1
00:00:01,168 --> 00:00:04,271
their issues. Sometimes the
issues choose them. We look

2
00:00:04,338 --> 00:00:07,074
at a few items in the news
this week, from flock

3
00:00:07,140 --> 00:00:09,676
cameras to election
integrity, to the name of a

4
00:00:09,743 --> 00:00:14,214
great lake. This is inside
Wisconsin politics.

5
00:00:17,451 --> 00:00:18,852
I'm Shawn Johnson here with
my colleagues, Anya Van

6
00:00:18,919 --> 00:00:20,988
my colleagues, Anya Van
Wagtendonk Zac Schultz and

7
00:00:21,054 --> 00:00:23,123
Rich Kremer in Eau Claire.
Hey, everyone.

8
00:00:23,190 --> 00:00:25,459
So flock
cameras. These cameras run

9
00:00:25,526 --> 00:00:28,795
by a private company that
are used by law enforcement

10
00:00:28,862 --> 00:00:31,565
for vehicle surveillance,
have been one of those

11
00:00:31,632 --> 00:00:34,835
slowly building issues in
the US. I got to say, I was

12
00:00:34,902 --> 00:00:38,105
not terribly aware of them
until about April. It seems

13
00:00:38,172 --> 00:00:41,942
like they have entered our
politics here, though. As

14
00:00:42,009 --> 00:00:45,546
we enter September. Zac,
where do they fit when it

15
00:00:45,612 --> 00:00:47,781
comes to this year's
elections?

16
00:00:47,848 --> 00:00:50,717
>> They are the new issue
and it feels like they're a

17
00:00:50,784 --> 00:00:53,086
build out from the data
center argument. This idea

18
00:00:53,153 --> 00:00:57,291
of AI surveillance state.
How in control are we of

19
00:00:57,357 --> 00:00:59,927
our own destiny? And these
really interesting

20
00:00:59,993 --> 00:01:02,462
political topics that don't
fit into the typical

21
00:01:02,529 --> 00:01:05,399
partisan narrative. So they
not only do we have to

22
00:01:05,465 --> 00:01:08,335
figure out how do people
think about them, but the

23
00:01:08,402 --> 00:01:10,470
candidates have to figure
out where do we think about

24
00:01:10,537 --> 00:01:12,639
these issues because they
don't fit into the usual

25
00:01:12,706 --> 00:01:15,409
pockets where they can say,
this is a Republican issue,

26
00:01:15,475 --> 00:01:17,644
this is a Democrat issue.
They fall across all of

27
00:01:17,711 --> 00:01:20,647
them. And the idea that
license plate readers,

28
00:01:20,714 --> 00:01:22,115
which is essentially what
these cameras are, have

29
00:01:22,182 --> 00:01:24,718
been around for a long time.
Wisconsin doesn't allow

30
00:01:24,785 --> 00:01:27,054
them, but many other states
do. Red light cameras.

31
00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:28,789
People have argued about
whether those are fair or

32
00:01:28,856 --> 00:01:31,859
not. You can get a ticket
in the mail if you've

33
00:01:31,925 --> 00:01:33,927
driven through Illinois and
had to pay a toll and

34
00:01:33,994 --> 00:01:36,630
worried about the toll
camera catching you or your

35
00:01:36,697 --> 00:01:39,867
license plate having
old issues. But the idea

36
00:01:39,933 --> 00:01:42,135
now that some data center
can just collect all that

37
00:01:42,202 --> 00:01:44,838
and automatically track you
without any idea that it's

38
00:01:44,905 --> 00:01:47,474
happening, or people can
use it for nefarious

39
00:01:47,541 --> 00:01:49,676
purposes or outside of a
subpoena is bringing it

40
00:01:49,743 --> 00:01:53,313
into legal territory. It
builds off these questions

41
00:01:53,380 --> 00:01:55,883
about how involved should
our government be when it

42
00:01:55,949 --> 00:01:58,051
comes to these, and where
should our politicians

43
00:01:58,118 --> 00:02:00,387
stand? And right now, what
we're seeing is the

44
00:02:00,454 --> 00:02:03,724
gubernatorial candidate
real quick where I want to

45
00:02:03,790 --> 00:02:06,627
be on this, because this
could be the next thing to

46
00:02:06,693 --> 00:02:09,796
bite me in the butt in a
few weeks. If I don't have

47
00:02:09,863 --> 00:02:12,299
a strong position that
falls in line with where my

48
00:02:12,366 --> 00:02:15,135
voters are and independent
voters.

