1
00:00:01,635 --> 00:00:04,104
Wisconsinites are feeling
like they help others and

2
00:00:04,171 --> 00:00:06,940
others help them when
they're in need.

3
00:00:07,007 --> 00:00:10,210
>> The cost of attending
University of Wisconsin

4
00:00:10,277 --> 00:00:13,680
schools is going up in the
fall. This month, the UW

5
00:00:13,747 --> 00:00:17,518
Board of Regents approved a
2% tuition hike for

6
00:00:17,584 --> 00:00:20,821
in-state undergraduate
students, plus roughly

7
00:00:20,888 --> 00:00:24,525
commensurate increases in
fees and room and board

8
00:00:24,591 --> 00:00:29,396
that will put UW-Madison at
$12,416 on the high end,

9
00:00:29,963 --> 00:00:34,535
and UW Parkside at 8851 at
the lowest price point.

10
00:00:35,402 --> 00:00:38,105
It's the fourth tuition
increase in a row after a

11
00:00:38,172 --> 00:00:41,808
ten year freeze. In the
midst of increasing cost

12
00:00:41,875 --> 00:00:45,012
pressures on families, how
reasonable is the tuition

13
00:00:45,078 --> 00:00:48,949
hike? We're joined by
professor in the UW-Madison

14
00:00:49,016 --> 00:00:51,919
Department of Education
Policy, Taylor Odle, and

15
00:00:51,985 --> 00:00:54,121
thanks for being here.
>> Thanks for having me.

16
00:00:54,188 --> 00:00:57,991
>> So a 2% tuition hike on
paper seems really modest,

17
00:00:58,058 --> 00:01:01,195
but at a time, as we said,
when people questioned the

18
00:01:01,261 --> 00:01:03,697
value of a college degree,
does it turn some people

19
00:01:03,764 --> 00:01:06,099
away?
>> I think it's very

20
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:09,570
important to acknowledge
that a 2% increase is very

21
00:01:09,636 --> 00:01:12,339
real money for students and
families. I think at the

22
00:01:12,406 --> 00:01:14,541
same time, we also have to
acknowledge that costs are

23
00:01:14,608 --> 00:01:18,045
going up for all of us,
including organizations and

24
00:01:18,111 --> 00:01:21,448
businesses like the
Universities of Wisconsin.

25
00:01:21,515 --> 00:01:24,618
2% is relatively modest and
predictable, and below the

26
00:01:24,685 --> 00:01:27,654
rate of inflation right now
doesn't mean it doesn't,

27
00:01:27,721 --> 00:01:29,857
you know, have important
conversations about dollars

28
00:01:29,923 --> 00:01:32,793
and cents at the end of the
day. But what students and

29
00:01:32,860 --> 00:01:34,995
families should really care
about is the net price of

30
00:01:35,062 --> 00:01:37,831
college. So when you quote
that $12,000 or that $8,000,

31
00:01:37,898 --> 00:01:39,900
that's what we call the
sticker price, what you see

32
00:01:39,967 --> 00:01:42,736
on the website. But from
that, we know people get

33
00:01:42,803 --> 00:01:44,938
grants and scholarships,
and that pulls it down to

34
00:01:45,005 --> 00:01:47,941
what we call the net price,
the check that you have to

35
00:01:48,008 --> 00:01:50,944
write at the end of the day
to be able to enroll. And

36
00:01:51,011 --> 00:01:53,046
that number has actually
been relatively flat over

37
00:01:53,113 --> 00:01:55,516
the last several years
because UW is taking money

38
00:01:55,582 --> 00:01:58,185
from these tuition
back into financial aid.

39
00:01:58,252 --> 00:02:02,055
>> With a 30% decline in
highest paying

40
00:02:02,122 --> 00:02:05,859
international students and
volatile federal research

41
00:02:05,926 --> 00:02:10,197
funding. What is a
university to do except use

42
00:02:10,264 --> 00:02:14,768
that tuition lever?
>> That's a great question.

43
00:02:14,835 --> 00:02:16,703
UW the universities of
Wisconsin have three

44
00:02:16,770 --> 00:02:19,506
primary revenue sources,
right? Federal grants,

45
00:02:19,573 --> 00:02:22,576
which we are among the top
in the nation at securing.

46
00:02:22,643 --> 00:02:25,045
We enroll students who pay
tuition and fees, and we

47
00:02:25,112 --> 00:02:28,282
receive funding from the
state. State support has

48
00:02:28,348 --> 00:02:31,485
long stagnated, with the
exception of a recent

49
00:02:31,552 --> 00:02:34,054
increase. And so tuition
dollars are a primary way

50
00:02:34,121 --> 00:02:38,392
of raising funds. With a
tuition freeze for many,

51
00:02:38,458 --> 00:02:41,195
many years, our ability to
do that was hamstrung. And

52
00:02:41,261 --> 00:02:43,697
so it quite literally
strangled some of the

53
00:02:43,764 --> 00:02:45,933
campuses. We benefit from
having international

54
00:02:45,999 --> 00:02:48,035
students and even students
from out of state who pay

55
00:02:48,101 --> 00:02:50,370
higher tuition rates
because they can afford it.

56
00:02:50,437 --> 00:02:53,440
They are mobile geographic
for colleges with a decline

57
00:02:53,507 --> 00:02:55,843
in international student
enrollment. There aren't

58
00:02:55,909 --> 00:02:58,111
many other students that we
can look to except for our

59
00:02:58,178 --> 00:03:00,113
in-state students,
especially now because the

60
00:03:00,180 --> 00:03:02,416
state has begun to
increasingly regulate our

61
00:03:02,482 --> 00:03:05,185
ability to even draw
students from Minnesota and

62
00:03:05,252 --> 00:03:07,487
Iowa and other out-of-state
partners.

