1
00:00:01,468 --> 00:00:04,738
>> The monthly U.S. jobs
report out today shows

2
00:00:04,805 --> 00:00:08,942
encouraging news for the
economy, adding 162,000

3
00:00:09,009 --> 00:00:13,080
jobs, keeping the
unemployment rate steady at

4
00:00:13,146 --> 00:00:17,117
4.1%. In Wisconsin, the
state of working Wisconsin

5
00:00:17,184 --> 00:00:20,687
is mixed. According to a
report by the same name

6
00:00:20,754 --> 00:00:24,758
from the High Road Strategy
Center at UW-Madison, Laura

7
00:00:24,825 --> 00:00:27,761
Dresser is an economist and
associate director at the

8
00:00:27,828 --> 00:00:30,030
center. And Laura, thanks a
lot for being here.

9
00:00:30,097 --> 00:00:33,033
>> I'm delighted to be here.
>> So how do our job

10
00:00:33,100 --> 00:00:35,269
numbers stack up and how
have they trended since

11
00:00:35,335 --> 00:00:38,272
your last Labor Day report?
>> Yeah, it's been a really

12
00:00:38,338 --> 00:00:40,474
rocky time for the economy
is a great report today

13
00:00:40,541 --> 00:00:44,378
from the national level.
But on net, the national

14
00:00:44,444 --> 00:00:47,681
labor market has barely
grown since January of 2025.

15
00:00:47,748 --> 00:00:51,118
And Wisconsin, as of the
data that came out last

16
00:00:51,185 --> 00:00:54,388
month, Wisconsin's total
job base had actually

17
00:00:54,454 --> 00:00:57,157
fallen and was slightly
below where it had been in

18
00:00:57,224 --> 00:01:00,494
January of 2025.
>> So your report shows

19
00:01:00,561 --> 00:01:03,830
median wages have grown
steadily. So part of the

20
00:01:03,897 --> 00:01:07,034
mix that we're talking
about now, sitting at just

21
00:01:07,100 --> 00:01:11,672
over $26 an hour. But what
stands out in that stat.

22
00:01:11,738 --> 00:01:14,308
>> That stats interesting
because the median it's

23
00:01:14,374 --> 00:01:17,077
great to see that going up
because it's going up

24
00:01:17,144 --> 00:01:20,414
faster than inflation. It's
been steadily going up

25
00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,383
faster than inflation for
most of the last ten years,

26
00:01:23,450 --> 00:01:27,254
except for 2022, when
inflation was really high.

27
00:01:27,321 --> 00:01:29,723
So that's a great stat on
that sense. But there's a

28
00:01:29,790 --> 00:01:34,361
lot of disparities hidden
underneath the median. And

29
00:01:34,428 --> 00:01:38,432
so we look in the report to
see what's going on and

30
00:01:38,498 --> 00:01:41,068
some of the gaps between,
for example, the lowest

31
00:01:41,134 --> 00:01:43,670
wage workers and the
highest wage workers

32
00:01:43,737 --> 00:01:45,873
continue to shrink a little
bit because of the

33
00:01:45,939 --> 00:01:47,841
tightness of this labor
market and the way that

34
00:01:47,908 --> 00:01:51,311
lower wage workers have
moved forward in wages

35
00:01:51,378 --> 00:01:53,480
faster than higher wage
workers.

36
00:01:53,547 --> 00:01:56,383
>> And there's also some
kind of demographic gaps.

37
00:01:56,450 --> 00:01:59,152
>> Yeah, for sure. There's
a big gender gap in wages.

38
00:01:59,219 --> 00:02:01,421
People are familiar with
that, though, over the last

39
00:02:01,488 --> 00:02:05,025
40 years, which we document
in this, men's wages have

40
00:02:05,092 --> 00:02:08,228
have only risen a little.
Women's wages have come

41
00:02:08,295 --> 00:02:12,232
quite substantially up. So
the gender gap is closed,

42
00:02:12,299 --> 00:02:16,036
has closed over the last 40
years. And even over the

43
00:02:16,103 --> 00:02:19,740
last little bit. But other
gaps are large and have

44
00:02:19,806 --> 00:02:24,344
grown, especially racial
gaps. Black white disparity,

45
00:02:24,411 --> 00:02:27,214
Black, Hispanic white
disparity has grown quite

46
00:02:27,281 --> 00:02:30,884
substantially.
people are hyper focused on,

47
00:02:30,951 --> 00:02:33,787
that being inflation. You
say there's concern that

48
00:02:33,854 --> 00:02:38,525
inflation could wipe out
wage gains of 2026. How so?

49
00:02:38,592 --> 00:02:41,762
>> Yeah, that's even true
in the the national report

50
00:02:41,828 --> 00:02:45,132
from today, inflation the
rate of inflation is higher

51
00:02:45,199 --> 00:02:47,935
than the rate of wage
growth. This is what

52
00:02:48,001 --> 00:02:51,538
happened in 2022. Wages
workers wages went up in

53
00:02:51,605 --> 00:02:54,775
nominal terms. But the cost
of living just wiped that

54
00:02:54,842 --> 00:02:57,678
right out. That looks like
what we're heading into for

55
00:02:57,744 --> 00:03:00,914
2026. So while we got a
high in 2025 and that's

56
00:03:00,981 --> 00:03:04,952
great news, 2026 looks much
less likely that that will

57
00:03:05,018 --> 00:03:07,821
be a strong gain and
possible that it will be a

58
00:03:07,888 --> 00:03:09,623
loss because of the high
inflation.

59
00:03:09,690 --> 00:03:12,926
>> As to affordability, you
report that 1 in 3

60
00:03:12,993 --> 00:03:16,797
households in Wisconsin
cannot afford basic things.

61
00:03:16,864 --> 00:03:19,466
You describe this as as
nothing new, but is it

62
00:03:19,533 --> 00:03:22,970
about the cost of living
per se, or is it about the

63
00:03:23,036 --> 00:03:24,538
wages?
>> Yeah, I think it's

64
00:03:24,605 --> 00:03:27,341
really important to see
both of those things in

65
00:03:27,407 --> 00:03:30,878
balance. I think when we
are are focused on the cost

66
00:03:30,944 --> 00:03:34,181
of living, like we see the
prices go up, especially

67
00:03:34,248 --> 00:03:38,519
recently of energy, gas,
utilities. That makes folks

68
00:03:38,585 --> 00:03:42,155
focus on the cost of living.
But in the background, the

69
00:03:42,222 --> 00:03:46,460
suppression of wages, the
long term kind of under the

70
00:03:46,527 --> 00:03:50,130
rates of economic growth,
wage stagnation that this

71
00:03:50,197 --> 00:03:53,300
nation has had, you know,
even this last five years

72
00:03:53,367 --> 00:03:57,237
of growth have not gotten
us back to to kind of

73
00:03:57,304 --> 00:04:00,440
moving ahead as the economy
moves ahead. And if it was

74
00:04:00,507 --> 00:04:03,477
the questions of the
questions of affordability

75
00:04:03,544 --> 00:04:06,647
would be wiped out by
having better job.

76
00:04:06,713 --> 00:04:10,017
>> Laura Dresser we leave
>> Thanks for having me.

77
00:04:10,083 --> 00:04:14,988
>> As to the rising cost of
energy, many people want to