49
00:02:15,202 --> 00:02:18,272
candidates on these? And
you know, what kind of

50
00:02:18,338 --> 00:02:20,307
political bedfellows are we
seeing here?

51
00:02:20,374 --> 00:02:23,143
>> Yeah, I mean, as Zac
said, it doesn't fall into

52
00:02:23,210 --> 00:02:25,045
these kind of clear
political narratives. And

53
00:02:25,112 --> 00:02:27,614
so we are seeing kind of
both candidates, much like

54
00:02:27,681 --> 00:02:30,417
the data center issue, kind
of use this to go after one

55
00:02:30,484 --> 00:02:32,886
another. So in particular,
Tom Tiffany this week has

56
00:02:32,953 --> 00:02:36,089
been trying to call David
Crowley big brother, David

57
00:02:36,156 --> 00:02:38,158
Crowley. So first he was
data center David Crowley,

58
00:02:38,225 --> 00:02:41,128
now he's big brother
because of the ways in

59
00:02:41,195 --> 00:02:43,664
which flock was used in
Milwaukee County. For his

60
00:02:43,730 --> 00:02:47,968
part. David. David. David
Crowley is now trying to

61
00:02:48,035 --> 00:02:50,103
reduce the use of them in
Milwaukee County. There's

62
00:02:50,170 --> 00:02:52,639
been changes to the policy
in Milwaukee City as well.

63
00:02:52,706 --> 00:02:55,976
And so both candidates are
really trying to kind of

64
00:02:56,043 --> 00:02:58,579
leverage people's feelings
on both the right and the

65
00:02:58,645 --> 00:03:01,114
left, sort of against this
tool for their own

66
00:03:01,181 --> 00:03:04,451
political aims.
>> And rich, it strikes me

67
00:03:04,518 --> 00:03:08,655
that there is not a really
clean line of where

68
00:03:09,756 --> 00:03:12,125
conservative stands on this.
You know, there's not a

69
00:03:12,192 --> 00:03:16,563
Republican position when it
comes to flock cameras.

70
00:03:16,630 --> 00:03:21,768
What's the sort of spectrum
of where they stand on this?

71
00:03:22,503 --> 00:03:24,605
>> Yeah, it is surprising
because, you know,

72
00:03:24,671 --> 00:03:28,842
typically you think of the
GOP as as, you know,

73
00:03:28,909 --> 00:03:31,445
lockstep with law
enforcement and law

74
00:03:31,512 --> 00:03:35,082
enforcement has been using
this technology for

75
00:03:35,148 --> 00:03:37,417
homicide investigations,
all sorts of things. But

76
00:03:37,484 --> 00:03:41,255
we've also seen stories,
including two in Milwaukee

77
00:03:41,321 --> 00:03:44,024
situations where officers
are using it for personal

78
00:03:44,091 --> 00:03:47,394
reasons or just not for
what it's intended.

79
00:03:47,461 --> 00:03:51,031
Unauthorized use. And that
is what is part of what's

80
00:03:51,098 --> 00:03:54,601
getting people really upset.
So on the Republican side,

81
00:03:54,668 --> 00:03:57,604
it seems like you've got
the more libertarian people

82
00:03:57,671 --> 00:04:01,074
who just don't like this
idea of surveillance at all.

83
00:04:01,141 --> 00:04:04,645
You've got some on in the
Republican Party that are

84
00:04:04,711 --> 00:04:07,648
saying, look, this is just
another tool. It's been

85
00:04:07,714 --> 00:04:10,050
around for a long time.
They don't understand why

86
00:04:10,117 --> 00:04:13,320
it's a big deal right now.
And then you've got Tom

87
00:04:13,387 --> 00:04:16,056
Tiffany, who's trying to
thread that needle, as Anya

88
00:04:16,123 --> 00:04:19,026
mentioned, he's been
attacking David Crowley,

89
00:04:19,092 --> 00:04:23,063
claiming that Crowley is
all about these things and

90
00:04:23,130 --> 00:04:26,700
is is a big supporter of
them. Crowley has said they

91
00:04:26,767 --> 00:04:30,871
are an important tool, but
he said, quote, unchecked

92
00:04:30,938 --> 00:04:33,340
surveillance isn't the
answer. So that speaks to

93
00:04:33,407 --> 00:04:35,809
the limits that the county
is putting in place now.

