1
00:00:00,634 --> 00:00:01,268
A major overhaul of

2
00:00:01,335 --> 00:00:02,870
Wisconsin's prison system

3
00:00:02,936 --> 00:00:04,171
got off the starting blocks

4
00:00:04,238 --> 00:00:05,205
this week when the

5
00:00:05,272 --> 00:00:06,373
State Building Commission

6
00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:07,508
voted to approve

7
00:00:07,574 --> 00:00:08,976
$15 million

8
00:00:09,042 --> 00:00:10,844
to start the planning phase.

9
00:00:10,911 --> 00:00:13,180
Corrections has been in disarray

10
00:00:13,247 --> 00:00:15,282
under many governors

11
00:00:15,349 --> 00:00:16,149
and Gov. Evers

12
00:00:16,216 --> 00:00:16,850
when he first ran

13
00:00:16,917 --> 00:00:17,851
against Gov. Walker

14
00:00:17,918 --> 00:00:18,452
what is that

15
00:00:18,519 --> 00:00:19,586
eight years ago now?

16
00:00:19,653 --> 00:00:20,854
Ran on

17
00:00:20,921 --> 00:00:22,289
corrections reform

18
00:00:22,356 --> 00:00:23,290
and has done

19
00:00:23,357 --> 00:00:24,591
really nothing.

20
00:00:24,658 --> 00:00:26,460
And now all of a sudden

21
00:00:26,527 --> 00:00:28,328
in 2025

22
00:00:28,395 --> 00:00:29,796
budgetary cycle

23
00:00:29,863 --> 00:00:30,597
he comes out

24
00:00:30,664 --> 00:00:32,332
with a proposal

25
00:00:32,399 --> 00:00:33,567
and he's kind of like

26
00:00:33,634 --> 00:00:35,802
shoving it down our throats

27
00:00:35,869 --> 00:00:36,370
and he didn't

28
00:00:36,436 --> 00:00:37,437
include anybody

29
00:00:37,504 --> 00:00:38,739
in this proposal.

30
00:00:38,805 --> 00:00:39,540
There was things

31
00:00:39,606 --> 00:00:40,174
in the governor's

32
00:00:40,240 --> 00:00:41,508
proposal that I think

33
00:00:41,575 --> 00:00:42,342
every one of us

34
00:00:42,409 --> 00:00:44,044
could have gotten behind

35
00:00:44,111 --> 00:00:45,012
because I think a lot of

36
00:00:45,078 --> 00:00:46,180
some of his ideas

37
00:00:46,246 --> 00:00:47,514
were positive.

38
00:00:47,581 --> 00:00:48,482
That's why I think

39
00:00:48,549 --> 00:00:49,349
it would have been nice

40
00:00:49,416 --> 00:00:50,450
to include everyone.

41
00:00:50,517 --> 00:00:51,351
So this isn't a

42
00:00:51,418 --> 00:00:52,953
this doesn't have to be

43
00:00:53,020 --> 00:00:53,787
a Democrat

44
00:00:53,854 --> 00:00:55,489
or a Republican idea.

45
00:00:55,556 --> 00:00:56,290
Prison reform

46
00:00:56,356 --> 00:00:57,457
across the United States

47
00:00:57,524 --> 00:00:59,660
has been very nonpartisan.

48
00:00:59,726 --> 00:01:00,327
We can all work

49
00:01:00,394 --> 00:01:02,029
towards the same ideas.

50
00:01:02,095 --> 00:01:03,363
But when you take

51
00:01:03,430 --> 00:01:04,398
when you give

52
00:01:04,464 --> 00:01:05,532
somebody a proposal and say

53
00:01:05,599 --> 00:01:06,633
take it or leave it

54
00:01:06,700 --> 00:01:08,135
here it is.

55
00:01:08,202 --> 00:01:08,735
This is what we're

56
00:01:08,802 --> 00:01:10,537
moving forward with

57
00:01:10,604 --> 00:01:11,371
and especially

58
00:01:11,438 --> 00:01:11,972
when it's not even

59
00:01:12,039 --> 00:01:13,874
a good proposal.

60
00:01:13,941 --> 00:01:14,508
How do you think

61
00:01:14,575 --> 00:01:15,108
the other sides

62
00:01:15,175 --> 00:01:16,977
are going to react?
