1
00:00:00,501 --> 00:00:00,767
Do you support

2
00:00:00,834 --> 00:00:01,635
a vote in the House

3
00:00:01,702 --> 00:00:02,336
on the enhanced

4
00:00:02,402 --> 00:00:03,537
ACA tax credits

5
00:00:03,604 --> 00:00:04,404
as is promised

6
00:00:04,471 --> 00:00:05,105
in the Senate?

7
00:00:05,172 --> 00:00:05,873
I think we need

8
00:00:05,939 --> 00:00:07,241
to continue to look at

9
00:00:07,307 --> 00:00:09,109
Health Savings Accounts.

10
00:00:09,176 --> 00:00:10,244
Just this week

11
00:00:10,310 --> 00:00:11,378
Wall Street Journal

12
00:00:11,445 --> 00:00:12,713
editorialized

13
00:00:12,779 --> 00:00:13,747
on something

14
00:00:13,814 --> 00:00:15,782
that goes back to 2017

15
00:00:16,149 --> 00:00:17,518
where individuals

16
00:00:17,584 --> 00:00:18,852
have control over

17
00:00:18,919 --> 00:00:19,386
their own

18
00:00:19,453 --> 00:00:20,754
health accounts.

19
00:00:20,821 --> 00:00:21,688
I think that's

20
00:00:21,755 --> 00:00:23,557
another pathway

21
00:00:23,624 --> 00:00:25,459
we could we could take.

22
00:00:25,526 --> 00:00:26,226
But the idea

23
00:00:26,293 --> 00:00:26,827
that we're just going

24
00:00:26,894 --> 00:00:28,328
to keep throwing money

25
00:00:28,395 --> 00:00:30,063
at a COVID-era fix

26
00:00:31,198 --> 00:00:32,165
that was dreamed up

27
00:00:32,232 --> 00:00:33,333
at the last second

28
00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:34,501
makes absolutely

29
00:00:34,568 --> 00:00:36,236
no sense to me.

30
00:00:36,703 --> 00:00:37,371
I couldn't

31
00:00:37,437 --> 00:00:38,505
support it right now.

32
00:00:38,572 --> 00:00:39,606
What is your message

33
00:00:39,673 --> 00:00:41,375
to your constituents

34
00:00:41,441 --> 00:00:42,042
in your district

35
00:00:42,109 --> 00:00:42,809
who may see

36
00:00:42,876 --> 00:00:44,311
their ACA premiums

37
00:00:44,378 --> 00:00:45,612
more than double

38
00:00:45,679 --> 00:00:46,980
when these enhanced

39
00:00:47,047 --> 00:00:48,448
credits expire?

40
00:00:48,515 --> 00:00:49,216
Yeah, I think the first

41
00:00:49,283 --> 00:00:50,284
thing I do is disagree

42
00:00:50,350 --> 00:00:51,051
with the premise

43
00:00:51,118 --> 00:00:52,252
that they're going to double.

44
00:00:52,319 --> 00:00:53,487
There's a

45
00:00:53,554 --> 00:00:55,389
couple of independent

46
00:00:55,455 --> 00:00:56,456
think tanks

47
00:00:56,523 --> 00:00:57,191
that have done

48
00:00:57,257 --> 00:00:58,025
some analysis

49
00:00:58,091 --> 00:00:58,525
since the

50
00:00:58,592 --> 00:01:00,093
whole shutdown

51
00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:00,994
and there are

52
00:01:01,061 --> 00:01:01,828
some instances

53
00:01:01,895 --> 00:01:02,596
where you could see

54
00:01:02,663 --> 00:01:04,031
a significant increase

55
00:01:04,097 --> 00:01:04,965
but there's others

56
00:01:05,032 --> 00:01:06,166
where it will

57
00:01:06,233 --> 00:01:07,668
be far less.

58
00:01:07,734 --> 00:01:09,436
As a result of that

59
00:01:09,503 --> 00:01:11,138
I think again

60
00:01:11,205 --> 00:01:12,139
something we don't have

61
00:01:12,206 --> 00:01:13,106
a handle on

62
00:01:13,173 --> 00:01:14,141
Congress doesn't have

63
00:01:14,208 --> 00:01:15,876
a handle on, and

64
00:01:16,210 --> 00:01:17,711
for us to somehow

65
00:01:17,778 --> 00:01:18,212
dream up

66
00:01:18,278 --> 00:01:19,913
some new policy

67
00:01:19,980 --> 00:01:20,914
without

68
00:01:20,981 --> 00:01:22,182
doing the legwork

69
00:01:22,249 --> 00:01:23,417
makes no sense to me at

70
00:01:23,483 --> 00:01:25,152
this point.