94
00:04:35,876 --> 00:04:38,712
And with regard to
surveillance, Tiffany's

95
00:04:38,779 --> 00:04:41,181
position is kind of
interesting. He says he

96
00:04:41,248 --> 00:04:45,085
would block state funds
going towards shared

97
00:04:45,152 --> 00:04:47,821
revenue to local
governments. He would

98
00:04:47,888 --> 00:04:50,123
essentially say this money
can't be used to purchase

99
00:04:50,190 --> 00:04:53,660
these types of cameras or
these systems until we have

100
00:04:53,727 --> 00:04:57,197
a committee task force,
take a look at it. And

101
00:04:57,264 --> 00:05:00,300
that's interesting because
in Congress, Tiffany has

102
00:05:00,367 --> 00:05:04,037
voted to restore or to
continue the FISA

103
00:05:05,105 --> 00:05:09,409
surveillance, which is
essentially warrantless

104
00:05:09,476 --> 00:05:12,579
mass surveillance of cell
phone conversations, text

105
00:05:12,646 --> 00:05:15,282
messages, electronic
communications. And that

106
00:05:15,349 --> 00:05:19,686
back in its days, in the
early 2000 was a very big

107
00:05:20,654 --> 00:05:23,357
political issue that's kind
of died down somewhat in

108
00:05:23,423 --> 00:05:27,361
more recent years.
>> So we could imagine a

109
00:05:27,427 --> 00:05:30,831
different world, right,
rich, where this issue

110
00:05:30,898 --> 00:05:34,735
comes up. And Tom Tiffany,
who's trying to run as this

111
00:05:34,801 --> 00:05:38,138
tough on crime candidate
and wants to say, let's not

112
00:05:38,205 --> 00:05:40,040
be Milwaukee since he's
running against the

113
00:05:40,107 --> 00:05:42,409
Milwaukee candidate, you
could definitely imagine a

114
00:05:42,476 --> 00:05:45,112
world where he's saying, we
need to give police every

115
00:05:45,179 --> 00:05:48,715
tool that they want to
fight crime. Has there been

116
00:05:48,782 --> 00:05:53,020
any hint of that in what
Tom Tiffany's saying?

117
00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:56,123
>> Well, he's he's
essentially not saying he's

118
00:05:56,190 --> 00:05:59,092
going to take this tool
away, but he wants to put

119
00:05:59,159 --> 00:06:03,096
more safeguards in place
just in my social media

120
00:06:03,163 --> 00:06:07,634
stream last night, I saw
two posts back to back on

121
00:06:08,302 --> 00:06:13,307
Twitter and one was Tiffany
calling David Crowley big

122
00:06:13,974 --> 00:06:16,510
brother, Crowley or, you
know, flat camera Crowley.

123
00:06:16,577 --> 00:06:19,313
And the next post was
someone with Tiffany's

124
00:06:19,379 --> 00:06:22,816
campaign talking about a
third party ad highlighting

125
00:06:22,883 --> 00:06:25,452
the the fights and the
melee we saw at the state

126
00:06:25,519 --> 00:06:28,856
Fair and talk about talking
about how Crowley is soft

127
00:06:28,922 --> 00:06:32,226
on crime. And it just
struck me as as kind of

128
00:06:32,292 --> 00:06:36,630
ironic because you're
saying he's too supportive

129
00:06:36,697 --> 00:06:40,167
of this technology that law
enforcement uses, but also

130
00:06:40,234 --> 00:06:42,903
soft on crime. So which is
it?

131
00:06:43,537 --> 00:06:46,273
>> Is there something, Zac,
about Wisconsin's politics

132
00:06:46,340 --> 00:06:49,443
being sort of a little
libertarian that makes this

133
00:06:49,510 --> 00:06:52,412
issue different than than
in other states? I mean, I

134
00:06:52,479 --> 00:06:54,314
think about you kind of
referenced it there, but

135
00:06:54,381 --> 00:06:56,850
there has been a push for
years to have red light

136
00:06:56,917 --> 00:06:59,920
cameras here, and that has
been defeated in the

137
00:06:59,987 --> 00:07:02,990
legislature. Every time.
You know, there was a time

138
00:07:03,056 --> 00:07:06,360
in the more distant past
when there was resistance

139
00:07:06,426 --> 00:07:08,829
to giving police the
ability to write tickets

140
00:07:08,896 --> 00:07:12,599
for not wearing a seatbelt.
Here. Is Wisconsin kind of

141
00:07:12,666 --> 00:07:16,570
a unique place when it
comes to issues like flock.

