1
00:00:18,709 --> 00:00:20,689
Do endorsements matter?

2
00:00:20,690 --> 00:00:22,629
This week we look at a few examples,

3
00:00:22,630 --> 00:00:23,989
including in heated primaries for

4
00:00:23,990 --> 00:00:25,289
the seventh congressional district

5
00:00:25,290 --> 00:00:27,109
and the governor's office.

6
00:00:27,110 --> 00:00:29,109
Plus the latest Republican party

7
00:00:29,110 --> 00:00:30,889
drama following the Supreme Court

8
00:00:30,890 --> 00:00:32,048
blowout.

9
00:00:32,049 --> 00:00:34,409
This is Inside Wisconsin Politics.

10
00:00:36,170 --> 00:00:37,609
I'm Sean Johnson here with my

11
00:00:37,610 --> 00:00:39,209
colleagues Anya Van Wagtendonck and

12
00:00:39,210 --> 00:00:40,809
Rich Kramer in Eau Claire.

13
00:00:40,810 --> 00:00:41,810
Hey gang.

14
00:00:43,350 --> 00:00:44,949
So part of the reason we wanted to

15
00:00:44,950 --> 00:00:46,949
talk about these races is that they

16
00:00:46,950 --> 00:00:48,309
are interesting, okay?

17
00:00:48,310 --> 00:00:49,449
If you haven't been following these

18
00:00:49,450 --> 00:00:50,849
primaries yet, and you'll be

19
00:00:50,850 --> 00:00:52,909
forgiven, it's April, but

20
00:00:52,910 --> 00:00:54,829
the races for the seventh

21
00:00:54,830 --> 00:00:55,889
congressional district, especially

22
00:00:55,890 --> 00:00:57,389
on the Republican side and the

23
00:00:57,390 --> 00:00:59,309
Democratic primary for governor are

24
00:00:59,310 --> 00:01:00,749
pretty dramatic.

25
00:01:00,750 --> 00:01:02,589
Let's start with the seventh though,

26
00:01:02,590 --> 00:01:04,049
Rich, because another reason we

27
00:01:04,050 --> 00:01:05,889
wanna follow these is that,

28
00:01:05,890 --> 00:01:07,709
they involve endorsements that

29
00:01:07,710 --> 00:01:09,449
seem like they could define the

30
00:01:09,450 --> 00:01:10,299
race.

31
00:01:10,300 --> 00:01:11,559
Tell us about what happened up in

32
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:13,199
the seventh, where you got kind of

33
00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:14,400
the biggest endorsement of all.

34
00:01:16,980 --> 00:01:18,619
Yeah, truly.

35
00:01:18,620 --> 00:01:20,659
President Donald Trump, way back in

36
00:01:20,660 --> 00:01:22,499
January, endorsed one of

37
00:01:22,500 --> 00:01:24,439
the candidates running

38
00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:26,339
for that seat, Michael

39
00:01:26,340 --> 00:01:28,159
Alfonso. Of course Michael Alphonso

40
00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:29,999
is the son-in-law of U.S.

41
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,119
Transportation Secretary Sean

42
00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,019
Duffy, who also had

43
00:01:34,020 --> 00:01:37,239
that congressional seat before.

44
00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:39,079
So it definitely created a stir

45
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:40,959
within the GOP primary and I'm

46
00:01:40,960 --> 00:01:42,539
sure you'll be hearing a little bit

47
00:01:42,540 --> 00:01:44,289
about that endorsement in the

48
00:01:44,290 --> 00:01:45,290
general.

49
00:01:45,960 --> 00:01:47,939
And the reason we

50
00:01:47,940 --> 00:01:50,559
have an open race up there, Anya,

51
00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:52,199
is because the current office

52
00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:54,059
holder, Tom Tiffany, is running

53
00:01:54,060 --> 00:01:54,979
for governor.

54
00:01:54,980 --> 00:01:56,139
We're gonna get to that race in a

55
00:01:56,140 --> 00:01:57,399
bit. But first of all, with Tom

56
00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,219
Tiffany as he transitioned to the

57
00:01:59,220 --> 00:02:01,179
governor's race, he also got that

58
00:02:01,180 --> 00:02:03,139
Trump endorsement.

59
00:02:03,140 --> 00:02:04,899
How has that played out in his race

60
00:02:04,900 --> 00:02:05,209
there?

61
00:02:05,210 --> 00:02:07,149
Yeah, I mean, if people go all

62
00:02:07,150 --> 00:02:09,309
the way back in time to 2025,

63
00:02:09,310 --> 00:02:11,309
there were briefly three Republican

64
00:02:11,310 --> 00:02:13,569
candidates for governor alongside

65
00:02:13,570 --> 00:02:14,509
Tom Tiffany.

66
00:02:14,510 --> 00:02:16,569
One dropped out after some negative

67
00:02:16,570 --> 00:02:17,649
reporting about some of the stuff

68
00:02:17,650 --> 00:02:19,089
he'd been following on social media.

69
00:02:19,090 --> 00:02:20,149
That was Bill Barion.

70
00:02:20,150 --> 00:02:21,469
But then Josh Schoeman, Washington

71
00:02:21,470 --> 00:02:23,089
County executive stayed in the race

72
00:02:23,090 --> 00:02:25,469
until the morning after

73
00:02:25,470 --> 00:02:26,809
Tom Tiffany got the Trump

74
00:02:26,810 --> 00:02:28,469
endorsement and he dropped out.

