1
00:00:01,602 --> 00:00:03,437
seeking anything.
>> All right. Judge Lazar,

2
00:00:03,504 --> 00:00:05,906
thanks for your time.
>> Thank you very much. It

3
00:00:05,973 --> 00:00:08,842
was a pleasure.
>> A large scale data

4
00:00:08,909 --> 00:00:12,112
center in the village of
DeForest was rejected this

5
00:00:12,179 --> 00:00:15,983
week. It's an example of
the push pull between local

6
00:00:16,049 --> 00:00:19,086
communities and tech
companies, with their ever

7
00:00:19,152 --> 00:00:22,689
increasing demands to store
and process huge amounts of

8
00:00:22,756 --> 00:00:26,126
data, especially in the age
of artificial intelligence.

9
00:00:26,193 --> 00:00:29,663
As Steven Potter reports,
opposition from DeForest

10
00:00:29,730 --> 00:00:33,000
residents left the village
board with a difficult

11
00:00:33,066 --> 00:00:36,370
decision to announce.
>> Some of you might feel

12
00:00:36,436 --> 00:00:39,573
very victorious tonight.
Others are feeling a great

13
00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:42,042
loss.
>> When residents in the

14
00:00:42,109 --> 00:00:44,311
DeForest area first heard
that a large scale data

15
00:00:44,378 --> 00:00:46,980
center was being planned
for farmland just outside

16
00:00:47,047 --> 00:00:49,883
their village. They were
not happy about it.

17
00:00:49,950 --> 00:00:52,886
>> I picked this spot 40
years ago to live because

18
00:00:52,953 --> 00:00:56,957
it was so remote. I never
thought we'd be faced with

19
00:00:57,024 --> 00:01:00,294
something like this.
>> Nancy Roth was one of

20
00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,497
the residents who opposed
the sprawling 1600 acre and

21
00:01:03,564 --> 00:01:06,366
$12 billion development
proposed by technology

22
00:01:06,433 --> 00:01:10,037
company data centers. They
worried that the data

23
00:01:10,103 --> 00:01:12,706
center may damage natural
resources and tear apart

24
00:01:12,773 --> 00:01:15,809
the tranquility of their
rural landscape.

25
00:01:15,876 --> 00:01:18,111
>> We want to live in a
farming community, not next

26
00:01:18,178 --> 00:01:21,315
to a concrete walled data
center.

27
00:01:22,316 --> 00:01:24,985
>> So Roth and others went
to work. They organized

28
00:01:25,052 --> 00:01:28,455
residents printed yard
signs, created an online

29
00:01:28,522 --> 00:01:31,425
community, and voiced their
opposition at numerous town

30
00:01:31,491 --> 00:01:34,595
and village board meetings.
And just this week, after

31
00:01:34,661 --> 00:01:37,130
months of expressing their
outrage.

32
00:01:37,197 --> 00:01:40,300
>> We're at a point where
we can finally make a vote.

33
00:01:40,367 --> 00:01:42,369
>> Those opposed to the
DeForest Data Center were

34
00:01:42,436 --> 00:01:45,138
able to claim victory when
the village board voted

35
00:01:45,205 --> 00:01:48,509
unanimously against the
data center plan.

36
00:01:48,575 --> 00:01:51,211
>> Yes, to reject AQ.
>> With that rejection of

37
00:01:51,278 --> 00:01:54,715
the proposal from the
village of DeForest has now

38
00:01:54,781 --> 00:01:57,584
formally withdrawn from the
project. This kind of

39
00:01:57,651 --> 00:01:59,786
conflict, which hinges on
the local control of land

40
00:01:59,853 --> 00:02:03,090
and resources, has been
repeating itself around the

41
00:02:03,156 --> 00:02:06,193
state. Here's what happens.
A large scale data center

42
00:02:06,260 --> 00:02:09,730
gets proposed. Residents
get upset and voice their

43
00:02:09,796 --> 00:02:12,432
opposition. And then local
officials take notice of

44
00:02:12,499 --> 00:02:16,637
the outrage and put an end
to the project. Or the data