142
00:07:16,637 --> 00:07:18,672
>> Potentially is, and
there's a history that goes

143
00:07:18,739 --> 00:07:20,874
about your individual
liberties as a member of

144
00:07:20,941 --> 00:07:23,377
the motorcycle helmet issue
in Wisconsin, being the

145
00:07:23,443 --> 00:07:26,046
home of Harley Davidson,
you didn't have to wear a

146
00:07:26,113 --> 00:07:28,415
helmet in Wisconsin for a
long time. And there were

147
00:07:28,482 --> 00:07:31,084
debates about whether it
was okay to ban the use of

148
00:07:31,151 --> 00:07:33,320
cell phones in cars, and
there was already laws that

149
00:07:33,387 --> 00:07:35,255
covered that. All these
things that we've covered

150
00:07:35,322 --> 00:07:38,058
at the Capitol over the
years, and there is this

151
00:07:38,125 --> 00:07:41,094
mentality that we don't go
too far or wait to see

152
00:07:41,161 --> 00:07:43,096
where other states go first,
and then figure out if it

153
00:07:43,163 --> 00:07:45,933
makes sense for Wisconsin.
And there's a lot of

154
00:07:45,999 --> 00:07:48,836
independents that just
don't like the idea of

155
00:07:48,902 --> 00:07:52,072
being watched or being
followed. And a lot of

156
00:07:52,139 --> 00:07:54,875
these came from like the
sci fi movies that we

157
00:07:54,942 --> 00:07:57,878
watched as kids that are
now in reality. And it's

158
00:07:57,945 --> 00:08:00,180
scary for some people
because we've been trained

159
00:08:00,247 --> 00:08:03,717
for decades that when these
things happen, it's the bad

160
00:08:03,784 --> 00:08:06,720
times and they're happening
now. So people are hearing

161
00:08:06,787 --> 00:08:09,590
it from both the left and
the right that, hey, this

162
00:08:09,656 --> 00:08:12,693
isn't what I signed up for.
Even if it is a tool that

163
00:08:12,759 --> 00:08:14,828
has helped law enforcement
track down people that have

164
00:08:14,895 --> 00:08:17,064
committed crimes, the
question is, does it go too

165
00:08:17,130 --> 00:08:21,935
far? And in this era of ICE
bursting into cities, the

166
00:08:22,536 --> 00:08:24,605
question of whether police
are going to come through

167
00:08:24,671 --> 00:08:27,808
your door. There's been
left and right debates over

168
00:08:27,875 --> 00:08:30,410
warrantless breaking into
apartments to arrest people.

169
00:08:30,477 --> 00:08:33,013
Then they got the wrong
door and all sorts of

170
00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:35,082
things that go beyond this,
where people are just

171
00:08:35,148 --> 00:08:38,085
scared of, hey, what if
they get it wrong? I don't

172
00:08:38,151 --> 00:08:40,153
trust AI. They can't even
repeat my my answer into my

173
00:08:40,220 --> 00:08:42,856
phone correctly. How are
they going to get this

174
00:08:42,923 --> 00:08:44,725
right when it comes to
arresting someone?

175
00:08:44,791 --> 00:08:47,160
>> Ana, do we have any
evidence that this is going

176
00:08:47,227 --> 00:08:50,264
to be an issue that moves
people in November, or are

177
00:08:50,330 --> 00:08:52,366
people going to be voting
on flock?

178
00:08:52,432 --> 00:08:55,402
>> You know, I don't know
if in the same way that the

179
00:08:55,469 --> 00:08:58,272
data center issue is, you
know, kind of a rich text

180
00:08:58,338 --> 00:09:00,541
of an issue that a lot of
people can read, many

181
00:09:00,607 --> 00:09:03,577
different sort of problems
or concerns into flock

182
00:09:03,644 --> 00:09:06,547
seems a little bit narrower.
And so I think it'll be up

183
00:09:06,613 --> 00:09:09,082
to the candidates to really
try to connect concerns

184
00:09:09,149 --> 00:09:12,085
with flock to other things
in order to drive that. So