75
00:02:28,470 --> 00:02:30,349
And so it was a little bit of This

76
00:02:30,350 --> 00:02:32,489
nod to the fact that in a Republican

77
00:02:32,490 --> 00:02:34,709
primary, a nod from Trump.

78
00:02:34,710 --> 00:02:36,549
Can really be a sort of king-making

79
00:02:36,550 --> 00:02:38,409
move, at least in the primary,

80
00:02:38,410 --> 00:02:40,289
but then it can also lead to

81
00:02:40,290 --> 00:02:41,559
all kinds of stuff in the general.

82
00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:43,499
It was really a

83
00:02:43,500 --> 00:02:45,299
cause effect situation there, right?

84
00:02:45,300 --> 00:02:47,079
Endorsement one day, he drops out

85
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:48,399
the next.

86
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:50,079
That has not been the case in the

87
00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:51,079
seventh though, Rich.

88
00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:52,499
I mean, I think that is the general

89
00:02:52,500 --> 00:02:54,959
playbook is that Trump endorses

90
00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:56,779
and people sort

91
00:02:56,780 --> 00:02:57,999
of assume that in a Republican

92
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:00,919
primary, that seals it.

93
00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:02,479
That is not what's happening there.

94
00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:04,239
And you kind of saw it firsthand

95
00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:06,099
last night at a candidate

96
00:03:06,100 --> 00:03:07,479
forum in Mercer.

97
00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:08,480
Tell us about that.

98
00:03:10,530 --> 00:03:12,489
Yeah, so this forum was

99
00:03:12,490 --> 00:03:14,709
hosted by the Iron County Republican

100
00:03:14,710 --> 00:03:16,749
Party. It was in a, a

101
00:03:16,750 --> 00:03:18,649
former gymnasium of a very old

102
00:03:18,650 --> 00:03:20,629
school. And it happened on the

103
00:03:20,630 --> 00:03:22,609
first 80 degree day that

104
00:03:22,610 --> 00:03:24,429
Mercer saw this year.

105
00:03:24,430 --> 00:03:26,349
So, um, it was a nice

106
00:03:26,350 --> 00:03:28,169
event, but the theme

107
00:03:28,170 --> 00:03:30,069
was, if I might summarize

108
00:03:30,070 --> 00:03:31,289
the candidates and some of the

109
00:03:31,290 --> 00:03:32,949
people I talked to in the audience,

110
00:03:32,950 --> 00:03:34,989
we support president Trump,

111
00:03:34,990 --> 00:03:36,809
but that doesn't mean we

112
00:03:36,810 --> 00:03:38,689
have to vote for who he

113
00:03:38,690 --> 00:03:40,389
tells us So...

114
00:03:40,390 --> 00:03:42,569
A lot of people up there and

115
00:03:42,570 --> 00:03:44,649
this was actually the first time

116
00:03:44,650 --> 00:03:45,650
that I saw

117
00:03:47,730 --> 00:03:49,609
candidates, Republican candidates,

118
00:03:49,610 --> 00:03:52,469
Kevin Hermaning and Jesse Eben,

119
00:03:52,470 --> 00:03:54,449
go negative against Alfonso.

120
00:03:54,450 --> 00:03:56,169
They were criticizing Alfonzo, who

121
00:03:56,170 --> 00:03:58,089
is 26 years

122
00:03:58,090 --> 00:04:00,409
old, for not having very

123
00:04:00,410 --> 00:04:02,309
much experience in

124
00:04:02,310 --> 00:04:04,229
politics or local government, etc.,

125
00:04:04,230 --> 00:04:05,929
and they were portraying themselves

126
00:04:05,930 --> 00:04:07,069
as the choice.

127
00:04:09,460 --> 00:04:11,379
They also, there was discussion

128
00:04:11,380 --> 00:04:13,319
about, you know, does

129
00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:15,679
Alfonso or Duffy feel like

130
00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:17,759
this congressional seat

131
00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:19,699
is something that he's entitled

132
00:04:19,700 --> 00:04:20,619
to.

133
00:04:20,620 --> 00:04:23,399
So it was really interesting.

134
00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:25,219
People up there tiptoeing the line

135
00:04:25,220 --> 00:04:27,159
of still supporting the president,

136
00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:29,059
who did very well in this district,

137
00:04:29,060 --> 00:04:31,459
which leans pretty Republican,

138
00:04:31,460 --> 00:04:33,919
but they just don't,

139
00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:35,659
there's this independent streak

140
00:04:35,660 --> 00:04:37,499
where they don't like the idea of

141
00:04:37,500 --> 00:04:38,909
being told what to do.

142
00:04:38,910 --> 00:04:40,709
And I got to ask you about what they

143
00:04:40,710 --> 00:04:42,989
did on the stage there, too,

144
00:04:42,990 --> 00:04:44,889
because they had assigned seats for

145
00:04:44,890 --> 00:04:45,890
all the candidates,

146
00:04:46,870 --> 00:04:48,369
including Michael Alfonso.

147
00:04:51,330 --> 00:04:53,349
Yeah. And in fact, the only

148
00:04:53,350 --> 00:04:55,329
seat that had a

149
00:04:55,330 --> 00:04:57,269
sign on it was Michael Alfonso.

150
00:04:57,270 --> 00:04:58,709
So you had the three of the

151
00:04:58,710 --> 00:05:00,189
Republican candidates were on the

152
00:05:00,190 --> 00:05:02,289
stage. That's Nina Baum,

153
00:05:02,290 --> 00:05:04,189
Jesse Eben, and Kevin Hermaning.

