used to compensate people

472
00:14:19,890 --> 00:14:22,409
like the January 6th defendants.

473
00:14:22,410 --> 00:14:24,049
Here's what Tom Tiffany had to say.

474
00:14:25,060 --> 00:14:27,199
So I'm still studying the details in

475
00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:28,119
regards to that.

476
00:14:28,120 --> 00:14:30,179
I'm asking the administration to

477
00:14:30,180 --> 00:14:32,199
give us more as far as how

478
00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,719
exactly they expect to

479
00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:36,819
implement this.

480
00:14:36,820 --> 00:14:38,879
I'd say just

481
00:14:38,880 --> 00:14:40,459
one thought that I have in regards

482
00:14:40,460 --> 00:14:42,799
to it is that

483
00:14:42,800 --> 00:14:44,439
maybe some people are due

484
00:14:44,440 --> 00:14:45,440
compensation.

485
00:14:46,460 --> 00:14:48,499
So Zach, this is a 50-50

486
00:14:48,500 --> 00:14:50,439
state and Tom Tiffany has the luxury

487
00:14:50,440 --> 00:14:52,579
of not running in a big

488
00:14:52,580 --> 00:14:54,419
competitive Republican primary right

489
00:14:54,420 --> 00:14:55,499
now.

490
00:14:55,500 --> 00:14:57,339
One could argue that this would be a

491
00:14:57,340 --> 00:14:59,179
chance for him to say, this where I

492
00:14:59,180 --> 00:15:01,259
differ from the president.

493
00:15:01,260 --> 00:15:02,929
Why didn't we hear that from him?

494
00:15:02,930 --> 00:15:04,129
Because he really hasn't differed

495
00:15:04,130 --> 00:15:05,689
from the president on most issues

496
00:15:05,690 --> 00:15:07,229
since the president has come into

497
00:15:07,230 --> 00:15:08,729
power and since Tom Tiffany's been

498
00:15:08,730 --> 00:15:10,729
in Congress. They've been very

499
00:15:10,730 --> 00:15:12,209
closely associated.

500
00:15:12,210 --> 00:15:13,709
And that's not just Tom Tiffany

501
00:15:13,710 --> 00:15:14,809
person belief, that's him

502
00:15:14,810 --> 00:15:16,049
representing his congressional

503
00:15:16,050 --> 00:15:17,909
district. The seventh is the

504
00:15:17,910 --> 00:15:19,949
most MAGA red of all

505
00:15:19,950 --> 00:15:20,989
of the Republican districts

506
00:15:20,990 --> 00:15:22,189
throughout the state.

507
00:15:22,190 --> 00:15:23,989
So yes, there's a political logic

508
00:15:23,990 --> 00:15:25,029
that comes with, well, he doesn't

509
00:15:25,030 --> 00:15:26,709
have a Republican primary to worry

510
00:15:26,710 --> 00:15:28,169
about. So he already has Trump's

511
00:15:28,170 --> 00:15:29,089
endorsement, the party's

512
00:15:29,090 --> 00:15:29,869
endorsements.

513
00:15:29,870 --> 00:15:31,289
So he can afford to split from

514
00:15:31,290 --> 00:15:32,609
Trump. It's not the same as.

515
00:15:32,610 --> 00:15:33,929
Some of these primaries we've seen

516
00:15:33,930 --> 00:15:35,849
around the country where everyone's

517
00:15:35,850 --> 00:15:37,249
desperately clinging to try and get

518
00:15:37,250 --> 00:15:39,229
Trump to give him their blessing so

519
00:15:39,230 --> 00:15:40,489
they can win a primary.

520
00:15:40,490 --> 00:15:41,829
He's already got that.

521
00:15:41,830 --> 00:15:43,629
So I think this clearly shows in his

522
00:15:43,630 --> 00:15:44,889
prior statements and a lot of these

523
00:15:44,890 --> 00:15:46,749
similar issues about the 2020

524
00:15:46,750 --> 00:15:49,089
election and election fraud and

525
00:15:49,090 --> 00:15:51,009
conspiracies clearly shows this

526
00:15:51,010 --> 00:15:51,849
is who he is.