185
00:09:12,152 --> 00:09:14,188
one of the arguments we've
seen in other states,

186
00:09:14,254 --> 00:09:16,190
because Wisconsin is not
the only state kind of

187
00:09:16,256 --> 00:09:18,458
grappling with this right
now, is that these

188
00:09:18,525 --> 00:09:21,128
contracts are very
expensive. And so at a time

189
00:09:21,195 --> 00:09:23,230
that a lot of communities
are really struggling, and

190
00:09:23,297 --> 00:09:25,465
certainly a lot of people
are really struggling

191
00:09:25,532 --> 00:09:27,935
financially. And then your
town, you know, maybe can't

192
00:09:28,001 --> 00:09:31,205
pave your potholes, but has
a $10 million contract.

193
00:09:31,271 --> 00:09:33,340
That is a connection that I
think will register with

194
00:09:33,407 --> 00:09:36,176
voters. I'm not sure if
this issue in and of itself,

195
00:09:36,243 --> 00:09:39,046
just the kind of AI and
surveillance aspect, will

196
00:09:39,112 --> 00:09:41,048
necessarily sway voters.
But as we always say, you

197
00:09:41,114 --> 00:09:43,817
only need to sway a few in
Wisconsin to win an

198
00:09:43,884 --> 00:09:47,054
election.
something like this, I have

199
00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,256
to take a step back
sometimes because, you know,

200
00:09:49,323 --> 00:09:51,959
we're journalists, we see a
new issue out there. We

201
00:09:52,025 --> 00:09:54,161
don't know how people are
going to respond. So

202
00:09:54,228 --> 00:09:57,030
exciting. You know, we feel
like this must be the next

203
00:09:57,097 --> 00:09:59,199
big thing. Marquette had
that poll last week asking

204
00:09:59,266 --> 00:10:01,768
people about, you know,
their most important issues.

205
00:10:01,835 --> 00:10:06,073
5% said data centers. And
it was like around 40% or

206
00:10:06,139 --> 00:10:09,676
so plus. That said, the
cost of living. So I think

207
00:10:09,743 --> 00:10:12,946
the old issues maybe still
carry a little bit more

208
00:10:13,013 --> 00:10:16,750
weight. We did get some
other news this week that

209
00:10:16,817 --> 00:10:20,821
feels a little more
familiar. There's an

210
00:10:20,888 --> 00:10:24,358
investigation. CNN reported
being launched by the

211
00:10:24,424 --> 00:10:29,162
Department of Homeland
Security into noncitizen

212
00:10:29,229 --> 00:10:33,400
voter fraud in nine states,
including Wisconsin. Rich,

213
00:10:33,467 --> 00:10:37,771
tell us about that.
>> Yeah. So this comes from

214
00:10:37,838 --> 00:10:41,375
an internal memo from the
federal government that CNN

215
00:10:41,441 --> 00:10:44,912
obtained. It listed the
states, of Wisconsin, also

216
00:10:44,978 --> 00:10:47,114
Georgia and Pennsylvania.
Those two caught my

217
00:10:47,181 --> 00:10:51,018
attention as well. But a
number of states included.

218
00:10:51,084 --> 00:10:54,988
So this is essentially in a
a plans for a big

219
00:10:57,024 --> 00:10:59,593
investigation into
noncitizen voting,

220
00:10:59,660 --> 00:11:03,030
fraudulent voting ahead of
the election. And

221
00:11:03,096 --> 00:11:05,299
traditionally, you know,
this is what CNN reported.

222
00:11:05,365 --> 00:11:07,701
Historically, the
Department of Justice

223
00:11:07,768 --> 00:11:11,972
doesn't launch these sorts
of big announcements right

224
00:11:12,039 --> 00:11:15,542
before an election, just as
a matter of kind of it's

225
00:11:15,609 --> 00:11:18,378
not a formal policy, but
just best practice.

226
00:11:18,445 --> 00:11:21,682
Department of Homeland
Security doesn't have to

227
00:11:21,748 --> 00:11:24,585
follow that. And it's got
its own investigative unit

228
00:11:24,651 --> 00:11:29,189
that is going to be doing
this work. So but the

229
00:11:29,256 --> 00:11:31,725
backdrop here is that
President Donald Trump has

230
00:11:31,792 --> 00:11:35,195
been, you know, making
these broad claims without

231
00:11:35,262 --> 00:11:38,332
any evidence that there was
massive voter fraud in 2020.