63
00:03:07,554 --> 00:03:10,457
>> So how kind of in
jeopardy are the finances

64
00:03:10,524 --> 00:03:13,393
of the Universities of
Wisconsin given all of

65
00:03:13,460 --> 00:03:15,762
these factors?
>> It's a very serious

66
00:03:15,829 --> 00:03:18,332
position, right? We've
already seen campus

67
00:03:18,398 --> 00:03:20,767
closures of many regional
campuses. We've seen cuts

68
00:03:20,834 --> 00:03:24,137
to academic programs. We've
seen staff and faculty

69
00:03:24,204 --> 00:03:28,108
restructurings. And so no
one wants to raise prices.

70
00:03:28,175 --> 00:03:30,544
If you're a business owner,
you don't want to walk out

71
00:03:30,611 --> 00:03:32,412
and show your customers
raising prices. The

72
00:03:32,479 --> 00:03:34,648
university doesn't want to
do that either. We want

73
00:03:34,715 --> 00:03:37,384
more people to access and
have access to a college

74
00:03:37,451 --> 00:03:39,586
education. Like you said,
for upper social and

75
00:03:39,653 --> 00:03:42,956
economic mobility. But when
the state is no longer a

76
00:03:43,023 --> 00:03:46,026
primary funding partner,
federal research and grants

77
00:03:46,093 --> 00:03:48,996
landscape is certainly
uncertain. Tuition is one

78
00:03:49,062 --> 00:03:52,866
of the only lovers left.
>> So some Republican state

79
00:03:52,933 --> 00:03:55,435
policymakers are super
angry about this tuition

80
00:03:55,502 --> 00:03:58,305
increase, saying it's, you
know, the fourth in a row

81
00:03:58,372 --> 00:04:02,543
after a state budget gave
the system $256 million.

82
00:04:02,609 --> 00:04:06,680
What about that persuasion?
>> Yeah, I think the

83
00:04:06,747 --> 00:04:09,349
average Wisconsinite should
also be super angry about

84
00:04:09,416 --> 00:04:13,320
that characterization. So
256 million is a big number

85
00:04:13,387 --> 00:04:16,356
and it's a very important
investment. It's however, a

86
00:04:16,423 --> 00:04:18,492
biennial increase. So we
have to divide that by two

87
00:04:18,559 --> 00:04:20,894
because it's going to be
the 120 something million

88
00:04:20,961 --> 00:04:24,198
every year. And just to put
that in context, the

89
00:04:24,264 --> 00:04:26,834
university leverages its
the state's largest public

90
00:04:26,900 --> 00:04:30,704
employer, and its operating
budget is around $7 billion.

91
00:04:30,771 --> 00:04:35,576
And so that increase is
less than almost 1.5%, so

92
00:04:35,642 --> 00:04:38,011
substantially below
inflation. And more

93
00:04:38,078 --> 00:04:41,114
importantly, that $256
million came with a lot of

94
00:04:41,181 --> 00:04:45,152
important caveats. Most
importantly, an unfunded

95
00:04:45,219 --> 00:04:48,288
tuition or salary raise for
faculty and staff across

96
00:04:48,355 --> 00:04:52,359
the institution. So no
other piece of state

97
00:04:52,426 --> 00:04:55,162
government has unfunded
mandates in that same way.

98
00:04:55,229 --> 00:04:58,866
So we're required to raise
salaries by 2% for all

99
00:04:58,932 --> 00:05:01,101
faculty and staff. But the
state didn't put in the

100
00:05:01,168 --> 00:05:03,637
money to fully fund that
raise. And so the Regents

101
00:05:03,704 --> 00:05:06,373
have said that the tuition
increase will predominantly

102
00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,009
fund faculty and staff
salary increases mandated.

103
00:05:09,076 --> 00:05:12,913
>> Well, that's another
piece that some

104
00:05:12,980 --> 00:05:15,315
policymakers are unhappy
about, because they say the

105
00:05:15,382 --> 00:05:19,920
number of staff has gone up,
whereas the number of

106
00:05:19,987 --> 00:05:22,990
students has not.
>> So many people, when

107
00:05:23,056 --> 00:05:25,459
they think about staff
increases on cross campus.

108
00:05:25,526 --> 00:05:28,395
We use this federal survey
where we report people in

109
00:05:28,462 --> 00:05:31,498
these huge buckets. Do they
teach? Do they work? Are

110
00:05:31,565 --> 00:05:33,600
they administrative in
different ways? It doesn't

111
00:05:33,667 --> 00:05:35,836
capture the granularity of
what those staff are

112
00:05:35,903 --> 00:05:38,705
actually doing. So if we
hire more students to

113
00:05:38,772 --> 00:05:42,409
provide career exploration
or oversee internships for

114
00:05:42,476 --> 00:05:44,778
students or help them get
placements with employers,

115
00:05:44,845 --> 00:05:47,147
those are staff members and
those are very valuable

116
00:05:47,214 --> 00:05:49,616
staff members. I'd be happy
to double or triple those

117
00:05:49,683 --> 00:05:51,919
numbers. And so it's a
really nuanced conversation,

118
00:05:51,985 --> 00:05:54,621
right? Are there
efficiencies to be had? Of

119
00:05:54,688 --> 00:05:57,090
course, but we need to have
better data and a more

120
00:05:57,157 --> 00:06:02,296
frank conversation around
frank conversation around