527
00:15:51,850 --> 00:15:53,709
And this has been who he

528
00:15:53,710 --> 00:15:55,369
all along in Congress.

529
00:15:55,370 --> 00:15:56,809
This really isn't any different from

530
00:15:56,810 --> 00:15:58,169
the Tom Tiffany we've been covering

531
00:15:58,170 --> 00:15:59,439
for all these years.

532
00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:00,479
I think there may be some

533
00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:01,759
Republicans who wish it was

534
00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:03,599
different because now he's in a

535
00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:05,619
more widespread political spotlight

536
00:16:05,620 --> 00:16:07,019
and a little higher stakes with the

537
00:16:07,020 --> 00:16:08,919
gubernatorial election, but it's

538
00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:10,519
not really a change from who he's

539
00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:11,520
always been.

540
00:16:12,540 --> 00:16:14,559
Rich, we've had the benefit

541
00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:16,899
of a few days since that forum, but

542
00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:18,839
he covered a lot there in this

543
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:19,879
forum by Whist Politics.

544
00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:22,859
What were some people in his own

545
00:16:22,860 --> 00:16:24,319
party saying about how that went for

546
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,219
him and kind of how he maneuvered

547
00:16:26,220 --> 00:16:27,220
around these questions?

548
00:16:29,140 --> 00:16:31,019
So through my trolling

549
00:16:31,020 --> 00:16:33,019
of social media,

550
00:16:33,020 --> 00:16:34,839
trolling is

551
00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:35,899
something else.

552
00:16:35,900 --> 00:16:36,900
That's right. Research.

553
00:16:38,100 --> 00:16:39,979
I saw a

554
00:16:39,980 --> 00:16:42,739
few conservatives, Republicans,

555
00:16:42,740 --> 00:16:45,379
and even one conservative website

556
00:16:45,380 --> 00:16:47,519
say this was

557
00:16:47,520 --> 00:16:48,599
an unforced error.

558
00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:51,119
He shouldn't be talking about 2020.

559
00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:52,519
He needs to talk about the future

560
00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:54,379
and what he's to do, and

561
00:16:54,380 --> 00:16:56,219
also to the

562
00:16:56,220 --> 00:16:58,079
surplus bill and his opposition

563
00:16:58,080 --> 00:16:59,979
to that, a lot of people said that

564
00:16:59,980 --> 00:17:02,139
was another unforced

565
00:17:02,140 --> 00:17:04,118
error and you know

566
00:17:04,119 --> 00:17:06,259
there's this race on to

567
00:17:06,260 --> 00:17:07,739
for every candidate to define

568
00:17:07,740 --> 00:17:09,358
themselves before they're defined by

569
00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:10,879
the other parties so some

570
00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:12,559
republicans think that Tiffany needs

571
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:13,599
to do a better job of that.

572
00:17:14,939 --> 00:17:16,799
Anya one thing that stood out to you

573
00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:17,759
I remember when we were talking

574
00:17:17,760 --> 00:17:19,879
about what went on at this forum is

575
00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:20,880
you said

576
00:17:21,959 --> 00:17:23,779
He basically covered a lot of ground

577
00:17:23,780 --> 00:17:25,679
and said Very

578
00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:27,358
little about the details would it be

579
00:17:27,359 --> 00:17:28,739
that be an accurate summation of

580
00:17:28,740 --> 00:17:29,279
what she saw?

581
00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:30,099
I think that's right.

582
00:17:30,100 --> 00:17:31,939
And, you know, to be clear, it's

583
00:17:31,940 --> 00:17:33,859
not unusual for a politician in an

584
00:17:33,860 --> 00:17:35,659
election year to kind of go broad

585
00:17:35,660 --> 00:17:37,039
strokes, big picture, and not

586
00:17:37,040 --> 00:17:39,019
necessarily settle on the details.