232
00:11:38,398 --> 00:11:41,502
And that was why he lost
the election to President

233
00:11:41,568 --> 00:11:45,405
Joe Biden. And since then,
you know, more recently, we

234
00:11:45,472 --> 00:11:48,642
see the Wisconsin I mean,
the U.S. Department of

235
00:11:48,709 --> 00:11:52,012
Justice is suing Wisconsin
to force us to force the

236
00:11:52,079 --> 00:11:55,582
state to turn over
sensitive voter

237
00:11:55,649 --> 00:11:58,118
registration documents. And
they're saying, well, there

238
00:11:58,185 --> 00:12:01,822
could be fraud. We need to
check. And we're not sure

239
00:12:01,889 --> 00:12:03,790
Wisconsin is checking.
That's the gist of the

240
00:12:03,857 --> 00:12:07,060
argument. And, you know,
the DOJ has sued dozens of

241
00:12:07,127 --> 00:12:09,897
other states as well. They
haven't won a single case.

242
00:12:09,963 --> 00:12:13,467
And also the U.S. Postal
Service has finalized a

243
00:12:13,534 --> 00:12:17,137
policy that would
essentially tell its people

244
00:12:17,204 --> 00:12:19,640
to not send absentee
ballots to people who

245
00:12:19,706 --> 00:12:21,875
aren't on these federal
lists. That is held up in

246
00:12:21,942 --> 00:12:26,847
court right now, but it all
serves as kind of this this

247
00:12:28,248 --> 00:12:31,118
backdrop of, of what's
happening with regard to

248
00:12:31,185 --> 00:12:35,122
this latest investigation
news reported by CNN.

249
00:12:35,189 --> 00:12:38,492
>> And Ana. I think we've
gotten kind of used to

250
00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:41,328
hearing about these types
of investigations. Now,

251
00:12:41,395 --> 00:12:45,132
even if they don't go
anywhere, is there anything,

252
00:12:45,199 --> 00:12:47,935
you know, particularly
unusual about this one,

253
00:12:48,001 --> 00:12:49,837
though, in terms of who's
leading it?

254
00:12:49,903 --> 00:12:52,172
>> Yeah. I mean, we've
certainly, as Rich said,

255
00:12:52,239 --> 00:12:54,875
there has been this kind of
steady drumbeat since 2020.

256
00:12:54,942 --> 00:12:57,544
It's the water that we swim
in. Is this kind of

257
00:12:57,611 --> 00:12:59,646
allegations of election
fraud. I think at this

258
00:12:59,713 --> 00:13:02,649
point in my sleep, I could
type out the list of sort

259
00:13:02,716 --> 00:13:04,952
of nonpartisan and partizan
investigations that all

260
00:13:05,018 --> 00:13:07,054
election fraud, but that
has not diminished the

261
00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:09,056
claims coming from the
Trump administration. What

262
00:13:09,122 --> 00:13:11,692
makes this so different is
that this is DHS. This is

263
00:13:11,758 --> 00:13:15,462
like an arm of DHS that
normally goes after human

264
00:13:15,529 --> 00:13:17,865
traffickers, drug smuggling,
this kind of thing, and

265
00:13:17,931 --> 00:13:20,801
they are looking into
noncitizen voting, which is

266
00:13:20,868 --> 00:13:23,303
essentially a thing that
does not happen. It is

267
00:13:23,370 --> 00:13:25,806
against state law. It's
against federal law. But

268
00:13:25,873 --> 00:13:29,510
we've been hearing sort of
claims around the

269
00:13:29,576 --> 00:13:32,079
possibility of this for a
long time. Wisconsin has

270
00:13:32,145 --> 00:13:34,448
has looked to pass a
constitutional amendment

271
00:13:34,515 --> 00:13:38,652
about this. But now using
this kind of quite

272
00:13:38,719 --> 00:13:41,054
militarized, quite
intensive arm of the

273
00:13:41,121 --> 00:13:44,625
government to go after it.
First of all, they don't

274
00:13:44,691 --> 00:13:47,294
sort of have to follow DOJ
guidance around what you

275
00:13:47,361 --> 00:13:49,863
can do around an election.
And I'll note, you know,

276
00:13:49,930 --> 00:13:52,766
we're less than two months
out from our election. DOJ