154
00:05:04,190 --> 00:05:05,949
And then there was an empty chair

155
00:05:05,950 --> 00:05:07,929
with Michael

156
00:05:07,930 --> 00:05:09,649
Alphonso's name on a piece of paper

157
00:05:09,650 --> 00:05:10,929
taped to it.

158
00:05:10,930 --> 00:05:12,789
And even during the

159
00:05:12,790 --> 00:05:15,429
debate, Kevin Hermining

160
00:05:15,430 --> 00:05:17,349
stretches arm out and

161
00:05:17,350 --> 00:05:18,329
kind of.

162
00:05:18,330 --> 00:05:19,909
Put it on the chair, had a big

163
00:05:19,910 --> 00:05:22,629
smile. His campaign person

164
00:05:22,630 --> 00:05:24,889
took a picture that made it on

165
00:05:24,890 --> 00:05:27,229
social media pretty quickly.

166
00:05:27,230 --> 00:05:28,869
So there was that, but even before

167
00:05:28,870 --> 00:05:30,409
the debate, one of the interesting

168
00:05:30,410 --> 00:05:32,289
things that kind of got me

169
00:05:32,290 --> 00:05:34,389
interested in going up there was

170
00:05:34,390 --> 00:05:36,749
this Republican party,

171
00:05:36,750 --> 00:05:38,749
their Facebook page was essentially

172
00:05:38,750 --> 00:05:40,869
goading or kind of making

173
00:05:40,870 --> 00:05:42,689
a little bit of fun of Alfonso's

174
00:05:42,690 --> 00:05:45,529
campaign for not responding.

175
00:05:45,530 --> 00:05:47,909
The GOP chair up there told me that

176
00:05:47,910 --> 00:05:49,529
People he knows with the Michael

177
00:05:49,530 --> 00:05:51,349
Alfonso campaign told him that the

178
00:05:51,350 --> 00:05:52,809
Trump-endorsed candidate doesn't

179
00:05:52,810 --> 00:05:54,489
need to debate.

180
00:05:54,490 --> 00:05:56,849
And people in the audience say that

181
00:05:56,850 --> 00:05:58,369
they told me that's just not the

182
00:05:58,370 --> 00:06:00,209
case. Like this is

183
00:06:00,210 --> 00:06:01,789
important. You've got to get out in

184
00:06:01,790 --> 00:06:04,209
this district and meet people one

185
00:06:04,210 --> 00:06:05,069
by one.

186
00:06:05,070 --> 00:06:07,009
And that's, that's what it takes to

187
00:06:07,010 --> 00:06:07,859
win.

188
00:06:07,860 --> 00:06:09,519
So you have the candidates who are

189
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:11,459
in that race saying,

190
00:06:11,460 --> 00:06:12,959
you can't tell us what to do.

191
00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:14,919
We're still running up here, Anya,

192
00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:17,019
although one of the candidates who

193
00:06:17,020 --> 00:06:18,959
Rich has done some reporting on did

194
00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:21,199
drop out this week.

195
00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:22,999
Tell us about that Paul Waskran left

196
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:23,429
the race.

197
00:06:23,430 --> 00:06:25,289
Yeah, so Paul Waskran is a

198
00:06:25,290 --> 00:06:26,409
successful business person.

199
00:06:26,410 --> 00:06:28,129
He had a largely self-funded

200
00:06:28,130 --> 00:06:29,129
campaign.

201
00:06:29,130 --> 00:06:30,229
And so him dropping out is kind of

202
00:06:30,230 --> 00:06:32,069
the first big dropout

203
00:06:32,070 --> 00:06:33,029
of the race.

204
00:06:33,030 --> 00:06:34,089
And that's one of the things we kind

205
00:06:34,090 --> 00:06:35,669
of look to going into a primary,

206
00:06:35,670 --> 00:06:37,209
especially in these crowded fields,

207
00:06:37,210 --> 00:06:38,789
is when will people start dropping

208
00:06:38,790 --> 00:06:40,649
out? So this is kind the first one.

209
00:06:40,650 --> 00:06:42,209
He had raised quite a bit of money

210
00:06:42,210 --> 00:06:43,629
from himself, as I mentioned, but

211
00:06:43,630 --> 00:06:45,409
very little in terms of independent

212
00:06:45,410 --> 00:06:46,329
donors.

213
00:06:46,330 --> 00:06:47,709
And then by contrast, you have

214
00:06:47,710 --> 00:06:49,599
Alfonso, who has received quite a

215
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:51,499
bit of money from this kind of DC

216
00:06:51,500 --> 00:06:52,979
connected past that he's on.

217
00:06:52,980 --> 00:06:54,819
You know, one thing that

218
00:06:54,820 --> 00:06:56,839
when Rich covered the empty

219
00:06:56,840 --> 00:06:58,759
chair, Alfonso was posting at the

220
00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:00,459
same time on Facebook photos of him

221
00:07:00,460 --> 00:07:02,299
with Republican congresspeople

222
00:07:02,300 --> 00:07:03,079
in DC.

223
00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:04,999
So he has these big connections.

224
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:06,199
And so I think it was a little bit

225
00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:07,839
of a signal that even people with

226
00:07:07,840 --> 00:07:09,839
deep pockets are not

227
00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:11,739
necessarily feeling up to the

228
00:07:11,740 --> 00:07:12,969
challenge. He also said that he

229
00:07:12,970 --> 00:07:14,429
didn't want to, Wasgren said that,

230
00:07:14,430 --> 00:07:15,849
he didn't want to kind of contribute

231
00:07:15,850 --> 00:07:17,449
to a bloody primary, that that could

232
00:07:17,450 --> 00:07:19,069
only empower Democrats.