587
00:17:39,020 --> 00:17:40,339
But I think, again, it speaks to

588
00:17:40,340 --> 00:17:41,259
this thing that we've been talking

589
00:17:41,260 --> 00:17:43,099
about this whole show about how

590
00:17:43,100 --> 00:17:44,659
do you kind of land a message

591
00:17:44,660 --> 00:17:46,199
without getting caught up in these

592
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:47,619
details? And I wonder to what

593
00:17:47,620 --> 00:17:49,639
extent, because he doesn't have to

594
00:17:49,640 --> 00:17:51,179
distinguish himself in a primary,

595
00:17:51,180 --> 00:17:52,159
the way that the Democratic

596
00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:54,039
candidates do, whether he just

597
00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:56,139
kind of wants to

598
00:17:56,140 --> 00:17:57,719
appeal to people who just want.

599
00:17:57,720 --> 00:17:59,239
A more conservative person in

600
00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:01,199
office, people for

601
00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:02,819
whom his sort of Northwoods

602
00:18:02,820 --> 00:18:05,059
background is more appealing and

603
00:18:05,060 --> 00:18:07,019
is maybe relying on a level

604
00:18:07,020 --> 00:18:09,099
of infighting from the Democrats.

605
00:18:09,100 --> 00:18:10,259
And therefore he doesn't really need

606
00:18:10,260 --> 00:18:11,899
to make a case in that traditional

607
00:18:11,900 --> 00:18:13,919
sense. He doesn't need to explain in

608
00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:15,499
great detail how he would balance

609
00:18:15,500 --> 00:18:16,539
that budget.

610
00:18:16,540 --> 00:18:18,799
He can kind of go a little bit on

611
00:18:18,800 --> 00:18:20,219
vibes and hope that that'll carry

612
00:18:20,220 --> 00:18:21,059
him through November.

613
00:18:21,060 --> 00:18:22,739
Maybe at a forum in Madison, he has

614
00:18:22,740 --> 00:18:23,519
that luxury.

615
00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:25,119
I did check before we recorded

616
00:18:25,120 --> 00:18:26,619
today, and he has a couple of

617
00:18:26,620 --> 00:18:28,999
campaign ads on YouTube, Zach.

618
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:30,919
Seven million views and four million

619
00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:31,999
views, where he talks about

620
00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:33,939
basically being a Wisconsin guy

621
00:18:33,940 --> 00:18:35,019
and a damn tender.

622
00:18:35,020 --> 00:18:36,559
It seems like that may reach more

623
00:18:36,560 --> 00:18:37,269
people.

624
00:18:37,270 --> 00:18:38,649
And that is his background.

625
00:18:38,650 --> 00:18:39,809
He started out running a small

626
00:18:39,810 --> 00:18:41,749
business. He's tended the dam.

627
00:18:41,750 --> 00:18:42,789
And that's what he's going to run,

628
00:18:42,790 --> 00:18:44,529
is that folksy Northwoods attitude

629
00:18:44,530 --> 00:18:45,629
widespread.

630
00:18:45,630 --> 00:18:47,029
The inside Wisconsin politics,

631
00:18:47,030 --> 00:18:48,529
that's the Madison math he's not

632
00:18:48,530 --> 00:18:49,530
worried about.

633
00:18:49,910 --> 00:18:50,949
Well, that's all the time we have

634
00:18:50,950 --> 00:18:51,749
for today.

635
00:18:51,750 --> 00:18:52,849
Thanks for joining us.

636
00:18:52,850 --> 00:18:54,289
This has been Inside Wisconsin

637
00:18:54,290 --> 00:18:55,269
Politics.

638
00:18:55,270 --> 00:18:56,469
Be sure to follow us on

639
00:18:56,470 --> 00:18:58,989
pbswisconsin.org, wpr.org

640
00:18:58,990 --> 00:19:00,889
YouTube, or wherever you get your

641
00:19:00,890 --> 00:19:01,890
podcasts.

642
00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:12,099
I didn't realize I was trying to say

643
00:19:12,100 --> 00:19:13,859
the title of the podcast at the end

644
00:19:13,860 --> 00:19:14,860
there.