277
00:13:52,833 --> 00:13:55,936
has guidance that says
don't do really intense

278
00:13:56,003 --> 00:13:57,471
investigative things unless
you absolutely have to this

279
00:13:57,538 --> 00:14:00,140
close to an election
because it can chill voting,

280
00:14:00,207 --> 00:14:02,409
etc. DHS doesn't have to
follow any of that. And

281
00:14:02,476 --> 00:14:05,145
then meanwhile, as they've
been ramping up this action,

282
00:14:05,212 --> 00:14:08,048
they've been saying at one
point they said that they

283
00:14:08,115 --> 00:14:10,951
found 250,000 noncitizens
who are registered to vote

284
00:14:11,018 --> 00:14:13,587
in four states. And then
upon further investigation,

285
00:14:13,654 --> 00:14:18,325
they've released 180 ID
numbers tied to people.

286
00:14:18,392 --> 00:14:20,260
They won't give any more
information. So they're

287
00:14:20,327 --> 00:14:23,096
kind of just at the very
least, significantly

288
00:14:23,163 --> 00:14:25,465
muddying the waters with a
huge amount of resources

289
00:14:25,532 --> 00:14:27,467
from the federal government.
Again, going into these

290
00:14:27,534 --> 00:14:30,304
critical midterm elections.
>> Zac, I don't feel like

291
00:14:30,370 --> 00:14:32,840
there's been a November
election that goes by when

292
00:14:32,906 --> 00:14:36,410
there isn't some election
issue that is, you know,

293
00:14:36,476 --> 00:14:39,079
tied up in the courts or
fought over in the courts

294
00:14:39,146 --> 00:14:43,050
or in the court of public
opinion. Is this one the

295
00:14:43,116 --> 00:14:46,820
big one in the year 2026?
Or will we forget about

296
00:14:46,887 --> 00:14:49,456
this in a few months?
>> Well, in a few months,

297
00:14:49,523 --> 00:14:51,558
it'll still be being
brought up because no

298
00:14:51,625 --> 00:14:55,229
matter what happens
afterwards, someone's going

299
00:14:55,295 --> 00:14:57,397
question is, of all the
things that Rich listed off,

300
00:14:57,464 --> 00:14:59,533
and there's a lot of
different avenues in which

301
00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:02,436
the Trump administration is
clearly pursuing to push

302
00:15:02,503 --> 00:15:06,073
their narrative of false
voting or fraud, which, as

303
00:15:06,139 --> 00:15:08,842
we must repeat every time,
there is no evidence it has

304
00:15:08,909 --> 00:15:11,411
ever existed or does exist.
It does not change the

305
00:15:11,478 --> 00:15:14,715
outcome of any elections,
anywhere, but that doesn't

306
00:15:14,781 --> 00:15:16,917
stop them from putting it
out into the public

307
00:15:16,984 --> 00:15:19,653
consciousness. And there's
this the is it the Postal

308
00:15:19,720 --> 00:15:22,456
Service? Potentially not
delivering ballots? Well,

309
00:15:22,523 --> 00:15:24,558
obviously, that would have
a tremendous impact on

310
00:15:24,625 --> 00:15:26,994
voting in Wisconsin. That
one seems like the courts

311
00:15:27,060 --> 00:15:29,930
are going to hold it up. It
seems less likely to come

312
00:15:29,997 --> 00:15:32,065
to fruition. We've heard
rumors for more than a year

313
00:15:32,132 --> 00:15:35,068
that Trump's going to send
ICE in around the polls to

314
00:15:35,135 --> 00:15:37,804
try and scare voters. It
was kind of hand-waved away

315
00:15:37,871 --> 00:15:40,040
by a lot of Republicans
saying, no, of course that

316
00:15:40,107 --> 00:15:42,042
wouldn't happen. This is
America, you know, that's

317
00:15:42,109 --> 00:15:45,112
just, you know, people have
not wanted to look too

318
00:15:45,179 --> 00:15:47,047
deeply into what could
happen because it's never

319
00:15:47,114 --> 00:15:49,750
happened in American
history before. So there

320
00:15:49,816 --> 00:15:52,953
are legitimate fears that
there could be law

321
00:15:53,020 --> 00:15:55,656
enforcement there at
certain poll sites in

322
00:15:55,722 --> 00:15:57,724
certain swing states, and
we can all guess which ones

323
00:15:57,791 --> 00:16:00,260
they are that might
influence the outcome of

324
00:16:00,327 --> 00:16:02,496
election. The question is,
will it actually happen?