233
00:07:19,070 --> 00:07:20,049
And so I think we're gonna see a

234
00:07:20,050 --> 00:07:21,989
little bit of that, you know, bowing

235
00:07:21,990 --> 00:07:23,709
out in order to maintain the good of

236
00:07:23,710 --> 00:07:24,710
the party.

237
00:07:27,420 --> 00:07:29,439
Yeah, if I could just chime in

238
00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:30,440
on that.

239
00:07:31,420 --> 00:07:33,379
So the other thing is that

240
00:07:33,380 --> 00:07:35,159
there's this political action

241
00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:37,079
committee that has been raising

242
00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:38,859
money. It's based in Alabama.

243
00:07:38,860 --> 00:07:40,499
It's brand new.

244
00:07:40,500 --> 00:07:42,219
And it's been getting some of that

245
00:07:42,220 --> 00:07:43,839
money, a million dollars, from Sean

246
00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:45,059
Duffy's former congressional

247
00:07:45,060 --> 00:07:46,139
campaign.

248
00:07:46,140 --> 00:07:47,599
And so they've essentially been

249
00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:49,439
doing a lot of ads, a lot

250
00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:50,919
work for Alfonso.

251
00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:52,739
Therefore, he hasn't had to spend as

252
00:07:52,740 --> 00:07:54,279
much of the money that he's actually

253
00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:56,359
raised. And with regard

254
00:07:56,360 --> 00:07:57,609
to Wasgren...

255
00:07:57,610 --> 00:07:59,529
What you notice, Sean, on

256
00:07:59,530 --> 00:08:01,349
that last finance report that

257
00:08:01,350 --> 00:08:03,229
we looked at when I was reporting on

258
00:08:03,230 --> 00:08:05,549
it, there was some interesting

259
00:08:05,550 --> 00:08:06,949
loan information.

260
00:08:06,950 --> 00:08:08,139
You wanna talk about that?

261
00:08:08,140 --> 00:08:09,839
Oh, yeah, I mean, well, I think the

262
00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:11,659
thing that got his attention

263
00:08:11,660 --> 00:08:13,199
for Paul Waskran when he jumped into

264
00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:15,479
the race was, as you mentioned,

265
00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:16,599
an ability to sell fun.

266
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:18,239
So he loaned himself a million bucks

267
00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:19,859
there to start out.

268
00:08:19,860 --> 00:08:22,059
He had repaid a lot of that in

269
00:08:22,060 --> 00:08:24,119
the in the last report.

270
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:25,939
So I think it is a

271
00:08:25,940 --> 00:08:27,339
situation where you put the money in

272
00:08:27,340 --> 00:08:29,319
there to send a message, he decided

273
00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:31,159
it was not well received and took

274
00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:32,879
the money back and got on out of

275
00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:33,880
there.

276
00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:36,739
Rich, I guess one thing we gotta

277
00:08:36,740 --> 00:08:37,519
ask here.

278
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:39,158
This is a very Republican district.

279
00:08:39,159 --> 00:08:40,158
And so we are talking about this

280
00:08:40,159 --> 00:08:42,319
Republican primary, but

281
00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:44,439
is this a situation

282
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:47,059
where, because of this infighting

283
00:08:47,060 --> 00:08:48,819
uneasiness among Republicans up

284
00:08:48,820 --> 00:08:50,839
there, is this door open for

285
00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:51,840
Democrats?

286
00:08:53,970 --> 00:08:55,849
I've heard that it is and I've

287
00:08:55,850 --> 00:08:56,729
heard that. It isn't.

288
00:08:56,730 --> 00:08:59,289
So this is a district that

289
00:08:59,290 --> 00:09:01,349
has 10 tended to be

290
00:09:01,350 --> 00:09:03,449
more and more Republican since,

291
00:09:03,450 --> 00:09:04,269
say, 2010.

292
00:09:04,270 --> 00:09:06,089
We have to also remember that

293
00:09:06,090 --> 00:09:07,969
former Democratic Congressman Dable,

294
00:09:07,970 --> 00:09:09,889
we represented that

295
00:09:09,890 --> 00:09:12,189
the seventh for many, many years.

296
00:09:12,190 --> 00:09:14,149
But, of course, with the Tea Party

297
00:09:14,150 --> 00:09:16,349
wave, Sharon Duffy

298
00:09:16,350 --> 00:09:18,409
got in and it

299
00:09:18,410 --> 00:09:19,929
stayed Republican since.

300
00:09:19,930 --> 00:09:21,549
Of course, the map also changed.

301
00:09:21,550 --> 00:09:23,439
But just what I've been told by

302
00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:25,739
Joe Hendrick, who's kind of like the

303
00:09:25,740 --> 00:09:27,939
maps and elections data

304
00:09:27,940 --> 00:09:30,179
guru for the Republicans,

305
00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:33,419
is that it is

306
00:09:33,420 --> 00:09:34,919
Republican. It would be an uphill

307
00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:37,019
battle for any Democrat,

308
00:09:37,020 --> 00:09:38,859
but it's

309
00:09:38,860 --> 00:09:39,659
not impossible.

310
00:09:39,660 --> 00:09:41,679
And he said if the GOP picks the

311
00:09:41,680 --> 00:09:43,919
wrong candidate in the primary and

312
00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:45,739
it's a wave year, which he

313
00:09:45,740 --> 00:09:47,559
said it seems to be looking like it

314
00:09:47,560 --> 00:09:49,439
might be, It's possible

315
00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:51,309
for this to flip back to...

