1
00:00:00,634 --> 00:00:01,535
Let me ask you, so we've

2
00:00:01,602 --> 00:00:02,536
seen low turnout

3
00:00:02,603 --> 00:00:03,237
elections

4
00:00:03,303 --> 00:00:04,605
in the past, and that

5
00:00:04,671 --> 00:00:05,105
was at a time

6
00:00:05,172 --> 00:00:06,473
when conservatives

7
00:00:06,540 --> 00:00:07,908
really won a lot
of these races.

8
00:00:07,975 --> 00:00:09,309
When there was lower

9
00:00:09,376 --> 00:00:09,877
turnout,

10
00:00:09,943 --> 00:00:10,978
when their consistent

11
00:00:11,044 --> 00:00:12,379
voters from the suburbs

12
00:00:12,446 --> 00:00:12,980
of Milwaukee

13
00:00:13,046 --> 00:00:13,881
came out to vote no

14
00:00:13,947 --> 00:00:14,581
matter what,

15
00:00:14,648 --> 00:00:15,215
and the liberal

16
00:00:15,282 --> 00:00:15,949
candidates really

17
00:00:16,016 --> 00:00:16,517
struggled

18
00:00:16,583 --> 00:00:17,351
to get the attention

19
00:00:17,417 --> 00:00:18,719
that they needed to
win these races.

20
00:00:18,785 --> 00:00:19,686
And then we saw things

21
00:00:19,753 --> 00:00:20,454
flip

22
00:00:20,521 --> 00:00:22,789
from Rebecca
Dalit on in 2018.

23
00:00:22,856 --> 00:00:23,891
So what do you see as

24
00:00:23,957 --> 00:00:24,424
the impact

25
00:00:24,491 --> 00:00:25,792
of less attention right

26
00:00:25,859 --> 00:00:27,628
now on this race?

27
00:00:27,694 --> 00:00:28,629
- I think we'll find out

28
00:00:28,695 --> 00:00:29,997
what a less attention

29
00:00:30,063 --> 00:00:31,031
race means here.

30
00:00:31,098 --> 00:00:33,100
I think though, in the

31
00:00:33,467 --> 00:00:34,568
era of Donald Trump for

32
00:00:34,635 --> 00:00:35,102
one,

33
00:00:35,169 --> 00:00:36,103
since Donald Trump

34
00:00:36,170 --> 00:00:36,670
realigned

35
00:00:36,737 --> 00:00:37,704
the Republican Party

36
00:00:37,771 --> 00:00:39,406
and its base of voters,

37
00:00:39,473 --> 00:00:40,941
a base that reliably

38
00:00:41,008 --> 00:00:42,242
elected conservative

39
00:00:42,309 --> 00:00:43,243
justices

40
00:00:43,310 --> 00:00:45,012
for many years up until

41
00:00:45,078 --> 00:00:46,914
around 2017,

42
00:00:46,980 --> 00:00:47,881
we don't know what that

43
00:00:47,948 --> 00:00:48,715
shift is going to mean

44
00:00:48,782 --> 00:00:49,550
in a lower turnout

45
00:00:49,616 --> 00:00:50,017
election,

46
00:00:50,083 --> 00:00:50,784
but we know that

47
00:00:50,851 --> 00:00:52,019
conservatives start out

48
00:00:52,085 --> 00:00:53,453
at kind of a structural

49
00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:55,289
disadvantage in
these races.

50
00:00:55,355 --> 00:00:56,990
And we also know that

51
00:00:57,057 --> 00:00:57,658
liberals

52
00:00:57,724 --> 00:00:58,659
have just found a

53
00:00:58,725 --> 00:00:59,560
pattern for what it

54
00:00:59,626 --> 00:01:00,494
takes to run,

55
00:01:00,561 --> 00:01:02,429
talk about their values.

56
00:01:02,496 --> 00:01:03,830
They're not afraid to

57
00:01:03,897 --> 00:01:05,899
talk about cases
that have happened.

58
00:01:05,966 --> 00:01:07,401
They're not afraid to

59
00:01:07,467 --> 00:01:08,402
talk about women's

60
00:01:08,468 --> 00:01:08,969
health,

61
00:01:09,036 --> 00:01:09,937
and it's just been a

62
00:01:10,003 --> 00:01:12,472
winning formula for them.