45
00:02:16,703 --> 00:02:20,240
center company itself
decides to pull out. Other

46
00:02:20,307 --> 00:02:22,743
proposed data centers that
have been nixed recently

47
00:02:22,809 --> 00:02:25,212
include one in Brown County
and another in Racine

48
00:02:25,279 --> 00:02:27,981
County, and the city
councils of both Menominee

49
00:02:28,048 --> 00:02:31,151
and Madison have passed
restrictions on data

50
00:02:31,218 --> 00:02:34,221
centers being built there.
>> The data center industry,

51
00:02:34,288 --> 00:02:37,791
especially at this scale,
it's new, right? And any

52
00:02:37,858 --> 00:02:41,562
time there's something of
this magnitude that's new,

53
00:02:41,628 --> 00:02:44,731
it's scary.
>> Tricia Braun is with the

54
00:02:44,798 --> 00:02:46,867
Wisconsin Data Center
Coalition, which advocates

55
00:02:46,934 --> 00:02:49,970
for these developments to
boost the state's economy.

56
00:02:50,037 --> 00:02:52,072
She says that our ever
growing need for more

57
00:02:52,139 --> 00:02:54,441
information, more
entertainment and more

58
00:02:54,508 --> 00:02:56,877
innovation, including and
especially with the use of

59
00:02:56,944 --> 00:03:00,147
artificial intelligence, is
what's driving demand.

60
00:03:00,214 --> 00:03:02,549
>> Whether you're on your
phone, your live streaming

61
00:03:02,616 --> 00:03:05,552
TV, your manufacturer
that's automating your

62
00:03:05,619 --> 00:03:08,021
processes, your regular
company that just decides

63
00:03:08,088 --> 00:03:11,625
to move its server offline
or to the cloud, all of

64
00:03:11,692 --> 00:03:13,861
that needs to be stored
somewhere. That's where

65
00:03:13,927 --> 00:03:16,663
data centers come in.
>> Some large scale data

66
00:03:16,730 --> 00:03:19,166
centers house only one
company, which is the case

67
00:03:19,233 --> 00:03:21,168
for the Beaver Dam Data
Center being built right

68
00:03:21,235 --> 00:03:24,738
now by meta and the
Microsoft Data Center,

69
00:03:24,805 --> 00:03:27,908
under construction in Mount
Pleasant. But Braun says

70
00:03:27,975 --> 00:03:30,410
smaller and midsize
companies are clients, too.

71
00:03:30,477 --> 00:03:32,980
>> Whether it's insurance
companies, financial

72
00:03:33,046 --> 00:03:35,716
institutions, just general
businesses can be some of

73
00:03:35,782 --> 00:03:38,285
these tenants when it comes
to something that is

74
00:03:38,352 --> 00:03:41,788
changing this fast. And as
you know, we're all doing

75
00:03:41,855 --> 00:03:44,892
more with technology every
day. The demand is

76
00:03:44,958 --> 00:03:46,293
increasing.
>> According to research

77
00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:48,562
from the Brookings
Institute, there are more

78
00:03:48,629 --> 00:03:51,598
than 5000 data centers
operating in the United

79
00:03:51,665 --> 00:03:55,202
States. That's ten times
more than any other country.

80
00:03:55,269 --> 00:03:58,038
There are around 50 data
centers here in Wisconsin,

81
00:03:58,105 --> 00:04:00,674
at least for now. But if
technology companies get

82
00:04:00,741 --> 00:04:03,577
their way, there may be
several more of them here

83
00:04:03,644 --> 00:04:05,846
soon. And some of them will
be the hyperscale sized

84
00:04:05,913 --> 00:04:09,550
data centers that span
hundreds of acres and cost

85
00:04:09,616 --> 00:04:12,853
billions of dollars. Data
center companies find

86
00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,622
Wisconsin appealing because
of available land, energy,

87
00:04:15,689 --> 00:04:19,259
and a favorable,
particularly cooler climate.

