1
00:00:01,101 --> 00:00:04,571
for having me.
>> Turning to this week's

2
00:00:04,638 --> 00:00:08,475
Inside Wisconsin politics.
Our panel of reporters

3
00:00:08,542 --> 00:00:11,411
discussed the campaign
implications of data

4
00:00:11,478 --> 00:00:13,714
centers and how the
candidates for governor are

5
00:00:13,780 --> 00:00:16,850
treating the brand new
wedge issue.

6
00:00:16,917 --> 00:00:19,853
>> As far as wedge issues
go, it's fairly clever.

7
00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:23,390
This is a relatively new
issue to politics, so it's

8
00:00:23,457 --> 00:00:25,893
not defined in the way that
some other issues are. You

9
00:00:25,959 --> 00:00:27,995
don't know exactly where
the interest groups stand

10
00:00:28,061 --> 00:00:31,798
with the parties. So Ana
how is that playing out in

11
00:00:31,865 --> 00:00:35,002
this attack from Tom
Tiffany? How is he going

12
00:00:35,068 --> 00:00:37,070
after David Crowley trying
to frame him?

13
00:00:37,137 --> 00:00:39,406
>> Yeah, I mean, he's
trying to use his initials

14
00:00:39,473 --> 00:00:42,109
against him. He's calling
him Data Data Center. David

15
00:00:42,176 --> 00:00:46,079
Crowley DC, DC as a way of
trying to kind of tie him

16
00:00:46,146 --> 00:00:49,116
to this. And the way he's
doing it is in a slightly

17
00:00:49,183 --> 00:00:51,151
convoluted way by saying
that because David Crowley

18
00:00:51,218 --> 00:00:53,287
hasn't pledged to kind of
roll back these specific

19
00:00:53,353 --> 00:00:55,856
tax incentives, that that
makes him more pro data

20
00:00:55,923 --> 00:00:57,991
center. David Crowley is
also kind of trying to

21
00:00:58,058 --> 00:01:00,194
split the difference a
little bit and say, well, I

22
00:01:00,260 --> 00:01:02,229
support local control. So
communities that don't want

23
00:01:02,296 --> 00:01:05,199
it don't have to have it. I
would want, you know, sort

24
00:01:05,265 --> 00:01:08,001
of tight controls and
regulations in this kind of

25
00:01:08,068 --> 00:01:10,604
thing. But the other kind
of interesting piece of how

26
00:01:10,671 --> 00:01:12,906
Tom Tiffany is handling
this. So I went yesterday

27
00:01:12,973 --> 00:01:15,209
to an endorsement
announcement for these

28
00:01:15,275 --> 00:01:17,411
environmental groups that
are now backing David

29
00:01:17,477 --> 00:01:19,646
Crowley. And of course,
environmental concerns are

30
00:01:19,713 --> 00:01:22,015
very tied up in people's
concerns over data centers.

31
00:01:22,082 --> 00:01:24,685
And part of the way that
that Tom Tiffany is now

32
00:01:24,751 --> 00:01:28,088
framing it is that data
centers are taking away

33
00:01:28,155 --> 00:01:31,425
farmland. And also because
there's a push from

34
00:01:31,491 --> 00:01:34,461
Democrats to have
sustainable energy, be sort

35
00:01:34,528 --> 00:01:36,930
of the backbone of data
centers. He's also now kind

36
00:01:36,997 --> 00:01:39,600
of using it as a one, two,
three punch of they're

37
00:01:39,666 --> 00:01:41,802
trying to take farmland,
not just to create data

38
00:01:41,869 --> 00:01:44,505
centers, but also to create
wind farms and solar farms.

39
00:01:44,571 --> 00:01:47,508
And so he can kind of
package it together in all

40
00:01:47,574 --> 00:01:49,710
of these things that will
speak to Republican voters.