316
00:09:51,310 --> 00:09:53,709
Democratic hands.

317
00:09:53,710 --> 00:09:55,829
Whether that happens or not,

318
00:09:55,830 --> 00:09:57,809
Hendrick said it's unlikely, but

319
00:09:57,810 --> 00:09:58,810
it's not off the table.

320
00:09:59,970 --> 00:10:01,469
So let's turn to the Democratic

321
00:10:01,470 --> 00:10:03,349
primary for governor here,

322
00:10:03,350 --> 00:10:05,369
where we have seven candidates

323
00:10:05,370 --> 00:10:07,429
running and it is at

324
00:10:07,430 --> 00:10:09,309
this stage not getting a

325
00:10:09,310 --> 00:10:10,669
ton of attention statewide.

326
00:10:10,670 --> 00:10:11,729
I mean, we did just have a Supreme

327
00:10:11,730 --> 00:10:13,349
Court race that ate up some of that.

328
00:10:13,350 --> 00:10:15,089
There's a little national news right

329
00:10:15,090 --> 00:10:17,669
now that has people's attention.

330
00:10:17,670 --> 00:10:19,509
But Anya, in that race, it

331
00:10:19,510 --> 00:10:21,249
feels like you could be talking

332
00:10:21,250 --> 00:10:22,909
about endorsements every week in a

333
00:10:22,910 --> 00:10:24,729
way about how that might affect

334
00:10:24,730 --> 00:10:25,789
the race.

335
00:10:25,790 --> 00:10:27,489
What's one that caught our eye this

336
00:10:27,490 --> 00:10:27,849
week?

337
00:10:27,850 --> 00:10:29,209
Yeah, I mean, so there have been all

338
00:10:29,210 --> 00:10:30,909
of these kind of smaller or more

339
00:10:30,910 --> 00:10:32,269
local endorsements that have been

340
00:10:32,270 --> 00:10:33,189
coming through.

341
00:10:33,190 --> 00:10:35,069
So local firefighters unions or this

342
00:10:35,070 --> 00:10:36,849
kind of thing. But then this week

343
00:10:36,850 --> 00:10:38,629
was the first at least that I've

344
00:10:38,630 --> 00:10:40,489
noticed sort of national figure to

345
00:10:40,490 --> 00:10:41,929
back a candidate.

346
00:10:41,930 --> 00:10:43,829
So Ilhan Omar of Minnesota backed

347
00:10:43,830 --> 00:10:45,869
Francesca Hong, who is a

348
00:10:45,870 --> 00:10:47,649
Democratic representative from

349
00:10:47,650 --> 00:10:49,309
Madison. She aligns the Democratic

350
00:10:49,310 --> 00:10:51,009
socialist sort of platform.

351
00:10:51,010 --> 00:10:52,969
And so she's one of the further left

352
00:10:52,970 --> 00:10:54,589
candidates, obviously getting the

353
00:10:54,590 --> 00:10:56,529
backing of a further left member of

354
00:10:56,530 --> 00:10:58,199
Congress. And this really caught our

355
00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:00,239
attention for sort of a double-edged

356
00:11:00,240 --> 00:11:01,739
reason, right? That can really

357
00:11:01,740 --> 00:11:03,719
signal where Hong stands here

358
00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:04,599
in Wisconsin.

359
00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:06,719
But of course, Ilhan Omar has

360
00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:08,199
plenty of people who don't care for

361
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,239
her in the Republican

362
00:11:10,240 --> 00:11:11,499
and sort of conservative side of

363
00:11:11,500 --> 00:11:13,299
things. And so looking towards a

364
00:11:13,300 --> 00:11:14,999
general election, I'm curious what

365
00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:16,279
it'll mean to have some of these

366
00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:17,979
more divisive endorsements.

367
00:11:17,980 --> 00:11:19,639
But right now, it's also really

368
00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:21,539
interesting for a big national

369
00:11:21,540 --> 00:11:23,239
figure with a lot of media

370
00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:24,859
attention, social media attention to

371
00:11:24,860 --> 00:11:26,299
be throwing her weight behind.

372
00:11:26,300 --> 00:11:27,879
A candidate in the Wisconsin

373
00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:29,259
governor's election.

374
00:11:29,260 --> 00:11:31,379
Yeah, to me, I think if you're

375
00:11:31,380 --> 00:11:33,159
a voter out there who's barely

376
00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:34,619
paying attention to these races at

377
00:11:34,620 --> 00:11:36,619
this point and you have this,

378
00:11:36,620 --> 00:11:38,479
you know,

379
00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:39,919
overwhelming list of choices and for

380
00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:41,939
any essentially, they're probably

381
00:11:41,940 --> 00:11:43,879
looking for clues on if they

382
00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:45,639
want to go for a very liberal

383
00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:47,479
candidate. This is a way of sending

384
00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:49,279
that message that representative

385
00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:50,719
Hong is that candidate, you know,

386
00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:51,919
you don't earn an endorsement like

387
00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:53,739
that without being a

388
00:11:53,740 --> 00:11:54,559
candidate like that.

389
00:11:54,560 --> 00:11:56,499
So it is a way to send a little

390
00:11:56,500 --> 00:11:58,059
cue kind of early going.

391
00:11:58,060 --> 00:11:59,139
Right. There's not a lot of

392
00:11:59,140 --> 00:12:01,099
differentiation on policy issues.