88
00:04:19,326 --> 00:04:21,795
Currently, data centers are
being proposed in Rock

89
00:04:21,862 --> 00:04:25,332
County, Ozaukee County,
Wood County, and Kenosha

90
00:04:25,399 --> 00:04:29,002
County, and although Qt's
withdrew its bid for

91
00:04:29,069 --> 00:04:31,038
DeForest, the company says
they may explore other

92
00:04:31,104 --> 00:04:34,174
locations in Wisconsin.
>> I think digital

93
00:04:34,241 --> 00:04:36,743
infrastructure is critical
to our economy and critical

94
00:04:36,810 --> 00:04:39,713
to national security, and
it has to get built

95
00:04:39,780 --> 00:04:41,648
somewhere.
>> State lawmakers are also

96
00:04:41,715 --> 00:04:44,251
getting involved in data
center regulation.

97
00:04:44,318 --> 00:04:47,321
>> We need to be
competitive in this space.

98
00:04:47,387 --> 00:04:49,556
>> Mark Born, a Republican
in the state assembly,

99
00:04:49,623 --> 00:04:52,526
represents Beaver Dam,
where social media company

100
00:04:52,593 --> 00:04:55,796
meta is building a $1
billion, 700 zero zero zero

101
00:04:55,863 --> 00:04:59,233
square foot data center.
>> This is the future. And

102
00:04:59,299 --> 00:05:01,702
why shouldn't Wisconsin
communities benefit from

103
00:05:01,768 --> 00:05:03,704
some of the economic
development that comes from

104
00:05:03,770 --> 00:05:06,006
that?
>> While he is in favor of

105
00:05:06,073 --> 00:05:08,242
these developments, Bourne
also wants to make sure

106
00:05:08,308 --> 00:05:10,277
that data centers don't
lead to higher electrical

107
00:05:10,344 --> 00:05:12,946
bills for local residents
and that the state's water

108
00:05:13,013 --> 00:05:16,049
supply is protected. He's a
lead author of legislation

109
00:05:16,116 --> 00:05:18,652
that aims to regulate data
centers.

110
00:05:18,719 --> 00:05:20,554
>> Ratepayers should be
protected. We should be

111
00:05:20,621 --> 00:05:23,257
protecting our natural
resources.

112
00:05:23,323 --> 00:05:25,259
>> Democratic State
Representative Angela

113
00:05:25,325 --> 00:05:28,295
Stroud of Ashland, says the
Republican bill doesn't go

114
00:05:28,362 --> 00:05:31,064
far enough. She wants to
see more rules around

115
00:05:31,131 --> 00:05:34,768
renewable energy fees and
labor. And if data center

116
00:05:34,835 --> 00:05:37,905
developers don't meet those
requirements.

117
00:05:37,971 --> 00:05:40,874
not be well suited for the
state. And I think we

118
00:05:40,941 --> 00:05:43,810
should be willing to admit
that and say, fine, then

119
00:05:43,877 --> 00:05:46,747
we're not the place for you.
But if we can achieve those

120
00:05:46,813 --> 00:05:48,782
things, which we can with
smart regulation, we need

121
00:05:48,849 --> 00:05:50,651
to get something done.
>> Regulation is a sticky

122
00:05:50,717 --> 00:05:53,820
topic for data center
proponents.

123
00:05:53,887 --> 00:05:58,225
very careful about what is
put into place as far as

124
00:05:58,292 --> 00:06:01,495
rules, restrictions,
regulations to make sure

125
00:06:01,562 --> 00:06:04,231
that those unintended
consequences aren't an

126
00:06:04,298 --> 00:06:06,967
overall detriment to future
development.

127
00:06:07,034 --> 00:06:09,303
>> While the future of data
centers in Wisconsin

128
00:06:09,369 --> 00:06:12,739
remains a case by case
situation, proponents say

129
00:06:12,806 --> 00:06:16,343
the need for more and more
computing power and data

130
00:06:16,410 --> 00:06:19,479
storage is undeniable. But
for now, it remains an

131
00:06:19,546 --> 00:06:22,549
exercise in compromise
between data center

132
00:06:22,616 --> 00:06:25,686
developers, local residents,
municipal government and

133
00:06:25,752 --> 00:06:31,091
state lawmakers. Reporting
state lawmakers. Reporting
