1
00:00:01,668 --> 00:00:04,671
to be a really hot topic
going forward.

2
00:00:04,738 --> 00:00:07,107
Sommerhauser, thanks very
much.

3
00:00:07,174 --> 00:00:10,410
>> The whole government
shutdown was over extending

4
00:00:10,477 --> 00:00:13,780
enhanced tax credits for
Affordable Care Act

5
00:00:13,847 --> 00:00:16,717
policies, with Democrats
warning of big increases in

6
00:00:16,783 --> 00:00:19,152
people's monthly premiums
come January if they're not

7
00:00:19,219 --> 00:00:22,389
kept in place. Aside from
those extra subsidies going

8
00:00:22,456 --> 00:00:25,192
away, why are marketplace
plans proving more

9
00:00:25,259 --> 00:00:28,428
expensive? And what of
Republican calls to do away

10
00:00:28,495 --> 00:00:32,099
with the ACA altogether? In
response, we asked

11
00:00:32,165 --> 00:00:35,669
Wisconsin School of
and Insurance Justin Sydnor.

12
00:00:35,736 --> 00:00:37,671
And thanks very much for
being here.

13
00:00:37,738 --> 00:00:40,774
>> Thanks for having me.
>> So is it in dispute that

14
00:00:40,841 --> 00:00:45,546
ACA premiums could more
than double without the

15
00:00:45,612 --> 00:00:47,414
extension of the enhanced
tax credits?

16
00:00:47,481 --> 00:00:50,617
>> No.
uncertainty about that. You

17
00:00:50,684 --> 00:00:53,954
know, it's basically pretty
straightforward, simple

18
00:00:54,021 --> 00:00:57,124
math. The way the tax
credits work is that

19
00:00:57,191 --> 00:01:00,460
they're tied to a share of
the percent of your income.

20
00:01:00,527 --> 00:01:03,397
And the enhanced tax
credits increased or

21
00:01:03,463 --> 00:01:05,799
decreased the share you
would have to pay an

22
00:01:05,866 --> 00:01:08,569
increase the income range
for people who are eligible.

23
00:01:08,635 --> 00:01:13,674
So they'll definitely go up.
The share that you're

24
00:01:13,740 --> 00:01:17,945
up. If those subsidies
expire. How much? Depends a

25
00:01:18,011 --> 00:01:20,814
lot on your income level.
And in particular, we could

26
00:01:20,881 --> 00:01:23,650
maybe think about a nice
example here. So take a 50

27
00:01:23,717 --> 00:01:26,453
year old couple so married
couple in Wisconsin, 50

28
00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:29,556
years old, no children.
They're facing a total

29
00:01:29,623 --> 00:01:33,894
premium of about $18,000
for a middle middle plan

30
00:01:33,961 --> 00:01:37,731
this year in the ACA
marketplace in Wisconsin.

31
00:01:37,798 --> 00:01:42,069
If they had the enhanced
tax credits and they made

32
00:01:42,135 --> 00:01:45,772
$85,000 or more a year,
that's 400% of the federal

33
00:01:45,839 --> 00:01:48,609
poverty line. They'd get
about $11,000 subsidy, and

34
00:01:48,675 --> 00:01:52,513
they'd have to pay about
$7,000 themselves. So if

35
00:01:52,579 --> 00:01:55,182
those subsidies expire,
they're on the hook for

36
00:01:55,249 --> 00:01:57,484
that whole 18,000. So
that's an $11,000 increase

37
00:01:57,551 --> 00:02:01,154
now for people who have
lower incomes, the

38
00:02:01,221 --> 00:02:03,790
subsidies protect them more,
even if the enhanced

39
00:02:03,857 --> 00:02:06,593
subsidies expire. So let's
take that same family and

40
00:02:06,660 --> 00:02:09,930
move them way down the
income spectrum. Make them

41
00:02:09,997 --> 00:02:12,833
at 25,000. Now they're just
above the poverty line in

42
00:02:12,900 --> 00:02:15,802
the enhanced subsidies.
They don't pay anything for

43
00:02:15,869 --> 00:02:18,939
that middle tier plan.
They're paying zero. But

44
00:02:19,006 --> 00:02:22,743
without them they're paying
about $500 a year. So about

45
00:02:22,809 --> 00:02:25,646
a $500 increase. So that
range, you know, in the

46
00:02:25,712 --> 00:02:28,916
ballpark some it's 500 a
year, some people it's

47
00:02:28,982 --> 00:02:31,752
$10,000 or more a year.
>> You know, there's so

48
00:02:31,818 --> 00:02:33,487
much political
consternation around not

49
00:02:33,554 --> 00:02:38,125
just the tax credits but
the ACA altogether is the

50
00:02:39,860 --> 00:02:42,462
Affordable Care Act in a
freefall?

51
00:02:42,529 --> 00:02:44,798
>> No, I don't think
there's any reason to think

52
00:02:44,865 --> 00:02:47,701
of it as being in a
freefall. It's actually

53
00:02:47,768 --> 00:02:51,138
been quite stable. So if
you look at the cost of

54
00:02:51,205 --> 00:02:53,807
plans for ACA marketplace
plans, both in Wisconsin

55
00:02:53,874 --> 00:02:57,644
but also nationally over
the last five years or so,

56
00:02:57,711 --> 00:02:59,513
those premiums have
actually been very stable.