393
00:12:01,100 --> 00:12:02,339
There's some differentiation on sort

394
00:12:02,340 --> 00:12:03,899
of the specifics of things.

395
00:12:03,900 --> 00:12:05,239
But basically every Democratic

396
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:07,319
candidate supports abortion rights,

397
00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:08,319
supports, you know, expanding

398
00:12:08,320 --> 00:12:09,559
Medicaid. Like there are all of

399
00:12:09,560 --> 00:12:10,899
these kind of signals there.

400
00:12:10,900 --> 00:12:12,919
And so an endorsement can offer a

401
00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:15,099
more specific kind of endorsement.

402
00:12:15,100 --> 00:12:16,919
I'm sorry, a signal

403
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:19,039
around values and also, again,

404
00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:20,399
invite some of the media attention

405
00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:21,299
that can come with that.

406
00:12:21,300 --> 00:12:23,119
So it's one thing to say, oh, I

407
00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:24,559
have the support of this local union

408
00:12:24,560 --> 00:12:25,899
in my community. And what does that

409
00:12:25,900 --> 00:12:27,059
say about my support for workers

410
00:12:27,060 --> 00:12:29,109
rights? It's another thing if,

411
00:12:29,110 --> 00:12:31,089
you know, Mom Donnie

412
00:12:31,090 --> 00:12:32,669
comes in and backs you, right, a

413
00:12:32,670 --> 00:12:34,849
sort of nationally famous figure

414
00:12:34,850 --> 00:12:36,349
where people have already kind of

415
00:12:36,350 --> 00:12:37,669
done the work to understand who that

416
00:12:37,670 --> 00:12:39,349
person is and so then they can apply

417
00:12:39,350 --> 00:12:40,749
it to the candidates here.

418
00:12:49,230 --> 00:12:50,350
We can't hear you, Rich.

419
00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:00,299
So Anya, I guess a

420
00:13:00,300 --> 00:13:01,539
question that I have when it comes

421
00:13:01,540 --> 00:13:03,359
to endorsements like this on

422
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:05,299
the Democratic side, is there

423
00:13:05,300 --> 00:13:07,679
an equivalent to the Donald Trump

424
00:13:07,680 --> 00:13:09,699
endorsement where if this person

425
00:13:09,700 --> 00:13:11,539
comes in, you know,

426
00:13:11,540 --> 00:13:13,359
it's kind of all over in a primary.

427
00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,239
I mean, put simply, no, Trump

428
00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:16,759
is really the standard bearer for

429
00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:18,219
the Republican Party and has been

430
00:13:18,220 --> 00:13:19,419
for a decade.

431
00:13:19,420 --> 00:13:20,679
Democrats just don't have that

432
00:13:20,680 --> 00:13:22,499
equivalent person, in part because,

433
00:13:22,500 --> 00:13:23,719
you know, you do have some of this

434
00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:25,159
division between more centrist

435
00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:26,519
Democrats and more left wing

436
00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:27,479
Democrats.

437
00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:28,959
And so again, somebody like Ilhan

438
00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:30,779
Omar is going to really appeal to

439
00:13:30,780 --> 00:13:32,759
people who are kind of already in

440
00:13:32,760 --> 00:13:35,179
the Francesca Hong camp, would

441
00:13:35,180 --> 00:13:36,899
not necessarily appeal to more sort

442
00:13:36,900 --> 00:13:38,639
moderate or business-minded

443
00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:39,549
Democrat.

444
00:13:39,550 --> 00:13:41,469
And then there are people,

445
00:13:41,470 --> 00:13:42,549
Kamala Harris or somebody similar

446
00:13:42,550 --> 00:13:44,009
who might appeal more to those kind

447
00:13:44,010 --> 00:13:45,809
of centrist folks, but there's not

448
00:13:45,810 --> 00:13:47,689
really a uniting figure in

449
00:13:47,690 --> 00:13:49,569
the same way that Donald Trump is.

450
00:13:49,570 --> 00:13:51,509
You could imagine if, let's say

451
00:13:51,510 --> 00:13:53,209
former President Obama were to jump

452
00:13:53,210 --> 00:13:54,409
in with an endorsement in that

453
00:13:54,410 --> 00:13:55,709
primary, which seems unlikely, but

454
00:13:55,710 --> 00:13:56,789
you never know.

455
00:13:56,790 --> 00:13:58,129
That might turn some heads.

456
00:13:58,130 --> 00:13:59,949
I think one difference is that

457
00:13:59,950 --> 00:14:02,549
President Trump has sort of

458
00:14:02,550 --> 00:14:04,509
gone after people who don't fall in

459
00:14:04,510 --> 00:14:06,129
line in a way that I don't know that

460
00:14:06,130 --> 00:14:07,750
President Obama would or could.

461
00:14:09,249 --> 00:14:10,889
Trump brags about it, frankly.

462
00:14:10,890 --> 00:14:13,329
I mean, he is not afraid to enforce

463
00:14:13,330 --> 00:14:15,209
his endorsements.

464
00:14:15,210 --> 00:14:16,209
And so I don't know that you have

465
00:14:16,210 --> 00:14:17,129
something like that on the

466
00:14:17,130 --> 00:14:17,989
Democratic side.

467
00:14:17,990 --> 00:14:19,729
Well, and you also don't have Tony

468
00:14:19,730 --> 00:14:21,489
Evers weighing in on who would be a

469
00:14:21,490 --> 00:14:23,589
good sort of recipient

470
00:14:23,590 --> 00:14:25,149
of the torch that he wants to pass.