41
00:01:49,776 --> 00:01:51,512
Democrats obviously, like
solar, like wind farms. And

42
00:01:51,578 --> 00:01:54,181
so they'll have more of
their work cut out for them

43
00:01:54,248 --> 00:01:57,317
to kind of distinguish
those issues.

44
00:01:57,384 --> 00:02:00,587
seeing some social media
appearances from Tom

45
00:02:00,654 --> 00:02:03,223
and he's kind of framing it
as data centers versus

46
00:02:03,290 --> 00:02:05,492
farmland. It's maybe like a
pretty transparent appeal

47
00:02:05,559 --> 00:02:07,294
to rural voters in that
instance.

48
00:02:07,361 --> 00:02:09,663
>> It's doing so many
things at the same time

49
00:02:09,730 --> 00:02:11,965
because it is about his
base and rural farmland.

50
00:02:12,032 --> 00:02:14,501
One of his earliest ads
months ago talked about how

51
00:02:14,568 --> 00:02:17,204
to prevent foreign
countries from coming in

52
00:02:17,271 --> 00:02:20,040
and buying up our farmland,
which is an issue that does

53
00:02:20,107 --> 00:02:22,276
concern people that are
worried about the rising

54
00:02:22,342 --> 00:02:25,145
cost of just trying to rent
out a field to put crops in

55
00:02:25,212 --> 00:02:27,848
the ground, as we've seen
with all the international

56
00:02:27,915 --> 00:02:30,050
tariffs affecting soybean
and corn farmers, they're

57
00:02:30,117 --> 00:02:32,319
looking for someone to
blame. And if they're some

58
00:02:32,386 --> 00:02:34,888
of the cognitive dissonance
for them is they don't want

59
00:02:34,955 --> 00:02:37,391
to blame Donald Trump. I've
interviewed them, and they

60
00:02:37,457 --> 00:02:39,660
don't really want to blame
him and his decisions. So

61
00:02:39,726 --> 00:02:42,396
if they Tom Tiffany says,
well, it's not his fault.

62
00:02:42,462 --> 00:02:44,665
It's over here. This is who
you blame for your rising

63
00:02:44,731 --> 00:02:47,334
costs. Well, they're more
than happy to follow along

64
00:02:47,401 --> 00:02:49,503
if they're if they're in
that inclination to begin

65
00:02:49,570 --> 00:02:52,306
with. So it's definitely a
way to do that. But what's

66
00:02:52,372 --> 00:02:56,076
another element that's
trying to split off those

67
00:02:56,143 --> 00:02:59,479
Hong voters from David
Crowley and split the left,

68
00:02:59,546 --> 00:03:01,815
because we've seen
elections where the far

69
00:03:01,882 --> 00:03:04,718
left and progressive left
have sat out. Maybe not in

70
00:03:04,785 --> 00:03:06,787
huge numbers, but enough
numbers where potentially

71
00:03:06,854 --> 00:03:09,323
it does swing an election.
We saw that with Hillary

72
00:03:09,389 --> 00:03:11,592
Clinton. We saw that with
Kamala Harris, and they're

73
00:03:11,658 --> 00:03:13,493
trying to repeat that
pattern with David Crowley.

74
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:16,897
If they can paint him as
more moderate, more

75
00:03:16,964 --> 00:03:20,868
corporate and less true,
far left than some of those

76
00:03:20,934 --> 00:03:22,970
voters may go third party
or just set out together.

