1
00:00:03,003 --> 00:00:07,474
Unfortunately, the union
has rejected our offer as

2
00:00:07,541 --> 00:00:11,144
the fall semester is poised
to begin. Wisconsin's major

3
00:00:11,211 --> 00:00:13,747
research university,
UW-Madison, is grappling

4
00:00:13,814 --> 00:00:17,184
with the potential of tens
of millions of dollars of

5
00:00:17,251 --> 00:00:20,888
cuts to federal funding,
most of it cuts to National

6
00:00:20,954 --> 00:00:23,323
Institutes of Health
research funding. But the

7
00:00:23,390 --> 00:00:26,527
cuts span other disciplines,
like money from the

8
00:00:26,593 --> 00:00:28,462
Department of Energy, the
National Science Foundation

9
00:00:28,529 --> 00:00:31,164
and the Department of
Defense. What does this

10
00:00:31,231 --> 00:00:34,601
mean for the state's
flagship university? We

11
00:00:34,668 --> 00:00:37,905
check in with the senior
associate dean for basic

12
00:00:37,971 --> 00:00:41,308
research, biotechnology and
graduate studies at the UW

13
00:00:41,375 --> 00:00:44,011
School of Medicine and
Public Health. John Audia.

14
00:00:44,077 --> 00:00:47,080
Thanks very much for being
here.

15
00:00:47,514 --> 00:00:50,717
>> So, all told, what is
the hit to federal research

16
00:00:50,784 --> 00:00:54,054
funding at UW-Madison as it
stands now?

17
00:00:54,121 --> 00:00:56,456
enormous delays in a lot of
funds that we were

18
00:00:56,523 --> 00:00:59,626
expecting to arrive on
campus nationwide. That

19
00:00:59,693 --> 00:01:03,130
amounts to about $5 billion
in shortfall in NIH funding

20
00:01:03,197 --> 00:01:06,066
to go to research
institutions. We've been

21
00:01:06,133 --> 00:01:09,469
fortunate in some senses,
in that many of our grants

22
00:01:09,536 --> 00:01:13,373
have come through. However,
many more are sitting,

23
00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:15,976
waiting where there's an
expectation for months. I

24
00:01:16,043 --> 00:01:18,378
personally even went
through a period of time

25
00:01:18,445 --> 00:01:21,281
where I waited on a grant
to be awarded for four

26
00:01:21,348 --> 00:01:24,117
months beyond the time that
I expected it to start.

27
00:01:24,184 --> 00:01:27,421
This has enormous impacts
on our ability to fund our

28
00:01:27,487 --> 00:01:31,191
research, to fund our
people. And luckily though,

29
00:01:31,258 --> 00:01:33,594
UW-Madison has stood up
bridging programs, which

30
00:01:33,660 --> 00:01:35,529
have been phenomenal. So
our chancellor, Chancellor

31
00:01:35,596 --> 00:01:39,333
Jennifer Mnookin, has just
reached out and really

32
00:01:39,399 --> 00:01:41,902
enabled us to continue to
thrive, even in an era

33
00:01:41,969 --> 00:01:45,305
where there's a lot of
uncertainty.

34
00:01:45,906 --> 00:01:49,476
uncertainty being felt most
acutely?

35
00:01:50,210 --> 00:01:52,479
larger research programs
when there's interruptions

36
00:01:52,546 --> 00:01:57,351
in funding to our large
grants. This really affects

37
00:01:57,918 --> 00:02:00,387
a lot of individuals. And
unfortunately, there has

38
00:02:00,454 --> 00:02:02,456
been directives from the
National Institutes of

39
00:02:02,523 --> 00:02:06,593
Health to remove certain
language from the work that

40
00:02:06,660 --> 00:02:08,228
we're doing. Some of the
directions that we've been

41
00:02:08,295 --> 00:02:11,398
taking historically in
really very important areas.

42
00:02:11,465 --> 00:02:15,502
Those types of disruptions
lead to really enormous

43
00:02:15,569 --> 00:02:19,039
challenges in ensuring that
our people are able to stay

44
00:02:19,106 --> 00:02:22,376
employed. We have put a
people first mentality. We

45
00:02:22,442 --> 00:02:25,379
want to ensure that the
folks that are currently

46
00:02:25,445 --> 00:02:27,147
working at the university
are able to continue to do

47
00:02:27,214 --> 00:02:31,018
so and pursue their lines
of research.

48
00:02:31,084 --> 00:02:34,221
that people often focus on
when they talk about

49
00:02:34,288 --> 00:02:37,257
research at UW-Madison is
Alzheimer's and dementia

50
00:02:37,324 --> 00:02:41,895
research. How much federal
funding is does that

51
00:02:41,962 --> 00:02:44,965
research get and is that at
risk?