471
00:14:25,150 --> 00:14:27,029
In fact, I have asked him several

472
00:14:27,030 --> 00:14:29,129
times if he's going to endorse and

473
00:14:29,130 --> 00:14:30,569
he shoots that question down every

474
00:14:30,570 --> 00:14:31,949
time. So it looks like he's really

475
00:14:31,950 --> 00:14:33,189
not playing favorites.

476
00:14:33,190 --> 00:14:34,889
And so that's, again, another lack

477
00:14:34,890 --> 00:14:35,809
of a signal, right?

478
00:14:35,810 --> 00:14:37,389
If if there's nobody to kind of

479
00:14:37,390 --> 00:14:39,069
carry forward the specific Evers

480
00:14:39,070 --> 00:14:41,109
legacy, then who is the person

481
00:14:41,110 --> 00:14:42,749
who can do what he did, which is win

482
00:14:42,750 --> 00:14:44,009
pretty narrowly against a

483
00:14:44,010 --> 00:14:44,849
Republican?

484
00:14:44,850 --> 00:14:47,309
Yeah, I want to just like reinforce

485
00:14:47,310 --> 00:14:48,849
that that is a perfectly reasonable

486
00:14:48,850 --> 00:14:50,169
question and you should keep asking

487
00:14:50,170 --> 00:14:51,549
it. And I think in a different year

488
00:14:51,550 --> 00:14:53,029
and different circumstances, he'd

489
00:14:53,030 --> 00:14:53,929
have somebody.

490
00:14:53,930 --> 00:14:55,829
But in this race, he doesn't

491
00:14:55,830 --> 00:14:57,369
want to go there for whatever

492
00:14:57,370 --> 00:14:58,569
reason.

493
00:14:58,570 --> 00:15:00,429
So I guess it is an open

494
00:15:00,430 --> 00:15:01,909
question that we can ask every

495
00:15:01,910 --> 00:15:03,909
single campaign, but I don't care.

496
00:15:03,910 --> 00:15:04,889
I want ask it again.

497
00:15:04,890 --> 00:15:06,649
Do endorsements matter?

498
00:15:06,650 --> 00:15:08,490
Do they matter for voters?

499
00:15:09,850 --> 00:15:11,809
To me, I think the answer

500
00:15:11,810 --> 00:15:14,229
is. Absolutely, yes, given the

501
00:15:14,230 --> 00:15:15,549
given the circumstances.

502
00:15:16,850 --> 00:15:18,349
One, I think that where you see it

503
00:15:18,350 --> 00:15:20,189
definitely mattering is in our

504
00:15:20,190 --> 00:15:21,209
upcoming court race.

505
00:15:21,210 --> 00:15:22,109
I don't know if you've paid

506
00:15:22,110 --> 00:15:23,569
attention to this one yet.

507
00:15:23,570 --> 00:15:24,389
I mean, I know you have you've

508
00:15:24,390 --> 00:15:26,449
written about it, but you

509
00:15:26,450 --> 00:15:28,289
did not have candidates

510
00:15:28,290 --> 00:15:29,949
endorse.

511
00:15:29,950 --> 00:15:31,149
You did not have the liberal

512
00:15:31,150 --> 00:15:33,009
justices endorse in that race

513
00:15:33,010 --> 00:15:35,109
yet. So in the 2024 Supreme

514
00:15:35,110 --> 00:15:36,769
Court race, you had the four sitting

515
00:15:36,770 --> 00:15:38,849
liberal justices endorsed Susan

516
00:15:38,850 --> 00:15:41,469
Crawford early on in 2025.

517
00:15:41,470 --> 00:15:43,809
You had them endorse Chris Taylor.

518
00:15:43,810 --> 00:15:45,429
You've had a candidate jump into the

519
00:15:45,430 --> 00:15:47,329
race, this race already, Anya, that

520
00:15:47,330 --> 00:15:49,209
you've written about,

521
00:15:49,210 --> 00:15:50,909
Lindsay Burnett.

522
00:15:50,910 --> 00:15:52,289
She did not immediately get that

523
00:15:52,290 --> 00:15:53,269
endorsement.

524
00:15:53,270 --> 00:15:54,889
And so now you have maybe Judge

525
00:15:54,890 --> 00:15:56,789
Pedro Colon in Milwaukee

526
00:15:56,790 --> 00:15:58,169
could be running.

527
00:15:58,170 --> 00:16:00,209
So the lack of endorsement may be

528
00:16:00,210 --> 00:16:02,289
spawning a little liberal primary

529
00:16:02,290 --> 00:16:02,989
on that side.

530
00:16:02,990 --> 00:16:04,809
Yeah, again, and especially with the

531
00:16:04,810 --> 00:16:06,189
courts, right? There can be a little

532
00:16:06,190 --> 00:16:07,689
bit of that, you know, kingmaking

533
00:16:07,690 --> 00:16:08,769
approach again.

534
00:16:08,770 --> 00:16:10,269
So I think it is when you have a

535
00:16:10,270 --> 00:16:11,789
crowded field that the endorsements

536
00:16:11,790 --> 00:16:12,869
really matter.

537
00:16:12,870 --> 00:16:14,549
But we live in also such polarized

538
00:16:14,550 --> 00:16:16,709
times that going into a general

539
00:16:16,710 --> 00:16:18,549
election, there are going to be

540
00:16:18,550 --> 00:16:20,429
very few surprising endorsements.