77
00:03:23,036 --> 00:03:25,806
And that's one of the
concerns, is he has to

78
00:03:25,873 --> 00:03:27,808
watch his flank, even
though he won by being in

79
00:03:27,875 --> 00:03:29,810
the center.
>> That's definitely an

80
00:03:29,877 --> 00:03:31,812
open question for me,
especially because you at

81
00:03:31,879 --> 00:03:34,014
least get the impression
that a lot of Hong voters

82
00:03:34,081 --> 00:03:37,351
are maybe not a politics
first kind of voter. You

83
00:03:37,417 --> 00:03:40,554
know, they came to her
because she spoke to them

84
00:03:40,621 --> 00:03:43,624
in different ways, more of
a movement candidate. She

85
00:03:43,690 --> 00:03:46,393
would not want to identify
with Donald Trump, but a

86
00:03:46,460 --> 00:03:48,929
movement candidate in that
way. You get different

87
00:03:48,996 --> 00:03:52,566
people into the political
arena. And, you know, one

88
00:03:52,633 --> 00:03:54,868
question that I think some
of them had during the

89
00:03:54,935 --> 00:03:58,605
primary was, why don't more
Democrats just say what

90
00:03:58,672 --> 00:04:00,707
Francesca Hong is saying?
We're going to have a

91
00:04:00,774 --> 00:04:02,876
moratorium on data centers.
I like the sounds of that.

92
00:04:02,943 --> 00:04:05,679
Why wouldn't David Crowley
Ana just say, hey, let's

93
00:04:05,746 --> 00:04:07,781
let's put the brakes on
these. And this data center

94
00:04:07,848 --> 00:04:10,484
issue is all taken care of
for me politically.

95
00:04:10,551 --> 00:04:12,519
>> Well, politically
speaking, data centers are

96
00:04:12,586 --> 00:04:14,922
not popular. The vast
majority of voters,

97
00:04:14,988 --> 00:04:17,224
Democrats and Republicans,
don't support data centers,

98
00:04:17,291 --> 00:04:19,293
or they certainly don't
support them sort of coming

99
00:04:19,359 --> 00:04:22,129
into their own communities.
But there is a real kind of

100
00:04:22,196 --> 00:04:24,298
question around the types
of jobs that they can bring

101
00:04:24,364 --> 00:04:26,767
in, the kind of economic
development possibilities

102
00:04:26,834 --> 00:04:30,037
there. And so I think like
as a politician, you don't

103
00:04:30,103 --> 00:04:32,472
necessarily want to say,
you know, categorically, I

104
00:04:32,539 --> 00:04:35,075
will not support a thing
that could be a driver of

105
00:04:35,142 --> 00:04:37,344
economic growth, especially
in some of these kind of

106
00:04:37,411 --> 00:04:39,446
hard hit places in
Wisconsin that are kind of

107
00:04:39,513 --> 00:04:43,884
hurting for economic
opportunities. You know,

108
00:04:43,951 --> 00:04:47,554
is that a lot of the the
data center, a lot of the

109
00:04:47,621 --> 00:04:50,457
unions that Bakke David
Crowley are involved in

110
00:04:50,524 --> 00:04:53,193
data center construction.
And so one of the things

111
00:04:53,260 --> 00:04:56,096
that he has said is that,
you know, again, if a local

112
00:04:56,163 --> 00:04:58,999
community wants a data
center, one of the things

113
00:04:59,066 --> 00:05:02,069
that he would want to see
is that it has to be union

114
00:05:02,135 --> 00:05:04,171
built. That gets you union
support. And unions are a

115
00:05:04,238 --> 00:05:07,040
pretty big part of how the
Democratic Party defines

116
00:05:07,107 --> 00:05:09,243
itself as being a party of
the unions. And unions are

117
00:05:09,309 --> 00:05:12,079
a pretty big part of how
Republicans have started to

118
00:05:12,145 --> 00:05:14,248
kind of make huge inroads
with working people. So the

119
00:05:14,314 --> 00:05:16,817
union question, I think, is
an untapped and unanswered

120
00:05:16,884 --> 00:05:19,553
one so far.
>> Look for reporting from

121
00:05:19,620 --> 00:05:22,222
Murv Seymour on what
community members think

122
00:05:22,289 --> 00:05:25,859
about data centers. That's
next Friday on this program.

123
00:05:25,926 --> 00:05:30,831
In other state news, the UW
In other state news, the UW