325
00:16:02,563 --> 00:16:04,998
And then who will be the
one crying foul afterwards

326
00:16:05,065 --> 00:16:07,868
about what that actually
means in deterring voters,

327
00:16:07,935 --> 00:16:09,703
literally keeping voters
from coming away? But these

328
00:16:09,770 --> 00:16:12,840
kind of stories do come up
every single cycle. The

329
00:16:12,906 --> 00:16:15,776
question is, will we see
people with guns outside

330
00:16:15,843 --> 00:16:17,511
polls that represent the
federal government, that

331
00:16:17,578 --> 00:16:21,448
scare away voters?
>> That's a big question.

332
00:16:21,515 --> 00:16:24,084
Turning to something
completely different and

333
00:16:24,151 --> 00:16:28,021
something I definitely did
not see coming as we enter

334
00:16:28,088 --> 00:16:30,858
this, you know, homestretch
of the election, the

335
00:16:30,924 --> 00:16:33,794
president renamed a great
lake. According to an

336
00:16:33,861 --> 00:16:38,699
executive order from Lake
Ontario to Lake America.

337
00:16:38,765 --> 00:16:42,536
Ana when that happens,
people react to it.

338
00:16:42,603 --> 00:16:44,738
Candidates have to react to
it. It's expected. What are

339
00:16:44,805 --> 00:16:47,241
our candidates saying about
the president doing this?

340
00:16:47,307 --> 00:16:50,043
>> Well, most interestingly
is Tom Tiffany, again, a

341
00:16:50,110 --> 00:16:52,513
close ally of President
Trump. And he essentially

342
00:16:52,579 --> 00:16:55,782
said, I don't know that I
like this. He said, you

343
00:16:55,849 --> 00:16:58,585
know, he sort of turned it
into a joke. He said,

344
00:16:58,652 --> 00:17:00,654
unless we're changing Lake
Michigan to Lake Wisconsin.

345
00:17:00,721 --> 00:17:03,423
Otherwise, I don't think
this is a good idea. And so

346
00:17:03,490 --> 00:17:05,759
that allows him to put a
little bit of air between

347
00:17:05,826 --> 00:17:08,996
himself and President Trump.
But on an issue that is not

348
00:17:09,062 --> 00:17:11,865
super from a policy
standpoint, not necessarily

349
00:17:11,932 --> 00:17:14,868
a super impactful decision,
what it is, is kind of one

350
00:17:14,935 --> 00:17:17,638
of these more ostentatious
decisions that Trump often

351
00:17:17,704 --> 00:17:20,307
likes to make, maybe a
distracting kind of moment

352
00:17:20,374 --> 00:17:22,609
during a time like this. So
it allows Tiffany to put

353
00:17:22,676 --> 00:17:25,445
that air between them, but
not necessarily on an issue

354
00:17:25,512 --> 00:17:29,183
that, you know, is very
consequential.

355
00:17:29,249 --> 00:17:32,019
oh, come on, this is the
one that you picked to

356
00:17:32,085 --> 00:17:34,955
differentiate with the
president. On Zac, just

357
00:17:35,022 --> 00:17:37,991
real quick as we wrap up
here, any sense that voters

358
00:17:38,058 --> 00:17:40,661
will take note of this in
November?

359
00:17:40,727 --> 00:17:43,063
>> I can't imagine this
being the deciding issue

360
00:17:43,130 --> 00:17:45,766
for someone in an election,
but I'm sure there's one

361
00:17:45,832 --> 00:17:48,335
person out of 3 million
voters that will say, this

362
00:17:48,402 --> 00:17:50,304
is what matters to me most,
and they're probably a

363
00:17:50,370 --> 00:17:53,607
sailor.
>> Going after that sailor

364
00:17:53,674 --> 00:17:58,078
vote, a crucial demographic
in Wisconsin.

365
00:17:58,145 --> 00:17:59,847
That's all
the time we have for today.

366
00:17:59,913 --> 00:18:02,616
This has been inside
Wisconsin politics. Be sure

367
00:18:02,683 --> 00:18:05,853
to follow us on PBS
wisconsin.org. WPR.org,

368
00:18:05,919 --> 00:18:10,123
YouTube, or wherever you
get your podcasts.