541
00:16:20,430 --> 00:16:21,709
So the people that I've talked to

542
00:16:21,710 --> 00:16:23,609
about the politics of

543
00:16:23,610 --> 00:16:24,849
endorsements have said, you know

544
00:16:24,850 --> 00:16:26,169
surprising endorsement really

545
00:16:26,170 --> 00:16:28,309
matter. Less surprising ones matter

546
00:16:28,310 --> 00:16:30,389
less because, you know, of course.

547
00:16:30,390 --> 00:16:32,369
Democratic royalty is going to back

548
00:16:32,370 --> 00:16:34,129
Democrats and Republican royalty is

549
00:16:34,130 --> 00:16:35,809
going to be back Republicans in

550
00:16:35,810 --> 00:16:36,698
general.

551
00:16:36,699 --> 00:16:38,359
Before we wrap up here, I feel like

552
00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:40,339
we got to talk about the

553
00:16:40,340 --> 00:16:41,999
kind of aftermath of the 2026

554
00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:43,919
Supreme Court race, though, in

555
00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,359
just about a minute here.

556
00:16:46,420 --> 00:16:48,479
There was some talk that the

557
00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:50,919
state party chair, Brian Schimming,

558
00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:52,439
could lose his job over that race.

559
00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:54,899
Some people wanted him out.

560
00:16:54,900 --> 00:16:55,900
What's the update on that?

561
00:16:58,070 --> 00:16:59,929
He's still in the

562
00:16:59,930 --> 00:17:01,969
the party web page still shows

563
00:17:01,970 --> 00:17:03,729
him as chairman, they had an

564
00:17:03,730 --> 00:17:04,529
executive committee.

565
00:17:04,530 --> 00:17:06,529
So that's the group of people

566
00:17:06,530 --> 00:17:08,429
that could have fired him

567
00:17:08,430 --> 00:17:09,949
and they apparently did not.

568
00:17:09,950 --> 00:17:12,229
But the twist is,

569
00:17:12,230 --> 00:17:13,769
people I talked to that are on the

570
00:17:13,770 --> 00:17:15,449
committee said we can't tell you

571
00:17:15,450 --> 00:17:17,449
what happened there because we

572
00:17:17,450 --> 00:17:19,649
signed non disclosure agreements.

573
00:17:19,650 --> 00:17:21,649
Those agreements were put in effect

574
00:17:21,650 --> 00:17:24,269
in December.

575
00:17:24,270 --> 00:17:26,279
And just for context.

576
00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:28,279
After the 2025 loss

577
00:17:28,280 --> 00:17:30,119
that Republicans

578
00:17:30,120 --> 00:17:31,779
had, that was the Schimel and Susan

579
00:17:31,780 --> 00:17:33,599
Crawford race, there were

580
00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:35,679
calls for Brian Schiming

581
00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:37,959
to be fired or

582
00:17:37,960 --> 00:17:40,559
resign. So kind of the same thing.

583
00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:42,779
And shortly after that,

584
00:17:42,780 --> 00:17:45,439
the executive committee passed some

585
00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:47,539
new rules to

586
00:17:47,540 --> 00:17:48,759
kind of clamp down on people

587
00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:50,899
complaining publicly about GOP

588
00:17:50,900 --> 00:17:51,900
party leadership.

589
00:17:53,850 --> 00:17:55,749
This is shimming is still

590
00:17:55,750 --> 00:17:57,489
in place and there's a new rule

591
00:17:57,490 --> 00:17:59,319
where you have to sign an NDA.

592
00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:01,039
So this powerful executive committee

593
00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,259
for the party makes decisions

594
00:18:03,260 --> 00:18:05,019
like this.

595
00:18:05,020 --> 00:18:06,918
And you talk to one of the members

596
00:18:06,919 --> 00:18:08,499
and he didn't really tell you about

597
00:18:08,500 --> 00:18:09,659
what went on, but he said,

598
00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:11,680
check the website.

599
00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:14,619
Yeah, check the website.

600
00:18:14,620 --> 00:18:15,049
That's right.

601
00:18:15,050 --> 00:18:16,369
And there's Brian Schimming's name

602
00:18:16,370 --> 00:18:17,370
as chair.

603
00:18:18,510 --> 00:18:20,189
Well, we'll continue to follow that

604
00:18:20,190 --> 00:18:21,669
one and all these endorsements

605
00:18:21,670 --> 00:18:23,629
that'll do it for this week.

606
00:18:23,630 --> 00:18:25,429
That's all the time we have.

607
00:18:25,430 --> 00:18:27,089
Our colleague Zach Schultz will be

608
00:18:27,090 --> 00:18:27,869
back next week.

609
00:18:27,870 --> 00:18:29,169
Thanks for joining us.

610
00:18:29,170 --> 00:18:30,889
This has been Inside Wisconsin

611
00:18:30,890 --> 00:18:32,889
Politics. Be sure to follow us on

612
00:18:32,890 --> 00:18:34,789
pbswisconsin.org,

613
00:18:34,790 --> 00:18:36,649
wpr.org YouTube or

614
00:18:36,650 --> 00:18:37,750
wherever you get your podcasts.

615
00:19:00,810 --> 00:19:02,309
They've been they've been wrestling

616
00:19:02,310 --> 00:19:03,549
with it man for days

617
00:19:05,790 --> 00:19:08,349
Sorry, I had a

618
00:19:08,350 --> 00:19:10,429
banger answer and you

619
00:19:10,430 --> 00:19:11,430
guys can't use it

620
00:19:12,760 --> 00:19:13,499
You had other banger.

621
00:19:13,500 --> 00:19:14,500
Did you deliver?

