1
00:00:01,101 --> 00:00:04,071
to do.
>> Senator Tammy Baldwin,

2
00:00:04,137 --> 00:00:06,940
thanks very much.
>> Thank you for having me.

3
00:00:07,007 --> 00:00:10,177
>> There could be a
scramble ahead of 2026

4
00:00:10,244 --> 00:00:13,013
elections in Wisconsin
after a Waukesha County

5
00:00:13,080 --> 00:00:16,416
Circuit Court ruling that
directs the Wisconsin

6
00:00:16,483 --> 00:00:18,785
Elections Commission to
verify whether people

7
00:00:18,852 --> 00:00:22,389
registered to vote are U.S.
citizens. Republican

8
00:00:22,456 --> 00:00:24,858
appointed Commissioner Don
Millis is here with

9
00:00:24,925 --> 00:00:26,994
reaction. And thanks very
much for being here.

10
00:00:27,060 --> 00:00:30,030
>> My pleasure.
>> So the judge's ruling

11
00:00:30,097 --> 00:00:32,799
requires election officials
to verify citizenship by

12
00:00:32,866 --> 00:00:35,936
matching voter
registrations to state Dot

13
00:00:36,003 --> 00:00:39,606
files, with a spring
primary coming up in

14
00:00:39,673 --> 00:00:43,177
February. How reasonable is
that timeline?

15
00:00:43,243 --> 00:00:46,180
>> Well, I think it's going
to be a challenge if that's

16
00:00:46,246 --> 00:00:49,249
the way the order sticks.
We know that there's going

17
00:00:49,316 --> 00:00:51,752
to be another hearing on
October 31st, and it's

18
00:00:51,818 --> 00:00:53,453
always possible that there
could be modifications.

19
00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:55,956
Certainly, the commission
does have a role in making

20
00:00:56,023 --> 00:00:59,226
sure that people who are on
the list are eligible to

21
00:00:59,293 --> 00:01:02,863
vote. And, you know, we
work with local clerks,

22
00:01:02,930 --> 00:01:06,200
1850 local clerks to make
sure that happens. So we

23
00:01:06,266 --> 00:01:09,136
will see what the order
ends up being and we will

24
00:01:09,203 --> 00:01:12,539
do our best to comply. At
least that's how I think we

25
00:01:12,606 --> 00:01:14,107
should be acting.
>> So you do think it's

26
00:01:14,174 --> 00:01:16,844
reasonable to prevent
non-citizens from being on

27
00:01:16,910 --> 00:01:20,047
the voter rolls or to
remove them?

28
00:01:21,114 --> 00:01:23,951
a role in doing that. A
year ago, there was a

29
00:01:24,017 --> 00:01:26,687
concern about a couple of
Department of

30
00:01:26,753 --> 00:01:29,189
Transportation types of
licenses that were handed

31
00:01:29,256 --> 00:01:32,059
or provided to visa holders
and green card holders.

32
00:01:32,125 --> 00:01:34,761
There was a concern that
those identification cards

33
00:01:34,828 --> 00:01:38,632
would be used for
registration and and or

34
00:01:38,699 --> 00:01:43,203
voting. And so we issued a
directive to all the clerks

35
00:01:43,270 --> 00:01:46,707
in the state to be on the
lookout for those to see if

36
00:01:46,773 --> 00:01:49,476
someone presents that
indicate that that's a

37
00:01:49,543 --> 00:01:52,212
great likelihood that that
person is not a citizen,

38
00:01:52,279 --> 00:01:54,448
not impossible. They could
be a citizen. And we

39
00:01:54,515 --> 00:01:56,783
provided instructions on
how to deal with that. So

40
00:01:56,850 --> 00:01:59,186
we've taken that on that
task before, and I think

41
00:01:59,253 --> 00:02:02,723
we'll take it on again. It
just depends on the degree

42
00:02:02,789 --> 00:02:06,126
and how widespread we're
required to act.

43
00:02:06,193 --> 00:02:10,130
>> As to that issue of
non-citizens holding ID's,

44
00:02:10,197 --> 00:02:14,268
state IDs that otherwise
could be used as part of

45
00:02:14,334 --> 00:02:18,405
the voter ID law to to vote.
Your commission told us

46
00:02:18,472 --> 00:02:21,575
when we did some reporting
on this that there were

47
00:02:21,642 --> 00:02:24,444
only three non-citizens
that have been referred for

48
00:02:24,511 --> 00:02:28,749
prosecution since 2019, in
that way, is this a

49
00:02:29,716 --> 00:02:33,187
solution in search of a
problem, then?