57
00:02:59,580 --> 00:03:03,183
And in fact, they haven't
risen in the same way that

58
00:03:03,250 --> 00:03:04,551
the employer sponsored
premiums that we've seen

59
00:03:04,618 --> 00:03:07,187
for, you know, that most
people get through their

60
00:03:07,254 --> 00:03:09,523
employers have those
premiums have been up about

61
00:03:09,590 --> 00:03:13,727
25% over the last five
years. ACA premiums are

62
00:03:13,794 --> 00:03:16,430
pretty stable.
>> What's driving that 25%

63
00:03:16,496 --> 00:03:19,666
increase?
overall in the US our

64
00:03:19,733 --> 00:03:22,603
healthcare costs are just
high. So we pay about

65
00:03:22,669 --> 00:03:26,740
$15,000 a person per year
in health care costs across

66
00:03:26,807 --> 00:03:29,676
the entire country. You
know. And those costs

67
00:03:29,743 --> 00:03:32,546
reflect a lot of things.
They reflect our market

68
00:03:32,613 --> 00:03:34,948
based system. So our costs
are about twice what they

69
00:03:35,015 --> 00:03:38,652
are in, say, Europe or
Canada. And, you know,

70
00:03:38,719 --> 00:03:40,787
that's partly a trade off.
We have a market based

71
00:03:40,854 --> 00:03:43,857
system. So we have a lot of
innovation. We have good

72
00:03:43,924 --> 00:03:45,659
access, we have the best
technology. So if you get

73
00:03:45,726 --> 00:03:48,829
very sick, you probably
want to be here. On the

74
00:03:48,896 --> 00:03:51,932
other hand, it means that
our prices are set by

75
00:03:51,999 --> 00:03:55,836
competitive forces and the
down prices that well

76
00:03:55,903 --> 00:03:58,639
through those competitive
about why are they

77
00:03:58,705 --> 00:04:01,742
increasing, why are they
steady rise over time. You

78
00:04:01,808 --> 00:04:04,545
know there's a confluence
of factors. So we have an

79
00:04:04,611 --> 00:04:07,414
aging population. So we
have sort of more demand

80
00:04:07,481 --> 00:04:09,883
for health care and the
expansion of health care

81
00:04:09,950 --> 00:04:12,920
services. How many nurses
you can bring on, how many

82
00:04:12,986 --> 00:04:15,122
doctors you train. Hospital
systems doesn't always keep

83
00:04:15,189 --> 00:04:19,026
up with that rising demand.
Well, we've also seen a big

84
00:04:19,092 --> 00:04:21,795
explosion of newer
pharmaceutical drugs. You

85
00:04:21,862 --> 00:04:26,266
know, innovations in
genetics have allowed us to

86
00:04:26,333 --> 00:04:29,703
treat rare diseases. Those
Now, of course, they're

87
00:04:29,770 --> 00:04:31,905
also highly beneficial. If
you have a rare disease,

88
00:04:31,972 --> 00:04:34,541
you're really happy that
there's a new drug for it.

89
00:04:34,608 --> 00:04:36,944
But that's been a big part
of the cost. And then

90
00:04:37,010 --> 00:04:38,812
there's also just overall
inflation. So there's been

91
00:04:38,879 --> 00:04:41,949
inflation in all parts of
the economy. And that also

92
00:04:42,015 --> 00:04:44,751
hits the health care prices.
>> So I wanted to ask you I

93
00:04:44,818 --> 00:04:47,487
know that President Trump
and members of the GOP talk

94
00:04:47,554 --> 00:04:49,790
about giving people direct
payments like $2,000 or

95
00:04:49,857 --> 00:04:52,526
something to to pay for
their health care and a

96
00:04:52,593 --> 00:04:54,328
health savings account or
something like that. What

97
00:04:54,394 --> 00:04:56,997
do you think of that?
>> Well.

98
00:04:57,064 --> 00:05:00,634
>> So, you know, it's hard
to react too much. So, you

99
00:05:00,701 --> 00:05:03,837
know, the details and
specifics really matter in

100
00:05:03,904 --> 00:05:07,140
health care. And so far the
proposals haven't been very

101
00:05:07,207 --> 00:05:10,010
detailed. But if you
instead gave people direct

102
00:05:10,077 --> 00:05:13,514
money that could be spent
on anything health care

103
00:05:13,580 --> 00:05:16,650
premiums or out-of-pocket
costs, you expose them to

104
00:05:16,717 --> 00:05:19,553
some more risk. If those
subsidies don't keep up

105
00:05:19,620 --> 00:05:22,089
with the rising costs of
health care, well, they're

106
00:05:22,155 --> 00:05:25,526
going to see that. On the
other hand, you create more

107
00:05:25,592 --> 00:05:30,497
competitive pressure and
competitive pressure and