52
00:02:46,333 --> 00:02:51,104
>> So right now we bring in
over $100 million a year in

53
00:02:51,171 --> 00:02:53,373
research funding from
National Institutes of

54
00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:56,343
Health and other federal
sources in support of our

55
00:02:56,410 --> 00:02:59,179
work directed against
Alzheimer's disease, as

56
00:02:59,246 --> 00:03:02,583
well as related dementias.
Currently, the grants that

57
00:03:02,649 --> 00:03:06,787
we have in that area, the
largest ones led by Doctor

58
00:03:06,854 --> 00:03:09,189
Sterling Johnson, for
example, a grant called

59
00:03:09,256 --> 00:03:13,026
clarity, which is hoping to
identify biomarkers for

60
00:03:13,093 --> 00:03:17,564
dementia. This grant was
funded on time, fully

61
00:03:17,631 --> 00:03:20,434
funded. Our Alzheimer's
Disease Research Center,

62
00:03:20,501 --> 00:03:25,472
its core grant was funded
late but fully funded. Many

63
00:03:25,539 --> 00:03:28,208
other institutions across
the nation have not seeing

64
00:03:28,275 --> 00:03:30,210
their funds come in when
they are expecting them.

65
00:03:30,277 --> 00:03:34,147
We've been fortunate to
this point. However.

66
00:03:34,214 --> 00:03:37,284
coming out of NIH that puts
some of this or other

67
00:03:37,351 --> 00:03:41,488
research at risk?
>> So there's layers now of

68
00:03:41,555 --> 00:03:45,359
additional review that very
little. It's quite opaque

69
00:03:45,425 --> 00:03:47,995
to be honest. We don't
actually know who is

70
00:03:48,061 --> 00:03:51,598
actually reviewing the
grants. After the point.

71
00:03:51,665 --> 00:03:53,634
The scientific review
process is done. Those

72
00:03:53,700 --> 00:03:56,470
additional layers of review
that are being led by the

73
00:03:56,537 --> 00:04:00,407
administration, whether
it's within the HHS, Health

74
00:04:00,474 --> 00:04:04,378
and Human Services or at
NIH specifically, we really

75
00:04:04,444 --> 00:04:08,182
don't understand why they
exist, what value, what

76
00:04:08,248 --> 00:04:12,119
purpose they serve. But
what they do do is cause

77
00:04:12,186 --> 00:04:14,521
delays in those grants
being funded, and the money

78
00:04:14,588 --> 00:04:17,391
being able to be dispersed
to the institution.

79
00:04:17,457 --> 00:04:19,960
>> Is some of it. They're
looking at research that

80
00:04:20,027 --> 00:04:23,330
goes to disadvantaged
populations.

81
00:04:23,397 --> 00:04:27,367
>> Absolutely. And as I
think many of us know, our

82
00:04:27,434 --> 00:04:31,438
disadvantaged populations
are often the most impacted

83
00:04:31,505 --> 00:04:35,542
by various types of disease.
Alzheimer's disease is no

84
00:04:35,609 --> 00:04:38,111
different. We see that
Alzheimer's rates are much

85
00:04:38,178 --> 00:04:42,683
higher in groups that are
suffering from economic

86
00:04:42,749 --> 00:04:46,987
disadvantage, from
And when we have to remove

87
00:04:47,487 --> 00:04:51,058
language related to those
areas, it actually goes

88
00:04:51,124 --> 00:04:53,660
against what the science is
telling us by studying

89
00:04:53,727 --> 00:04:56,163
what's happening in those
populations around the

90
00:04:56,230 --> 00:04:59,633
state of Wisconsin, our
rural populations, our

91
00:04:59,700 --> 00:05:03,237
urban populations. That is
absolutely critical for us

92
00:05:03,303 --> 00:05:06,240
to be able to meet the
needs of everyone across

93
00:05:06,306 --> 00:05:08,909
the entire globe, across
the entire United States.

94
00:05:08,976 --> 00:05:11,778
>> Are cuts to indirect
costs for research

95
00:05:11,845 --> 00:05:15,115
operations happening.
>> So far? They haven't

96
00:05:15,182 --> 00:05:18,285
started. There is sort of
this idea that this is

97
00:05:18,352 --> 00:05:21,788
coming in the future, and
there's huge concern. We've

98
00:05:21,855 --> 00:05:24,658
seen, for example,
messaging from the National

99
00:05:24,725 --> 00:05:26,927
Science Foundation, from
the Department of Defense

100
00:05:26,994 --> 00:05:31,532
that are requiring us to
put in place smaller

101
00:05:31,598 --> 00:05:34,902
amounts of indirect costs,
which funds the institution,

102
00:05:34,968 --> 00:05:38,272
the actual fabric of the
university that allows this

103
00:05:38,338 --> 00:05:42,176
research to be done. Not
yet. We're really worried

104
00:05:42,242 --> 00:05:44,344
about where things could go
in the future, however.

105
00:05:44,411 --> 00:05:46,313
>> So if some of this
research this year was

106
00:05:46,380 --> 00:05:49,516
delayed but eventually
dispersed, what about next

107
00:05:49,583 --> 00:05:52,152
year?
that delta of about $5

108
00:05:53,554 --> 00:05:57,357
billion that hasn't made it
out of NIH. Come the end of

109
00:05:57,424 --> 00:06:00,394
the NIH fiscal year, which
is the end of September, if

110
00:06:00,460 --> 00:06:03,363
those funds aren't
likely to be reverted back

111
00:06:03,430 --> 00:06:06,233
to Treasury. So those are
dollars that become they

112
00:06:06,300 --> 00:06:08,669
were appropriated by
Congress but not actually

113
00:06:08,735 --> 00:06:10,971
fulfilled.
fulfilled.