50
00:02:33,253 --> 00:02:37,391
>> Well, I don't doubt that
the issue of non-citizens

51
00:02:37,457 --> 00:02:40,160
voting is a very minor one.
It doesn't happen very

52
00:02:40,227 --> 00:02:43,430
often, but part of our role
is to make sure that

53
00:02:43,497 --> 00:02:46,233
there's confidence in the
elections. I know I've told

54
00:02:46,300 --> 00:02:49,069
you in the past that, you
know, despite the fact that

55
00:02:49,136 --> 00:02:50,871
we have some of the best
technology available, and

56
00:02:50,938 --> 00:02:54,174
we can assure that our
elections are fair and the

57
00:02:54,241 --> 00:02:58,345
results are valid. But
there are these things come

58
00:02:58,412 --> 00:03:01,448
up. And part of our role is
to instill confidence. We

59
00:03:01,515 --> 00:03:04,218
have in the past, like last
year when we sent that

60
00:03:04,284 --> 00:03:07,588
circular out, we were
concerned that there was a

61
00:03:07,654 --> 00:03:10,958
perception that those
widespread use of those IDs,

62
00:03:11,024 --> 00:03:14,261
regardless of whether there
was widespread use. It was

63
00:03:14,328 --> 00:03:17,030
important that we instill
confidence. Back in 2022,

64
00:03:17,097 --> 00:03:20,968
there were a couple of
examples of improper

65
00:03:21,034 --> 00:03:24,037
requests for absentee
ballots. Now those were

66
00:03:24,104 --> 00:03:27,074
handled properly. Those
ballots were never issued.

67
00:03:27,140 --> 00:03:30,043
But because the public
perception we acted and we

68
00:03:30,110 --> 00:03:32,980
took steps to make sure
that that if that happened

69
00:03:33,046 --> 00:03:35,916
on a widespread basis,
there would be a way of

70
00:03:35,983 --> 00:03:38,085
making sure that those
ballots wouldn't be issued

71
00:03:38,151 --> 00:03:40,687
or that people, if they
were issued, there'd be a

72
00:03:40,754 --> 00:03:43,123
way of remedying that.
Again, just because

73
00:03:43,190 --> 00:03:46,093
something in fact doesn't
happen on a widespread

74
00:03:46,159 --> 00:03:49,363
basis doesn't mean that
it's not important for us

75
00:03:49,429 --> 00:03:51,164
to address the perception,
to instill public

76
00:03:51,231 --> 00:03:53,233
confidence in the validity
of our elections.

77
00:03:53,300 --> 00:03:55,969
>> As you mentioned, the
Wisconsin Department of

78
00:03:56,036 --> 00:03:58,639
Justice has appealed this
Waukesha County Circuit

79
00:03:58,705 --> 00:04:02,176
Court ruling. And while
that's under consideration,

80
00:04:02,242 --> 00:04:05,078
the Waukesha judge put on
hold his ruling that local

81
00:04:05,145 --> 00:04:08,949
clerks cannot register new
voters without proof of

82
00:04:09,016 --> 00:04:14,454
citizenship. But how would
citizenship be proved right?

83
00:04:14,521 --> 00:04:18,091
>> Well, that I didn't have
a huge problem with much of

84
00:04:18,158 --> 00:04:21,895
the decision. That was one
one aspect of the decision.

85
00:04:21,962 --> 00:04:25,132
I don't think it's a good
look to tell people you

86
00:04:25,199 --> 00:04:27,367
can't register, especially
if we have an opportunity

87
00:04:27,434 --> 00:04:31,104
to later verify. I think
that it is it is a

88
00:04:32,439 --> 00:04:36,210
challenge because some of
our identifications that we

89
00:04:36,276 --> 00:04:38,579
that are provided to
citizens are also provided

90
00:04:38,645 --> 00:04:42,082
to non-citizens. So that is
a challenge. I think it is

91
00:04:42,149 --> 00:04:44,785
more incumbent on the
authorities, the Department

92
00:04:44,852 --> 00:04:47,087
of Transportation, the
Elections Commission,

93
00:04:47,154 --> 00:04:50,224
working with local clerks
to try to identify people

94
00:04:50,290 --> 00:04:54,061
who might not be citizens
or not citizens and take

95
00:04:54,127 --> 00:04:56,363
remedial action.
>> But when when you

96
00:04:56,430 --> 00:04:59,333
register to vote, you have
to check a box. Saying that

97
00:04:59,399 --> 00:05:01,802
you are a citizen under
penalty of law. Is that not

98
00:05:01,869 --> 00:05:05,205
good enough?
>> Then I think that for

99
00:05:08,075 --> 00:05:11,011
99.99% of the registrants,
that is good enough. But

100
00:05:11,078 --> 00:05:14,114
there is again a perception
that this could happen. And

101
00:05:14,181 --> 00:05:16,049
again, we shouldn't take it
lightly that that doesn't

102
00:05:16,116 --> 00:05:19,286
happen. You know, we have
we have examples of double

103
00:05:19,353 --> 00:05:22,589
voting. We make referrals
to district attorneys

104
00:05:22,656 --> 00:05:26,493
because things like that do
happen. It's not widespread,

105
00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:31,465
instill confidence and take
action appropriately.
